Soultechs
21st September 2007 - 03:25 AM
Radio-Astronomy: Galactic Waves: Stellar Intense X-Ray sources
With enough mass in an given area/region even light can’t escape? Perhaps the amount of mass in an given area determines the {Wavelength, Frequency} that an stellar object can retain/contain as well as the spectrum that it emits in an given region of the heavens.
Essentially like what some might think is a black flower appears very colorful to insects that can see stronger spectrums like Ultra Violet.
Spectrums: Ultra Violet, Micro Waves, X-Rays, Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, Galactic Waves, Mass, Partial Spectrum Invisible Mass, =>
What’s blacker than black? Something passing in the heavens between galaxies’s that obscures the view of galaxy’s butt has no spectrum meaning it’s invisible/indivisible to Radio-Telescopes? Can’t tune your radio-telescope to receive Galactic Waves yet?
The heavens might become very colorful when Digital Integrated Circuits & Transistors are designed to function at such intense high-frequencies as Galactic Waves. Then ultimately with infinite spectrum reception it might be said there’s no such thing as black but instead that at high enough energy states: spectrums are particles/mass.
Interstellar Propulsion Systems: Increasing the spectrums in front of an engine with gravitational field accelerators to higher energy levels that are emitted at the rear.
cream-pye'czar-hour
13th April 2008 - 01:13 AM
Someone has considerably trimmed Soultechs post. Here is a copy of Galactic Waves post:
Energy fields are additional dimensions of spectrum's with energy levels large enough to be thought of as having 3 dimensions like mass.
Week and Strong nucleic Energy Fields (Forces) (Binding Energy)
Electromagnetic Energy Fields (Like with `Rare Earth Magnets' interacting with Superconductors)
Gravitational Energy Fields/Dimensional Seas: (Gravity between Moons, Planets, Suns, Black Holes, Galaxies, Universes, Multi-verses amongst other things could be understood as our region in space that’s visible is an floating around of overlapping mass areas.
With respect to Atoms: We comfortably accept the wave/particle duality of light.
We comfortably understand that within a transformer electrons take on the wave energy aspect inducting into the secondary coil producing a current of electrons that we can pass through a resistive material(filament) thus converting the electrons into various spectrum's of light that the filament emits.
However we have a model in our minds suggesting that electrons spin around the nucleus of an atom.
I would say that’s a model that’s easily understood but I would speculate in all probability the electrons are perhaps in wave state where the electrons are really quantified fields of energy that wrap around the nucleus all at once like the field of force surrounding planets, moons, suns.
As like I suggested that electron shells are likely to be shelves of quantified energy: `Electrons in an non alternating wave state wrapped around the nucleus all at once' rather than particles orbiting like stellar objects in the heavens, I would speculate that the nucleus isn't a stack marbles stuck together either.
Particles like Protons, Neutrons, & Electrons etc pieces of quanta who's Mass, Size, Charge etc can exist individually in a vacuum for certain periods of time all determined by natural laws of physics that we're still trying to understand.
The masses of Elements and there Isotopes differ to the sum total mass of their protons and neutrons, that's what makes fission/fusion possible. The nucleus emits energy in quantifiable pieces Particles/EMF etc in the same way as electron shells/shelves emit quanta to retain a stable equilibrium when an imbalance occurred
There have been numerous particles observed/discovered capable of existing individually when experimenting with particle accelerators.
However most people think of an nucleus in terms of protons and neutrons arranged like marbles in the shape of a 3 spatial dimension sphere. That is an easy way to visualize/imagine the nucleus; however ProbabbleE the nucleus is an all entwined multidimensional entangled mass of energy that merely emits stable pieces of quanta like Protons/Electrons/Neutrons that we observe individually in experiments.
We do now understand that the gravitational field pertaining to a 3D object is just another dimensional aspect of that object that has always been there, It's an non alternating field thus doesn't ever (propagate away)/(dissipate)
Electrons when propagating through whatever medium do in an alternating wave pattern. When they are stationary in quantified shells/shelves around an nucleus they are in an non alternating state wrapped around the nucleus and thus don't propagate away/dissipate.
The electromagnetic field pertaining to an object is a spatial dimension that pertains to the (electron states)/ {stationary, moving} of that object. Whereas the `Gravitation’ of objects is a spatial dimension pertaining to the mass of the object: Most of what is the `positive nucleus in terrestrial mater' and is the `negative nucleus in anti-matter'.
The Universe is ProbabbleE an Multi-verse of partially overlapping Universes along all its edges perhaps to infinite proportions.
All 3D stellar objects/particles within an given Universe/Multi-verse have always been connected as one entity by the other dimensions above 3D pertaining to all mass. These two dimensions I'm referring to are an `Multiversal Sea' that has always been there. It doesn't propagate because it's simply another dimension of an object (Like the electromagnetic field of an magnet is always there and doesn't propagate away like light/radio-waves/microwaves which are alternating waves as is motion of whatever.)
The greater the Mass the greater the gravitation of the object. Gravitation of an abject directly relates to mass of the object and is just another dimension of the 3D object meaning it is part of the object. To ask what is the speed of an gravitational or electromagnetic field is like asking what is the speed of the 3rd dimension of a cube? It's always been there. It's a part of the object.
Gravitation is the more powerful of the two other spatial dimensions because whilst there isn't any real `specific area in the Universe' where there is no `aspect of it': from some object/particle. It's intensity can be greater/smaller in different regions of the `Universe/Multi-verse'
The intensity/density of that all encompassing Sea of Gravitation determines the `Inertial Mass' of objects in an given region of the Universe as well as the spectrum's of energy they are able to emit/contain: Essentially like what some might think is a black flower appears very colorful to insects that can see stronger spectrum's like Ultra Violet.
Spectrum's: Ultra Violet, Micro Waves, X-Rays, Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, Galactic Waves, Particles, Mass, Partial Spectrum Invisible Mass, =>
What’s blacker than black? Something passing in the heavens between galaxies’s that obscures the view of galaxy’s butt has no spectrum meaning it’s invisible/indivisible to Radio-Telescopes? Can’t tune your radio-telescope to receive Galactic Waves yet?
The heavens might become very colorful when Digital Integrated Circuits & Transistors are designed to function at such intense high-frequencies as Galactic Waves. Then ultimately with infinite spectrum reception it might be said there’s no such thing as black but instead that at high enough energy states: spectrum's are particles/mass.
The intensity/density of that all encompassing Sea of Gravitation determines determines the `Speed at which Time Travels' in that region compared/relative to other regions of differing intensities/densities. Furthermore its intensity determines the maximum speed of propagation of Spectrum's in that area/region within that dimension/sea.
Thermal motion is propagation that varies from place to place in space within the Multiverse like the passage of time place to place likewise with inertial-mass (energy)
The gravitational dimensional seas are energy fields that give material inertial mass too: `what we perceive as 3 Dimensional objects’. However remember that somewhere in the spectrum between Galaxy waves and Mass alternating/propagating spectrum's become subatomic particles that we would say are 3 Dimensional however they are multidimensional in themselves being composed of non-alternating/propagating fields that wrap around each other instead of the misconception of orbiting which would mean propagation.
Electrostatic charges/nuclear binding energies +/- as like within the PEN model: {Protons,Electrons,Neutrons} don’t propagate away because they are dimensions as well like 3D:{Height,Length,Width} that have always been there in the time the mass was there.
The interesting aspect is that the gravitational dimensional sea proportionately to its intensity/density gives spectrum's `that could be called particles/mass’ all their multi-dimensional qualities {time, inertial-mass, binding-intensity}
cream-pye'czar-hour
13th April 2008 - 03:21 AM
It's time everyone downloaded all their thousands of sequential essay posts from years and years because trimmers are mildly/effectively tuning out functional 5D potential positions within the present. Titanic tuning of trimmers merely sink whats working(Quarking) in terms of 5D potential positions.
N O M
13th April 2008 - 09:27 PM
QUOTE (cream-pye'czar-hour+Apr 13 2008, 01:13 PM)
Someone has considerably trimmed Soultechs post.
That would be because soultechs was a complete loon with no mental faculties. I suspect he was a sock-puppet of the arch-poof Chris Rivos, who used to troll this site trying to pick up young boys.
cream-pye'czar-hour
14th April 2008 - 01:45 AM
NOM you are the complete loon. Some may think I was a bad boy yesterday lol. That's nothing and the cause was completely spending a few hours reading your post histories. Your an insufferable mongrel that disrupts the classroom. If the forum was a school you wouldn't send your Kidd's here because they would be mugged in the classroom under the teachers nose. the so called MoFM crank busters are the `real cranks' because they don't produce anything just post ridicule into other peoples. Spending a day reading your post history is enough to send anyone around the bend in one night. Because there is no reasoning with bullies. So the best approach is to beat the absolute crap out of classroom muggers such as you NOM theDoc. Newcomers to the forum shouldn't bother posting worthwhile essays here with those two loons around, because the atmosphere is uncondusive to happily reading, learning and writing essays quietly minding your own business. The feedback they receive cyclically from the same goons will build up and when they read the post histories of the goons giving the negative feedback, they'll realize the goons actually don't write essays, they are serial classroom muggers that simply abuse other peoples threads. The jokes on you goon, I'm not going to post any long masterful essays for you. I'll post them In a respectable `classroom forum' free from classroom muggers rorting the system under the teachers nose.
TheDoc
14th April 2008 - 02:13 AM
QUOTE (cream-pye'czar-hour+)
NOM you are the complete loon.
You're a drunken, ignorant, rambling idiot,
Chris. It's sad you haven't realized that yet.
QUOTE
Some may think I was a bad boy yesterday lol.
No,
Chris. We know you were a bad boy yesterday.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Some may think I was a bad boy yesterday lol. |
No,
Chris. We know you were a bad boy yesterday.
the so called MoFM crank busters are the `real cranks'
Care to point out an instance of the FM posting pseudoscience,
Chris?
QUOTE
Because there is no reasoning with bullies.
You have yet to prove instances of our "bullying",
Chris.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Because there is no reasoning with bullies. |
You have yet to prove instances of our "bullying",
Chris.
Newcomers to the forum shouldn't bother posting worthwhile essays here with those two loons around
Wazzamatta,
Chris? Can't prove anything you've said, so you can only hurl insults?
QUOTE
they'll realize the goons actually don't write essays
It's time to get this through your head,
Chris: We don't have to have long, wordy essays to be intelligent.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| they'll realize the goons actually don't write essays |
It's time to get this through your head,
Chris: We don't have to have long, wordy essays to be intelligent.
The jokes on you goon
No, the joke is on you, Chris. You keep coming up with new sockpuppets, thinking you can sneak back in, but you can't. We'll always be able to find you, Chris Rivos, and you're a fool if you think we can't.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.