I'm no physicist, but I do spend time imagining about the unification theory. Thinking about this has left with with a few theories of my own. Now, none of this might be scientifically feasible, but imagination is what I believe drove some of the best physicists of our time.
Now onto my ideas. The general idea of unification is to join the two seemingly paradoxic theories of relativity and quantum mechanics. The problem with these two theories merging is the differences that size makes in the effect of the warping of space-time. General relativty is based on facts that the size of an object molds the fabric of space and time, causing divets in the fabric that carry on to other objects.
While this is all very simple and predictable, Quantum physics is known for its drastic, unpredictable, bouncy, volatile effect on space and time. The question of, of course, is what can possibly bind these two theories together?
My personal theory, which I have spent countless hours thinking about, is that the key to this equation is time itself. What if times effect on an object changes based on the size of an object. In my belief, everything indeed does exist on the same space-time field, but this field is also made of an infinite number of smaller fields, which I refer to as grids, giving my theory the title Grid Theory.
Basically, the ideas of quantum physics and the volatile, unpredictable actions that it has on the fabric of space-time, all boils down to the effect of time on the small objects included in quantum mechanics. In these smaller "grids" time would have a much more drastic effect on these fields, making the fabrics warp at a drastic and fast pace, compared to the larger grids, such as the one that our sun lies on.
The reason for the less active warped fields for larger objects is not a matter of different effects of energy or size, but the different effect of time on these larger objects. Which would mean, the space-time field that the earth and sun lie on, have the same properties as the quantum sized fields, yet are effected by a slower pace of time compared to the smaller objects.
I'm sorry if this makes no sense at all or has no scientific justification. It's just something I have been throwing around in my mind and on paper. Comments are welcome. :-)
Could you be more specific about the effects of time on your "grid" ?
hej anjrued123@gmail.com
wellcome -
perhaps you will find some inspiration in the idas expressed in the 3D Pixel Universe -
basically it is based upon the assumption that universe is the physical expression of information, and this translation is via an interphase, which is composed of smallest particles that can exist i physical world - and which fill out fundamental space as a 3D Grid.
any and all physical expressions - matter - is made - or perhaps better - expressed by the pixels playing ON OFF.
you can see the model im little more detail in a parallel thread "Particles Have Mass, How?" and it is presented on juli 24.
wellcome -
perhaps you will find some inspiration in the idas expressed in the 3D Pixel Universe -
basically it is based upon the assumption that universe is the physical expression of information, and this translation is via an interphase, which is composed of smallest particles that can exist i physical world - and which fill out fundamental space as a 3D Grid.
any and all physical expressions - matter - is made - or perhaps better - expressed by the pixels playing ON OFF.
you can see the model im little more detail in a parallel thread "Particles Have Mass, How?" and it is presented on juli 24.
Hi Anjrued,
I believe you are using the idea of "scale" as it relates to your grid size. An
analogy would be like scaled graph paper.
Time is essentially a measurable change of energy density in a fixed volume of
space.
Another perspective for you to contemplate:
Have you considered the idea that space-time warp is due to a change of
the energy density in a fixed volume of space? Essentially, it is gravity,
the displacement/filling of "steady state" space by energy.
Matter, couples to "space" via matter waves, which are a form of resonance.
This resonance coupling effect changes the energy density (and the index of
refraction) of the proximity space around energetic systems, according to their
mass and total energy displacement. Radiative masses, like stars, displace more
energy into near space, and have a greater effect on the energy density in
the volume surrounding the energetic mass.
The energy density, in the space around massive objects, follows the scale of the
Inverse Square Law (ISL).
The more energy that a mass displaces/radiates into space, the higher the
gravitational attraction that is associated with that displacement.
So, following your initial conceptualization about "time" varying with the mass of
the object, perhaps you should consider the energy density around massive
objects, which distorts the space and time as a non-linear function of energy
displacement over volume/distance from the source.
Just some food for thought. Comments welcomed.
LL
I believe you are using the idea of "scale" as it relates to your grid size. An
analogy would be like scaled graph paper.
QUOTE
My personal theory, which I have spent countless hours thinking about, is that the key to this equation is time itself. What if times effect on an object changes based on the size of an object. In my belief, everything indeed does exist on the same space-time field, but this field is also made of an infinite number of smaller fields, which I refer to as grids, giving my theory the title Grid Theory.
Basically, the ideas of quantum physics and the volatile, unpredictable actions that it has on the fabric of space-time, all boils down to the effect of time on the small objects included in quantum mechanics. In these smaller "grids" time would have a much more drastic effect on these fields, making the fabrics warp at a drastic and fast pace, compared to the larger grids, such as the one that our sun lies on.
The reason for the less active warped fields for larger objects is not a matter of different effects of energy or size, but the different effect of time on these larger objects. Which would mean, the space-time field that the earth and sun lie on, have the same properties as the quantum sized fields, yet are effected by a slower pace of time compared to the smaller objects.
Basically, the ideas of quantum physics and the volatile, unpredictable actions that it has on the fabric of space-time, all boils down to the effect of time on the small objects included in quantum mechanics. In these smaller "grids" time would have a much more drastic effect on these fields, making the fabrics warp at a drastic and fast pace, compared to the larger grids, such as the one that our sun lies on.
The reason for the less active warped fields for larger objects is not a matter of different effects of energy or size, but the different effect of time on these larger objects. Which would mean, the space-time field that the earth and sun lie on, have the same properties as the quantum sized fields, yet are effected by a slower pace of time compared to the smaller objects.
Time is essentially a measurable change of energy density in a fixed volume of
space.
Another perspective for you to contemplate:
Have you considered the idea that space-time warp is due to a change of
the energy density in a fixed volume of space? Essentially, it is gravity,
the displacement/filling of "steady state" space by energy.
Matter, couples to "space" via matter waves, which are a form of resonance.
This resonance coupling effect changes the energy density (and the index of
refraction) of the proximity space around energetic systems, according to their
mass and total energy displacement. Radiative masses, like stars, displace more
energy into near space, and have a greater effect on the energy density in
the volume surrounding the energetic mass.
The energy density, in the space around massive objects, follows the scale of the
Inverse Square Law (ISL).
The more energy that a mass displaces/radiates into space, the higher the
gravitational attraction that is associated with that displacement.
So, following your initial conceptualization about "time" varying with the mass of
the object, perhaps you should consider the energy density around massive
objects, which distorts the space and time as a non-linear function of energy
displacement over volume/distance from the source.
Just some food for thought. Comments welcomed.
LL
QUOTE (Cédric H.+Aug 11 2007, 06:04 PM)
Could you be more specific about the effects of time on your "grid" ?
Depending on the size of the "grid" time would have a different lasting effect for each size difference. If the grid was as small as say a typically quantum sized scale, the effects of time would be significantly increased based on the smaller scale. With my theory, think of time as a measurable force such as gravity. The size of the gird would determine the speed of time effecting it.
Depending on the size of the "grid" time would have a different lasting effect for each size difference. If the grid was as small as say a typically quantum sized scale, the effects of time would be significantly increased based on the smaller scale. With my theory, think of time as a measurable force such as gravity. The size of the gird would determine the speed of time effecting it.
QUOTE (Laserlight+Aug 11 2007, 06:54 PM)
Hi Anjrued,
I believe you are using the idea of "scale" as it relates to your grid size. An
analogy would be like scaled graph paper.
Time is essentially a measurable change of energy density in a fixed volume of
space.
Another perspective for you to contemplate:
Have you considered the idea that space-time warp is due to a change of
the energy density in a fixed volume of space? Essentially, it is gravity,
the displacement/filling of "steady state" space by energy.
Matter, couples to "space" via matter waves, which are a form of resonance.
This resonance coupling effect changes the energy density (and the index of
refraction) of the proximity space around energetic systems, according to their
mass and total energy displacement. Radiative masses, like stars, displace more
energy into near space, and have a greater effect on the energy density in
the volume surrounding the energetic mass.
The energy density, in the space around massive objects, follows the scale of the
Inverse Square Law (ISL).
The more energy that a mass displaces/radiates into space, the higher the
gravitational attraction that is associated with that displacement.
So, following your initial conceptualization about "time" varying with the mass of
the object, perhaps you should consider the energy density around massive
objects, which distorts the space and time as a non-linear function of energy
displacement over volume/distance from the source.
Just some food for thought. Comments welcomed.
LL
I understand what you're saying, but what I'm trying to imply, and with all humility, is that time could be a less concrete concept than what has been tested. I'm saying that time can be a changeable force that changes with each field you deal with. The scaling would depend on the "grid" at which each piece of matter filled. Something as small as the insides of a nucleus, would be tremendously faster than the field that the solar system is controlled by. The quantum scales could be so much more volatile not because they are a separate set of laws, but because they have a tremendous stress of time which makes them appear to be volatile. Just as if there were a different being in a different dimension, researching the space-time warps of our solar system, they might think that we are quantum-like if they are in a larger grid space, which would mean time would be handled slower with a less violent warping speed.
EDIT: And in addition, the actual rate could be tested by taking the average change in field shape from a quantum sized field, and comparing it to the size and the warp of our solar system. This would equal the effect of time comparative to size of the grid.
I believe you are using the idea of "scale" as it relates to your grid size. An
analogy would be like scaled graph paper.
Time is essentially a measurable change of energy density in a fixed volume of
space.
Another perspective for you to contemplate:
Have you considered the idea that space-time warp is due to a change of
the energy density in a fixed volume of space? Essentially, it is gravity,
the displacement/filling of "steady state" space by energy.
Matter, couples to "space" via matter waves, which are a form of resonance.
This resonance coupling effect changes the energy density (and the index of
refraction) of the proximity space around energetic systems, according to their
mass and total energy displacement. Radiative masses, like stars, displace more
energy into near space, and have a greater effect on the energy density in
the volume surrounding the energetic mass.
The energy density, in the space around massive objects, follows the scale of the
Inverse Square Law (ISL).
The more energy that a mass displaces/radiates into space, the higher the
gravitational attraction that is associated with that displacement.
So, following your initial conceptualization about "time" varying with the mass of
the object, perhaps you should consider the energy density around massive
objects, which distorts the space and time as a non-linear function of energy
displacement over volume/distance from the source.
Just some food for thought. Comments welcomed.
LL
I understand what you're saying, but what I'm trying to imply, and with all humility, is that time could be a less concrete concept than what has been tested. I'm saying that time can be a changeable force that changes with each field you deal with. The scaling would depend on the "grid" at which each piece of matter filled. Something as small as the insides of a nucleus, would be tremendously faster than the field that the solar system is controlled by. The quantum scales could be so much more volatile not because they are a separate set of laws, but because they have a tremendous stress of time which makes them appear to be volatile. Just as if there were a different being in a different dimension, researching the space-time warps of our solar system, they might think that we are quantum-like if they are in a larger grid space, which would mean time would be handled slower with a less violent warping speed.
EDIT: And in addition, the actual rate could be tested by taking the average change in field shape from a quantum sized field, and comparing it to the size and the warp of our solar system. This would equal the effect of time comparative to size of the grid.
Hi Anjrued,
Remember, time is relative to the observer at the point of observation.
You are applying a geometric or logarithmic scaling system to time in order to
match the geometric scale being observed. This seems to be in line with
relativity theory.
We typically consider time as an abstract linear function which provides equal
temporal spacing increments. It does seem questionable to continue to apply a
linear system to a non-linear environment.
Comments? Discussion?
LL
Remember, time is relative to the observer at the point of observation.
You are applying a geometric or logarithmic scaling system to time in order to
match the geometric scale being observed. This seems to be in line with
relativity theory.
We typically consider time as an abstract linear function which provides equal
temporal spacing increments. It does seem questionable to continue to apply a
linear system to a non-linear environment.
Comments? Discussion?
LL
QUOTE (Laserlight+Aug 11 2007, 08:22 PM)
Hi Anjrued,
Remember, time is relative to the observer at the point of observation.
You are applying a geometric or logarithmic scaling system to time in order to
match the geometric scale being observed. This seems to be in line with
relativity theory.
We typically consider time as an abstract linear function which provides equal
temporal spacing increments. It does seem questionable to continue to apply a
linear system to a non-linear environment.
Comments? Discussion?
LL
But maybe its time to think outside of the box concerning time. Maybe it's not as comparative to prospective as we thought. Maybe time is a measurable changing force depending on the circumstance.
Remember, time is relative to the observer at the point of observation.
You are applying a geometric or logarithmic scaling system to time in order to
match the geometric scale being observed. This seems to be in line with
relativity theory.
We typically consider time as an abstract linear function which provides equal
temporal spacing increments. It does seem questionable to continue to apply a
linear system to a non-linear environment.
Comments? Discussion?
LL
But maybe its time to think outside of the box concerning time. Maybe it's not as comparative to prospective as we thought. Maybe time is a measurable changing force depending on the circumstance.
QUOTE (anjrued123@gmail.com+Aug 11 2007, 08:44 PM)
everything indeed does exist on the same space-time field, but this field is also made of an infinite number of smaller fields, which I refer to as grids
You should make familiar with the Aether Wave theory (AWT), which is based on the nested foam ("grid" is too artificial concept for me), formed by the recursive condensation of Aether particles.
You should make familiar with the Aether Wave theory (AWT), which is based on the nested foam ("grid" is too artificial concept for me), formed by the recursive condensation of Aether particles.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.