Derek1148
4th March 2009 - 07:44 PM
QUOTE (rpenner+Mar 4 2009, 07:35 PM)
Bukh -- the two new posters whose names end in 88 may have started the thread as advertising for a specific Los Angeles site run by a celebrity Psychologist and not apparently an M.D. despite having "hospitalization facilities."
I'm all for discussing things, but I'm trying to avoid the giving of medical advice when there is no practical way to verify medical credentials, or indeed sanity and/or good will on the Internet.
As a moderator you should exercise your authority when you question the goodwill of a poster relative to providing medical advice. Err on the side of caution. If you believe this thread was started with questionable motives, delete or lock it.
rpenner
4th March 2009 - 07:56 PM
But then we would have no posts or threads anywhere.
A Moderator needs to be moderate.
Edward 3
4th March 2009 - 08:09 PM
You have a point RP - in fact, a very strong point !!!!!
Derek1148
4th March 2009 - 09:04 PM
QUOTE (rpenner+Mar 4 2009, 07:56 PM)
But then we would have no posts or threads anywhere.
A Moderator needs to be moderate.
You're probably right.
bukh
4th March 2009 - 09:07 PM
Derek1148
I was not as clear as I wished to be -
What I intended to say was that to me it is not only perfectly OK but also wise that anyone seek information everywhere - and I am happy if my clients orientate themselves to all possible sides - and I see a doctor as just one out of many alternatives. And then I am often surprised about how much clients know - because of the web - which is a sound and a good thing.
And then I like to say with low voice that it is wise for a Forum like this - not to get involved in cases concerning strictly personal health issues - because it is not and should not be a chat site for personal health disorders. Just as a principle - easy to administer - and wise to follow.
rpenner
Yes - moderation is a very tough and extremely difficult and very little gratifying job.
And I feel confident that You are not only capable and skilled but also a fortunate choice for this Forum.
As you rightly say - moderation needs to be moderate. Freedom of thinking cannot be praised high enough.
Moderation is vital in order to avoid spamming of pornographic and commercial character and avoid obvious teasing and abusive behavior. When I advocate not to allow personal health issues to be discussed - it is solely meant as a wise precaution.
Otherwise I am a strong believer in total freedom of speech - so called stupidity is no reason for moderation, scientific quality is for the respective member to judge by themselves, and there is no need for keeping a thread neither on-topic nor clean from stupidities.
I myself is a crank - for good reasons and I gladly accept it - and I find inspiration mainly in the thinking of so called non-main streamers. I trust and hope that this Forum will continue to be so - and I painfully recall how I was excommunicated from another Forum I was invited to participate, because of exposing ideas about "Aether" that was not in accordance with the ideas of "the owner" and moderator of said Forum - God forbid that such a thing should ever happen in this Forum.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.