GRAND UNIFIED THEORY
(Most Clarified)
Abstract - For almost a hundred years, the search for the unification of the four fundamental forces of the universe,, re- gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, have not been fruitful.. The treatise below appears strongly, finally, to have unified the four forces into one.
Two common threads run through and link all matter in the universe. One is the immutable opposite law of the universe, which states “like repulse, unlike attract”, such as positive-negative, north pole -south pole, proton-electron, quark up-down, male-female, right-wrong, matter-anti-matter, electron- positron, name it, and always, there are two opposite sides. All matters, from largest to smallest, are wired to the opposite law, re- galaxies, stars, planets, atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks. That shows just how all intrinsic is the opposite law that runs through in all atoms, and thereby, in all the make-ups of structures in the universe. It is the opposite law, re-unlike-attract property, that made up the attraction formation, re-the positive to negative attraction, alignment and binding of primordial gases, dust into eventual formations of all stated suspended bodies in outer space.. (This “attraction” formations may explain why there is dire lack of anti-matter in the universe in the present, because from the beginning, the unlike-attract property prevailed over the like-repulse property OTHERWISE NO GALAXIES, STARS, PLANETS WOULD HAVE SOLIDIFIED.). By dissecting atom, the basic building block, the natures and behaviors of all matter are unveiled.
Atom is found to be 99.999999999999% empty space! If atom were the size of 30 basketballs rolled into one, proportionately, the size of nucleus would be like a grain of sand inside, and if the nucleus were the size of 30 basketballs rolled into one, the size of a quark would be like a grain of sand. That is how spacious is the atom, such concept of atom is patterned after the solar system, atom appears even spacious. (what would happen to the established law of science if a more fundamental particle or no longer finer particle but pure energy is detected by a super-super accelerator, vibrating inside the hollow quarks?).Atom has nucleus, consisting of protons-neutrons and electrons, and said nucleus is further dissected to consist of smaller fundamental particles, called quarks. Atom consists of positive proton/s- neutral neutron/s and negative electron/s. Neutron, bedfellow of proton, decays to proton or to electron, called positron. Electron, on the other hand, mutates to positron or to neutron. Even protons steal electron to make up lack of neutron in nucleus. What do all these changing partners mean, these switching decays/mutations? But what is more revealing is that there are dwellers huddled inside the hollow nucleus, re-the smaller fundamental particles, called quarks, as unearthed by particle accelerators.. Quarks have three families, re- up-down, top-bottom, and charm-strange, the family features are actually positive (up, top, charm) and negative (down, bottom, strange), the positive and negative properties of the governing opposite law. In short, even in the very fundamental quarks, there is positive-negative property, not just positive-neutral nucleus as conceived before. The natures and behaviors of the opposite law are revealed in a magnet: cut and cut a bar magnet to slimmer and slimmer sizes and always, in each cut, there is positive and negative. Bring and align the cut bars back together and always the reconstructed bar magnet is divided into versatile two equal positive and negative. The opposite law is like one coin with intrinsically two sides, and with compulsion to divide into two equal opposite positive and negative sides. The changing partners, the switching mutations/decays of neutrons, electrons, as stated earlier, mean the positive and negative property of nucleus and electrons of atom, each, seek equilibrium and stability, just like water seeks its own level. The tilt or direction of motion determines whether it is positive or negative. Positive and negative can even be reversed, like earth.
The law on conservation states that nothing is lost nor destroyed, neither is the law of opposite. Why is there this opposite law that works tirelessly and never sleeps? Don’t ask this author, but when you see two lovers of opposite sex, impulsively kissing each other, then know, without knowing why.
A common thread, a common bond runs through and unifies the four fundamental forces of the universe, namely, gravity, electro-magnetism, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force. Here is a making of a universal law: all galaxies, stars, planets, have inherent gravitational, magnetic, and electrical properties. and the same properties are inherent in the nucleus and electrons of micro-solar system of atom. Is there gravity in the atom? Here are the rationale. Atom, as stated, is 99.999999999999% space, that shows how spacious is atom, just as spacious as the solar system. It is undeniable electro-magnetism exist inside the shell of atom, implicating there also exist gravitational field in the wide space separating the nucleus and electrons. Thus, the existence of gravitational field, coming from gravity, shows that gravity, including magnetism, exists, is inherent in nucleus and electrons of atoms (just as gravity is inherent in macro- re galaxies, stars, planets). The super-speed orbit of electrons and spin of nucleus generates the unquestionable electro-magnetism.(In like manner, as electro-magnetism is generated in micro-solar system of atom, so in macro-solar system, electro-magnetism is generated in the locked gravitational fields of both the sun and earth, which have inherent gravity-magnetic property, caused by stated motion). The raising of million of tons of salty sea water on earth, salt being good conductor of electricity) is evidenced of existence of electro-magnetism, at weak, weak gravity vibratory undetectable level). Here is further rationale of existence of gravity in atom: The “Strong nuclear force” that holds in nucleus of atom is actually gravity. Here is proof: In that micro solar system of atom, the nucleus and electrons have compact gravity/gravitational property, but the nucleus is much, much more compact. Compact nucleus of atom is uncannily similar to compact black hole in outer space whose “strong gravitational force” is so concentrated/compact to cause collapse of suspended object into black hole but such concentrated “strong gravitational force” is the same gravity before the object collapses/becomes a black hole. In like manner, in nucleus of micro-solar system of atom, “strong nuclear force” is concentrated/compact gravity in that micro-area of nucleus but it is the same gravity if it were not compacted. Evidence just how concentrated or compact is the nucleus of atom: a modern nuclear explosion is a billion times greater than TNT. Further. tt is noted that proton does not decay, black hole, also, does not decay, implicating that both are uncannily compacted/concentrated gravity, similarly. There is no question that electro-magnetism and electro-weak force are one and the same, particularly, in high temperature. Thus, the four fundamental forces of the universe exist in unity in all atoms, re- wherever there is “strong nuclear force” that mediates in nucleus of atom, it is concentrated gravity, and wherever there is gravity, there is magnetism, because both are fundamentally one, and wherever there is motion/rotation of gravity and magnetism, electro-magnetism, electro-weak force are generated, thus, all forces are indispensably unified as one in all atoms, the building blocks of all structures in the universe..
More revelations: the gravitational, magnetic, electrical properties, in macro and micro, have positive and negative properties of the opposite law, and all are akin to one another, and can even be convertible one to another. Gravity is the weakest, magnetism being the concentrated inert, semi-active form. and electricity being the active form. Through motion/rotation of magnetism, electro-magnetism is evoked. Electricity, for instance, is one with magnetism, live electricity has positive and negative wires to make bulb produce light, roll the live wire around a nail and magnetism is produced in the nail, with positive and negative. Magnetism is one with gravity. Here is a clue: A magnet bar has equal positive and negative, strength of gravity is at the thinnest, dividing middle of the magnet bar that is at trillion times weaker in strength than magnetic forces at both ends of bar magnet. As such, supra-supra-weak gravity is closest a monopole with super-imposed, intersecting positive and negative property, but unlike-attract property prevailed otherwise, no planets, stars, galaxies would have been formed. There is only one attraction, including gluon-attraction-binding, and that is the making of all-encompassing opposite law which states UNLIKE ATTRACT..
.
In a capsule, the fundamental particles inside the shell of atoms and the four fundamental forces, are all-together unified as one inside the atoms. It is stated that the stated fundamental particles and forces were unified as one at time of Big Bang, and were separated then after. They may have been divorced temporarily by temperatures and changing time, but all have never been separated permanently, all re-assert their existence, their formations, inside the atoms, in keeping with the law on conservation which states that energy and matter are never lost nor destroyed though forms change whether in low temperature like the present time conducive to life or in super-high temperature (trillion KeV) as in Big Bang which altered the symmetries of particles (example: ice to water to gaseous), and in like manner, the opposite law is neither lost nor destroyed. All such fundamental particles and fundamental forces are inside in each of all atoms, the building blocks, thus, all can be found, unified, in all structures in the universe.. Why do these fundamental particles and forces uncannily appear inside all atoms, as if pre-Set Up, pre-Arranged, pre-Designed, as if following and obeying an unmistakable, unfathomable LAW? Don’t ask me.
3th Revised Philippine Copyrights 2009
By: jose s. aldea
With Philippine Copyrights, Ist & 2nd revision 2009
8.5.09
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Why is this wacko still allowed to start threads?
AlexG, I hope you understand what you are saying, thus, permit me to summarize::
(a) It is stated in the article: Here is a making of universal law: All galaxies stars, planets have inherent gravity/gravitational, magnetic, and electrical properties. In like manner, the same properties are inherent in atom, re-nucleus and electrons.. If you read the article, you will find the rationale why there is gravity in the atom. Am I right or wrong?
(
In like manner, it is stated in the article that all the four fundamental forces, re-gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force and the fundamental particles, re-nucleus and electrons, of atom, have positive and negative properties of the opposite law of the universe.
© Most of all, do you agree or not that the four fundamental forces and the fundamental particles, re-nucleus and electrons, are all UNIFIED inside the atom, the building blocks of all structures in the universe. That all have never been lost nor destroyed, instead all re-assert their formation inside the atoms, in keeping with the law of conservation..
All of these pertain to making of universal laws.
Kindly read the article and give me your views/ comments.
Jsaldea12
8.05.09.
(a) It is stated in the article: Here is a making of universal law: All galaxies stars, planets have inherent gravity/gravitational, magnetic, and electrical properties. In like manner, the same properties are inherent in atom, re-nucleus and electrons.. If you read the article, you will find the rationale why there is gravity in the atom. Am I right or wrong?
(
In like manner, it is stated in the article that all the four fundamental forces, re-gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force and the fundamental particles, re-nucleus and electrons, of atom, have positive and negative properties of the opposite law of the universe.© Most of all, do you agree or not that the four fundamental forces and the fundamental particles, re-nucleus and electrons, are all UNIFIED inside the atom, the building blocks of all structures in the universe. That all have never been lost nor destroyed, instead all re-assert their formation inside the atoms, in keeping with the law of conservation..
All of these pertain to making of universal laws.
Kindly read the article and give me your views/ comments.
Jsaldea12
8.05.09.
It is not a making of universal law: It is a universal law: Gravity, magnetism, and electricity/electro-magnetism are inseparable. Whenever/wherever there is gravity, there is magnetism, and whenever/wherever there is magnetism, there is electricity/electro-magnetism, that is why in macro, re- all planets, stars, galaxies, without exception, have inherent gravity, magnetism, and electricity/electro-magnetism. As it is in macro, so is it in micro, thus, in micro-solar system of atom, re- nucleus and electrons, there is inherent gravity, magnetism, and electricity/electro-magnetism. The fact that there is undeniable electro-magnetism in atom shows there is inherent magnetism and gravity in nucleus and electrons. Gravitational field is the effect/result of the motion/rotation of gravity while electro-magnetism is the effect/result of the motion/rotation of magnetism on the gravitational field of gravity. Further, the properties, re-gravity, magnetism and electricity/electro-magnetism are governed by the opposite law of the universe which states: unlike attract, like repulse.
Am I right or wrong?
Jsaldea12
8.18.09
Am I right or wrong?
Jsaldea12
8.18.09
You're wrong.
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 18 2009, 09:30 AM)
Whenever/wherever there is gravity, there is magnetism,
I haven't read this whole thread but the moon has gravity and it doesn't have a magnetic field. If magnetic fields are what you are talking about.
I haven't read this whole thread but the moon has gravity and it doesn't have a magnetic field. If magnetic fields are what you are talking about.
The moon has magnetic field. That the moon has one side facing earth has something to do why the dipole of the magnetic field of the moon is difficult to detect. But the moon has magnetic field, otherwise the moon would not have generated electro-magnetic force to lift millions of tons of electro-magnetic inducer salty sea water on earth.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09
Jsaldea12
8.19.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 18 2009, 08:36 PM)
The moon has magnetic field. That the moon has one side facing earth has something to do why the dipole of the magnetic field of the moon is difficult to detect. But the moon has magnetic field, otherwise the moon would not have generated electro-magnetic force to lift millions of tons of electro-magnetic inducer salty sea water on earth.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09
The moon has no magnetic field. The tides are an effect of gravity, which has nothing to do with electromagnetism.
As you've often demonstrated, your knowledge of physics is non-existent.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09
The moon has no magnetic field. The tides are an effect of gravity, which has nothing to do with electromagnetism.
As you've often demonstrated, your knowledge of physics is non-existent.
Gravity, magnetism, and electricity/electro-magnetism are inseparable. In a bar magnet, gravity is in the thinnest, thinnest middle, where the positive and negative intersect as one, not monopole, and the farther in the length of magnet bar on both opposite sides, the clearer is the separation of positive and negative, call it north pole and south pole, the positive and negative of magnetism. Motion/rotation of bar magnet which includes the inseparable weakest force, gravity, at the thinnest middle creates electro-magnetism. Gravity maybe likened to light, the thinnest spectrum in the electro-magnetic spectrum, yet, it is the dominant, as far as human eyes can see, in like manner, gravity is the weakest, yet it is the most dominant force in the universe. Thus, as the dominant gravity has extension gravitational field, there is in that gravitational field both the gravity and magnetic property, that generates electro-magnetism at gravitational vibratory level that upon contact with salty sea water (good conductor of electro-magnetism) of earth, such salty sea water is binded and is being raised, not by gravity alone but both inseparable gravity and magnetism. The moon has gravitational field, though some 10,000 weaker than earth’s but because gravity and magnetism are inseparable, both creates built-in electro-magnetic force that can raise million of tons of SALTY sea water on earth. Salt is good conductor of electricity.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09.
QUOTE
Gravity, magnetism, and electricity/electro-magnetism are inseparable. In a bar magnet, gravity is in the thinnest, thinnest middle, where the positive and negative intersect as one, not monopole, and the farther in the length of magnet bar on both opposite sides, the clearer is the separation of positive and negative, call it north pole and south pole, the positive and negative of magnetism
Nonsensical Gibberish.
Before an object becomes a blackhole, it has ordinary gravitational field. When the object collapses into a blackhole, it has the same gravitational field but now concentrated, constricted, into that tinniest black area that even electro-magnetic light cannot escape because the concentrated gravitational field is so strong,,,meaning, its electro-magnetic property becomes concentrated, becomes apparent, that it is stronger than the speeding electro-magnetic light trying to escape, thus light is slowed, is sucked back. In that compacted electro-magnetic gravitational field of blackhole is inherent the gravity and magnetism property which was the same ordinary gravitational field before the object becomes a blackhole. It is just like conversion of field of rotating magnet into electro-magnetism. …It is a universal law: gravity, magnetism and electro-magnetism are inseparable, with conversion from one into another.
Jsaldea12
8.20.09
Jsaldea12
8.20.09
More gibberish.
Is black hole gibberish? It is not. It is not, too, gibberish that ALL the strong gravitational force of blackhole is nothing more than the SAME weak gravitational force before the object, for instance, a dying massive star, collapsed into a black hole and is found such concentrated gravitational force has electro-magnetism property. Such generated electro-magnetism in macro is UNDENIABLY in micro-solar system of atom, is the SAME as generated by the hi-speed rotating electrons orbiting around the spinning nucleus? That as there is electro-magnetism in micro solar system of atom implicates the existence of inherent magnetism and gravity inside the shell of atom?
Jsaldea12
8.20.09
Jsaldea12
8.20.09
For the last time, electomagnetism and gravity are two entirely seperate forces.
They do not merge until you reach energy levels not seen since 10^-33 seconds after the BB.
So yes, your posts are gibberish.
They do not merge until you reach energy levels not seen since 10^-33 seconds after the BB.
So yes, your posts are gibberish.
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 19 2009, 01:36 AM)
The moon has magnetic field. That the moon has one side facing earth has something to do why the dipole of the magnetic field of the moon is difficult to detect. But the moon has magnetic field, otherwise the moon would not have generated electro-magnetic force to lift millions of tons of electro-magnetic inducer salty sea water on earth.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09
What do you base that on?
How did you come to believe this?
More importantly how is it you don't know that tides are caused by tidal forces? Which of course is why they are called tides.
Tidal forces are difference in gravitational attraction caused by distance.
Jsaldea12
8.19.09
What do you base that on?
How did you come to believe this?
More importantly how is it you don't know that tides are caused by tidal forces? Which of course is why they are called tides.
Tidal forces are difference in gravitational attraction caused by distance.
There is nothing I can do, Would rather respect your scientific mind as is? But we have to move on. Gravity, magnetism and electro-magnetism have one thing on common: All have fundamentally the same inherent positive and negative properties of the opposite law of the universe that is never lost nor destroyed in keeping with the law of conservation, though symmetries change, from temperature of BB to present temperature.
Tides on earth are caused by tidal forces, such tidal forces are caused by attraction gravitational pull of the Moon.
Jsaldea12
8.21.09
Tides on earth are caused by tidal forces, such tidal forces are caused by attraction gravitational pull of the Moon.
Jsaldea12
8.21.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 20 2009, 08:52 PM)
There is nothing I can do, Would rather respect your scientific mind as is? But we have to move on. Gravity, magnetism and electro-magnetism have one thing on common: All have fundamentally the same inherent positive and negative properties of the opposite law of the universe that is never lost nor destroyed in keeping with the law of conservation, though symmetries change, from temperature of BB to present temperature.
Nope. There is no such thing as negative gravity.
Nope. There is no such thing as negative gravity.
Just like magnetism and electro-magnetism, gravity has both same inseparable positive and negative built-in intersecting property of the opposite law of the unverse.
jsaldea12
8.21.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 20 2009, 09:16 PM)
Just like magnetism and electro-magnetism, gravity has both same inseparable positive and negative built-in intersecting property of the opposite law of the unverse.
Completely incorrect.
Completely incorrect.
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 20 2009, 09:16 PM)
Just like magnetism and electro-magnetism, gravity has both same inseparable positive and negative built-in intersecting property of the opposite law of the unverse.
jsaldea12
8.21.09
You have made this statement many times, and each time it has been pointed out by numerous people that it is completely false.
You are wrong. There is no negative gravity. There is no 'law of opposites'. Can it be said in a more unambiguous manner?
jsaldea12
8.21.09
You have made this statement many times, and each time it has been pointed out by numerous people that it is completely false.
You are wrong. There is no negative gravity. There is no 'law of opposites'. Can it be said in a more unambiguous manner?
AlexG, male and female are opposite sex, positive and negative, north and south pole, etc., and these opposites are used acceptably and unquestionably by ALL SCIENTISTS.. this UNIVERSAL EXISTENCE OF OPPOSITE, call it a law of the universe or not a law, makes no difference, the important thing is IT EXISTS AND GOVERNS UNIVERSALLY THE UNIVERSE.
Gravity is not all negative, gravity has BOTH positive and negative. There is no such thing as monopole, all positive or all negative.
Jsaldea12
8.21.09
Gravity is not all negative, gravity has BOTH positive and negative. There is no such thing as monopole, all positive or all negative.
Jsaldea12
8.21.09
You're wrong. Very wrong.
It's as simple as that, and there's no point in arguing with you, because you appear too stupid to know you're wrong. You have no knowledge of physics, or of how the physical universe works.
You're not worth the bandwidth it takes to reply to you.
It's as simple as that, and there's no point in arguing with you, because you appear too stupid to know you're wrong. You have no knowledge of physics, or of how the physical universe works.
You're not worth the bandwidth it takes to reply to you.
AlexG, you have a God-given wonderful mind: use it, not waste it on others minds. What did Jesus Christ said: "What I can do, you can do and more than this you can do (because you are still here) because I go to the Father and the Father is greater than me.," He will give you knowledge and wisdom when you use your own mind.. Regarda.
jsaldea12
8.21.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 21 2009, 05:32 AM)
AlexG, you have a God-given wonderful mind: use it, not waste it on others minds. What did Jesus Christ said: "What I can do, you can do and more than this you can do (because you are still here) because I go to the Father and the Father is greater than me.," He will give you knowledge and wisdom when you use your own mind.. Regarda.
So you get your scientific insights from your religious opinions? No wonder they don't make any sense.
So you get your scientific insights from your religious opinions? No wonder they don't make any sense.
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 21 2009, 05:24 AM)
AlexG, male and female are opposite sex, Jsaldea12
8.21.09
That is not true for scientists.
In reality it's not that simple.
True scientists follow reality.
In the Bible it is that simple.
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/08/ca...-or-female.html
Not the part where it says
Earlier I read an article that said some people are XXY some XYY and some XO, but couldn't find the article again.
Don't be so sure of what you think you know.
8.21.09
That is not true for scientists.
In reality it's not that simple.
True scientists follow reality.
In the Bible it is that simple.
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/08/ca...-or-female.html
Not the part where it says
QUOTE
even genetic testing cannot confirm male or female
Earlier I read an article that said some people are XXY some XYY and some XO, but couldn't find the article again.
Don't be so sure of what you think you know.
Permit me to bring it out: … there is no opposite law in physics? that opposite law that states “like repulse, unlike attract” that governs the universe, just like the law on conservation. Then let me propose, make it a law in physics. This opposite law governs not only the macro universe but also in micro solar system of atoms. This opposite law governs even human beings.
Jsaldea12
8.23.09
Jsaldea12
8.23.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 22 2009, 09:34 AM)
Permit me to bring it out: … there is no opposite law in physics? that opposite law that states “like repulse, unlike attract” that governs the universe, just like the law on conservation. Then let me propose, make it a law in physics. This opposite law governs not only the macro universe but also in micro solar system of atoms. This opposite law governs even human beings.
Hmmm, this is easy.... NO.
Hmmm, this is easy.... NO.
Do you believe there is such a thing as unlike attracts, like repulse. This is physics. Also, positive and negative, north pole-south pole, also for every action there is a corresponding reaction. If there is such a law on conservation, there is also, not a theory, not only a principle, but a law of opposite. Regards.
Jsaldea12
8.23.09
Jsaldea12
8.23.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 23 2009, 10:21 AM)
Do you believe there is such a thing as unlike attracts, like repulse. This is physics. Also, positive and negative, north pole-south pole, also for every action there is a corresponding reaction. If there is such a law on conservation, there is also, not a theory, not only a principle, but a law of opposite.
Gross oversimplification. Action/Reaction is not an example of Positive/Negative.
Electromagnetism is the only source of positive/negative that you are aware of.
One force. Not every force.
Gross oversimplification. Action/Reaction is not an example of Positive/Negative.
Electromagnetism is the only source of positive/negative that you are aware of.
One force. Not every force.
Nucleus and electrons of atoms, as well as strong and weak nuclear force are all governed by the law of opposite: unlike attract, like repulse; positive and negative.
But my question is this: Do you agree that these nucleus/quarks and electrons, as well as strong and weak nuclear force are all inside every atom, unified and inseparable as one, that they are never lost nor destroyed, in keeping with the law on conservation since the time of BB?
Regards.
Jsaldea12
8.24.09
But my question is this: Do you agree that these nucleus/quarks and electrons, as well as strong and weak nuclear force are all inside every atom, unified and inseparable as one, that they are never lost nor destroyed, in keeping with the law on conservation since the time of BB?
Regards.
Jsaldea12
8.24.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 23 2009, 02:21 PM)
Do you believe there is such a thing as unlike attracts, like repulse. Jsaldea12
8.23.09
The can of sardines I bought wasn't attracted to the bananas I aslo bought.
If you can get more unalike than that I don't know how.
8.23.09
The can of sardines I bought wasn't attracted to the bananas I aslo bought.
If you can get more unalike than that I don't know how.
maybe if you put sardines and bannanas on a sandwich, it will taste good. In doing so you now have an attractive 'taste'. (using anologies here) and maybe thats what the OP means. 
I don’t think even a Pope marooned in an isolated island for a year with very appetizing beautiful virgin can resist the temptation of the situation. Such is the power of unlike-attract…the strongest force in the universe. Regards.
Jsaldea12.
8.25.09
Jsaldea12.
8.25.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 24 2009, 05:07 PM)
I don’t think even a Pope marooned in an isolated island for a year with very appetizing beautiful virgin can resist the temptation of the situation. Such is the power of unlike-attract…the strongest force in the universe. Regards.
Jsaldea12.
8.25.09
idiot.
Nothing more need be said.
Jsaldea12.
8.25.09
idiot.
Nothing more need be said.
Joke only.
But do you agree that strong nuclear force is nothing but simple gravity if it were not compressed/compacted inside the nucleus of atom?
jsaldea 12
9.5.09
QUOTE
But do you agree that strong nuclear force is nothing but simple gravity if it were not compressed/compacted inside the nucleus of atom?
No.
Please permit me to ask if you agree or not, and state your reasons;
(1)That undeniable electro-magnetism is generated by hi-speed electrons and spinning nucleus inside the solar system of atoms implicates there is gravitational field in that 99.99999999999999% spacious atom, just as spacious as the macro solar system of our sun.. that gravitational field means it is the making of gravity.
(2) That it is universal that gravity, magnetism, and electro-magnetism exist altogether in the universe. No planet, star, nor galaxy is without these three. As it is in macro, so in micro: there exist altogether the universal three: gravity, magnetism, and electro-magnetism inside the micro system of atom.
(3) That strong gravitational force of black hole is NOTHING more than ordinary gravity before it becomes a black hole. that strong gravitational force is universal concentrated/compressed gravity into that collapsed constricted black hole but is the SAME ordinary gravity as before. In like manner, the strong nuclear force inside the atom is compressed concentrated gravity but is the same gravity if the nucleus were not compressed. Evidence that nucleus is compressed, super-tight gravitational nucleus: A nuclear bomb is billion times greater than TNT. Where would such unproportionate force come from if not compressed.
(4) That because strong gravitational force of black hole is concentrated gravity, it becomes electro-magnetism, the reason that even electro-magnetic light cannot escape is because the strong electro-magnetic force sucks the weaker electro-magnetic light back to blackhole. That such electro-magnetism is UNIVERSAL as created by the blackhole is the same electro-magnetic field inside the micro solar system of atom. Evidence: it comes out as electricity.
(5) That proton does not decay, in like manner, blackhole does not decay also, in that it SUCKS..
(6) Finally, that strong gravitational field of blackhole and strong nuvclear force of nucleus of atom have universal same positive and negative as governed by the opposite law of the universe. otherwise if none possessed such positive and negative, there is no undeniable electro-magnetism, the undeniable product of positive and negative.
Regards.
Jsaldea12
9.6.09
(1)That undeniable electro-magnetism is generated by hi-speed electrons and spinning nucleus inside the solar system of atoms implicates there is gravitational field in that 99.99999999999999% spacious atom, just as spacious as the macro solar system of our sun.. that gravitational field means it is the making of gravity.
(2) That it is universal that gravity, magnetism, and electro-magnetism exist altogether in the universe. No planet, star, nor galaxy is without these three. As it is in macro, so in micro: there exist altogether the universal three: gravity, magnetism, and electro-magnetism inside the micro system of atom.
(3) That strong gravitational force of black hole is NOTHING more than ordinary gravity before it becomes a black hole. that strong gravitational force is universal concentrated/compressed gravity into that collapsed constricted black hole but is the SAME ordinary gravity as before. In like manner, the strong nuclear force inside the atom is compressed concentrated gravity but is the same gravity if the nucleus were not compressed. Evidence that nucleus is compressed, super-tight gravitational nucleus: A nuclear bomb is billion times greater than TNT. Where would such unproportionate force come from if not compressed.
(4) That because strong gravitational force of black hole is concentrated gravity, it becomes electro-magnetism, the reason that even electro-magnetic light cannot escape is because the strong electro-magnetic force sucks the weaker electro-magnetic light back to blackhole. That such electro-magnetism is UNIVERSAL as created by the blackhole is the same electro-magnetic field inside the micro solar system of atom. Evidence: it comes out as electricity.
(5) That proton does not decay, in like manner, blackhole does not decay also, in that it SUCKS..
(6) Finally, that strong gravitational field of blackhole and strong nuvclear force of nucleus of atom have universal same positive and negative as governed by the opposite law of the universe. otherwise if none possessed such positive and negative, there is no undeniable electro-magnetism, the undeniable product of positive and negative.
Regards.
Jsaldea12
9.6.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Sep 6 2009, 01:20 PM)
(3) That strong gravitational force of black hole is NOTHING more than ordinary gravity before it becomes a black hole. that strong gravitational force is universal concentrated/compressed gravity into that collapsed constricted black hole but is the SAME ordinary gravity as before. In like manner, the strong nuclear force inside the atom is compressed concentrated gravity but is the same gravity if the nucleus were not compressed. Evidence that nucleus is compressed, super-tight gravitational nucleus: A nuclear bomb is billion times greater than TNT. Where would such unproportionate force come from if not compressed.
Jsaldea12
9.6.09
The graivty in a block hole is the same. You simply have more.
TNT gets it's engery from chemical reactions.
Nuclear bombs are powered by E-MC^2.
I think you are another person in danger of trying to hit a baseball with a furry flying mammal. You dont' seem to understand specialized meanings of words.
Jsaldea12
9.6.09
The graivty in a block hole is the same. You simply have more.
TNT gets it's engery from chemical reactions.
Nuclear bombs are powered by E-MC^2.
I think you are another person in danger of trying to hit a baseball with a furry flying mammal. You dont' seem to understand specialized meanings of words.
Before and after a suspended body in space collapses into a blackhole. its content is the same or lesser after, its gravity remains the same or lesser after, just concentrated, thus it becomes extra-ordinarily strong, just like strings of rope when concentrated becomes strong but the same strings.
E=MC2 is release of energy from concentrated/compact mass of nucleus, implicating the nucleus is a billion times more compact than TNT.
jsaldea12
9.7.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Sep 7 2009, 10:08 AM)
E=MC2 is release of energy from concentrated/compact mass of nucleus, implicating the nucleus is a billion times more compact than TNT.
What? Do you even read this crap before you post it?
What? Do you even read this crap before you post it?
What is beyond imagination is that “a modern thermo nuclear bomb weighing little more than a thousand kilograms can produce an explosion comparable to the detonation of more than a billion kilograms of conventional high explosives”.
jsaldea12
9.8.09
jsaldea12
9.8.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Sep 7 2009, 10:08 PM)
What is beyond imagination is that “a modern thermo nuclear bomb weighing little more than a thousand kilograms can produce an explosion comparable to the detonation of more than a billion kilograms of conventional high explosives”.
jsaldea12
9.8.09
TNT is a chemical reaction.
Nuclear bombs get their engergy from the conversion of mass to energy.
jsaldea12
9.8.09
TNT is a chemical reaction.
Nuclear bombs get their engergy from the conversion of mass to energy.
Note: Comparable. TNT is release of energy in outer shell of atom, nuclear is release from inner shell, the nucleus. The nuclear release is unimagineably a billion times more destructive COMPARED to TNT release.
jsaldea12
9.8.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Sep 8 2009, 01:04 AM)
Note: Comparable. TNT is release of energy in outer shell of atom, nuclear is release from inner shell, the nucleus. The nuclear release is unimagineably a billion times more destructive COMPARED to TNT release.
jsaldea12
9.8.09
With TNT it's purely chemical.
With nuclear bombs the atoms get broken up and some mass is converted to engergy.
It's like comparing walking with flying a jet.
And the wieght of the nuke has no real bearing on the engergy, so why mention it?
jsaldea12
9.8.09
With TNT it's purely chemical.
With nuclear bombs the atoms get broken up and some mass is converted to engergy.
It's like comparing walking with flying a jet.
And the wieght of the nuke has no real bearing on the engergy, so why mention it?
Don't blame it on the strength of the nuclear energies. Blame it on the weakness of chemical energies. Your expectations are shaped in a realm which is no more natural than another, so your prejudices are parochial and inconsequential.
Only nuclear explosion breaks up the nucleus. You are right: TNT is like walking while nuclear explosion is like flying a jet. You are also right: the weight of the nuke has no real bearing on the engergy release. It is what is being released INISDE the nucleus. Then if nuclear explosion comes from micro, micro-nucleus, how can you account for the billion times COMPARABLE destruction of nuclear that can demolish a city......unless what is inside the nucleus is COMPACT, COMPRESSED. Do you agree or not, it is compact/compressed, please inform if not? just like black hole?
jsaldea12
8.9.09
QUOTE
how can you account for the billion times COMPARABLE destruction of nuclear that can demolish a city
Sigh... go read a book on nuclear power will you.
Seriously.... you have a computer. Read some actual information on the subject before you start posting your own theories based on ignorance.
Reiterating, please explain, account for the unimaginable release of nuclear bomb that can demolish a city, a billion times more powerful than ordinary TNT, if the TINY NUCLEUS IS NOT THAT TOO COMPRESSED/CONCENTRATED? Remember, the proton-sized Big Bang before it exploded.
Jsaldea12
9.13.09.
Is not Big Bang the greatest, the biggest, the mother black hole?
Regards.
jsaldea12
91309
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Sep 13 2009, 08:12 AM)
Is not Big Bang the greatest, the biggest, the mother black hole?
Regards.
jsaldea12
91309
Not at all, brainfucked ones ..... the 'bang' occurred with the singularity - not @ its swartzchild radius.
Regards.
jsaldea12
91309
Not at all, brainfucked ones ..... the 'bang' occurred with the singularity - not @ its swartzchild radius.
Big Bang was singularity, the first event, black hole was an aftermath, a replica, a reminder of that first event, everything was there in outer space.....thus the swarthzchild computation is applicable.
pacetime can be smooth, flat, and curved with measurable time. that's it.
jsaldea12
9.13.09
QUOTE (flyingbuttressman+Aug 21 2009, 02:05 AM)
Nope. There is no such thing as negative gravity.
can you prove there is no negative gravity or anit-gravity?
can you prove there is no negative gravity or anit-gravity?
QUOTE (flyingbuttressman+Aug 21 2009, 02:05 AM)
Nope. There is no such thing as negative gravity.
can you prove there is no negative gravity or anti-gravity?
can you prove there is no negative gravity or anti-gravity?
QUOTE (billyandtherockets+Sep 27 2009, 06:17 PM)
can you prove there is no negative gravity or anti-gravity?
Can you prove that there is no Easter Bunny?
You made it up. It's up to you to prove that it exists. That's called "burden of proof."
Can you prove that there is no Easter Bunny?
You made it up. It's up to you to prove that it exists. That's called "burden of proof."
The governing unwritten law of the universe states: Like repulse, UNLIKE ATTRACT. Gravity of Newton conforms with the statement: “Unlike attract”, positive binds negative. Without the attraction and binding of positive to negative, no planets, stars, galaxies would have been formed. Neither would there be human beings. Thus, from the beginning, such attraction gravity won over the “like repulse”.
When positive meets positive, negative meets negative, there is repulsion. this has the impression of anti-gravity. This is the real definition of anti-gravity.
Jsaldea12
102,09
When positive meets positive, negative meets negative, there is repulsion. this has the impression of anti-gravity. This is the real definition of anti-gravity.
Jsaldea12
102,09
QUOTE (flyingbuttressman+Sep 27 2009, 10:50 PM)
Can you prove that there is no Easter Bunny?
You made it up. It's up to you to prove that it exists. That's called "burden of proof."
[B]only if you will wait on the white house lawn on easter
You made it up. It's up to you to prove that it exists. That's called "burden of proof."
[B]only if you will wait on the white house lawn on easter
But I defined what is anti-gravity. It is contact positive to positive, negative to negative..the effect is repulsion. Such repulsive behavior, as governed by the unwritten law of opposite of the universe, is anti-gravity.
Gravity and magnetism are fundamentally one and the same. Both are governed by the unwritten opposite law of the universe which states, like repluse, unlike attract. Align positive to positve, negative to negative of two bar magnets, and the result is repulsion. But earth is circular, thus, the dividing, longest straight path is toward the center of earth.
jsaldea12
10.2.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Oct 2 2009, 02:27 PM)
But I defined what is anti-gravity. It is contact positive to positive, negative to negative..the effect is repulsion. Such repulsive behavior, as governed by the unwritten law of opposite of the universe, is anti-gravity.
Gravity and magnetism are fundamentally one and the same. Both are governed by the unwritten opposite law of the universe which states, like repluse, unlike attract. Align positive to positve, negative to negative of two bar magnets, and the result is repulsion. But earth is circular, thus, the dividing, longest straight path is toward the center of earth.
jsaldea12
10.2.09
Then I can go home now?
Gravity and magnetism are fundamentally one and the same. Both are governed by the unwritten opposite law of the universe which states, like repluse, unlike attract. Align positive to positve, negative to negative of two bar magnets, and the result is repulsion. But earth is circular, thus, the dividing, longest straight path is toward the center of earth.
jsaldea12
10.2.09
Then I can go home now?
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Oct 2 2009, 02:27 PM)
But I defined what is anti-gravity. It is contact positive to positive, negative to negative..the effect is repulsion. Such repulsive behavior, as governed by the unwritten law of opposite of the universe, is anti-gravity.
Gravity and magnetism are fundamentally one and the same. Both are governed by the unwritten opposite law of the universe which states, like repluse, unlike attract. Align positive to positve, negative to negative of two bar magnets, and the result is repulsion. But earth is circular, thus, the dividing, longest straight path is toward the center of earth.
jsaldea12
10.2.09
Clueless garbage, even to suggest the Earth is circular
...... when anyone with the slightest tinge of an education knows it to be an oblate spheroid.
Gravity and magnetism are fundamentally one and the same. Both are governed by the unwritten opposite law of the universe which states, like repluse, unlike attract. Align positive to positve, negative to negative of two bar magnets, and the result is repulsion. But earth is circular, thus, the dividing, longest straight path is toward the center of earth.
jsaldea12
10.2.09
Clueless garbage, even to suggest the Earth is circular
...... when anyone with the slightest tinge of an education knows it to be an oblate spheroid.
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Oct 2 2009, 10:27 AM)
But I defined what is anti-gravity. It is contact positive to positive, negative to negative..the effect is repulsion. Such repulsive behavior, as governed by the unwritten law of opposite of the universe, is anti-gravity.
There is no law of opposites. There is one fundamental force that makes use of opposites, and that's electromagnetism.
There is no law of opposites. There is one fundamental force that makes use of opposites, and that's electromagnetism.
Electro magnetism is anti gravity yo.
Kindly answer the following:
1. Do you believe that there is such thing as “attraction”, as the definition of gravity by Newton?.
2. That the only attraction is in keeping with the UNWRITTEN law of the universe which states: Unlike attract, then what is the opposite (see 3)
3.The only opposite is unlike repulse, the anti-gravity to attraction gravity of Newton...
Kindly answer each and explain why if you dis-agree.
By the way, What is your concept of anti-gravity?
Jsaldea12
10.3.09
1. Do you believe that there is such thing as “attraction”, as the definition of gravity by Newton?.
2. That the only attraction is in keeping with the UNWRITTEN law of the universe which states: Unlike attract, then what is the opposite (see 3)
3.The only opposite is unlike repulse, the anti-gravity to attraction gravity of Newton...
Kindly answer each and explain why if you dis-agree.
By the way, What is your concept of anti-gravity?
Jsaldea12
10.3.09
1. Possibly. Depends on what you mean by attraction.
2. Yes unlikes attract like bad women and good men.
3. Idk gravity is different bro. Not every thing is gona apply to a simple rule all the time.
Why I dont agree...
Gravity is simply gravity. What it does is makes things heavy. When some object is heavy it tends to fall the heavyer it is the faster it falls... at least here on earth. Can an object be lighter then nothing at all? Perhaps a new type of matter would be needed for this to happen. I dont think this type of matter exists because imo any thing that displaces nothingness will have mass and be heavy.
I will give you one thing tho. Nothingness aka the void would be anti gravity if anything was. If you can find a way to use nothingness you will have found a way to use anti gravity imo. Think about it. A ball filled with air will rise under water... A ball filled with hot air will rise under air <--less hot air. A ball filled with empty space would rise where? All hot air is is less air right?
[Moderator: Suspended 30 days for lying and for claiming he himself does not belong on this forum. If I hadn't wasted all the time cleaning up after magpies, I almost certainly would have perma-banned jsaldea12 by this time.]
2. Yes unlikes attract like bad women and good men.
3. Idk gravity is different bro. Not every thing is gona apply to a simple rule all the time.
Why I dont agree...
Gravity is simply gravity. What it does is makes things heavy. When some object is heavy it tends to fall the heavyer it is the faster it falls... at least here on earth. Can an object be lighter then nothing at all? Perhaps a new type of matter would be needed for this to happen. I dont think this type of matter exists because imo any thing that displaces nothingness will have mass and be heavy.
I will give you one thing tho. Nothingness aka the void would be anti gravity if anything was. If you can find a way to use nothingness you will have found a way to use anti gravity imo. Think about it. A ball filled with air will rise under water... A ball filled with hot air will rise under air <--less hot air. A ball filled with empty space would rise where? All hot air is is less air right?
[Moderator: Suspended 30 days for lying and for claiming he himself does not belong on this forum. If I hadn't wasted all the time cleaning up after magpies, I almost certainly would have perma-banned jsaldea12 by this time.]
I have to say once more, is the gravitation towards talk on grand unification, have to do with an impending big crunch, via instinct, or is this the telling of a cool down period, due to gravity push by dark matter?
Gravity is not all negative, gravity has BOTH positive and negative. There is no such thing as monopole, all positive or all negative.
[QUOTE]
true
gravity is the opposite to centripetal force
if you accelerate in a car at i G you feel your 'weight' on the back of your seat.
thus when you are lying on your back you are accelerated by gravity upwards
when you jump off a cliff gravity has no effect ( you are weightless for a few seconds)
when you are in a centrifuge you can experience 1 G outward from the center
you are in effect being accelerated inward towards the centre of rotation
so when you speed around the earth at 17000 mph your inward acceleration equals your outward acceleration from gravity and you are weightless
so gravity has an equal and opposite to it
[QUOTE]
true
gravity is the opposite to centripetal force
if you accelerate in a car at i G you feel your 'weight' on the back of your seat.
thus when you are lying on your back you are accelerated by gravity upwards
when you jump off a cliff gravity has no effect ( you are weightless for a few seconds)
when you are in a centrifuge you can experience 1 G outward from the center
you are in effect being accelerated inward towards the centre of rotation
so when you speed around the earth at 17000 mph your inward acceleration equals your outward acceleration from gravity and you are weightless
so gravity has an equal and opposite to it
Yes, gravitation is vital in the grand unification theory, would encompass expansion and theory of big crunch of the universe, though another topics of their own.
That is right: gravity has both equal positive and negative, no monopole.
Your several illustrations of gravity pertaining to acceleration of car, jump off a cliff, lying on back ,..all unmask your mass. Lying on your back and jumping off cliff are due to gravity pulling downward, but acceleration on car that presses your back is not due to gravity, though the effect is similar to attraction gravity.. that acceleration unmasks your mass.
Jsaldea12
10.7.09
That is right: gravity has both equal positive and negative, no monopole.
Your several illustrations of gravity pertaining to acceleration of car, jump off a cliff, lying on back ,..all unmask your mass. Lying on your back and jumping off cliff are due to gravity pulling downward, but acceleration on car that presses your back is not due to gravity, though the effect is similar to attraction gravity.. that acceleration unmasks your mass.
Jsaldea12
10.7.09
QUOTE
gravity pulling downward
what i was trying to illustrate here is the gravity is accelerating your mass outwards
and centripetal force accelerates you inward the opposite to gravity.
i wish scientists would think laterally, not that gravity attracts when in reality it is accelerating a mass away from the earths mass to give it 'weight'
Actually, it is the electrostatic and fermi repulsion of "solid" matter you rest upon which diverts your trajectory away from its natural free-fall.
Falling out of an airplane is natural and simple. Parachutes and the stop at the end of the ride are messy and in the case of parachutes, artificial.
Falling out of an airplane is natural and simple. Parachutes and the stop at the end of the ride are messy and in the case of parachutes, artificial.
QUOTE
solid" matter you rest upon which diverts your trajectory away from its natural free-fall.
exactly the earth is accelerating your mass at 32feet per sec per sec
so that is why you have a weight
Mass, gravity and weight are indispensable to one another. Whenever there is weight, there is gravity, and there cannot be gravity without mass. Gravity unmasks mass, that 32 ft/ sec. PRESS downward on surface of earth unmasks mass, call it weight, proportionate to mass, itself, of earth.
Jsaldea12
10.10.09
Jsaldea12
10.10.09
Profound.
Please, sir, tell us more?
Please, sir, tell us more?
QUOTE (piersdad+Oct 9 2009, 06:47 PM)
exactly the earth is accelerating your mass at 32feet per sec per sec
so that is why you have a weight
I thought acceleration was change in velocity.
How is gravity changing my velocity?
so that is why you have a weight
I thought acceleration was change in velocity.
How is gravity changing my velocity?
QUOTE
How is gravity changing my velocity?
you are getting there
gravity seems to be giving your mass an acceleration with out change in velocity
the same in a centrifuge
no change in velocity but constant acceleration (towards center of rotation)
when you find out that you will have the clues to the unified theory
when you jump off a cliff you accelerate at 32f/s toward the center of the earths mass
and in accelerating the opposite to the acceleration of gravity you have then no weight but still mass.
I was referring to a person stationary weight on earth, as pressed by gravity downward, is his mass/weight. Accelerating downward toward earth, from great height, changing velocity would change weight (here is the clue, just like in outer space, could even be weightless) but not mass, as we all know. But upon rest, stationary, on surface of earth, (but gravity never stop pressing), your true mass/weight, proportionate to mass of earth, is revealed. Gravity is inherent and proportionate to mass in the universe.. And weight, too, is universal, proportionate to gravity at rest, but never stop pressing.
Jsaldea12
10.10.09
Jsaldea12
10.10.09
QUOTE (piersdad+Oct 10 2009, 02:18 AM)
the same in a centrifuge
no change in velocity but constant acceleration (towards center of rotation)
But there is a change in velocity in a centrifuge.
If it's a horizontal centrifuge not at a pole, then at one point in it's revolution the sample is moving north, a half cycle later it's heading south.
And since velocity is speed and direction that means if it's changing direction then it's changing velocity.
So the centrifuge is constantly changing velocity when it's working.
QUOTE
But there is a change in velocity in a centrifuge.
correct
the centrifuge i agree is constantly trying to go off in a tangent and accelerating you towards the center of rotation thus your mass has weight
this weight is experienced as an outward weight.
so as you stand on the ground is your mass attracted to the center of the earth or is gravity accelerating ( like the centrifuge) outwards
this is the concept i am trying to get across, or understand, is gravity an attraction or an acceleration
The centrifuge is constantly changing velocity, I am not.
No change in velocity = no acceleration.
Centrifuge = change in velocity = acceleration
therefor gravity is not like centrifuge.
Or maybe you don't understand a centrifuge goes in a circle. i.e. constantly changing direction. Therefore changing velocity which includes direction as well as speed.
20 MPH is a speed.
20 MPH north is a velocity.
20 MPH north becoming 20 MPH NNW is acceleration.
No change in velocity = no acceleration.
Centrifuge = change in velocity = acceleration
therefor gravity is not like centrifuge.
Or maybe you don't understand a centrifuge goes in a circle. i.e. constantly changing direction. Therefore changing velocity which includes direction as well as speed.
20 MPH is a speed.
20 MPH north is a velocity.
20 MPH north becoming 20 MPH NNW is acceleration.
we are going in circles 
what i am perhaps interested in ( i am a lateral thinking inventor) is
yes we feel weight from gravity
we feel weight from when we are spun in a centrifuge
so to have weight experienced by our mass (when standing on earths surface)
we have to have our mass constantly accelerated.
this occurs in a centrifuge
so the question perhaps i ask
our mass has to be accelerated to experience weight (true?)
how come gravity gives us weight with out acceleration
so I surmise that gravity is an outward acceleration
what i am perhaps interested in ( i am a lateral thinking inventor) is
yes we feel weight from gravity
we feel weight from when we are spun in a centrifuge
so to have weight experienced by our mass (when standing on earths surface)
we have to have our mass constantly accelerated.
this occurs in a centrifuge
so the question perhaps i ask
our mass has to be accelerated to experience weight (true?)
how come gravity gives us weight with out acceleration
so I surmise that gravity is an outward acceleration
QUOTE (piersdad+Oct 11 2009, 04:36 AM)
so I surmise that gravity is an outward acceleration
And I surmise that because we are not experiencing a change in velocity we are at best experience faux acceleration which is to say fake acceleration with is to say not experiencing acceleration at all.
ok we will compromise it remains a false acceleration
which in essence is true.
QUOTE
we are not experiencing a change in velocity
yes and no only at the poles do we not have any velocity change as you would experience when in the center of a childs roundabout
so next thing for science is what causes this false acceleration.
according to Einstein it is a warp in time space continuum as demonstrated by the bending of light rays from massive gravity fields.
so just a thought is this false acceleration an attempt of space/ time to correct a massive body's displacement of time
QUOTE (piersdad+Oct 11 2009, 06:20 PM)
yes and no only at the poles do we not have any velocity change as you would experience when in the center of a childs roundabout
But it works in the opposite direction of gravity.
That's why the States launch as far south as they can.
theory's today are not the theory's of tomorrow
Kindly let me clarify: the gravity that I have been referring all along is the attraction gravity of Newton which is inherent in all suspended bodies, such as earth, and which PULLS, without rest, everything at surface of earth toward the interior center of earth, itself. There is also the equivalence gravity of Dr. Einstein, such simulated gravity in centerfuge. Both gravities exist.
The other article posted, "why is gravity all attraction toward earth?" may offer more details.
jsaldea12
10.15.09
QUOTE (jsaldea12+Aug 4 2009, 10:39 PM)
GRAND UNIFIED THEORY
(Most Clarified)
Abstract - For almost a hundred years, the search for the unification of the four fundamental forces of the universe,, re- gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, have not been fruitful.. The treatise below appears strongly, finally, to have unified the four forces into one.
Two common threads run through and link all matter in the universe. One is the immutable opposite law of the universe, which states “like repulse, unlike attract”, such as positive-negative, north pole -south pole, proton-electron, quark up-down, male-female, right-wrong, matter-anti-matter, electron- positron, name it, and always, there are two opposite sides. All matters, from largest to smallest, are wired to the opposite law, re- galaxies, stars, planets, atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks. That shows just how all intrinsic is the opposite law that runs through in all atoms, and thereby, in all the make-ups of structures in the universe. It is the opposite law, re-unlike-attract property, that made up the attraction formation, re-the positive to negative attraction, alignment and binding of primordial gases, dust into eventual formations of all stated suspended bodies in outer space.. (This “attraction” formations may explain why there is dire lack of anti-matter in the universe in the present, because from the beginning, the unlike-attract property prevailed over the like-repulse property OTHERWISE NO GALAXIES, STARS, PLANETS WOULD HAVE SOLIDIFIED.). By dissecting atom, the basic building block, the natures and behaviors of all matter are unveiled.
Atom is found to be 99.999999999999% empty space! If atom were the size of 30 basketballs rolled into one, proportionately, the size of nucleus would be like a grain of sand inside, and if the nucleus were the size of 30 basketballs rolled into one, the size of a quark would be like a grain of sand. That is how spacious is the atom, such concept of atom is patterned after the solar system, atom appears even spacious. (what would happen to the established law of science if a more fundamental particle or no longer finer particle but pure energy is detected by a super-super accelerator, vibrating inside the hollow quarks?).Atom has nucleus, consisting of protons-neutrons and electrons, and said nucleus is further dissected to consist of smaller fundamental particles, called quarks. Atom consists of positive proton/s- neutral neutron/s and negative electron/s. Neutron, bedfellow of proton, decays to proton or to electron, called positron. Electron, on the other hand, mutates to positron or to neutron. Even protons steal electron to make up lack of neutron in nucleus. What do all these changing partners mean, these switching decays/mutations? But what is more revealing is that there are dwellers huddled inside the hollow nucleus, re-the smaller fundamental particles, called quarks, as unearthed by particle accelerators.. Quarks have three families, re- up-down, top-bottom, and charm-strange, the family features are actually positive (up, top, charm) and negative (down, bottom, strange), the positive and negative properties of the governing opposite law. In short, even in the very fundamental quarks, there is positive-negative property, not just positive-neutral nucleus as conceived before. The natures and behaviors of the opposite law are revealed in a magnet: cut and cut a bar magnet to slimmer and slimmer sizes and always, in each cut, there is positive and negative. Bring and align the cut bars back together and always the reconstructed bar magnet is divided into versatile two equal positive and negative. The opposite law is like one coin with intrinsically two sides, and with compulsion to divide into two equal opposite positive and negative sides. The changing partners, the switching mutations/decays of neutrons, electrons, as stated earlier, mean the positive and negative property of nucleus and electrons of atom, each, seek equilibrium and stability, just like water seeks its own level. The tilt or direction of motion determines whether it is positive or negative. Positive and negative can even be reversed, like earth.
The law on conservation states that nothing is lost nor destroyed, neither is the law of opposite. Why is there this opposite law that works tirelessly and never sleeps? Don’t ask this author, but when you see two lovers of opposite sex, impulsively kissing each other, then know, without knowing why.
A common thread, a common bond runs through and unifies the four fundamental forces of the universe, namely, gravity, electro-magnetism, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force. Here is a making of a universal law: all galaxies, stars, planets, have inherent gravitational, magnetic, and electrical properties. and the same properties are inherent in the nucleus and electrons of micro-solar system of atom. Is there gravity in the atom? Here are the rationale. Atom, as stated, is 99.999999999999% space, that shows how spacious is atom, just as spacious as the solar system. It is undeniable electro-magnetism exist inside the shell of atom, implicating there also exist gravitational field in the wide space separating the nucleus and electrons. Thus, the existence of gravitational field, coming from gravity, shows that gravity, including magnetism, exists, is inherent in nucleus and electrons of atoms (just as gravity is inherent in macro- re galaxies, stars, planets). The super-speed orbit of electrons and spin of nucleus generates the unquestionable electro-magnetism.(In like manner, as electro-magnetism is generated in micro-solar system of atom, so in macro-solar system, electro-magnetism is generated in the locked gravitational fields of both the sun and earth, which have inherent gravity-magnetic property, caused by stated motion). The raising of million of tons of salty sea water on earth, salt being good conductor of electricity) is evidenced of existence of electro-magnetism, at weak, weak gravity vibratory undetectable level). Here is further rationale of existence of gravity in atom: The “Strong nuclear force” that holds in nucleus of atom is actually gravity. Here is proof: In that micro solar system of atom, the nucleus and electrons have compact gravity/gravitational property, but the nucleus is much, much more compact. Compact nucleus of atom is uncannily similar to compact black hole in outer space whose “strong gravitational force” is so concentrated/compact to cause collapse of suspended object into black hole but such concentrated “strong gravitational force” is the same gravity before the object collapses/becomes a black hole. In like manner, in nucleus of micro-solar system of atom, “strong nuclear force” is concentrated/compact gravity in that micro-area of nucleus but it is the same gravity if it were not compacted. Evidence just how concentrated or compact is the nucleus of atom: a modern nuclear explosion is a billion times greater than TNT. Further. tt is noted that proton does not decay, black hole, also, does not decay, implicating that both are uncannily compacted/concentrated gravity, similarly. There is no question that electro-magnetism and electro-weak force are one and the same, particularly, in high temperature. Thus, the four fundamental forces of the universe exist in unity in all atoms, re- wherever there is “strong nuclear force” that mediates in nucleus of atom, it is concentrated gravity, and wherever there is gravity, there is magnetism, because both are fundamentally one, and wherever there is motion/rotation of gravity and magnetism, electro-magnetism, electro-weak force are generated, thus, all forces are indispensably unified as one in all atoms, the building blocks of all structures in the universe..
More revelations: the gravitational, magnetic, electrical properties, in macro and micro, have positive and negative properties of the opposite law, and all are akin to one another, and can even be convertible one to another. Gravity is the weakest, magnetism being the concentrated inert, semi-active form. and electricity being the active form. Through motion/rotation of magnetism, electro-magnetism is evoked. Electricity, for instance, is one with magnetism, live electricity has positive and negative wires to make bulb produce light, roll the live wire around a nail and magnetism is produced in the nail, with positive and negative. Magnetism is one with gravity. Here is a clue: A magnet bar has equal positive and negative, strength of gravity is at the thinnest, dividing middle of the magnet bar that is at trillion times weaker in strength than magnetic forces at both ends of bar magnet. As such, supra-supra-weak gravity is closest a monopole with super-imposed, intersecting positive and negative property, but unlike-attract property prevailed otherwise, no planets, stars, galaxies would have been formed. There is only one attraction, including gluon-attraction-binding, and that is the making of all-encompassing opposite law which states UNLIKE ATTRACT..
.
In a capsule, the fundamental particles inside the shell of atoms and the four fundamental forces, are all-together unified as one inside the atoms. It is stated that the stated fundamental particles and forces were unified as one at time of Big Bang, and were separated then after. They may have been divorced temporarily by temperatures and changing time, but all have never been separated permanently, all re-assert their existence, their formations, inside the atoms, in keeping with the law on conservation which states that energy and matter are never lost nor destroyed though forms change whether in low temperature like the present time conducive to life or in super-high temperature (trillion KeV) as in Big Bang which altered the symmetries of particles (example: ice to water to gaseous), and in like manner, the opposite law is neither lost nor destroyed. All such fundamental particles and fundamental forces are inside in each of all atoms, the building blocks, thus, all can be found, unified, in all structures in the universe.. Why do these fundamental particles and forces uncannily appear inside all atoms, as if pre-Set Up, pre-Arranged, pre-Designed, as if following and obeying an unmistakable, unfathomable LAW? Don’t ask me.
3th Revised Philippine Copyrights 2009
By: jose s. aldea
With Philippine Copyrights, Ist & 2nd revision 2009
8.5.09
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
we can see the empty space between the planets and galaxies. I yearn for the day when we can view atoms in a microscope.
(Most Clarified)
Abstract - For almost a hundred years, the search for the unification of the four fundamental forces of the universe,, re- gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, have not been fruitful.. The treatise below appears strongly, finally, to have unified the four forces into one.
Two common threads run through and link all matter in the universe. One is the immutable opposite law of the universe, which states “like repulse, unlike attract”, such as positive-negative, north pole -south pole, proton-electron, quark up-down, male-female, right-wrong, matter-anti-matter, electron- positron, name it, and always, there are two opposite sides. All matters, from largest to smallest, are wired to the opposite law, re- galaxies, stars, planets, atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks. That shows just how all intrinsic is the opposite law that runs through in all atoms, and thereby, in all the make-ups of structures in the universe. It is the opposite law, re-unlike-attract property, that made up the attraction formation, re-the positive to negative attraction, alignment and binding of primordial gases, dust into eventual formations of all stated suspended bodies in outer space.. (This “attraction” formations may explain why there is dire lack of anti-matter in the universe in the present, because from the beginning, the unlike-attract property prevailed over the like-repulse property OTHERWISE NO GALAXIES, STARS, PLANETS WOULD HAVE SOLIDIFIED.). By dissecting atom, the basic building block, the natures and behaviors of all matter are unveiled.
Atom is found to be 99.999999999999% empty space! If atom were the size of 30 basketballs rolled into one, proportionately, the size of nucleus would be like a grain of sand inside, and if the nucleus were the size of 30 basketballs rolled into one, the size of a quark would be like a grain of sand. That is how spacious is the atom, such concept of atom is patterned after the solar system, atom appears even spacious. (what would happen to the established law of science if a more fundamental particle or no longer finer particle but pure energy is detected by a super-super accelerator, vibrating inside the hollow quarks?).Atom has nucleus, consisting of protons-neutrons and electrons, and said nucleus is further dissected to consist of smaller fundamental particles, called quarks. Atom consists of positive proton/s- neutral neutron/s and negative electron/s. Neutron, bedfellow of proton, decays to proton or to electron, called positron. Electron, on the other hand, mutates to positron or to neutron. Even protons steal electron to make up lack of neutron in nucleus. What do all these changing partners mean, these switching decays/mutations? But what is more revealing is that there are dwellers huddled inside the hollow nucleus, re-the smaller fundamental particles, called quarks, as unearthed by particle accelerators.. Quarks have three families, re- up-down, top-bottom, and charm-strange, the family features are actually positive (up, top, charm) and negative (down, bottom, strange), the positive and negative properties of the governing opposite law. In short, even in the very fundamental quarks, there is positive-negative property, not just positive-neutral nucleus as conceived before. The natures and behaviors of the opposite law are revealed in a magnet: cut and cut a bar magnet to slimmer and slimmer sizes and always, in each cut, there is positive and negative. Bring and align the cut bars back together and always the reconstructed bar magnet is divided into versatile two equal positive and negative. The opposite law is like one coin with intrinsically two sides, and with compulsion to divide into two equal opposite positive and negative sides. The changing partners, the switching mutations/decays of neutrons, electrons, as stated earlier, mean the positive and negative property of nucleus and electrons of atom, each, seek equilibrium and stability, just like water seeks its own level. The tilt or direction of motion determines whether it is positive or negative. Positive and negative can even be reversed, like earth.
The law on conservation states that nothing is lost nor destroyed, neither is the law of opposite. Why is there this opposite law that works tirelessly and never sleeps? Don’t ask this author, but when you see two lovers of opposite sex, impulsively kissing each other, then know, without knowing why.
A common thread, a common bond runs through and unifies the four fundamental forces of the universe, namely, gravity, electro-magnetism, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force. Here is a making of a universal law: all galaxies, stars, planets, have inherent gravitational, magnetic, and electrical properties. and the same properties are inherent in the nucleus and electrons of micro-solar system of atom. Is there gravity in the atom? Here are the rationale. Atom, as stated, is 99.999999999999% space, that shows how spacious is atom, just as spacious as the solar system. It is undeniable electro-magnetism exist inside the shell of atom, implicating there also exist gravitational field in the wide space separating the nucleus and electrons. Thus, the existence of gravitational field, coming from gravity, shows that gravity, including magnetism, exists, is inherent in nucleus and electrons of atoms (just as gravity is inherent in macro- re galaxies, stars, planets). The super-speed orbit of electrons and spin of nucleus generates the unquestionable electro-magnetism.(In like manner, as electro-magnetism is generated in micro-solar system of atom, so in macro-solar system, electro-magnetism is generated in the locked gravitational fields of both the sun and earth, which have inherent gravity-magnetic property, caused by stated motion). The raising of million of tons of salty sea water on earth, salt being good conductor of electricity) is evidenced of existence of electro-magnetism, at weak, weak gravity vibratory undetectable level). Here is further rationale of existence of gravity in atom: The “Strong nuclear force” that holds in nucleus of atom is actually gravity. Here is proof: In that micro solar system of atom, the nucleus and electrons have compact gravity/gravitational property, but the nucleus is much, much more compact. Compact nucleus of atom is uncannily similar to compact black hole in outer space whose “strong gravitational force” is so concentrated/compact to cause collapse of suspended object into black hole but such concentrated “strong gravitational force” is the same gravity before the object collapses/becomes a black hole. In like manner, in nucleus of micro-solar system of atom, “strong nuclear force” is concentrated/compact gravity in that micro-area of nucleus but it is the same gravity if it were not compacted. Evidence just how concentrated or compact is the nucleus of atom: a modern nuclear explosion is a billion times greater than TNT. Further. tt is noted that proton does not decay, black hole, also, does not decay, implicating that both are uncannily compacted/concentrated gravity, similarly. There is no question that electro-magnetism and electro-weak force are one and the same, particularly, in high temperature. Thus, the four fundamental forces of the universe exist in unity in all atoms, re- wherever there is “strong nuclear force” that mediates in nucleus of atom, it is concentrated gravity, and wherever there is gravity, there is magnetism, because both are fundamentally one, and wherever there is motion/rotation of gravity and magnetism, electro-magnetism, electro-weak force are generated, thus, all forces are indispensably unified as one in all atoms, the building blocks of all structures in the universe..
More revelations: the gravitational, magnetic, electrical properties, in macro and micro, have positive and negative properties of the opposite law, and all are akin to one another, and can even be convertible one to another. Gravity is the weakest, magnetism being the concentrated inert, semi-active form. and electricity being the active form. Through motion/rotation of magnetism, electro-magnetism is evoked. Electricity, for instance, is one with magnetism, live electricity has positive and negative wires to make bulb produce light, roll the live wire around a nail and magnetism is produced in the nail, with positive and negative. Magnetism is one with gravity. Here is a clue: A magnet bar has equal positive and negative, strength of gravity is at the thinnest, dividing middle of the magnet bar that is at trillion times weaker in strength than magnetic forces at both ends of bar magnet. As such, supra-supra-weak gravity is closest a monopole with super-imposed, intersecting positive and negative property, but unlike-attract property prevailed otherwise, no planets, stars, galaxies would have been formed. There is only one attraction, including gluon-attraction-binding, and that is the making of all-encompassing opposite law which states UNLIKE ATTRACT..
.
In a capsule, the fundamental particles inside the shell of atoms and the four fundamental forces, are all-together unified as one inside the atoms. It is stated that the stated fundamental particles and forces were unified as one at time of Big Bang, and were separated then after. They may have been divorced temporarily by temperatures and changing time, but all have never been separated permanently, all re-assert their existence, their formations, inside the atoms, in keeping with the law on conservation which states that energy and matter are never lost nor destroyed though forms change whether in low temperature like the present time conducive to life or in super-high temperature (trillion KeV) as in Big Bang which altered the symmetries of particles (example: ice to water to gaseous), and in like manner, the opposite law is neither lost nor destroyed. All such fundamental particles and fundamental forces are inside in each of all atoms, the building blocks, thus, all can be found, unified, in all structures in the universe.. Why do these fundamental particles and forces uncannily appear inside all atoms, as if pre-Set Up, pre-Arranged, pre-Designed, as if following and obeying an unmistakable, unfathomable LAW? Don’t ask me.
3th Revised Philippine Copyrights 2009
By: jose s. aldea
With Philippine Copyrights, Ist & 2nd revision 2009
8.5.09
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
we can see the empty space between the planets and galaxies. I yearn for the day when we can view atoms in a microscope.
QUOTE (buttershug+Aug 20 2009, 09:03 PM)
What do you base that on?
How did you come to believe this?
More importantly how is it you don't know that tides are caused by tidal forces? Which of course is why they are called tides.
Tidal forces are difference in gravitational attraction caused by distance.
I was taught that when the earth rotated the oceans ran toward the least pull.
(due to the gravity of earth) (like chocolate melting down over ice cream.)
Thats what makes the tides I think....spring tides are different..a bigger bulge on the earths surface on one side and a lessor bulge on the other.
due to rotation of the earth and full or new moon
How did you come to believe this?
More importantly how is it you don't know that tides are caused by tidal forces? Which of course is why they are called tides.
Tidal forces are difference in gravitational attraction caused by distance.
I was taught that when the earth rotated the oceans ran toward the least pull.
(due to the gravity of earth) (like chocolate melting down over ice cream.)
Thats what makes the tides I think....spring tides are different..a bigger bulge on the earths surface on one side and a lessor bulge on the other.
due to rotation of the earth and full or new moon
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.