The process of the formation of black holes are leftover aspects of usually stars that have undergone the process of collapse.

This mathematically give the dimension of one, to the baseline equation, as the density of the black hole, is that it is such that only a next to next leftover of atomic structures is present.

So this is indefinite mass, over normal space-time as a solid state factor.

The core density is of little matter at this point, however what is of important, are the magnetic fields, however they may express themselves, which is relational to time space.

So therefore, what one is looking for, are magnetic lines of representation as enacted from the core density itself.

The computer modeling is available for this stement to act as a working movement drawing in the CAD CAM visual drawing arena.

>You now have two probable in function set theories.

A. Would be the locus of the primary virgin black hole, that is probably by itself, however does or might not take in any matter, other than stellar dust.

The yield off of Hawking Radiation from example A. would be, what is the slighter expression of matter which is taken into the magnetic envelope of a black hole, then taken apart? Two as a subset function, where is this expression of matter exhausted?

The answer as in probability as most black hole center densities are round, would be an analiation expression of Hawking Radiation, at the near poles.

This fact was observed a while back by the Hawking investigative group, as a radiation expression of glow, near the relative poles north and south of a black hole.

TWO,B The second example would not be a non virgin black hole, that would be placed in an area of time space to where an average amount of leftover matter is observed being taken into the magnetic fields, of a black hole.

As said in published theory, these magnetic force lines generated by the singularity density are so intense, that these lines of force rip down the basic structure of the atoms of most matter.

So since time space is a multi fielded reality, with many differing dimensions to it, the take in matter that is taken into the event horizon or other parts of the take in spacts of the black hole, must be expressed as with reference to the universal law of energy conservation.

This factor would mean, on the non virgin black hole, that a ring as expressed near the north and south poles of most black holes, would express the dimensionalities of the taken in and ripped apart matter.

So therefore what Hawking Radiation is, is it seems a similar to microwavic generational forces, as expressed as to display, by more than dualist representation of changed taken in by black hole matter.

Sources, mechanics of the Hawking primary investigative group, as published by physicist writer, Marcia Bartsuiack

Notes on post: Nobody is absolutely sure that all black hole densities are round?

The magnetic lines of expression around a black hole, are expressed as force lines held in a field.

There must be a tidal rip, which catches most matter within that filed, then tears at this matter.

A near virgin black holes is possible for a mathematical expression of x or said value amount of time.

G'day from the land of ozzz

Phillip I think you are on track.

To understand the properties of black holes one may need to read up on Nuclear transition phases.

These are general research via arXiv, you can also to a search via NASA\ADS

Nuclear transition phase cosmology
http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+cosmo...e/0/1/0/all/0/1


Nuclear transition phase
http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+trans...e/0/1/0/all/0/1

By understanding transition phase we can understand the properties of what makes up the so called black holes.

Vector fields can prevent EMR from escaping.

But!

To have a spherical BH it is not possible, due to the quantum that makes up the BH.

Electromagnetic waves would create a vortex that is able to form a jet formation that gravity radiation can excape and carry with it quantum particles close to the speed of light. We notice these properties in jets from Jets large and small. Their stability is more comon from large active galactic nuclei from ultra large compact matter that some call black holes.

Wow...

That was an unusually long series of babbling nonsense.

Seriously... has either of you ever considered actually taking a few courses on this stuff... or is it easier to make it up as you go?

G'day Rob

Why not give us you scientific opinion on the matter rather than an emotional hangup.

rpenner

Sphere Surface Area = 4 • Pi • r² = Pi • d²

You are right, my bad.



Harry Costas



Nothing can escape THE EVENT HORIZON. It does not matter one whit what is happening within the EH to the matter making up the BH. Jets are a phenomina of the ACCRETION DISK and it's magnetic field, powered by the BH's gravity. They are ELECTROMAGNETIC in nature, not gravity "radiation".

Grumpy

G'day from the land of ozzzzzzz

There is this notion that some scientists think that nothing can escape a so called black hole.

They have taken this to heart without knowing the properties of compact matter.

This notion has trapped some scientists in not researching further the actual formation of super jet formation that is able to remain stable for millions of years.

We live now in the modern ERA.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.1569
Are black holes in alternative theories serious astrophysical candidates? The case for Einstein-Dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet black holes

Authors: Paolo Pani, Vitor Cardoso
(Submitted on 10 Feb 2009 (v1), last revised 21 Apr 2009 (this version, v3))




and

http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3850
Black holes and black hole thermodynamics without event horizons

Authors: Alex B. Nielsen
(Submitted on 23 Sep 2008)

QUOTE

Abstract: It is generally accepted that Einstein's theory will get some as yet unknown corrections, possibly large in the strong field regime. An ideal place to look for these modifications is around the vicinities of compact objects such as black holes. Our case study here are Dilatonic Black Holes, which arise in the framework of Gauss-Bonnet couplings and one-loop corrected four-dimensional effective theory of heterotic superstrings at low energies. These are interesting objects as a prototype for alternative, yet well-behaved gravity theories: they evade the "no-hair" theorem of General Relativity but were proved to be stable against radial perturbations. We investigate the viability of these black holes as astrophysical objects and try to provide some means to distinguish them from black holes in General Relativity. We start by extending previous works and establishing the stability of these black holes against axial perturbations. We then look for solutions of the field equations describing slowly rotating black holes and study geodesic motion around this geometry. Depending on the values of mass, dilaton charge and angular momentum of the solution, one can have measurable differences in the ISCO location and orbital frequency, relatively to black holes in General Relativity. Such differences may be useful in future experiments, to discriminate between alternative theories of gravity.