Been reading a handful of printouts from Internet, one by F.J Tipler, "The Structure of the world from pure numbers",

[PDF] The structure of the world from pure numbers
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
The structure of the world from pure numbers. FJ Tipler. Department of Mathematics and Department of Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans,. LA 70118, USA ...
www.math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf

{{Abstract
I investigate the relationship between physics and mathematics. I argue that physics can shed light on the proper foundations of mathematics, and that the nature of number can constrain the nature of physical reality. I showthat requiring the joint mathematical consistency of the Standard Model of particle physics and the DeWitt–Feynman–Weinberg theory of quantum gravity can resolve the horizon, flatness and isotropy problems of cosmology. Joint mathematical consistency naturally yields a scale-free, Gaussian, adiabatic perturbation spectrum, and more matter than antimatter. I show that consistency requires the universe to begin at an initial singularity with a pure SU(2)L gauge field. I show that quantum mechanics requires this field to have a Planckian spectrum whatever its temperature. If this field has managed to survive thermalization to the present day, then it would be the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). If so, then we would have a natural explanation for the dark matter and the dark energy. I show that isotropic ultrahigh energy cosmic rays are explained if the CMBRis a pure SU(2)L gauge field. The SU(2)L nature of theCMBRmay have been seen in the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect. I propose several simple experiments to test the hypothesis.}}

[comments: This essay of some 60 pages (897-964), on page 912:

{{
4. The 25 ‘constants’ of the particle physics (extended) standard model
The main objections to the SM as the ultimate theory of nature as follows:
(1) The SM does not include gravitational forces.
(2) The Gauge Hierarchy Problem: The SM Higgs mass must be less than a few hundred GeV, and the largest Yukawa coupling constant is that of the top quark, with a mass of about 180 GeV. These masses are very much less than the Planck mass of 1019 GeV.
(3) The Triviality Problem (Callaway 1988): The mutual interaction of the coupling constants, which should cause the values to be pulled up to the Planck mass or beyond.
(4) The presence of 25 parameters, which are not given by theory, but which must be determined by experiment. These parameters are
(a) six lepton masses (Yukawa coupling constants)
( six quark masses (Yukawa coupling constants)
© four lepton mixing angles
(d) four quark mixing angles
(e) two Higgs fields constants (v = 246.22 GeV, and the Higgs mass mH, say)
(f) three gauge coupling constants.
}}

Really, the author writes well, his mathematics seems deep, I am a novice that with EE training can get, maybe, his "feeling" for his subject.

In reading conversations above on the forum, I agree that the force of gravity is a tension drawing objects together, Newton's law a starter, mathematical topology nice to connect the dots, Tipler gives meaning to the words "unity", "unitification", as I have taken them to mean in the Higgs Particle Conjecture as connecting all dot masses in the or our universe (measureable and imagined).

Tipler also is beginning to clarify for me, that is to bring an understanding of Cantor's labeling the various kinds of Infinity using alpha naught, one, two, ..., w, .... In short, infinity it a big subject.

The list above is followed by the paragraph below which mentions the lepton meu (the other two leptons, electron and tau along with the three anti-leptons):

{{Before the discovery of non-zero neutrino masses and neutrino mixing, the three neutrino masses and the four lepton mixing angles were set equal to zero (this restriction gives the (un-extended) SM, so this would give 18 parameters to be discovered by experiment. But if the SM is correct, and there is nothing beyond the (extended) SM, then one of the quark masses must actually be zero, most likely the up quark mass mu. For only if at least one of the quark mass is zero will there be an SM mechanism to eliminate the Strong CP problem. A zero up quark mass has been proposed as the solution to the Strong CP Problem for over 30 years, and refutations of this resolution have been published almost as fast as new variations
of the proposal. However, all the refutations have been based on approximations to the SU(3) colour force, and not on exact calculations based on quantum chromodynamics itself. In
view of the recent acknowledgement of the difficulty in calculating the correct value of the QCD correction to the muon g-2 factor, I think we cannot rule out a zero up quark mass. As I said, a zero quark mass is the only solution to the Strong CP problem if the SM is correct. (I shall discuss this point in more detail later.) The only quark mass that could be zero is the up mass. By symmetry between the lepton and quark sectors, I would expect the electron neutrino, the analogue of the up quark, to have zero mass also. If these two masses are zero, the SM would have 23 ‘free’ parameters.}}

The Hall Quantum Effect, the voltage produced when leptons travel in a plane that has a magnetic field perpendicular through it, operates at all levels that so far I am now studying:
(1) Van Allen Belts contain both sonic and relativistic charged particles, the Earths mantle next to the solid iron core is a liquid, ZiSiO4, itself a tetrahedron with the vertices Oxygen, with Zi=Si in the middle, a very tough material, the Van Allen Belts appear to account for some ten percent of the Earth Magnetic fields, thus there may be a connection between the outer and inner Earths magnetic fields.
(2) The three or six leptons (particles and anti-particles) themselves are considered imcompressable, but adding the Dehmelt Conjecture that the leptons,
e+ and e- are triplets with e/3 at each vertex, thus giving nucleons a structure topological like the tetrahedron of String Theory.
(3) Thus the "aether" is material, and the "vacumn" is both "space" and symmetrical matter and anti-matter.
(4) Consider the various "universes", expanding, oscillating, static, combinations, foams, and otherwise, the connecting two dots at a time, counting connections to all other dots, lots of connections, that gets us toward a unity of something, ... of exchanging mass and energy.

Best, rmuldavin]