Are you sure your not thinking about the "dynamic theory of gravity"? This theory states that:

All ponderable bodies are constantly in motion in through space.

* Absence of a medium would result in no electromagnetic forces (the space-vacuum fabric is a medium, the aether (the ultimate medium))
* Ponderable bodies and other media filling space all possess a dielectric level.
* Motion through space produces the "illusion of time".
* Mechanical effects are produced by electromagnetic forces acting through media (i.e., momentum and inertia is electromagnetic in nature; Energy is force over time)
* A media exposed to resonant vibrations of electromagnetic force interact.

This is part of a theory that Nicola Tesla had come up with while Einstein was in diapers, and make more sense to me. It also goes states:

# Electromagnetic energy fills all space (referred to as radiant energy).

* Electromagnetic force is a phenomenon produced through the medium in space (eg., the result of the medium acting upon ponderable matter).
* Modulating Wide-band frequencies of electromagnetic phenomenon permeate through all media (akin to spread spectrum's).
* Self-regenerative hetrodyning electromagnetic fields condense through the medium in space.
* Electromagnetic potentials arrange themselves in groups according to the mediums polarization and the mediums dielectric resistance.
* Electromagnetic fields interact and produce rotating fields.
* Electromagnetic entropy returns energy to potentials.
* Electromagnetic potentials of high frequency produce: [a] lower environmental interaction, [b] uniform movement without rotation through space-time, and [c] electromagnetic saturation [i.e., plasmas]
* Stationary low frequency electromagnetics behave as waves.

# Mediums electromagnetic fields creates attractive forces from negative polarity [or what is commonly referred to as "gravity"].

The final paragraph states:
"Tesla never referred to "space-time" directly, referring instead to the concept of the "primary substance". He also never used this relativistic "twin" term. He considered time as a mere man-made "measure" of the rate at which events occur such as a distance traversed (in miles or km) in a certain period of time, for a frame of reference. He considered the "curving" of space to be absurd (putting it in gentle terms) saying that if a moving body curved space the "equal and opposite" reaction of space on the body would "straighten space back out".

I can follow this direction of thinking. I hate to say it but I don't think that Einstein was correct in his interpretation of Sir Issac's theories.
As a matter of fact I think that Einsteins theory has already been disproved by NASA, Lockheed Martin, and Stanford University with the GP-B space laboratory. Apparently a ton of money was spent on this craft to test the theory, but the results are so out of whack that the results don't add up.

Then again I could be a complete tard for posting this. Then again, I could be taking away some peoples physics god. At least you will be able to make that determination yourself.