To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Holographic Animation: Not Yet, But...?
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > PhysOrg WebLog > PhysOrg WebLog

HolographicData
Does holographic animation exist yet? The answer depends on how you define it... there are some products being called "holographic television" now, but in my view the answer is "not yet."

Seems to me that true holographic animation would have three-dimensional image, produced with holographic technology, with reasonable clarity that can be viewed from different angles by changing location of viewer. Need not be in "mid-air" or "interactive" with respect to touch -- although that could come with time. Three-dimensional graphics on a flat screen, although some are very neat, would not qualify. What is out there now? The following is my rough shot (from another forum) at summarizing what is out there.

The FogScreen folks project a three-dimensional moving image onto a volume of suspended water particles ("fog"). This is, in some respects, an image in mid-air. I am not sure how clear the image is, but you have to admire their creativity and it is a start! http://www.fogscreen.com

I find it hard to get my hands around what the folks at Holocinema are doing, but it is impressive that they won an oscar and it sounds like they have had pioneering work and patents in the past. Maybe others can add more. http://www.holocinema.com

So... does the image moving image of the HoloDeem coupon thingy really appear in mid-air? The website shows it doing so, but I have not yet found information on how. http://www.holodeem.com

http://www.kioskmarketplace.com/news_story.htm?i=24022

Holotouch is one of my favorite technologies. In some respects, it is on the input (human to computer) rather than the output (computer to human) side of things. They have created holographic keypads that project in mid air and register finger "pushes" via infrared. Not exactly Holo TV, but could perhaps be used toward interactive holography some day. http://www.holotouch.com (pdf file = filehttp://www.holotouch.com/docs/HoloT.artkioskmarkeplace041105.pdf )

The Io2Tech folks use air turbulence to create mid-air imaging for the Heliodisplay. Looks pretty cool to me. I wonder how clear the image can really be at this point, but very creative. http://www.io2technology.com/technology/overview

LightSpace Technologies uses multiple panels to create a three-dimensional image. Probably better clarity than the fog or air turbulence approaches, but one would think that it would limit images in terms of only offer 20 points in the "depth" image projection? I could be wrong. Again, a neat innovation. http://www.lightspacetech.com

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9378644/site/newsweek/

A little older, but here is the work done at MIT.... their "Holovideo Project"

http://www.media.mit.edu/spi/holoVideoAll.htm

http://www.xenia.media.mit.edu/~lucente/holo/holovideo.html

http://www.media.mit.edu/people/lucente/holo/holovideo.html

... and work done at the little school on the west coast --

http://www.stanford.edu/~matteoja/hologram.html

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/relaged/940804Arc4171.html

These researchers at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center have made headlines by using a container of gel in which to project moving holograms -- currently with applications oriented toward medical and military purposes.

http://innovation.swmed.edu/research/instr...inst_dev3d.html

There is a commercially-available product that is called holographic television, by Claro. In my view, it scores big time on the clarity side of things and would no doubt be fun thing to have in your living room (although you could probably feed a village of poor folks for years for the price!), but is not really three-dimensional. It seems to be a back-projected image projected onto a special holographic pane of glass... so that the picture appears to float in mid-air if you can tune out the glass. Holographic technology used to enhance TV -- yes -- but not really "holographic television" in my view.

http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/review.php?reviewId=594

So... where does that leave us? Well.. this is just my first attempt to summarize this. Hopefully the collective effort of current and future participants in the forum will refine it. As of now it seems that no one yet as true, clear, interactive images projected in mid-air. Folks are projecting images on fog, turbulent air, gel, glass, multiple parallel planes, etc -- but it may be a while before you walk into your living room and click on the HoloTV. Any comments? Additions? Rotten tomatoes?
Neutron
Great review, thanks!
Allen
Holodeem is just a sales gimmic. Animations of the display show an image floating out independant of the screen while actual photos of the machine are straight on - clearly a rip off from some 1990's "3D" arcade games which used mirrors to warp and project a flat image.

cheers.
Skip T. Cull
QUOTE
Holodeem is just a sales gimmic


I agree.... they have nothing
HolographicData
more on this subject:

Hubeschman, Michael, Bala Munjuluri, and Harold G. Garner, Dynamic holographic 3-D image projection, Optics Express, March, 2003, 11(5), p. 437-445. -- "display of dynamic holographic images is possible by computing the hologram of objects in a three-dimensional scene and then transcibing the two-dimensional digital hologram onto a digital mirror system illuminated with coherent light."

http://innovation.swmed.edu/research/instr...tation/dh3p.pdf
Allen
Micromirror arrays are very exciting, I wonder how many individual 1024X768 chip's would be required for a high quality-high resolution image? Furthermore I wonder what the required computational power would be required to decode such an image. Unless something drastically better comes along, I believe this technology will be the most likely platform for 3d displays.

HolographicData
QUOTE (Allen+Nov 6 2005, 08:28 PM)
Micromirror arrays are very exciting, I wonder how many individual 1024X768 chip's would be required for a high quality-high resolution image?  Furthermore I wonder what the required computational power would be required to decode such an image.  Unless something drastically better comes along, I believe this technology will be the most likely platform for 3d displays.

If you have not already seen this, does this help address your question?

I had not seen this when I first put together the above list of refs.

V. M. Bove, Jr., W. J. Plesniak, T. Quentmeyer, and J. Barabas, Real-Time Holographic Video Images with Commodity PC Hardware, Proc. SPIE Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, v. 5664A, 2005. "The MIT second-generation holographic video system is a real-time electro-holographic display."

http://web.media.mit.edu/~vmb/papers/5664A-28.pdf
Guest
The hologram can only be a binary amplitude one. Thus, the reconstruction quality is limited. The usually empployed time multiplex method won´t work with holography as coherence is required while the images are displayed one after the other.
Guest
There is an artical in the May '06 Popular Science you may find interesting.... page 13. I went to the internet to find out more on this subject and this was one of the sites I came to. I doubt anyone will see this post (seeing that the last post was a bout a year ago) but just thought I'd add to this great post.
Tron323
I've actually been trying to find some more information on that popular science article. (Which also lead me here). So far, I haven't had much luck. I can't even seem to find a reference to it on the popular science website even though it's one of their articles!

Can anyone find more info about that experiment and the group behind the project?
neurohacker@gmail.com
Along time ago many many years ago

Sounds like the start of Stare Wars. Hun


I got this $


Mirage 3-D Instant Hologram maker, three-dimensional real image, holograms, parabolic mirror.




http://www.optigone.com/

Its very cool maybe some one could make a Real Size one and make it fit my T.V.

P.S. if you make it send me a Email ok

Good Day
neurohacker@gmail.com
Skinny
Star wars? Then you'll be looking at stuff like this.

http://www.actualitysystems.com/
neurohacker@gmail.com
QUOTE (neurohacker@gmail.com+May 8 2006, 12:43 AM)
Along time ago many many years ago

Sounds like the start of Star Wars. Hun


I got  this $


Mirage 3-D Instant Hologram maker, three-dimensional real image, holograms, parabolic mirror.




http://www.optigone.com/

Its very cool maybe some one could make a Real Size one and make it fit my T.V.

P.S. if you make it send me a Email ok

Good Day
neurohacker@gmail.com

“Right now we need a classical computer to see how it works. It’s kind of like a crutch. But when we get up to 30 or 40 qubits, we won’t be able to do it. What we do today is to find ways to control the system so that we can go deeper into the quantum world where classical computers will not be of help to understand what is going on here.”


Today, physicists are working on ways to understand how quantum systems work. “Back when the Wright Brothers were building airplanes,” Laflamme explains, “some physicists said that we couldn’t build such a thing. But now we have huge Boeing 747s. It would have been heresy to claim that a huge metal contraption could carry people through the sky.” The key, says Laflamme, is to understand how it works. Once we understand how quantum mechanics works, and how to control it, quantum computers with amazing capability can be built and used. The difference will be as profound as the changes in flight.

These changes will come about as a result of establishing benchmarks for quantum computers and developing the systems with the most likely success. “Right now,” says Laflamme, “we show two methods [in the paper]. One takes many resources and is incredibly precise. The other takes fewer resources and is not as precise.” Unfortunately, the more precise method, while stronger and better, is not scalable. It cannot be made into a practical pattern to be copied and made into several models of a quantum computer. “What we are working toward,” says Laflamme, “and what you will probably see next year, is a way to bring the best of both methods together.”

Even though there are a few scientists that still pooh-pooh the idea of building quantum computers, Laflamme is confident. “We will learn the systems, and as we go deeper we will find the best way to control this force of nature. Quantum computing is not a figment of imagination.”

By Miranda Marquit, Copyright 2006 PhysOrg.com
neurohacker@gmail.com
QUOTE (neurohacker@gmail.com+May 10 2006, 12:16 AM)
QUOTE (neurohacker@gmail.com+May 8 2006, 12:43 AM)
Along time ago many many years ago

Sounds like the start of Star Wars. Hun


I got  this $


Mirage 3-D Instant Hologram maker, three-dimensional real image, holograms, parabolic mirror.




http://www.optigone.com/

Its very cool maybe some one could make a Real Size one and make it fit my T.V.

P.S. if you make it send me a Email ok

Good Day
neurohacker@gmail.com

“Right now we need a classical computer to see how it works. It’s kind of like a crutch. But when we get up to 30 or 40 qubits, we won’t be able to do it. What we do today is to find ways to control the system so that we can go deeper into the quantum world where classical computers will not be of help to understand what is going on here.”


Today, physicists are working on ways to understand how quantum systems work. “Back when the Wright Brothers were building airplanes,” Laflamme explains, “some physicists said that we couldn’t build such a thing. But now we have huge Boeing 747s. It would have been heresy to claim that a huge metal contraption could carry people through the sky.” The key, says Laflamme, is to understand how it works. Once we understand how quantum mechanics works, and how to control it, quantum computers with amazing capability can be built and used. The difference will be as profound as the changes in flight.

These changes will come about as a result of establishing benchmarks for quantum computers and developing the systems with the most likely success. “Right now,” says Laflamme, “we show two methods [in the paper]. One takes many resources and is incredibly precise. The other takes fewer resources and is not as precise.” Unfortunately, the more precise method, while stronger and better, is not scalable. It cannot be made into a practical pattern to be copied and made into several models of a quantum computer. “What we are working toward,” says Laflamme, “and what you will probably see next year, is a way to bring the best of both methods together.”

Even though there are a few scientists that still pooh-pooh the idea of building quantum computers, Laflamme is confident. “We will learn the systems, and as we go deeper we will find the best way to control this force of nature. Quantum computing is not a figment of imagination.”

By Miranda Marquit, Copyright 2006 PhysOrg.com

THIS WAS NOT MY POST.

I was reading it as i was doing the Quote




[SIZE=14] Sorry about that.

neurohacker@gmail.com

neurohacker@gmail.com
QUOTE (Skinny+May 9 2006, 01:43 AM)
Star wars? Then you'll be looking at stuff like this.

http://www.actualitysystems.com/

This is the Quote


neutrino platform scanner

1) Make a Brain scan with your Brain out of scan(neutrinos capture)=(Template1)

2) Make a Brain scan with your Brain in scan(neutrinos capture)=(Template2)

3) The Difference would be your Brain and (mind) in neutrinos.


4) Then Template2 - Template1 = neutrinos from particles of Brain and mind.


Note The scan is neutrinos(Templates) from our Sun.


neurohacker@gmail.com
tikay
Well I dont see anything like I expected really, in tose links but call me when they get something done like the technology of the image in that movie "Paycheck", Then i will get enthused~

peace
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.