Just want to know
Thanks
Many regards
Sandra
As in, newbie to member, then member to advanced member.
Just want to know
Thanks
Many regards
Sandra
Just want to know
Thanks
Many regards
Sandra
QUOTE (Sandra doliak+Apr 8 2008, 06:40 AM)
As in, newbie to member, then member to advanced member.
Just want to know
Thanks
Many regards
Sandra
50 posts to 'Newbie', 300 posts to 'Advanced Member', and at 1000 posts you can create your own Member Title.
Just want to know
Thanks
Many regards
Sandra
50 posts to 'Newbie', 300 posts to 'Advanced Member', and at 1000 posts you can create your own Member Title.
QUOTE (TheDoc's member status+)
Taking obnoxiousness to new levels, hourly.
Why does that sound so familiar...
Why does that sound so familiar...
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 05:50 PM)
QUOTE (TheDoc's member status+)
Taking obnoxiousness to new levels, hourly.
Why does that sound so familiar...
I don't know. How familiar does it sound?
Why does that sound so familiar...
I don't know. How familiar does it sound?
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 8 2008, 12:55 PM)
Why does that sound so familiar... [/QUOTE]
I don't know. How familiar does it sound?
Very... Almost as if some incredibly handsome, intelligent, witty, and manly person were to have used almost the same title before you adopted it....
[/QUOTE]I don't know. How familiar does it sound?
Very... Almost as if some incredibly handsome, intelligent, witty, and manly person were to have used almost the same title before you adopted it....
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 05:57 PM)
Very... Almost as if some incredibly handsome, intelligent, witty, and manly person were to have used almost the same title before you adopted it....
Ok, look at my member title now.
Ok, look at my member title now.
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 8 2008, 12:59 PM)
Ok, look at my member title now.
Well, look at mine. That's what a witty new title each planck time looks like.
Well, look at mine. That's what a witty new title each planck time looks like.
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 06:07 PM)
Well, look at mine. That's what a witty new title each planck time looks like.
Hrumph. I don't like it.
Hrumph. I don't like it.
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 8 2008, 01:29 PM)
Hrumph. I don't like it.
Well, I do. Besides which, I've amended my title to one which you simply cannot top.
HA!
Well, I do. Besides which, I've amended my title to one which you simply cannot top.
HA!
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 06:48 PM)
Well, I do. Besides which, I've amended my title to one which you simply cannot top.
HA!
Too late, chappy! I already bested you.
DOUBLE HA HA!
HA!
Too late, chappy! I already bested you.
DOUBLE HA HA!
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 8 2008, 02:01 PM)
Too late, chappy! I already bested you.
DOUBLE HA HA!
Well, you may have been doing so since the beginning of time, but that doesn't mean you always will be doing so. Mine does. Eternally: From the beginning of time to the end of time. And at a rate beyond which it is not physically meaningful to discuss, no less.
so....
TRIPLE COLORFUL HA HA HA!!!
DOUBLE HA HA!
Well, you may have been doing so since the beginning of time, but that doesn't mean you always will be doing so. Mine does. Eternally: From the beginning of time to the end of time. And at a rate beyond which it is not physically meaningful to discuss, no less.
so....
TRIPLE COLORFUL HA HA HA!!!
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 07:06 PM)
Well, you may have been doing so since the beginning of time, but that doesn't mean you always will be doing so. Mine does. Eternally: From the beginning of time to the end of time. And at a rate beyond which it is not physically meaningful to discuss, no less.
so....
TRIPLE COLORFUL HA HA HA!!!
...Except you can't prove that I'll stop sometime in the future. You have no assurance I'll fade away, which means you'll always have to watch your back lest your competition overtakes you.
So I give you a...
QUADRUPLE INVISIBLE HA HA HA HA!!!!!
Take that!
so....
TRIPLE COLORFUL HA HA HA!!!
...Except you can't prove that I'll stop sometime in the future. You have no assurance I'll fade away, which means you'll always have to watch your back lest your competition overtakes you.
So I give you a...
QUADRUPLE INVISIBLE HA HA HA HA!!!!!
Take that!
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 8 2008, 02:14 PM)
...Except you can't prove that I'll stop sometime in the future. You have no assurance I'll fade away, which means you'll always have to watch your back lest your competition overtakes you.
So I give you a...
QUADRUPLE INVISIBLE HA HA HA HA!!!!!
Take that!
Well, I CAN prove that I won't, plus I'll be doing so at a rate you can't beat, so...
A GIANT BLACK (cause we all know how you love the big black ones!) QUINTUPLE HA HA HA HA HA WITH A LINK TO A FUNNY PICTURE OF A HORSE LAUGHING AT YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!
So I give you a...
QUADRUPLE INVISIBLE HA HA HA HA!!!!!
Take that!
Well, I CAN prove that I won't, plus I'll be doing so at a rate you can't beat, so...
A GIANT BLACK (cause we all know how you love the big black ones!) QUINTUPLE HA HA HA HA HA WITH A LINK TO A FUNNY PICTURE OF A HORSE LAUGHING AT YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!
err...is obnoxiousness quantized?
once the obnoxiousness crosses the saturation point of the forum, you get crystallized obnoxiousness. Who wants to put that in their title?
QUOTE (vkamath+Apr 8 2008, 02:53 PM)
err...is obnoxiousness quantized?
Oh yes, it's quantity can be measured in metric units known as "damns" ( d ).
There are kilodamns (Kd), centidamns (cd), millidamns(md), and even megadamns (Md). Scientists are currently working to understand if the vast size of the universe allows for the largest known measurement of obnoxiousness to exist, the Goddamn (Gd).
Obnoxiousness is also a fundamental force. It is tramsitted by the exotic particle known as the "pisson." It is most readily observed as being emitted from the skeptic's ego.
Excessive bombardment of certain particles (most commonly found in the crank's brain) is known to produce the pisson's antiparticle pair, the "pissoff."
Of course, due to annihilations, the emitted pissoffs rarely reach the source of the pissons, and even when they do, they are generally absorbed without noticable effect, other than a slight increase in mass of the obnoxious ego.
Oh yes, it's quantity can be measured in metric units known as "damns" ( d ).
There are kilodamns (Kd), centidamns (cd), millidamns(md), and even megadamns (Md). Scientists are currently working to understand if the vast size of the universe allows for the largest known measurement of obnoxiousness to exist, the Goddamn (Gd).
Obnoxiousness is also a fundamental force. It is tramsitted by the exotic particle known as the "pisson." It is most readily observed as being emitted from the skeptic's ego.
Excessive bombardment of certain particles (most commonly found in the crank's brain) is known to produce the pisson's antiparticle pair, the "pissoff."
Of course, due to annihilations, the emitted pissoffs rarely reach the source of the pissons, and even when they do, they are generally absorbed without noticable effect, other than a slight increase in mass of the obnoxious ego.
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 04:09 PM)
Oh yes, it's quantity can be measured in metric units known as "damns" ( d ).
There are kilodamns (Kd), centidamns (cd), millidamns(md), and even megadamns (Md). Scientists are currently working to understand if the vast size of the universe allows for the largest known measurement of obnoxiousness to exist, the Goddamn (Gd).
Obnoxiousness is also a fundamental force. It is tramsitted by the exotic particle known as the "pisson." It is most readily observed as being emitted from the skeptic's ego.
Excessive bombardment of certain particles (most commonly found in the crank's brain) is known to produce the pisson's antiparticle pair, the "pissoff."
Of course, due to annihilations, the emitted pissoffs rarely reach the source of the pissons, and even when they do, they are generally absorbed without noticable effect, other than a slight increase in mass of the obnoxious ego.
I'd like to see that as a formula
There are kilodamns (Kd), centidamns (cd), millidamns(md), and even megadamns (Md). Scientists are currently working to understand if the vast size of the universe allows for the largest known measurement of obnoxiousness to exist, the Goddamn (Gd).
Obnoxiousness is also a fundamental force. It is tramsitted by the exotic particle known as the "pisson." It is most readily observed as being emitted from the skeptic's ego.
Excessive bombardment of certain particles (most commonly found in the crank's brain) is known to produce the pisson's antiparticle pair, the "pissoff."
Of course, due to annihilations, the emitted pissoffs rarely reach the source of the pissons, and even when they do, they are generally absorbed without noticable effect, other than a slight increase in mass of the obnoxious ego.
I'd like to see that as a formula
QUOTE (paul h+Apr 8 2008, 03:16 PM)
I'd like to see that as a formula
Well, I'll give you a hint:
AςςħΩLΣ represents the skeptical ego and
ſΣτΛſD represents the cranks brain, so
√AςςħΩLΣ = g * πR^2 and √ſΣτΛſD = g * πR^-2 so AςςħΩLΣ > ſΣτΛſD.
Well, I'll give you a hint:
AςςħΩLΣ represents the skeptical ego and
ſΣτΛſD represents the cranks brain, so
√AςςħΩLΣ = g * πR^2 and √ſΣτΛſD = g * πR^-2 so AςςħΩLΣ > ſΣτΛſD.
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 8 2008, 08:56 PM)
Well, I'll give you a hint:
AςςħΩLΣ represents the skeptical ego and
ſΣτΛſD represents the cranks brain, so
√AςςħΩLΣ = g * πR^2 and √ſΣτΛſD = g * πR^-2 so AςςħΩLΣ > ſΣτΛſD.
Hmmm....you may just have stumbled across the discovery of the century my friend! Excellent work.
AςςħΩLΣ represents the skeptical ego and
ſΣτΛſD represents the cranks brain, so
√AςςħΩLΣ = g * πR^2 and √ſΣτΛſD = g * πR^-2 so AςςħΩLΣ > ſΣτΛſD.
Hmmm....you may just have stumbled across the discovery of the century my friend! Excellent work.
√AςςħΩLΣ = g * πR^2 and √ſΣτΛſD = g * πR^-2 so AςςħΩLΣ > ſΣτΛſD.
Here is your new member title.
Here is your new member title.
Uhh, wait,,
I've been looking at this formula and I find room for improvement.
I'm thinking about time, distance and the inverse square law.
The degree that Obnoxiousness becomes Obnoxious, should be proportional to the time exposed at a given distance.
So before πR^2 can determine if the √AςςħΩLΣ reaches the size of a true Gd you first need to find TD^2. If enough time has passed or a great enough distance between √AςςħΩLΣ and √ſΣτΛſD exists then it may only result in an O= $h!t
I've been looking at this formula and I find room for improvement.
I'm thinking about time, distance and the inverse square law.
The degree that Obnoxiousness becomes Obnoxious, should be proportional to the time exposed at a given distance.
So before πR^2 can determine if the √AςςħΩLΣ reaches the size of a true Gd you first need to find TD^2. If enough time has passed or a great enough distance between √AςςħΩLΣ and √ſΣτΛſD exists then it may only result in an O= $h!t
Whoa!
This post has turned from a simple question, to awkward equations.
Ha!
At least we are enjoyin it
Sandra
This post has turned from a simple question, to awkward equations.
Ha!
At least we are enjoyin it
Sandra
QUOTE (paul h+Apr 8 2008, 07:03 PM)
Uhh, wait,,
I've been looking at this formula and I find room for improvement.
I'm thinking about time, distance and the inverse square law.
The degree that Obnoxiousness becomes Obnoxious, should be proportional to the time exposed at a given distance.
So before πR^2 can determine if the √AςςħΩLΣ reaches the size of a true Gd you first need to find TD^2. If enough time has passed or a great enough distance between √AςςħΩLΣ and √ſΣτΛſD exists then it may only result in an O= $h!t
Dammn good point sir... We may be on to something here, as TheDoc suggested...
Perhaps we should fully work this up and submit it to Foundations of Physics?
I've been looking at this formula and I find room for improvement.
I'm thinking about time, distance and the inverse square law.
The degree that Obnoxiousness becomes Obnoxious, should be proportional to the time exposed at a given distance.
So before πR^2 can determine if the √AςςħΩLΣ reaches the size of a true Gd you first need to find TD^2. If enough time has passed or a great enough distance between √AςςħΩLΣ and √ſΣτΛſD exists then it may only result in an O= $h!t
Dammn good point sir... We may be on to something here, as TheDoc suggested...
Perhaps we should fully work this up and submit it to Foundations of Physics?
Thank you, thank you.
However, it would be faster to just email it to NASA.
There have been plenty of people here that have said this is what they do when they have a great idea.
However, it would be faster to just email it to NASA.
There have been plenty of people here that have said this is what they do when they have a great idea.
On the other hand you could cut out all the middle men and submit it directly to the Nobel committee.
QUOTE (vkamath+Apr 9 2008, 10:46 AM)
On the other hand you could cut out all the middle men and submit it directly to the Nobel committee.
Good idea... After all, what could possibly be of more value to science than this?
Good idea... After all, what could possibly be of more value to science than this?
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.