3rd September 2006 - 05:10 PM
DrPhysics is, on the basis of an analysis of his prior posting, an ideologue of the first rank and has to date not given an opinion supported by citation. Indeed, DrPhysics neither quotes nor cites any scientific article or textbook, but only respond with what is intuitively to him
It's clear he has never worked with atmospheric data as I have. It's obvious that these long term forecasts are only rough forecasts, and that the methodology involve does not base it's prediction on the fact of global warming
(only the exact percentage of global warming due to human intervention is at debate, with some estimates exceeding 100%, and as a consequence some uncertainty in climate modeling), but on meteorological data and past behavior.