Are there any alternatives to remote sensing technology.
http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Front/tofc.html
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/press_office/media/media260.shtml
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3951134.html
http://www.ottawa.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/docs/e/TEO-TM-2003-233.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerline_communication
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_energy
QUOTE (w354652+Oct 15 2008, 02:15 PM)
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3951134.html
There is a picture developing here, and not in silver.
Robots are allowed to register and post just like real trolls, and if anyone at physforum.com gets a paycheck for administration and moderation of this cesspool, they should stand for fraud.
I know it doesn't do a damned bit of good, and Fairy will blow me another fetid kiss via PM or feedback, but this was once a decent place for physics and foolery both.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.