Introns are the supposed founding gene sets, that any sort of beings are composed of.

In humans, there seems to be a reporting, that humans are composed in the biological sence, of other past animilia?

These simple telltale indications, are hair, canine teeth, markers in the retinal stance, such as electromagnetic sensory organs, other than rods and cones, within the eye.

How intron slippage, as a separate bivaled clock, expresses itself, is that some of the founding hierarchy, "whatever that might be, seems to loose either its countenance, or control of those groups".

Those groups, could be certain stressed groups, or the whole of society, to where by collective memory within that society, these marker traits find expression.

The examples of control in this mythical society, replace flags and national symbols, with a block of cheese.

Cheese is tied to everything and is most important, in representing a unative collective thought ideal, for that entire society.

If you have trouble, say with substance abuse and are placed in incarceration, the motto might be, "For God's sakes, if you don't observe the glory of cheese, then your not supporting the cheese ideal"!

Anyone who infracts against cheese, or anything to do with cheese degradation, is considered non-good.

Within this mythical cutrlure, say with the expression of how long the composite gene, of say the kangaroo people, some of these people start to revert to taking to the countryside.This would be bounding around as their ancestors did, without driving kangaroo friendly driving vehicles.

At first, the cheese hierarchy, thinks that these might be phylosohple ideological rebelion. But after further investigation, it is found that these ex-cheese patriot kangaroo people, even forage from trees; rather than buy their green salad fixing, from a market, as the main group would.

There might be encouragement from the hierarchy, that since cheese was always good and made the country of, Bouncing Utopia, that cheese instruction shock centers, should be constructed.

These centers, would be to extol the virtues of loving cheese, on all supposed rebels, who would want to return back to public foraging.

There are two inserts here, that must be noted.One is a probable natural dissections, to where certain groups might not want to tote the ideological encompassments of cheese.

However the second might be held within the width and length of that certain civilization?This said to the point where certain ideals, do not affect primary founding introns, or the building blocks of what that society is, from working their way up as an expression, to their current day genetic stance.

A hierarchy, any hierarchy it seems, give a society its definition in purpose of stance, or what that particular society might be about.

However, any dedicated political, or ideological codas, cannot by and large, wherever that society might be placed, overcome the basic inner genetic mechanical workings, of memory recall.

This is a complex statement, as this saying extols that the nature of genetics, cannot in some ways, be completely overcome.

A very simple explanation in intron slippage, is given in the graphic form, in the two movies, The Island Of Doctor Moreau.

The first movie, founding that a panther could be subjected to constant genetic infiltration, of human genes grafted onto its genetic and physical stance, to the point to where this panther, had become pantherman.

Pantherman, reverted in its physical ideologies and destroyed the doctor that made him.

In the second very complex edition of the same movie, what occurs to the story plot, is that the unity of society, is composed of all genetic intron variants, bonded onto mankind are we know him.

The result in outcomes is, that in order to maintain their collective society, the book of rule must be exacted, on all members of that society, who infract upon the logic of what is consider socially whole, by the hierarchies demands.

I'm sad to say, what occurs at the end of the second rendition of The Island Of Doctor Moreau, is that a baser element of animal intron logic, combines with what is human in these beings and they overthrow both Doctor Moreau and destroy their once former social stance.

The difference between these happenings in an ideological stance, over and genetic one, is that the wave of the genetic stance, was compress and held back.So therefore it was nature herself, that wanted the expression of this wave to come.

I must make this clear, that the intron wave, might or might not have made itself expressed anyway. However, what occurred, was the expression of the wave, moreso, simply because it was held back!

There are counter-precedents to this telling.

And these are.

What happens if a society is completely open and meets foristance, an either non-same tribe that comes from a different area?

The second is more grandiose and may not always occur, but what happens to the primary group, if this society would say experience full off their world contact.

The second happenstance, would drastically broaden or destroy their horizons?

This is as much as I can say.

Thank you

Notes on this copy submitted:

When I said in thre example destroyed, as an option to that mythical society, I did not stipulate that this might always happen.

I said that there were a number of possibilities and that destruction might be in one of these chosen coordinates.

2.To understand this work, I used a simple Boolean algebraic series of formulas, consisting of the and not nor principles.

There is a caution here, as where any one society is placed, outcomes by environmental inputs, may always vary the outcomes.

So I am not investing in any set series of answers here, I only said, that destruction, may have been one possibility?

3.In the realization of a society reverting to some of its past introns making up[ that society, may or may not be considered an end to that particular society.

For example, if people of the big city go to the fields and enjoy foraging for berries. Lets project, who is to say that one week later, as a result of an abandoned offworld spacecraft being found by these people, that they may not elect to leave their world and become fishermen, on another world?

These are nonsecure, mytholigal example sets, so therefore, within real societies, wherever they might be placed, all computed outcomes, may or may not be the same.

Last note, but this must be placed separate from the others.

Heisenberg interference, of the naturally unfolding societal mechanics:

Say that there would be an advanced hidden civilization, that is kind of guiding the less advanced civilization along.

Say that this guest society, had the ability to time travel and could come back to the host society and express, that there are dangers in stocking a certain kind of dairy product, that makes one quack like a duck, in all supply outlets.

Say that the host society listens to the hidden guest and replaces this dairy product, with a substitute product, that makes one howl in similar fashion to a dog?

If the guest society uses its ability of traveling into time, to overly direct the nature of the host society, two problems would occur.

One, is that the true nature of the host society, through time, would never turn out as it truly would, with interference.>with or without?

Two, there would start to occur, what would be termed as a binding apparatus, within the nature of time and space itself, so in probability affecting the very long range outcome, for that entire host society.

Philip339, you have actually edited each of the posts here, but not one of them makes any sense.

One telling quote though:This explains quite a lot about you.