The atomcores expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have
the nature of electron and photon.
New model of an atom
The atomcores expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have
the nature of electron and photon.
The atomcores expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have
the nature of electron and photon.
Protons and Neutrons *
According to my theory protons and neutrons are similar 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy and they unroll energywaves which have the nature of even smaller 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy. This way protons and neutrons (which we could call with a mutual name) get more energy from the samekind of concentrations nearby and that causet that the protons and neutrons explode / uproll energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other with the same respect as they expand.
They themselves are formed of separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconcentrations (quarks), that also open up energywaves. Also the quarks consist of even smaller three-dimentionally expanding
energyconcentraions ect.
The smaller the separate energyconcentraion in a atomcore is, the denser the energy in that area in space is. The further the energy from the expanding energyconcentraion moves, the less dense itself turns into until it meets the denser energy coming towards. An energy coming towards a denser energy
burns out and is carried away with it to another direction.
According to my theory protons and neutrons are similar 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy and they unroll energywaves which have the nature of even smaller 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy. This way protons and neutrons (which we could call with a mutual name) get more energy from the samekind of concentrations nearby and that causet that the protons and neutrons explode / uproll energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other with the same respect as they expand.
They themselves are formed of separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconcentrations (quarks), that also open up energywaves. Also the quarks consist of even smaller three-dimentionally expanding
energyconcentraions ect.
The smaller the separate energyconcentraion in a atomcore is, the denser the energy in that area in space is. The further the energy from the expanding energyconcentraion moves, the less dense itself turns into until it meets the denser energy coming towards. An energy coming towards a denser energy
burns out and is carried away with it to another direction.
The bending of a light*
The photons also expand and open up energywaves. They push themselves in their energywaves away from each other. The photons coming out of stars are more massive than the old photons of another stars.
The massiver and the thicker the photon is, the less it has exterior surface. The slower the photon expands, the the less it opens up energywaves. The massiver the photon is, the slower the time is.
The photons opening up from the sun don´t have interaction with the old photons. Tha is why they don´t push the old photons away from the sun.
A lot of old photons of different stars come towards the sun. They expand and open up energywaves, by which they make the old photons that pass the sun explode more energy away from the sun.
This is how the light bends because of the variation of the pressure. Not because the sun would bend a space in some marvelous way.
The spaceship has the same energy as the photons have and they both turn or can be turned their orbit of movement for the same reason.
The photons also expand and open up energywaves. They push themselves in their energywaves away from each other. The photons coming out of stars are more massive than the old photons of another stars.
The massiver and the thicker the photon is, the less it has exterior surface. The slower the photon expands, the the less it opens up energywaves. The massiver the photon is, the slower the time is.
The photons opening up from the sun don´t have interaction with the old photons. Tha is why they don´t push the old photons away from the sun.
A lot of old photons of different stars come towards the sun. They expand and open up energywaves, by which they make the old photons that pass the sun explode more energy away from the sun.
This is how the light bends because of the variation of the pressure. Not because the sun would bend a space in some marvelous way.
The spaceship has the same energy as the photons have and they both turn or can be turned their orbit of movement for the same reason.
The Interaction / The Black Holes
How do the orbs interact with each other?
They open up energywaves, by which they interact with each other.
The less the orb has exterior surface, the less it interacts with other pieces. Also the density of energy matters as well.
In a energy concentration there can be a lot of energy, although it would have just a little exterior surface in relation to other orbs.
The denser the energy in an orb is, the less it has exterior surface in relation to the quantity of energy.
The less exterior surface, the slower the energy opens up away from the orb and the less it interacts with other orbs.
The denser the energy of a piece is, the more efficient it stops to itself for example the neutrinos coming from the stars and also the less there comes neutrinos away from the piece.
There woun´t come any neutrinos of the stars from the direction of a black hole, because they stop themselves to a black hole.
However, towards the black hole there move neutrinos all the time and they expand and open up energywaves, while transfering their kinetic energy with them to the orbs.
From the pieces that move near the black hole loose more neutrinos from the side that it away from the black hole. This is how a certain exterior pressure is formed around the black hole.
The closer to the black hole the piece is, the less energybundles come from backside of the black holes and the stronger the exterior pressure is.
When one understands that all the energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves that have the nature of expanding energyconcentration, one can undestand that the black hole does not draw other pieces towards itself. It devours all the other pieces, because it expands and pushes pieces that locate nearby away from itself slower than the pieces and the black hole itsel do expand.
However, some of the black holes are in a way in a diet. They push the gas that locates nearby away from themselves faster than they expand.
Someone may wonder, why the black hole finally begins to reject the pieces that approach the black hole faster than the black hole and the piece themselves expand. It is based on a fact, that allthough the black hole opens up slowly its energy, do these dense energywaves have large energic particles, which also transfer their kinetic energy with energywaves opening up from themselves towards the expanding atomcores of other orbs.
The modern physics does not understand these large energic particles. According to my theory, the speed of these large energic particles has accelerated just because of the fact, that they also do expand and open up energywaves by which they can make the large energic particles in front of them to speed up all the time.Their speed accelerates slower than the speed of the photons. Correspondingly their speed slows down slower than the photons speed when they move for example towards the sun. The speed of a ship accelerates slower than the speed of a boat. The speed of the ship also slows down slower than the speed of a boat.
This way it is easy to understand how the expanding star that pushes itself away from the expanding black hole explodes a lot of its energy towards the black hole. Those opening and expanding energybudles that come from the expanding black hole make the expanding atoms of a star explode faster than normally. It achieves an illusion that the black hole absorbs with some kind of gravitation from a star the mass of a star towards itself.
In fact, the energy coming from the black hole makes the expanding star to explode its energy much stronger than normally. With this energy that explodes towards the black hole it pushes itself away from the expanding black hole in a curved orbit.
How do the orbs interact with each other?
They open up energywaves, by which they interact with each other.
The less the orb has exterior surface, the less it interacts with other pieces. Also the density of energy matters as well.
In a energy concentration there can be a lot of energy, although it would have just a little exterior surface in relation to other orbs.
The denser the energy in an orb is, the less it has exterior surface in relation to the quantity of energy.
The less exterior surface, the slower the energy opens up away from the orb and the less it interacts with other orbs.
The denser the energy of a piece is, the more efficient it stops to itself for example the neutrinos coming from the stars and also the less there comes neutrinos away from the piece.
There woun´t come any neutrinos of the stars from the direction of a black hole, because they stop themselves to a black hole.
However, towards the black hole there move neutrinos all the time and they expand and open up energywaves, while transfering their kinetic energy with them to the orbs.
From the pieces that move near the black hole loose more neutrinos from the side that it away from the black hole. This is how a certain exterior pressure is formed around the black hole.
The closer to the black hole the piece is, the less energybundles come from backside of the black holes and the stronger the exterior pressure is.
When one understands that all the energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves that have the nature of expanding energyconcentration, one can undestand that the black hole does not draw other pieces towards itself. It devours all the other pieces, because it expands and pushes pieces that locate nearby away from itself slower than the pieces and the black hole itsel do expand.
However, some of the black holes are in a way in a diet. They push the gas that locates nearby away from themselves faster than they expand.
Someone may wonder, why the black hole finally begins to reject the pieces that approach the black hole faster than the black hole and the piece themselves expand. It is based on a fact, that allthough the black hole opens up slowly its energy, do these dense energywaves have large energic particles, which also transfer their kinetic energy with energywaves opening up from themselves towards the expanding atomcores of other orbs.
The modern physics does not understand these large energic particles. According to my theory, the speed of these large energic particles has accelerated just because of the fact, that they also do expand and open up energywaves by which they can make the large energic particles in front of them to speed up all the time.Their speed accelerates slower than the speed of the photons. Correspondingly their speed slows down slower than the photons speed when they move for example towards the sun. The speed of a ship accelerates slower than the speed of a boat. The speed of the ship also slows down slower than the speed of a boat.
This way it is easy to understand how the expanding star that pushes itself away from the expanding black hole explodes a lot of its energy towards the black hole. Those opening and expanding energybudles that come from the expanding black hole make the expanding atoms of a star explode faster than normally. It achieves an illusion that the black hole absorbs with some kind of gravitation from a star the mass of a star towards itself.
In fact, the energy coming from the black hole makes the expanding star to explode its energy much stronger than normally. With this energy that explodes towards the black hole it pushes itself away from the expanding black hole in a curved orbit.
Cold fusion*
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.
As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms. A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.
The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves. This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.
It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.
As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms. A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.
The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves. This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.
It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.
Hi ya Jukris,
Do you have any observations or experiments that back up these claims (the burden is on the new theory to provide such), or is it just mental masturbation? It's ok if it is, entertainment through thought experiments is fun, but just want to know how serious you are. (Don't want to label you prematurely, cause crack pots are identified immediately to warn any unsuspecting honest inquisitors.)
Peace,
Ron
Do you have any observations or experiments that back up these claims (the burden is on the new theory to provide such), or is it just mental masturbation? It's ok if it is, entertainment through thought experiments is fun, but just want to know how serious you are. (Don't want to label you prematurely, cause crack pots are identified immediately to warn any unsuspecting honest inquisitors.)
Peace,
Ron
"Hi ya Jukris,
Do you have any observations or experiments that back up these claims (the burden is on the new theory to provide such), or is it just mental masturbation? It's ok if it is, entertainment through thought experiments is fun, but just want to know how serious you are. (Don't want to label you prematurely, cause crack pots are identified immediately to warn any unsuspecting honest inquisitors.)
Peace,
Ron"
I am very serious with my idea.
Lets check out this and told me what you think about that?
Magnetism
When an iron item is brought close to a magneto, the energybundles opening up from them have interaction with each other.The energybundles opening up from a magneto slow down the energybundles that come from an iron item and the energybundles coming from the iron item slow down the energybundles coming from the magneto.
This way their speed does not accelerate. When the energybundles coming from the magneto get inside the iron item and energybundles coming from the ironitem get inside the magneto, they make the atomcores of the magneto and iron item themselves to go to the orbit so that they turn around scant half a round and then are thrown to the same direction where they came from. The speed has accelerated in a same than the speed of a sounder does while passing the planet.
Now the energybundles are directed straight towards some expanding atoms core and they explode there.
This is why we can feel how the magneto and a iron item aspire towards each other when they locate close enough each other.
The repulsion of two magnetos can be explained so, that the magnetos make eac others atomcores to explode their energy towards each other. Perhaps a part of the energybundles are directed straight towards the atomcore of a magneto nextby.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/221
Sounders/Probes
The speed of a sounder accelerates when the sounder passes the planet nearby.
When the sounder approaches the planet, it begins to have more interaction with the planet. The energywaves opening up from the planets energybundles make the atomcores of a sounder to explode their energy more. Now these waves make the energybundles coming from the planet explode their energy more towards the atomcores of a sounder ect.
After passing by more and more energy comes from the atomcores of a sounder towards the energybundles coming from the planet and this is how they explode their energy more towards the sounders atomcores.
So now they transfer their kinetic energy more to the sounder.
When the sounder goes by the planet, more massive energybudles come towards the sounder from the planet. These energybundles have less exterior surface and this way they can have interaction with the atomcores of the sounder less than the energybundles that come from the space.
The energybundles coming from the space make the orbit of a sounder to bend in accordance with the planet with the energywaves opening up from themselves. So they expand and bombard this expanding atomcore with a radiation that opens up from themselves. This radiation contains very small exploding energybundles.
Little by little the charge of a sounder changes and more and more energy begins to open up from its atomcores.
Now the more massive / more energic energybundles coming from the planet get more and more hits towards themselves and begin this way to transfer more and more kinetic energy towards the sounder with the help of energywaves that open up from themselves.This is why the speed of a sounder accelerates when the sounder moves away from the planet.
Do you have any observations or experiments that back up these claims (the burden is on the new theory to provide such), or is it just mental masturbation? It's ok if it is, entertainment through thought experiments is fun, but just want to know how serious you are. (Don't want to label you prematurely, cause crack pots are identified immediately to warn any unsuspecting honest inquisitors.)
Peace,
Ron"
I am very serious with my idea.
Lets check out this and told me what you think about that?
Magnetism
When an iron item is brought close to a magneto, the energybundles opening up from them have interaction with each other.The energybundles opening up from a magneto slow down the energybundles that come from an iron item and the energybundles coming from the iron item slow down the energybundles coming from the magneto.
This way their speed does not accelerate. When the energybundles coming from the magneto get inside the iron item and energybundles coming from the ironitem get inside the magneto, they make the atomcores of the magneto and iron item themselves to go to the orbit so that they turn around scant half a round and then are thrown to the same direction where they came from. The speed has accelerated in a same than the speed of a sounder does while passing the planet.
Now the energybundles are directed straight towards some expanding atoms core and they explode there.
This is why we can feel how the magneto and a iron item aspire towards each other when they locate close enough each other.
The repulsion of two magnetos can be explained so, that the magnetos make eac others atomcores to explode their energy towards each other. Perhaps a part of the energybundles are directed straight towards the atomcore of a magneto nextby.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/221
Sounders/Probes
The speed of a sounder accelerates when the sounder passes the planet nearby.
When the sounder approaches the planet, it begins to have more interaction with the planet. The energywaves opening up from the planets energybundles make the atomcores of a sounder to explode their energy more. Now these waves make the energybundles coming from the planet explode their energy more towards the atomcores of a sounder ect.
After passing by more and more energy comes from the atomcores of a sounder towards the energybundles coming from the planet and this is how they explode their energy more towards the sounders atomcores.
So now they transfer their kinetic energy more to the sounder.
When the sounder goes by the planet, more massive energybudles come towards the sounder from the planet. These energybundles have less exterior surface and this way they can have interaction with the atomcores of the sounder less than the energybundles that come from the space.
The energybundles coming from the space make the orbit of a sounder to bend in accordance with the planet with the energywaves opening up from themselves. So they expand and bombard this expanding atomcore with a radiation that opens up from themselves. This radiation contains very small exploding energybundles.
Little by little the charge of a sounder changes and more and more energy begins to open up from its atomcores.
Now the more massive / more energic energybundles coming from the planet get more and more hits towards themselves and begin this way to transfer more and more kinetic energy towards the sounder with the help of energywaves that open up from themselves.This is why the speed of a sounder accelerates when the sounder moves away from the planet.
Examination*
A test
In physics it´s very important to be able to make repeatable tests, that confirm theories.
I have only one repeatable test that I have developed myself and which confirms my theory.
Most of us can perform this repeatable test my themselves physically and every one of us can perform it in our minds.
I can curl up the energy of my body to a embryo position, when less energy opens up away from me. After that I can unfold (=expand/explode open) to a less dense position when energy opens up / explodes away from me more and faster.
According to my theory I myself also explode all the time and my straightening accelerates opening up. This way this repeatable test proves, that opening / exploding / expanding of energy can very well be accelerating in a space that does not expand.
When this test is repeated with several persons, one can get a better image how for example the continually expanding atoms of the globe make pressure towards the centre of the globe without gravitation.
A captured animal can hide and curl up to a dense position. This way it opens up less energy away from itself and is also more difficult to observe.
The energy of the black holes is energy that is extremely at frequent intervals curled up.
A test
In physics it´s very important to be able to make repeatable tests, that confirm theories.
I have only one repeatable test that I have developed myself and which confirms my theory.
Most of us can perform this repeatable test my themselves physically and every one of us can perform it in our minds.
I can curl up the energy of my body to a embryo position, when less energy opens up away from me. After that I can unfold (=expand/explode open) to a less dense position when energy opens up / explodes away from me more and faster.
According to my theory I myself also explode all the time and my straightening accelerates opening up. This way this repeatable test proves, that opening / exploding / expanding of energy can very well be accelerating in a space that does not expand.
When this test is repeated with several persons, one can get a better image how for example the continually expanding atoms of the globe make pressure towards the centre of the globe without gravitation.
A captured animal can hide and curl up to a dense position. This way it opens up less energy away from itself and is also more difficult to observe.
The energy of the black holes is energy that is extremely at frequent intervals curled up.
A stronger external pressure is directed to the black hole than to the other orbs.
This is because the massive and a little external surface possessive energybundles opening up from the black hole don´t have interaction with the expanding energybundles that pass by the black hole.
Now the expanding energybundles passing by the black hole push each other towards the black hole with the energywaves opening up from themselves. This is why more three-dimentionally expanding energybundles go towards the black hole.
They also move their kinetic energy more towards the pieces that locate nearby the black hole than the energybundles opening up from the black hole can move their kinetic energy towards the pieces close to the black hole.
The large energic energybundles coming from the black hole pull with them the energywaves coming from the energybundles that across them. The energybundles acrossing open up energywaves which burn out because of the energywaves opening up from the large energic energybundles and are then pulled with them away from the black hole.
Now the expanding energybundles that go towards the black hole don´t push themselves away from each other.The energywaves opening up from them are cleaned away and this way they can not make each other to explode energy towards each other with these energywaves. The continue their expanding and reach out for each other, without moving towards each other. The cold fusion is in question.
This is how a bigger external pressure is directed to the black hole.
This is because the massive and a little external surface possessive energybundles opening up from the black hole don´t have interaction with the expanding energybundles that pass by the black hole.
Now the expanding energybundles passing by the black hole push each other towards the black hole with the energywaves opening up from themselves. This is why more three-dimentionally expanding energybundles go towards the black hole.
They also move their kinetic energy more towards the pieces that locate nearby the black hole than the energybundles opening up from the black hole can move their kinetic energy towards the pieces close to the black hole.
The large energic energybundles coming from the black hole pull with them the energywaves coming from the energybundles that across them. The energybundles acrossing open up energywaves which burn out because of the energywaves opening up from the large energic energybundles and are then pulled with them away from the black hole.
Now the expanding energybundles that go towards the black hole don´t push themselves away from each other.The energywaves opening up from them are cleaned away and this way they can not make each other to explode energy towards each other with these energywaves. The continue their expanding and reach out for each other, without moving towards each other. The cold fusion is in question.
This is how a bigger external pressure is directed to the black hole.
The charge of a corpuscule*
Why does the positively charged corpuscule bend at its track in a magnetic field?
The track of a corpuscule can bend only when the corpuscule explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.
The corpuscule holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.
The energybundles opening up from the corpuscule clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the corpuscule with them away from the corpuscule. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the corpuscule don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The corpuscule itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the corpuscule is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the corpuscule thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the corpuscule ect.
Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged corpuscule won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the corpuscule.
This way the positively charged corpuscule explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a corpuscule bends a little towards the magneto.
Why does the positively charged corpuscule bend at its track in a magnetic field?
The track of a corpuscule can bend only when the corpuscule explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.
The corpuscule holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.
The energybundles opening up from the corpuscule clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the corpuscule with them away from the corpuscule. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the corpuscule don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The corpuscule itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the corpuscule is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the corpuscule thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the corpuscule ect.
Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged corpuscule won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the corpuscule.
This way the positively charged corpuscule explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a corpuscule bends a little towards the magneto.
Thats what i already told for you.
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/3c321/
If two galaxies moving near, galaxies centre expanding black holes open energywaves all a time and with this opening energywaves they get other big black holes expanding a lot of energy out side.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/224
Savor
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/3c321/
If two galaxies moving near, galaxies centre expanding black holes open energywaves all a time and with this opening energywaves they get other big black holes expanding a lot of energy out side.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/224
Savor
Corpuscule?!?
The charge of a particle*
Why does the positively charged particle bend at its track in a magnetic field?
The track of a particle can bend only when the particle explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.
The particle holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.
The energybundles opening up from the particle clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the particle with them away from the particle. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the particle don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The particle itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the particle is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the particle thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the particle ect.
Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged particle won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the particle.
This way the positively charged particle explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a cparticle bends a little towards the magneto.
The charge of a particle*
Why does the positively charged particle bend at its track in a magnetic field?
The track of a particle can bend only when the particle explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.
The particle holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.
The energybundles opening up from the particle clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the particle with them away from the particle. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the particle don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The particle itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the particle is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the particle thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the particle ect.
Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged particle won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the particle.
This way the positively charged particle explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a cparticle bends a little towards the magneto.
Hi J,
After reading your posts and your 'references' (usually a reference is from a source other than yourself!), I can only come to the conclusion that you have found some buzz words and put them together haphazardly into a story that, to be quite honest, makes absolutely no physical sense whatsoever. I'm not trying to be harsh\, but seriously, do you have any backround at all in the physical sciences?. You may feel like you make sense in your own mind, but to anyone with the most trivial understanding of any of the 4 understood forces , the standard model or even just electromagnetism, you are not making one bit of sense. You mention photons and neutrinos in such an incomprehensible way that you appear to be stringing words together towards absolutely no end.
If I'm just completely misunderstanding you, I apologize, but to convince me of that I would appreciate if you could make at least one statement that makes physical sense.
How about we start with something straight forward like what are the 4 forces of nature, and , at least to some extent, what are they responsible for. You can google this , but I'd like to hear how you understand them, and , to go a little further, can you tell me what a neutrino is (specifically the 3 different types)?
I'm not a physicist, but I can at least answer these questions fairly easily and would hope you could too.
Not a challenge, I would just like to know where you stand.
Extra credit if you can explain a proton and a neutron in terms of it's constituent quarks.
Peace,
Ron
After reading your posts and your 'references' (usually a reference is from a source other than yourself!), I can only come to the conclusion that you have found some buzz words and put them together haphazardly into a story that, to be quite honest, makes absolutely no physical sense whatsoever. I'm not trying to be harsh\, but seriously, do you have any backround at all in the physical sciences?. You may feel like you make sense in your own mind, but to anyone with the most trivial understanding of any of the 4 understood forces , the standard model or even just electromagnetism, you are not making one bit of sense. You mention photons and neutrinos in such an incomprehensible way that you appear to be stringing words together towards absolutely no end.
If I'm just completely misunderstanding you, I apologize, but to convince me of that I would appreciate if you could make at least one statement that makes physical sense.
How about we start with something straight forward like what are the 4 forces of nature, and , at least to some extent, what are they responsible for. You can google this , but I'd like to hear how you understand them, and , to go a little further, can you tell me what a neutrino is (specifically the 3 different types)?
I'm not a physicist, but I can at least answer these questions fairly easily and would hope you could too.
Not a challenge, I would just like to know where you stand.
Extra credit if you can explain a proton and a neutron in terms of it's constituent quarks.
Peace,
Ron
After looking at your posts/thread and your "references," I've seen absolutely nothing credible to support your ideas. No equations, no numbers period... can you please support your "stuff" with something "credible?" Heck, there's not even stuff copied from wikipedia-- not that I approve of such things, as I in fact condone plagiarism.
I understand that you need to start somewhere, but as of now, your "stuff" lacks substance.
Cheers,
-Guest00
I understand that you need to start somewhere, but as of now, your "stuff" lacks substance.
Cheers,
-Guest00
Lets read about guasars page and also protons and neutrons page.
Guasars
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/175
Protons and neutrons
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/76
Lets remember that galaxies centre very big black holes expanding and opening energywaves who have protons personality.
Thats what i already told for you.
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/3c321/
If two galaxies moving near, galaxies centre expanding black holes open energywaves all a time and with this opening energywaves they get other big black holes expanding a lot of energy out side.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/224
Guasars
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/175
Protons and neutrons
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/76
Lets remember that galaxies centre very big black holes expanding and opening energywaves who have protons personality.
Thats what i already told for you.
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/3c321/
If two galaxies moving near, galaxies centre expanding black holes open energywaves all a time and with this opening energywaves they get other big black holes expanding a lot of energy out side.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/224
Photon in a optical fiber cable*
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.
The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.
In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.
When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.
The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.
In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.
When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.
QUOTE (JukriS+Dec 21 2007, 02:19 PM)
Photon in a optical fiber cable*
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.
The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.
In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.
When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.
Hi J,
Have you ever heard the term "Critical Angle"?
Your 'thread' is looking more and more like a soliloquy. If you are truly interested in science, you should try to have some sort of intelligent discourse.
Right now, this thread is pure spam. Do you have anything remotely related to a 'theory', or is your only intention to lecture a course in science fiction? Just trying to understand your motives.
Can I ask you to state one principle at a time and then wait for someone to respond critically? (Look up the definition of criticism before becoming insulted, please.)
Peace,
Ron
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.
The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.
In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.
When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.
Hi J,
Have you ever heard the term "Critical Angle"?
Your 'thread' is looking more and more like a soliloquy. If you are truly interested in science, you should try to have some sort of intelligent discourse.
Right now, this thread is pure spam. Do you have anything remotely related to a 'theory', or is your only intention to lecture a course in science fiction? Just trying to understand your motives.
Can I ask you to state one principle at a time and then wait for someone to respond critically? (Look up the definition of criticism before becoming insulted, please.)
Peace,
Ron
Post from my friend
" Dear Sir,
>
> Here is a new theory suggesting that everything is energy.
>
> E = (mgh * ½mv^2) * RT/(pV) * |c|
>
>
> mgh = potential energy
> ½mv^2 = kinetic energy
> R = (gas) constant
> T = temperature
> p = pressure
> V = volume
> |c| = mass specific heat capacity, absolute value only
>
>
>
>
> Feel free to use, copy, review, do what ever You would like to do with this theory."
" Dear Sir,
>
> Here is a new theory suggesting that everything is energy.
>
> E = (mgh * ½mv^2) * RT/(pV) * |c|
>
>
> mgh = potential energy
> ½mv^2 = kinetic energy
> R = (gas) constant
> T = temperature
> p = pressure
> V = volume
> |c| = mass specific heat capacity, absolute value only
>
>
>
>
> Feel free to use, copy, review, do what ever You would like to do with this theory."
What about now?
E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|
E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|
GRAVITATION*
1. The surface of the expanding globe pushes us away from the centre of the globe in the same relation as we and everything else expand.
2. Energy flows as waves between the atomcores of the globe and the expanding eneregybundles in these waves get hits towards themselves from the from the energybundles that open up from the atomcores. That is why they open up their energy towards the atomcores and move this way their kinetic energy to the expanding atomcores.
3. There comes energywaves also from the space and these waves have energybundles that have had interaction with eachother by the energywaves that open up from themselves. From these energywaves that open up they have received themselves energyfields at the same principle than the centers of the galaxies have received energyfiels around them from the stars. So the stars have arised from the energywaves that come from the giant energy concentraions of the galaxy centres and can be assumed to be particles of a substance of larger size. This way the energybundles comimg from the space move their kinetic energy more towards the atomcores of the globe than the energybundles that move between the atomcores of the globe do.
4. When one remembers that for example the energywaves opening up from the globe have interaction with the energywaves coming towards the globe, one can easily understand this theory. In other words to say, the energybundles that push themselves away from the globe clean / absorb with themselves the opening energywaves coming from the energybundles that move towards the globe. Now the energybundles moving towards the globe expand without pushing themselves away from each other. That is why a larger amount of them move towards the globe than would have moved if the globe did not open up energy as waves away from itself.
The external pressure towards the orb is so based on what kind of energywaves the orb itself opens up away from itself, because the energywaves opening away make the energy in a way to bend towards the orb.
The interior pressure pushing away from the orb is based on how massive small energybundles the piece itself opens up away from itself.
The smaller energybundles are, the less they get hits from the expanding energywaves of the atomcores. The massiver and the smaller energybundles the orb itself opens up, the less they have interaction with the atomcores of the pieces nearby the orb and the less they move their kinetic energy towards them.
Simply it does not exist any so called drawing force. That is why it is unnecessary to even try to make an explanation how the so called drawing force would transfer.
1. The surface of the expanding globe pushes us away from the centre of the globe in the same relation as we and everything else expand.
2. Energy flows as waves between the atomcores of the globe and the expanding eneregybundles in these waves get hits towards themselves from the from the energybundles that open up from the atomcores. That is why they open up their energy towards the atomcores and move this way their kinetic energy to the expanding atomcores.
3. There comes energywaves also from the space and these waves have energybundles that have had interaction with eachother by the energywaves that open up from themselves. From these energywaves that open up they have received themselves energyfields at the same principle than the centers of the galaxies have received energyfiels around them from the stars. So the stars have arised from the energywaves that come from the giant energy concentraions of the galaxy centres and can be assumed to be particles of a substance of larger size. This way the energybundles comimg from the space move their kinetic energy more towards the atomcores of the globe than the energybundles that move between the atomcores of the globe do.
4. When one remembers that for example the energywaves opening up from the globe have interaction with the energywaves coming towards the globe, one can easily understand this theory. In other words to say, the energybundles that push themselves away from the globe clean / absorb with themselves the opening energywaves coming from the energybundles that move towards the globe. Now the energybundles moving towards the globe expand without pushing themselves away from each other. That is why a larger amount of them move towards the globe than would have moved if the globe did not open up energy as waves away from itself.
The external pressure towards the orb is so based on what kind of energywaves the orb itself opens up away from itself, because the energywaves opening away make the energy in a way to bend towards the orb.
The interior pressure pushing away from the orb is based on how massive small energybundles the piece itself opens up away from itself.
The smaller energybundles are, the less they get hits from the expanding energywaves of the atomcores. The massiver and the smaller energybundles the orb itself opens up, the less they have interaction with the atomcores of the pieces nearby the orb and the less they move their kinetic energy towards them.
Simply it does not exist any so called drawing force. That is why it is unnecessary to even try to make an explanation how the so called drawing force would transfer.
Freezing water*
Let us imagine that the expanding footballs are water molecules which open up expanding table tennis balls, so to say energy as waves in every direction.
When the temperature of the water is over four degrees, the table tennis balls are partly directed beyond the footballs nextby. Then a different amount of energy (=table tennis balls) is directed towards the footballs from different directions.
When the temperature of the water gets down under four degrees, those table tennis balls are directed all the time less and less beyond the footballs nextby.
This happens because the table tennis balls coming towards twitch with them even smaller balls that open up from the table tennis balls and then these table tennis balls that move to a same direction don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand themselves. Then the footballs expand faster than the table tennis balls coming towards them do spread.
Now a bigger and bigger part of the expanding table tennis balls hit to the expanding football nextby and this way the footballs finally lock out to expand side by side so to say the water freezes.
The more table tennis balls hit directly to the footballs nextby, the more energic the expanding footballs have strenght to push themselves away from each other and this is why the water expands when its temperature gets down under four degrees.
This is when towards the water there doesn´t come so much energy as waves outwards and this way the water molecules can find a well-balanced way to expand side by side.
PS. I describe the water molecules bigger than the energybundles locating in energywaves opening up from them are. Surely for example there exists a lot more energy in the atom cores than there is in electrons, but still the electrons cover the space more than the atom cores do. In so called electrons there exists considerably less dense energy than the energy in atom cores is.
When an electron coming from the atomcore nextby reaches the expanding atomcore, it moves to a denser form. The energywaves opening up from the separate expanding energybundles of the electron burn out when they meet energybundles opening up from the atomcore and then snatch themselves along them away from the atomcore towards which the electron is heading.This way the capacity of the
electron is reduced in a relation to the atomcore and finally the electron itself burns out to the energy
opening up from the atomcore and snatches with it away from the atomcore that it had just headed.
Later from that and from all the other energy coming outwards from the atomcore rises new electrons (according to my theory).
Let us imagine that the expanding footballs are water molecules which open up expanding table tennis balls, so to say energy as waves in every direction.
When the temperature of the water is over four degrees, the table tennis balls are partly directed beyond the footballs nextby. Then a different amount of energy (=table tennis balls) is directed towards the footballs from different directions.
When the temperature of the water gets down under four degrees, those table tennis balls are directed all the time less and less beyond the footballs nextby.
This happens because the table tennis balls coming towards twitch with them even smaller balls that open up from the table tennis balls and then these table tennis balls that move to a same direction don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand themselves. Then the footballs expand faster than the table tennis balls coming towards them do spread.
Now a bigger and bigger part of the expanding table tennis balls hit to the expanding football nextby and this way the footballs finally lock out to expand side by side so to say the water freezes.
The more table tennis balls hit directly to the footballs nextby, the more energic the expanding footballs have strenght to push themselves away from each other and this is why the water expands when its temperature gets down under four degrees.
This is when towards the water there doesn´t come so much energy as waves outwards and this way the water molecules can find a well-balanced way to expand side by side.
PS. I describe the water molecules bigger than the energybundles locating in energywaves opening up from them are. Surely for example there exists a lot more energy in the atom cores than there is in electrons, but still the electrons cover the space more than the atom cores do. In so called electrons there exists considerably less dense energy than the energy in atom cores is.
When an electron coming from the atomcore nextby reaches the expanding atomcore, it moves to a denser form. The energywaves opening up from the separate expanding energybundles of the electron burn out when they meet energybundles opening up from the atomcore and then snatch themselves along them away from the atomcore towards which the electron is heading.This way the capacity of the
electron is reduced in a relation to the atomcore and finally the electron itself burns out to the energy
opening up from the atomcore and snatches with it away from the atomcore that it had just headed.
Later from that and from all the other energy coming outwards from the atomcore rises new electrons (according to my theory).
Entropy = Expanding stuff
Its meaning stuff who expanding all a time
It is that simple
Peace and love
Its meaning stuff who expanding all a time
It is that simple
Peace and love
QUOTE (JukriS+Jan 10 2008, 08:46 AM)
What about now?
E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|
Physics is not done by just pulling out random equations you know or find on Wikipedia and jumbling them together. You need some kind of postulate motivation for what you're doing.
Besides, what does your 'equation' describe? 'm' only makes sense for objects with mass. ½mv² is only true for Newtonian dynamics, it isn't true for relativity. How do you account for other forces, you've only considered gravity (and a constant gravitational field at that). You don't need | | signs around c, c is a positive constant.
How do you account for non-Newtonian processes? As said, your expressions are wrong in relativity. Quantum mechanics you've completely ignored. Hell, you don't even have anything to do with electromagnetism. There's more to physics than just energy. What about spin, charge, momentum, colour? How do you derive the motion of an object from your equation? How does your equation explain the difference between an electron and a positron? What about time dilation due to motion or position in a gravitational field?
You have explained nothing. You have modelled nothing. Your wordy explainations display a lack of understanding of high school level physics. Your equations show you are doing nothing but jumbling together equations you don't understand. Do you really think that's what physics is about? That by making up a random expression for what you hope is energy, you 'explain it all'? That you 'know'?
Even a school pupil will tell you that E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c| is fundamentally wrong on the grounds of dimensional analysis. The left hand side has units of Joules (ie energy). The right hand side has units of Joule^2 per kilogram per Kelvin. It's like saying "1+1 = elephant". Utter gibberish.
If you want an expression which is as close as possible to describing as much of the universe, on a fundamental level, as we currently can, spend 3 years learning enough mathematics to understand field theory and Lagrangian methods and then just sum together the gravitational Einstein-Hilbert action of GR and then the quantised Electroweak (Higgs and all) and QCD actions from the Standard Model. It's not all encompassing, gravity is still treated classically, but it's enough to explain all particle interactions on atomic scales and all the motions of planets and stars.
Actually, considering you obviously need to go back to high school physics first, it'll be longer than 3 years. More like 10.
E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|
Physics is not done by just pulling out random equations you know or find on Wikipedia and jumbling them together. You need some kind of postulate motivation for what you're doing.
Besides, what does your 'equation' describe? 'm' only makes sense for objects with mass. ½mv² is only true for Newtonian dynamics, it isn't true for relativity. How do you account for other forces, you've only considered gravity (and a constant gravitational field at that). You don't need | | signs around c, c is a positive constant.
How do you account for non-Newtonian processes? As said, your expressions are wrong in relativity. Quantum mechanics you've completely ignored. Hell, you don't even have anything to do with electromagnetism. There's more to physics than just energy. What about spin, charge, momentum, colour? How do you derive the motion of an object from your equation? How does your equation explain the difference between an electron and a positron? What about time dilation due to motion or position in a gravitational field?
You have explained nothing. You have modelled nothing. Your wordy explainations display a lack of understanding of high school level physics. Your equations show you are doing nothing but jumbling together equations you don't understand. Do you really think that's what physics is about? That by making up a random expression for what you hope is energy, you 'explain it all'? That you 'know'?
Even a school pupil will tell you that E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c| is fundamentally wrong on the grounds of dimensional analysis. The left hand side has units of Joules (ie energy). The right hand side has units of Joule^2 per kilogram per Kelvin. It's like saying "1+1 = elephant". Utter gibberish.
If you want an expression which is as close as possible to describing as much of the universe, on a fundamental level, as we currently can, spend 3 years learning enough mathematics to understand field theory and Lagrangian methods and then just sum together the gravitational Einstein-Hilbert action of GR and then the quantised Electroweak (Higgs and all) and QCD actions from the Standard Model. It's not all encompassing, gravity is still treated classically, but it's enough to explain all particle interactions on atomic scales and all the motions of planets and stars.
Actually, considering you obviously need to go back to high school physics first, it'll be longer than 3 years. More like 10.
It certainly sounds like Zephir, winding up for a big blow... 
A logical story
How do the particle coming from the space move their kinetic energy more
towards the atomcores of heavier substaces?
According to my theory this is how it should be, because a hammer drops to
the surface of the moon at the same time as the feather does!
The massiver the atomcore is, the denser energywaves it opens up and the
more it possesses so called electons.
The denser energywaves the expanding atomcore opens up, the more it makes
the expanding particle passing by to explode energy towards itself.
And this is how all the atoms get an equal amount of kinetic energy
(towards that piece in whose neighbourhood the atom locates) from the
expanding particles coming from the space.
When for example the surface of the globe simultaneously pushes itself away
from the centre of the globe, we don´t have to try to explain how the globe
draws the items towards itself. Everything can be explained with the
variation of the pressure. The pressure pushes all the expanding atoms of
the expanding globe away from the centre of the globe and the external
pressure keeps us on the surface of the expanding globe.
So you can forget all about the gravitation and start to wonder how the
universe really works.
The accelerating movement of all the substance away from one certain point
that is really far away from the visible universe, may take the visible
universe in a moment away from the space where it locates now and at the
same time all energy concentrations have had room to expand
three-dimentionally.
The speed of the galaxygroups that move ahead us accelerate faster than our
speed and their speed accelerates more the further they are from us. The
speed of the galaxygroups behind us accelerates in relation to us slower the
further behind us they move. Because of the expanding of the sector the
galaxygroups moving by the side of us draw away faster the further they
locate from us and this is how the common redshift can be explained without
a magical expanding of the space.
When the stars formely arised relatively all at the same time, the new light
did not meet with the light coming towards and this is how the expanding
photons could make their speed to accelerate easily at the same relation as
they expanded three-dimentionally. So the expanding photons also open up
energywaves with which they push eacother away from eachother. The old light
assembles for example when it comes towards the sun, because it meets energy
that comes towards it and makes the photons to explode their energy more
forwards in relation to the motiontrack. Still the common redshift of the
light does not vanish entirely from the old light.
Peace and love!
How do the particle coming from the space move their kinetic energy more
towards the atomcores of heavier substaces?
According to my theory this is how it should be, because a hammer drops to
the surface of the moon at the same time as the feather does!
The massiver the atomcore is, the denser energywaves it opens up and the
more it possesses so called electons.
The denser energywaves the expanding atomcore opens up, the more it makes
the expanding particle passing by to explode energy towards itself.
And this is how all the atoms get an equal amount of kinetic energy
(towards that piece in whose neighbourhood the atom locates) from the
expanding particles coming from the space.
When for example the surface of the globe simultaneously pushes itself away
from the centre of the globe, we don´t have to try to explain how the globe
draws the items towards itself. Everything can be explained with the
variation of the pressure. The pressure pushes all the expanding atoms of
the expanding globe away from the centre of the globe and the external
pressure keeps us on the surface of the expanding globe.
So you can forget all about the gravitation and start to wonder how the
universe really works.
The accelerating movement of all the substance away from one certain point
that is really far away from the visible universe, may take the visible
universe in a moment away from the space where it locates now and at the
same time all energy concentrations have had room to expand
three-dimentionally.
The speed of the galaxygroups that move ahead us accelerate faster than our
speed and their speed accelerates more the further they are from us. The
speed of the galaxygroups behind us accelerates in relation to us slower the
further behind us they move. Because of the expanding of the sector the
galaxygroups moving by the side of us draw away faster the further they
locate from us and this is how the common redshift can be explained without
a magical expanding of the space.
When the stars formely arised relatively all at the same time, the new light
did not meet with the light coming towards and this is how the expanding
photons could make their speed to accelerate easily at the same relation as
they expanded three-dimentionally. So the expanding photons also open up
energywaves with which they push eacother away from eachother. The old light
assembles for example when it comes towards the sun, because it meets energy
that comes towards it and makes the photons to explode their energy more
forwards in relation to the motiontrack. Still the common redshift of the
light does not vanish entirely from the old light.
Peace and love!
WACKO!!!!!!!!!!
QUOTE (JukriS+Jan 4 2008, 11:20 PM)
Feel free to use, copy, review, do what ever You would like to do with this theory."
I have it printed on several rolls of soft, absorbant paper.
I have it printed on several rolls of soft, absorbant paper.
Lets remember. I dont have any own mathematic. Some personal giving me some formula. I dont know is that good mathematic or not.
JukriS
Peace and love
JukriS
Peace and love
For example in the sun the energy is denser than outside the sun. In the
atom cores of the sun the energy is denser tham in an area between the atom
cores. In the protons and in the neutrons the energy is denser than in an
area between them. In the quarks the energy is denser than in an area
between the quarks ect.
When one can understand that all the energyconsentrations do expand and
emit their energy, one can also understand that there is less dense energy
in the area between the energyconsentrations than in the
energyconsentrations themselves.
There is no reason to doubt that the neutrinos and the photons also do
expand and emit their energy according to the entropy.
Peace and love
atom cores of the sun the energy is denser tham in an area between the atom
cores. In the protons and in the neutrons the energy is denser than in an
area between them. In the quarks the energy is denser than in an area
between the quarks ect.
When one can understand that all the energyconsentrations do expand and
emit their energy, one can also understand that there is less dense energy
in the area between the energyconsentrations than in the
energyconsentrations themselves.
There is no reason to doubt that the neutrinos and the photons also do
expand and emit their energy according to the entropy.
Peace and love
QUOTE (Guest00+Dec 20 2007, 03:57 AM)
Heck, there's not even stuff copied from wikipedia-- not that I approve of such things, as I in fact condone plagiarism.
Cheers,
-Guest00
Ahh, yes... good old plagiarism... I condone it as well.
Also thanks for signing your post with your real name. It makes it so much more friendly and personal.
Cheers,
-Guest00
Ahh, yes... good old plagiarism... I condone it as well.
Also thanks for signing your post with your real name. It makes it so much more friendly and personal.
Ron,
>After reading your posts and your 'references' (usually a reference is from a source other than yourself!),
Well that's normal around here. See any "Proofs" posted by Zerkoff.
>After reading your posts and your 'references' (usually a reference is from a source other than yourself!),
Well that's normal around here. See any "Proofs" posted by Zerkoff.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.