flyingbuttressman
4th August 2009 - 02:08 AM
QUOTE (magpies+Aug 3 2009, 07:15 PM)
seeing as how I already know how to what reason is there for you to not tell me? I'm just seeing if anyone can do it in a different way...
Let me guess:
YOU USE THE POWER OF YOUR F**KING MIND TO SPLIT THE SH1T OUT OF THAT SQUARE, AND THEN YOU SUMMON ZEUS TO PUT THE FRAGMENTS BACK TOGETHER INTO PERFECT THIRDS, AND THEN YOU KILL ZEUS WITH THE STRAIGHTEDGE AND YOU DIG HIS GRAVE WITH THE PENCIL.
Was I close?
magpies
4th August 2009 - 02:29 AM
kinda but still not a direct answer.
hurmmmm... mby there is some thing I know that you dont
flyingbuttressman
4th August 2009 - 01:30 PM
QUOTE (magpies+Aug 3 2009, 09:29 PM)
kinda but still not a direct answer.
hurmmmm... mby there is some thing I know that you dont
I am afraid that it is you who is wrong. I am obviously correct, as you can plainly see.
egnorant
9th August 2009 - 06:29 AM
I found a few folding techniques from origami sites or quilting sites.
I have another folding technique that I haven't found referenced anywhere.
Got a couple of rather lengthy flat measuring solutions but feel as if there is a simple accepted method that I may have overlooked.
What is your method?
Bruce
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.