Gravitational Potential Energy of the Mind

The potential energy of something is the energy that is stored in the gravitational field which is caused by the potential energy due to the gravitational field which permeates everything – even free spacetime and its symbol is given as U_g. This energy is stored in spacetime due to the following formula:

w=fd

Where…

w= work
f= force
d = distance

When an object is considered to ‘’work,’’ we mean it in the sense that something is being inexorably lifted. At a constant speed, we find that there is a restriction upon that object… this is the kinetic energy.

Kinetic energy implies to a change or a velocity derived from a fraction of potential energy.
Potential energy is therefore an inference to a storage of kinetic energy where the increase of velocities experienced the higher the Potential Kinetic energy one may claim is observing.

Obviously the more kinetic energy the more velocity and the more apparent energy is perceived as a ‘’force’’ that is stronger by more velocities. One must imagine if two equal velocities collide, they cancel each other out, but in doing so this cancelled out amount is then transferred as potential energy.

The work upon such an object, like any materialistic object, is found through a set of equations:

w=fD

Where D is for displacement, so work equals force multiplied by the displacement of the object, and its force equaled the weight of the object in question:

w=f_gD

And the weight of the object is equal to its mass multiplied by the acceleration of the object, not only causing more kinetic energy, but it is also due to the gravitational field given as:

w=MgD

The work an on an object can now be summed up rather easily by saying that it is ‘’lifted’’ and transfers to become a gravitational potential of energy, given as:

U_g=Mgh

Where M is for mass and h is for the height of the lift. Now consider this potential energy, lifts and weights inside the mind… Gravity is found in physics to ‘’unravel’’ certain properties that are not due necessarily due to cause and effect, but also effects before the causes.

We call these, curved-timelike-paths, and on very tiny scales, this must happen all of the time. So how is this affecting the mind? Is such gravitational forces ‘’unraveling’’ the phenomena of this holographic world we see and know?

…

m = mind
M=mass
E=Energy
gd = gravitational distance
K = Kinetic Energy

Because of the leading theory that gravity ''unravels'' consciousness, we must assume that all the forces are at work. This is because all the forces make up one force: Quantum Gravity.

So i gave, using gravitational accelated formulea's:

m=(GM)/d^2

but we can work out how much energy there is against the Gravitational Distance raised to the power of two...

E/gd^2=M

Therego,

mG|T_abE^2(gd^4 -> K- G_ab=T_ab)

Which left the question of: How is gravity important... indeed, how is any of the forces important?

The Graviphoton is an exctitation of the Gravitational Potential, and directly couples to fermions: Particles with spns of 3/2, 5/3 ect ect.

According to Dr. Penrose, there are about 10^17 tubulins (which are tiny shells, located around the neurons in our brains). The negative energy of the vacuum must be (gd^4) due to the Kaluza-Klein Theory and the Casimir Effect... therego, there are tiny negative fluctuations which MIGHT spark consciousness using the graviphoton:

(1/2)- (2/1) ~ (2/1')- (1/2') = mG|T_abE^2(gd^4 -> K- G_ab=T_ab)

Which in short, allows magnetism and electronic fluctuations in the gravitational field to ''unravel'' consciousness. The Curles are allowed because of the following set of equation:

A(X) and is curled into electricity through > B=Nabla(A)

…
Here is my theory on the spark of cognitivity in humans. Instead of trying to adopt the normal idea of tubules in mediation with gravity, I’ve decided to involve the implications of electromagnetic influences, and how they might couple to an intrinsic particle called the graviphoton.
Glutamate transporters are one of more than 360 families of transporters that have so far been identified in mapping the extensive layout of the human brain. All of these molecular-sized cells are vital for regulating energy levels, movement and metabolic processes. The specific role of glutamate transporters is to regulate glutamate concentrations in the brain.
There are about 100 billion neurons in the brain and in [most] of these neurons exist glutamate transporters, acting as neurotransmitters. Because they are active brain cells, they must play a fundamental part in the charge of electromagnetic signals. They release short spasms of electromagnetic pulses, and according to my theory, they may even have an affect on sister-brother glutamate transporters through the well-known theory of the Casmir effect; the Casmir effect is nothing but short range attractions between two objects caused by electromagnetic fluctuations in the vacuum. Any two plates, whether that be a conductor or dielectrics would experience a force that is raised to the fourth power.
The short pulse of communication is made successful through a relatively simple medium of the hypothetical graviphoton, which is itself an excited photon of the gravitational field, which is inexorably surrounding the cells.
I propose that these super tiny interaction on a mass-scale give rise to the complex phenomena of the human cognitivity, and in essence, works like a simple on-off binary construct, and it might even play a fundamental part in memory as well.

I will improvise on my theory.
The Casmir Effect between two glutamate transporters may not be necessary. One glutamate molecule may interact via Casmir Effect between other cells, called the glial. The reason why the Casmir Effect would work more amply with the neuron molecules of the glutamates is because glial cells surround neurons. This may have a direct affect on consciousness as intelligence.
Why intelligence?
Well, when Einstein’s brain was dissected and analyzed, a number of strange defects where a result. One result was that he had a much larger concentration of white brain mass. The other result was that he had a much, much larger concentration of glial cells. His intelligence might be related through such neuronal processes.

…

As i have mentioned quite a few times recently, a prof. of Physics has suggested two time dimensions

We must start to consider that Einstein’s contempt for the Copenhagen Interpretation is dead and buried, and that his speculations were totally incorrect. If this is true, then no one should deny that consciousness should then be seen in preferred light of that particular interpretation. Something scared Einstein, and I don’t believe he told us the true story.
I’m sure he contemplated that same-old-age question ‘’is the mind what we know as time?’’

The answer seemed so obviously ‘’yes’’ according to the observer effect of quantum mechanics, but Einstein would not humor it. Perhaps a bit of pride and ego was entangled with all of this, but he had problems accepting the limit of knowledge that quantum mechanics was predicting.
Everything turned out (from the humans perspective anyway) that the world was totally unknowable, and this might have had profound connections to Einstein, since his only ambition in the end was to unify gravity to a single force, ‘’Quantum Gravity.’’ His field equations have came in very handy for our calculations, but the more we extrapolate on their potential values and predictions, the more we are bound by complications. Even success has its limits.

The Standard Interpretation has predicted some remarkable things for consciousness.* It predicts that consciousness is some ‘’superdimension,’’ inextricably tied into the normal vectors of space. In fact, some interpretations state that the mind is somehow the fourth dimension of time. If it isn’t, then it surely is an imaginary 5th.
We ascribe the vectors with simple x, y and z coordinates. The square laws describe these vectors most best, and is the most valid proof we have that spacetime is really a three-dimensionally physical dimension of freedom. The square law given for the electromagnetic formulae is given as:

Fm = (1/µ)(p1p2/r2)

In this next mathematical model, you must first realize that Einstein’s equations where based upon Pythagoras’ theorem, given in any standard course of geometry as:

a2 + b2 = c2

This is a spacetime triangle under the correct mathematical direction, and the mind can be brought into this as a fourth vector on the spacetime vector, where di is the imaginary conscious dimension, and a, b and c are the space coordinates of x, y and z:

a2 + b2 + c2 = di2

The simple mathematical base I am using here, will lead to a decision to make consciousness a region of energy that must also represent a value of zero, based on the following hypothesis:
Energy and spacetime is all there is. So in Einstein’s formula of:

E=Mc^2

Is in fact just the materialistic side of the equation, first shown by Poncair:

M=E/c^2

… and if:

E+E=Mc^2 and M=E/c^2

Then c states as it having an infinite sum that:

E=0 and M=0

They are summed up then, that the vacuum holds two types of matter that must renormalize:

E=Mc^2+(E=-Mc^2)=0

And so if consciousness is described to have an energy, then we can say that:

E= a2 b2 c2 di2

… which the other three coordinates are bound to emerge as a zero total, including the hyperdimension of the mind:

a2 + b2 + c2 + di2 =0

So even all the products of consciousness contribute to the renormalization of everything. The next equation describes the two sides of the coin: The first is relative and cosmological time, given by t. This describes the time that existed before the mind, which didn’t account for much without the mind. The asymptotic time we all experience, described by the T: This is a subliminal time experience. t could in fact be described as a relative time dimension, and the T as an absolute time dimension. This would help explain some strange properties of the mind.

a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + tdi^2 - Tdi^2

Let i^2 = i *k^2

Then the real part would be

a^2 + b^2 + c^2 - i^2*k^2^2 = 0

which simplifies to:

a^2 + b^2 +c^2 + k2^2 =0

The only solution is a=b=c=k^2=0

Here is where we can use the idea that the mind is time, and experiences absolutely no time at all, apart from this ‘’directionality’’ created by the unfixed proverbial clock.

…

We are made up of about 10^24 atoms, and they make up molecules, but all of these tiny objects are sharing something unique, which allows them to become atoms, and molecules: This is subatomic energy.

Atoms move at about 10^-10m/s, which is 1,700 km/h, and the energy inside them move at something like 10^-14m, which is 6.616 x 10^7m/s which is 1/5 of c, the speed of light. This energy are, as you might already know, are mostly gluons, and they ''entangle'' the atom shells between the electrons and other subatomic particles.

Gluons move at the speed of light, but this speed is slowed down inside an atom, simply because the space and time isn't free. But they inexorably 'bind'' everything together... and this is what we mean by decoherence... a ''natural collapse in the wave fuction.''

In 1997, of september, scientists where able to create particles of matter out of the purest energy known: The Luxen Particle of Light. This is why almost nearly every scientist in the world believes that light was indeed the first particle to come from spacetime, and they concurrently ''evolved'' into every known particle today... which is something like 410 known.

A particle of matter, such as an atom, has a rest mass, which means they are entities that move with a velocity that is below the value of ''c'', and yet they are consistant particles that normally move with a value of ''c''.

... The Mind Is A Tardyon

There are, as i believe it is known, that brains are naturally collapsed through such a decoherence, and as we shall soon see, the mind MUST BE measured against the speed of light.

We live in such a slow part of the universe because during the inflationary phase, (when the universe began to move at superluminal speeds), certain parts of the universe are still moving at differential speeds. If our minds move at very slow speeds, we might even be able to say that consciousness as we know it, has a rest mass, but experiences no time at all. This is because scientists of the Copenhagen Interpretation declair that time is the mind, as much as the mind is time itself!

... The Mind Is Made of Luxens

We learn from all of this, that the mind is actually made up of nothing but very slow luxens... Very slow gluons and photons. The interesting part, is that every bit of these slow particles, such as protons, neutrons, muons, electrons, ect ect, but they all have an antipartner, which allows all these ''slow luxens'' to be reverted back to light. This was made possible through the discovery of the Dirac Equation, which was inexorably possible through M=E/c^2 + M=-E/c^2...

Luxens cannot have a rest mass in spacetime... But if they are moving through solid objects, they contribute to new particles that do. Why? Why would the universe contribute such a configuration? Of course, this might be best answered through the Anthropic Principle.

... The Summery In Mind

That this universe created so much space (or God created so much space) which allowed enough time for us to be sitting here today, around all of these baryons and rest materials. A very slight change in the math, would result in us not even existing... so... we should, I think, revert to the Anthropic Principle... that is unless Multiple Universes exist... And i am not thrilled by this theory...

It's sloppy at best.

The Speed of the Mind

I have explained a phenomenon that scientists are right now attempting to simplify. Why is it that our minds work at the speeds thy do? Why do they not work at a constant speed? Maybe they do?

‘’ We march along through time at the speed of light... however; my perception of it is quite not as fast. Unlike the clock on the wall, sometimes my time can vary - it can fluctuate, making one time feel longer than another time. Why does this happen?
To explain this will take a little thought. Relativity explains that time becomes stretched when one moves faster and faster until one reaches the maximum speed of light, time will stop completely. I envision the mind being the opposite. Somehow the mind when in a fast mode of thinking, time is not stretched - in fact, time can move quite fast when we are enjoying ourselves. Only when the speed of our thought slows down and we become less aware does time begin to stretch.
We already saw an example of the in the part titled 'Time' - certain narcotics can alter what we perceive as time. For instance, cannabis can alter ones state of perception. Using cannabis time can move slowly for the user... in other cases, some have reported that time speeds up. LSD, the hallucinogen can also either speed up or slow down what we perceive as time. Why does this happen? There may be many reasons for this effect. However, my explanation is a little more conservative. It all has to do with our minds capacity of awareness in one single day. Let me explain.

First Pointer - Time is at its fastest when the mind is fully occupied with reality (FI)

Second pointer - Time is at its slowest when the mind is not fully occupied with reality (SI)

* I would like to note here, that both pointers depend on a particular state of mind.

It is these two rules that govern perception, and i call them the 'fast influence' (FI), and the 'slow influence' (SI). We can imagine certain drugs have different influences on different individuals. Thus, a certain drug can have either a fast influence on time inside our minds, and to others, it might have a slow influence. Other drugs however, will have more or less the same effect on our perceptions, such as amphetamines (speed).
However, there are certain times we all feel the strains of fast and slow influences. For instance, most mornings we will wake up in a state that perceives time at its slow influence. My goodness... we have all known mornings like that - it seems to take us forever to adjust if we don't have that strong cuppa. This is time being stretched. This means that our minds are not fully occupied with reality. Now, this is not hard to imagine, if one takes into consideration the fact they where sleeping. In a sleep state, the mind is not fully aware - it is, hence, unconscious. Thus, it will take a while for the mind to adjust, and speed up - this speeding up is actually the mind becoming more occupied with being awake, and eventually, my brain will start functioning properly in its fast influence state.

Time can seem to stretch quite a bit if we stay up a little late as well. Perhaps you sat up, watching a thrilling film, and realize that it is 4.00am. You decide not to go back to sleep because you need to go to work at 7.00am, and if you did go to sleep, you would never be able to get up in time - so, you wait it out; however, those remaining 3 hours seem to take forever. Your tired brain finds it hard to speed up, and the 3 hours seem more like 6 hours.
Obviously the brain needs sleep. You can imagine that, because you are supposed to be asleep, your brain is continuously slowing down. This is the brain not fully occupied with reality - and time is thus stretched. We would be experiencing what i call, slow influence all over again...
Thus our minds will continuously fluctuate between slow influences and fast influences due to our awareness in reality. We don't tend to experience time, in other words, in a dream state - unless it is the phenomenon known as a lucid dream. We simply do not concern ourselves with the perception of time in our sleeps - but our minds can tend to oscillate through the time barriers in our sleeps. Let me quickly explain.

Ever had a dream that replays some event you experienced earlier that day, or that week? This is your mind recreating a past event. Your mind has nothing like a memory system of files we can flick through in physics. And there are even the estranged phenomena of psychic visions in dreams, where you might see an event come about before it has happened. This can only be answered in physics via backwards-through-time-travel. It is very possible that information can travel backwards in time, and we receive that information in our neural networks, like a transmitter in a radio, tuning into a certain frequency.
Now, i use slow influence and fast influence to describe the differential speeds that the mind can experience, like in the examples, morning time and afternoon time, with night time and back to morning. These durations can only be explained by having a fast and a slow influence, and it is all brought about by the simple speeds of perception at different peaks. Thus, the brain needs to speed up to function during the day, and the brain needs to function slower to drift off into sleep. It is waking our minds from the entropy of slow to fast influence, and from fast to slow we must all experience.

Now the slow influence and the fast influences are only descriptions. We might not always wake in a daze. We might wake up and be totally energized, ready from go. We might not always get tired if we stay up. When we are active in mind, when our brains are functioning at normal speeds, it might not always stay at this speed. You might get tired at 1:00pm, and need an afternoon cat-nap. The slow influence and the fast influence is only a description i use to describe our quantum natures. It doesn't necessarily need to always occur. If our brains continued at the same speeds till a specific time everyday, we would not have experience; now this experience is the everyday experiences we might have. Those worried thoughts that might go slowly compared to our adrenaline of excitement where time might go fast. It is these experiences that permeates our perceptions everyday and makes us who we are. Without our differentiating perception throughout the day, in other words, our emotions and experience would be suspended in time... that would be, mental, imaginary time.
However, the fast influence and slow influences actually bring with them quite a good argument concerning time; and that is that it has a direction - a distinct and obvious track. This is forward. We can determine this process through the fast and slow influences, whenever we have to move from the slow into the fast influences, and vice versa. It is a process - of gradual steps. These steps actually resemble an arrow of time.’’

Rotational Values Used to Help Us Understand The Understandable?

Time moves against ‘’everything’’ at the speed of light. This is probably very hard to comprehend, as it is with myself, but it seems to be very adequate to the momentum of existence.
If time moves through everything at the value of ‘’c’’, then we might even assume that the mind is time… therego… we will now ask… ‘’does mind have a constant speed? If it does, then we find ourselves in a quandary, since [we] experience this ‘’outside’’ world moving at differential speeds, as we do feel them inside our own minds.

The world is indeed created through observation… but this is where the buck stops at the Copenhagen Interpretation, because the truth of the matter is, how can a world exist, without a mind…? Indeed, how can an entire universe be described without a mind to give it any formation?
Here is where I feel we do need the ‘’outside’’ as much as it creates the ‘’inside’’ – that is, the world we see, and the world we feel – So a constant needs to be integrated into the theory of the mind… A constant we have known for a very long time… the speed of light.

Rotational Values found in relativity, explain how even at even at the smallest levels, and possibly even smaller, do not abide by merely cause and effect… But sometimes, as the math indicates, the cause can precede the effect… Things can, in other words, ‘’especially at this very small level, things can go back in time…’’

We know of such instances. We know of such systems… Take antimatter, as it is widely accepted now that they are ACTUALLY holes of normal matter moving back in time!!!

The Mind Causes The Universe To Be, Just as Much as the Universe Effects the Mind. We must now understand that what we have developed into (macroscopic life forms), Is in fact a product of only, and ONLY BUT, microscopic phenomena, which will always oscillate throughout the time barriers. In other words, macroscopic levels are totally irrelevant, when we look into the smallest foundations, but mean everything when understanding how the mind works, including the universe itself.

I’m not fully sure how the mind contemplates into the world, but if light was indeed the first energy ever to exist 32 years after spacetime expansion, then somehow the mind itself moves at the speed of light!!!! This would indicate, as it has been proposed by any scientists before me, that mind is time; but there are a few strange paradoxes to work out:

1. How can a mind moving at the speed of light, experience any time at all?

> This was asked, because a photon experiences no time or space at all… it’s lifespan is as short as next to nothing.

2. How can time move at zero-spacetime when it moves through nothing?

> If time moves at ‘’c’’, then how does time have any substance at all?

3. If the fabric of space bends into time, how does the mind bend into reality…?

> Let’s tackle these questions: But first, we should try and contemplate that the mind, time and the speed of light are all one of the same thing.

Lorentz Rotations

The mind might experience no time at all! Indeed, this could be understood, if one contemplated that if space was to disappear, so would time, and so would the constants of the universe… Those being, The Mind and The Speed of Light (‘’c’’), matter and even energy!!! This was proven by Einstein himself… but he would not accept why we are here through mind alone.
There is a purpose that binds the mind with the world, as much as the world binds the mind to these sets of paradoxes above. If mind was to suddenly disappear, time would happen in one instant! A single Chronon = (5.88 x 10^-44) - the shortest time span known to science, but why?

This is because there is now no mind to evaluate a providence in space, therego, the future, present and past and even the past, present and the future would have no one there to say ‘’It did’’. Everything would happen as quick as it had begun…

If this is true, which I really do hope it is, then we might even calculate that the constant of 186,350 = ‘’c’’ is in fact what deludes the mind, as much as we could analogously say that matter bends into space, as much as time bends into matter… even the matter of the mind. In other words, the value of ‘’c’’ is the value of the mind.

Remember this… the mind is an imaginary dimension… In fact, the time dimension itself is an imaginary dimension of space; Einstein proved this… All we need to do now, is to build the bridges of science, which has inexorably become dogmatic over the years… a tireless force which fights against itself. This kind of answers the paradox of all three axioms in this chapter.

Slow, Fast or Even Neither?

The mind, I have found out through using imagination only, that the Lorentz Rotational Values found in Relativity can be applied to how we might be able to ‘’tune’’ into any frequency of the universe, and yet experience some type of forward directionality, which physics have quite correctly called, ‘’The Psychological Arrow of Time.’’
It’s a constant… but we only see this as a constant, because we cannot reject naturally the ‘’strangeness’’ of how macroscopic brains move in this direction, and yet compilated itself of tiny quantum, jitterbugging objects that do not have any real directionality at all. Is this how we see dreams back-to-front when we sleep, when the mind isn’t totally aware of it’s own macroscopic existence (apart from Lucid Dreaming) – which is when am individual dreams, and KNOWS they are in some type of holographic, and yet, corporeal and mentality-form. Is this how we experience déjà vu? The lists of phenomena are truly endless…!

Now… here is a little math to try and explain how the mind is affected by the Lorentz Rotations. First, we need to understand some of the concepts all over again:

(SI) = Slow Influence – when the mind experiences a slowing down of time
(FI) = Fast Influence – when the mind experiences a speeding up of time
( ’ ) = The Rotational Value

Now, to try and make this as simple as possible, let us postulate that (1) is a system moving forward in time. If (1) is moving forward in time, then (1’) is then moving back in time.

In Einstein’s Tensor Equations, we learn that G_ab=kT_ab , where the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab and k is a constant. This equation relates to the curvature of space and time, saying that stress energy is what causes the disturbance of spacetime.

The same ‘’could be said, for the mind.’’ Where we Einstein using Newton’s law of Gravity in his Field Equations, then we find the constant of k to have a value of:

Where π is pi, and G is the gravitational constant and k is a ‘’Coupling Constant’’, which will be most familiar as >

k=8piG/c^4

Let us now say that the mind, represented as an easy variable, (m), we can say that:

(m)(G/K- G_ab=kT_ab)

Where the mind (m) multiplied by the Gravitational Constant over the Coupling Constant is inversely proportional to the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab , but what does this really mean?
It shows exactly what I have been postulating throughout this rather long chapter. Mind bends into gravity as the enigmatic theory right now goes, and is found to be proportional to the Tensor Factor and the Stress Energy Tensor found in matter… remember… Mind is matter, as much as matter is mind.
The Rotational Formulae allows us to extrapolate some new theories, by suggesting that the mind moves no where at all, but instead, is an illusion of smaller objects that allows this ‘’Psychological Directionality.’’

(SI) ½c ^4_(m)(G/K- G_ab=kT_ab)

Here we have the mind experiencing a Slow Influence, with the power of ‘’c’’ raised to the force of the forth power due to the negative energy in the vacuum, which must itself be multiplied by the half of it’s own power… This is now brought into the lower factor of the (m)(G/K- G_ab=kT_ab), where the mind (m) multiplied by the Gravitational Constant over the Coupling Constant is inversely proportional to the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab

(FI) ½c^4_(m)(G/K- Gab=kTab)

The same can be said now, but with one slight difference. This time, the mind experiences a Fast Influence.

(FI)’ ½c^4_(m)(G/K- G_ab=kT_ab)

Now, according to the rotational value of ( ’ ), we have the mind experiencing a Fast Influence which is moving ‘’back in time’’, still with the power of ‘’c’’ raised to the force of the forth power due to the negative energy in the vacuum, which must itself be multiplied by the half of it’s own power… This is now brought into the lower factor of the (m)(G/K- G_ab=kT_ab), where the mind (m) multiplied by the Gravitational Constant over the Coupling Constant is inversely proportional to the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab

(SI)’ ½c_(m)(G/K- G_ab=kT_ab)

The same can now be said again, but with one slight difference… This time, the ‘’reversed’’ properties of the Slow Influence can be said to work for the mind at using the same equations.

The Mind Has a Constant Speed?

If the mind has no time, and the time is zero-dimensional, then how can we ever take any time to do anything?

Now... just recently, I showed an article in which a professor announced that by applying two time dimensions onto the three spatial dimensions would help physics answer great problems. It can also, after a while of thought, answer a great deal to how the mind experiences these ''distortional'' affects of (SI) and (FI).

He pronounced that one dimension of these two time dimensions where unfixed, just as Einstein postulated, and the other static. If this is true, then the mind might oscillate in a sinusoidal manner between the two dimensions.

In other words, what we experience as ''time forward,'' is the unfixed proverbial clock, and the fixed proverbial clock is were mind ''rests,'' into infinity; for we are beings of infinity you know. The mind is strange, but physics is just as strange and incapable at the moment to answer such phenomena. What is even harder, is to find a unified solution for the mind and a universally-acceptable mathematical model of consciousness.

I'll admit...

String Theory could help answer a lot of questions concerning consciousness, but the biggest problems with this idea is that:

1. String Theory cannot be falsifiable
2. That Consciousness so-far cannot be answered for

The dimensions of string theory go like this:

0=void singularity, infinite curvature
1=linear
2=surface, linear
3=spatial, 3-dimensional
4=static vibration
5=static electromagnetic patterns of spectral lines
6=positional
7=the surface between wave and particle
8=particle fills, inner shells, outer shells
9=uncertainty, probability, possibility, chaos
10=thought, memory and holography
11=gravity, unseen and all-permeating
12=consciousness, mind and psyche
13=infinity which is also zero, nothing and everything…

A belated X-mas prezzie ...... go knock yourself out - please.


Fruitcake Site

Closed Timelike Curves

In physics, when we consider a particle and its past, present and future path throughout the universe, we call its definite path a ‘’worldline.’’ A particle will always try to move in straight lines throughout spacetime, but because space and time are curved into each other, most of the time, they follow curved paths through space.
This is what we mean by a warped space, or distorted spacetime. We find that these distortions are in fact just gravity, or curved spacetime. And gravity is the presence of matter itself. Even light cannot escape the wrath of gravity at very strong levels, but usually, a tiny photon traveling in empty space will almost definitely travel in straight lines.
But there really isn’t just one straight line, or worldline for any particle. We find that according to Feynman’s Sum Over Histories, a particle actually has every possible path to its disposal – these path’s are of both times past and times to come.
We find that these paths have themselves a statistical element about them and will variably shape how a particle will end up in any state given upon measurement. Take a photon traveling from the past: It will take every known possible path, even those improbable paths through a black hole (but as you can imagine, the statistics for this are so vanishingly small, we can nearly neglect them, but Hawking shows that it is possible for allowing a particle to travel at superluminal speeds using the uncertainty principle), and upon arrival at Earth, we can measure the photon, and all the paths its could have taken, according to the wave function, suddenly collapses into a single probability!

For Feynman’s Sum Over History to apply to physics, one must use imaginary time, rather than the concept of real time. Imaginary time is the same thing as real space, whereas real time is the same thing as imaginary space. The two concepts are pivotal to understanding how we contemplate different ways to look at our universe at large, and even at small scales.
Granted, the concepts themselves are purely mathematical, but they play an enormous part in relativity and quantum mechanics. You need to first gather up all the possible path a particle can take, bundle them together so-to-say, and then we need to measure those statistics against real time, and the result is the real conditions of the particles history; but even those results have a slight statistical aura about them.

In the case of the universe at large and gravity, Feynman would need to have analyzed all possible histories of a curved spacetime, and this at large affects everything that has a worldline in this universe. There would indeed be a finite number of possible outcomes, but one would need to chose which outcome best fits this universe today.
Hawking reminds us, that if this is indeed the case, the class of curved spacetime that determines the universe today (including those spaces and times which are blown into unimaginable proportions, or singularities), the probabilities of such spaces cannot be determined by the theory. However, he says it is possible if we calculate them in some arbitrary way. Dr. Hawking is very cryptic this way, but what he means is that science cannot predict any history for the universe if there is a singular past. So any attempt to learn how a universe with a singularity would result, is really a disaster for science.

Now, since this study is about time and space at large, let’s consider CTC’s or ‘’Closed-Timelike-Curves.’’ This is a worldline describing a physical system which is ‘’closed’’. This means something physical in fact returns to original starting point. We call such movements ‘’sinusoidal’’.
The idea of CTC’s was in fact developed by Willem Jacob van Stockum in 1937 and later by the infamous Kurt Godel in 1949. There is indeed a lot of controversy over their existence, but if they do exist, it could revolutionize relativity including our ability to create machines capable of a global causal violation; in other words, a path that twists in space and moves through time.

Worldlines and of course Feynman’s Sum Over Histories is best described in terms of ‘’light cones’’, which is really a more specified term that is timelike in nature. It will probably be more recognized than the last two concepts. Light cones describe every possible future of a physical object in spacetime, given a current measurement during the present time. This can seem a bit strange, because not only does one deflate all possibilities of the past events to a single value upon measurement (the collapse of the wave function), but one can now calculate all possible path’s in the future in real time.
Because particles don’t have a specific arrow of directionality following cause and effect, one can have in special conditions, a particle which experiences a timespace and spacetime that is so heavily curved, it can return to the place it began – in other words, things at very small levels are able to move back through time… From effect to the cause instead of cause to the effect. These are simply basic rotations through space and through time, which are conveniently called, ‘’closed-timelike-curves’’, so just think of a loop that twists in space and moves through time back into its original starting point.

Frank J. Tipler, Prof. of mathematics and physics at Tulane University in New Orleans, developed an ingenious idea involving such closed-timelike-curves. I have read his article… it’s a good read. He explains that classical relativity does in fact predict pathological behavior. The exact nature of the pathology, or, CTC’s, are however very debatable, since the predictive nature of relativity has itself many outcomes.
His design is quite old now, but it is still a probability in physics creation of time machines today. His design is to create a huge rapidly rotating cylinder (possibly in space – I assume), and the spacetime around the cylinder will be warped to such an extent, that even time itself becomes sinusoidally warped so that instead of flowing in the correct direction… that is forwards, it in fact varies in an oscillating manner. Of course, one might think that such a spacetime would rip a spacetime traveler apart, but we aren’t talking about black holes here. If one entered this machine carefully, one could avoid being turned into spaghetti and experience a dilated time frame. Perhaps this is the time machine of the future?

Retrocausality

There is something very fixed in the universe: This is the observer…
She observes the universe in all its glory, and there is a specific directionality to this phase. This is of course, the psychological arrow of time. This arrow allows the psyche to adapt to a certain flow within the universe… This flow is forward. Because the human is intrinsic to such properties, we find that in the Copenhagen Interpretation that time is actually relative to the observer… Indeed, it states that if the observer was not here, there would be no such thing as time!! We say the same thing about energy-matter and space, since according to relativity, all are deeply connected and somehow the same thing.
If things where going backwards, things would seem very strange indeed… According to Dr. Hawking, if time is reversed, then so must the entropy contained within the universe. This means, everything that has evolved into today’s present states, would suddenly begin to de-evolve, and the plate that fell onto the floor would suddenly reassemble on the table! Counterintuitive? Perhaps, but this is what we should expect, since the entropy reverse on the microscopic scale would indeed drag even the components it makes ‘’macroscopic objects’’ to the their previous states…

Something more can be seen in this though. The human mind, according to my theory, and understanding of the Copenhagen Interpretation would not allow us to know that the plate had reassembled on the table. Why? Because one must assume that even ‘’secret knowledge,’’ or personal knowledge is also dragged along with the matter…
For those who believe that mind is bound by the matter of the brain, then mind too must experience the same flow of time, and same consequences. This means that personal knowledge that was increasing as time passed, now begins to decrease! So I propose, even though Hawking explains that if time went back and in result we would see the proverbial plate reassemble, we wouldn’t know! He doesn’t explain this. But it makes logical sense… since to the observer now, time is still flowing in the correct manner… In short, we wouldn’t know. He may have proclaimed this before though, but I do not recall him mentioning this in his book, ‘’A Brief History of Time.’’

So, what should we expect if time does move back? Should it move back at all??
According to the Omega Theory of Cosmological Evolution, everything will reach an end singularity. A singularity which halts all known forward laws of physics, and inexorably forces everything to move backwards; but this depends on a steady balance of matter against the ratio of spacetime…There are existing theories right now which currently goes against such a point, against such a symmetry in time, such as the known acceleration of the universe, which seems to be indicating that our universe is ‘’Open,’’ meaning it will continue forever to expand. If it does, this can lead to Armageddon visions such as a Big Freeze or even Big Rip.

However, such a symmetry in time leads to exciting proposals that makes us realize that in subtle ways, the end and the beginning are somehow the same thing. It is easier to understand this, by using Hawkings analogy that if the universe sprung from a singularity, it would end in a singularity… both are somehow points which oscillate in imaginary time.
Reversing time allows us to find these strange results predicted, and if we could watch a reversed time frame of the universe, we ask the question, ‘’would it look the same as it did going forward?’’

Take a jar of gas. Any gas, with about a billion, billion, billion atoms. As time moves forward, the atoms in the jar become more and more disordered, and more and more less like the original state they had evolved from. How long would we need to wait, until all of those atoms reached the same states as they begun? It’s very difficult say, but in the long run, it should take trillions of years… maybe even longer…

Now, this so far, has explained in very pragmatic terms what energy-matter is subjected to in this universe; a constant disorder which should never reach a state which it had begun, unless everything is suddenly reverted back to whence it came via an Omega Singularity, or a Big Crunch.
But what about this notion that the beginning is somehow very much like, if not the same as the end? How can one come to such a conceptualized view of the universe?
The answer turns out to be very dubious indeed. The answer might lye in closed- timelike-curves… In short, just to get a very quick picture of what is being said here, is that the beginning of the universe might be a state which eventually curves back onto itself so that that there is what appears to be, a superb intrical Gordian’s knot.

As explained earlier, a CTC (Closed-Timelike-Curves) are states of a physical system which twists through space and time, and ends up exactly where it began. Is this the nature of the universe? It begs the question.
Let us view the universe like an atom, as described by Hawkings principle of Quantum Cosmology… and then assume that this particle/universe reaches a state which is so heavily curved upon itself, it is forced to end up where it began… then it turns out that the end is in fact the beginning, and vice versa… (This idea could be related intimately to pulsating universe theory).

But something even more sinister can arise from all of this, I speculate. If the beginning is the end, and the end is the beginning, (as I believe some old wise religions and philosophies state), then there might be room for some retrocausality – but first, what is a retrocausality in physics?

It is when the effect precedes the cause… We postulate this from interpretations of general relativity, and some interpretations of quantum mechanics. In fact, Dr. Wolf reminds us that the uncertainty principle, which governs our inability to predict all that there is to be known at the very small scales of quarks and protino’s, that cause and effect breaks down!!! This is very true, and since we know that physics predicts this, we can say that retrocausality must happen everyday in our lives; we are not concerned with this strange action though, because we exist on levels which are not normally affected by such a principle.

Cause and Effect, or the Effect Causes the Cause

In this section, I want to explore the foundation of how macroscopic objects capable of knowing their surrounding (us) is not an intrinsic direction at all. In fact, the very rise of macroscopic intelligence does indeed come around through tiny objects that defy a directionality in compared with what we call ‘’forward time flow.’’
The retrocausality is best described as what can inexorably happen in the future affects what we call the present, and what we call the present can indeed affect the past…

Such affects don’t defy the rules of physics… in fact, they SHOULD be intrinsic properties happening all the time, as I have explained so far. What we call the past, might be a loop in time, or a ‘’time loop,’’ which confines everything within its own existence. The past can therefore be the future, as much as the future can be the past; that intrical Gordian’s knot I spoke of.

It actually allows ‘’things’’ – whether that be of an energetic or even a corporeal nature can move back through time… but for this to be possible, we need to make sure the mass is imaginary…
Such matter is called tachyonic in nature, but as I have shown, tachyonic doesn’t necessarily mean a particle traveling constant at v>c… instead, it can mean for a very short period, that a particle can travel at superluminal speeds… such as a photon.

According to Dr. Cramer and his Transactional Interpretation, such backwards through time-travel is very possible. In his theory, there is two types of time waves. A time wave that moves forward in time, called an ‘’Offer Wave,’’ and an ‘’Echo Wave’’ which moves back in time.
Every time an observation is made in the present, he predicts that these two waves, one coming from the past, and another moving back from the future meet up in the present… the original wave, the Echo Wave, meets up with its complex-conjugate, and they multiply. The creation is said to be a collapse in the wave function… when a superpositional system is reduced to a single value which equals exactly 1.

What are these waves?
According to this very smart physicist, they are in fact time waves. They move at superluminal speeds, and because of this, they can travel freely throughout the time dimension, spending very little time in real time.
These waves create everything solid and defined. They are the result of everything we call ‘’tangible,’’ and they might even give rise to consciousness itself, according to Dr. Wolf and many other psychophysicists.

Retrocausality can now play a new part in all of this… According to one specific interpretation of relativity, ‘’All Time’’ or all that is past, present and future, in fact all happens in one go…!! Why?
This is because time is not fixed. The psychological arrow shows us that we have a definite position during the present, and creates the true illusion that we are living in only one present time. In other words, the past and the future are happening right now! This is very difficult to imagine, but it has been found to best analyzed by saying that the human consciousness creates this defined existence here and now, and without it, time as we know it would all happen in one swift go!

Again… hence… time is only relative to the observer… Without the observer, the past and future, including the present, are all present. This is what allows time travel and superluminal speeds to exist… but this might not be true for macroscopic systems, even though they are themselves made up by systems that seem to defy the normal macroscopic constant of cause and effect. Instead, what we call normal procedure of cause and effect, is an effect before the cause.

Wheelers Delayed-Choice Experiment

Dr. Wolf reminds us in his book, ‘’Parallel Universes: The Search for Other Worlds,’’ that we are being told by top physicists that what we do now, is in fact shaping the early state of the universe! This is very counterintuitive, but it turns out to answer for quite a lot in physics.
The state of a system, unless collapsed into a value through decoherence, is found to be in a mixed state of probability. The best way to imagine this is by understanding that a photon doesn’t travel across the galaxy via one course or path. It actually travels through all of the potential paths, and out of which one upon measurement creates a defined history for that photon.

Wheelers Delayed-Choice Experiment was first proposed as a thought experiment by John Archibald Wheeler in 1978, and it was a variation of the famous Thomas Young’s Double Slit Experiment, in which the detector screen that ‘’picks up the presence of the photon can be removed at the very last moment according to the observer who measures the experiment.
It is a choice however that is made after the photon has passed the slit, and it could have traveled as a particle, or it could have traveled as a wave and we also find it could have traveled in many varied paths regardless of the instrument being used.
However, the instrument could be set up so that we couldn’t determine which path the photon had arrived, then the two paths are superpositioned together – and just as found in the Double Slit Experiment, the two waves are found to interfere with each other so that the final state is different to what would be expected without that slight change in the instrument being used.
In short, it is we who decide, by our choice of how the set-up is performed whether the photon traveled path A or path B or both A and B. It is the very last moment to decide whether to make that slight change that determines the past history of the quantum system… The experiment was verified in 1985 at College Park by three physicists by the names of Carroll Alley, William Wickes and Oleg Jakubowicz – and confirmed again later by Yoon-Ho Kim in 2000, using another advanced experiment called delayed-quantum eraser, verifying a delayed choice and proving backwards through time travel.

Somehow, we are making the universe more and more defined through the measurements we make today… It is sending signals back through time, creating a more defined reality for us – and for the times of the universe when there wasn’t an observer present… unless one resorts to some superintelligence.
Dr Hawking and Dr Wolf reminded us that in the beginning, the universe couldn’t have had a unique radius, or any unique configuration, because no one was there to give it these unique factors. Therefore, we have had to resort to the idea that perhaps somehow what we are doing now is shaping the early universe. This is very strange, because it suggests that the beginning of what we call ‘’big bang,’’ is somehow happening right now. Time is all laid out like a fine fabric, which allows the past and future to exist alongside the present time as their own present times. Because of this prediction, Dr Cramer allowed superluminal time waves to permeate every corner of spacetime, past, present and future.

The present time in the future, is sending waves back through time, creating things here and now… But what is creating these waves from the future?
Astrophysicist, Fred Hoyle, who passed away in 2001, believed that these waves where coming back through some superintelligence located in the future. I believe he attributed this to some high-powered, Godlike machine… He was a very vivid thinker this way. Much like what he predicted for what was happening in the future sending these waves back, one must assume that we are sending waves into the past…
Dr Cramer shows in his Transactional Interpretation, the present only affects the future in a statistical sense. It is really the future which shapes up everything we call ‘’tangible’’ and ‘’material’’ here in the present. This means that the past affects our present time in a statistical sense as well. But which future send these messages to us? Great developments in black hole theory now suggest something quite different to what Dr Wolf proclaimed in his book. He stated that these messages were being sent back through time from other universes.
In a recent proposal, Dr Hawking solved what was called, ‘’The Information Paradox’’ of quantum physics. It suggested that information cannot ever be destroyed or lost in a universe… But if things where able to move into black holes and into other universes, this would suggest that even information would be squeezed out of existence.
In order to solve this, Hawking now believes that information is in fact mangled and squeezed back into the same universe, instead of moving into any other. This means that information is never lost… and this brings a boundary on the Transactional Interpretation…
When Dr Cramer developed his theory, he never designed it for multiple universes. Instead, the future which sent back these messages was in fact the ‘’most probable future.’’ Information cannot spontaneously flow from one universe and into another with physics reshaping how we define as a ‘’self-contained’’ universe.

There is a double flow in time. This flow clashes during the present time, formulating everything we know: Perhaps even consciousness itself arises out of such a collapse in the wave function, as the growing enigmatic theory goes right now. As explained earlier, the original wave needs to square with its complex-conjugate; any waves that do not manage this, simply cancel out.

The Phase of Information and the Group Phase of Velocity
So… this is all perhaps so far, just ‘’small talk’’ – But when Einstein developed his relativistic wave equations of velocity’s, he was biased with his own work, I assume. Just because phase velocities described ay wave, he meddles with the mathematics, so that he could see it as a local phenomena, coupled with a group velocity, which reduced the Phase Velocity to a value of 186,350 mp/s ‘’c’’… But he would not accept superluminal waves: Waves that are totally ethereal in nature, but oscillate in a sinusoidal configuration, providing everything, space, matter, time and energy to flow into a mixed probabilistic state. What he never realized through, was that Bell, years after Einstein’s death, solved this by a loosely-used term, coined ‘’non-localism,’’ inherent in the universe, despite any other rule.

Bell it turns out from my assumptions that he might have seen the from the wrong side of the equations. Instead of saying everything was ‘’non-local’’ – including the entire universe – is just another way to accept that Einstein was right about time information waves traveling at v>c… As you will see, in this four paper analysis of modern Physics, it might be best Einstein wrong about his first assumption concerning concerning some waves can actually be predicted through relativity and even quantum mechanics, in a purely logical sense.

Is There Math to Indicate
a Wave Exceeding c?

Phase velocity
Look at this wave equation:

d2u d2u
-- - c2 -- + w2 u = 0
dt2 dx2

…has a set of solutions:

u = A cos( ax - bt )

c2 a2 - b2 + w2 = 0

Which are sine waves propagating with a speed,

V =b/a=√(c2+(w/a)2)

The problem here, is that they are moving at a speed which exceeds ''c''. These are normal equations for any wave form or particle. The problem can be removed, by distinguishing this velocity which is known as the phase velocity vpr from another velocity known as the group velocity vgr which is given by,

vgr = c / vph

Now, this basically means that a wave packet will have a velocity at the value of ''c'' when in a group. But here is the problem, we can apply the same values for actual information waves in space and time, and when you measure an entangled photon, the other photon is instantly determined: despite any group variables. We could apply the phase velocity equation to an information wave which would allow instantaneous action at a very spooky distance. The equations just shown, say that is it is only possible to send information with such a wave equation at a group velocity ''c'', but it doesn't account for possible information determining the action at great distances.

The Phase Velocity however, does in itself; describe faster-then-light communication. It begs the question to what kind of information we are dealing with, without resorting to a group factor. If there isn't anything which describes this phase velocity, then the phase velocity is just a lame example of a speed faster than light which cannot carry a message.

This doesn't seem right, especially when we have top physicists, such as Dr Cramer whose interpretations describe faster-than-light travel for certain information, the Wheeler-Choice Experiment, which even proves in itself backwards through time travel, and the well known phenomena of action at spooky distances which could be answered for by superluminal phase waves.

Ah and here was me thinking you'd left....