To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Gaiacomm and Terahertz Conference
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > General Sci-Tech Discussions > Other Sci-Tech Topics
Pages: 1, 2, 3

gaiacomm
See link for data about Terahertz conference and Gaiacomm International technololgy.

http://www.ttcus.com/ti/index.html
gaiacomm
Dear Learned Members:

I can understand your confusion and doubt as to the validly of claim of a wireless communications system using frequencies from the terahertz and hertz arena to allow for broadband communications and other uses. Its difficult to understand the dynamics of the technology. There are laws of Physics that are strained.

This forum is a place for all interested parties to exchange and debate technologies that we use each day and to project future technologies that we will also use someday.

As a Physicist it is one of my goals to discover, report, test, and find solutions to questions of Natures technology. We have discovered several of Natures technologies and have found solutions. Those solutions are in the 4G wireless system. The Motorola's and the like have for years struggled with the dynamics of current communications systems. The results are quite obvious. The conference in WDC will be lead by experts including myself that will share our results to those that wish to know. Pay close attention to this because it will answer most of your questions. I have been allowed to only publicly make certain claims of fact and hold other claims for other reasons. As to the demo of a 4G system, that will rest with a decision from either the Pentagon or some other agency. The commercialization of this technology will have to wait until our government and military have first capitalized off of the benefits that it offers. Until then you and others will have to wait. But I can assure you that you will not have to wait long. The Ionosphere is not the only electromagnetic layer that offers a good method of transmission. J.Clerk Maxwell and others have forecasted its existence and Physicists like Tesla and others have made it into reality. There was great debate years ago about the creditability of AC versus DC energy and there were scientists on both sides that felt they were right. AC won out but only after long debate...and now you cannot live without it. Your mobile device is ready for a new form of broadband energy and Gaiacomm will be that Broadband service provider.

Sincerely,
Dr. Judah Ben-Hur
CTO
Gaiacomm International
www.gaiacomminternational.com
Skeptic
Let me get this straight. From five minutes of looking at your website, and doing some internet searches:

A) Your "company" hasn't updated its webpages in two years.
B) Your chief scientist is named for a fictional character
C) ...and once tried to partner with Saddam Hussein
D) ...and likes to write cranky rants on the internet about overthrowing the government.
E) You plan to use THz radiation as a new communications medium, despite the fact that THz doesn't propagate well through air.
F) Your corporate address appears to be collocated with somebody's private residence.
G) You have no working technology to show. Just ideas. Bad ones.
H) You like to talk about aether and Tesla (crank alert! crank alert!)
I) You also appear to be developing a scheme for broadband communications to submarines using ELF, oblivious to considerations of Shannon's law.
J) "Dr." Ben-Hur doesn't seem to have published anything. Ever. Nor can I figure out where he got his degree. (But I can guess...Did he reply to a "COLLEGE.DEGREES.CHEEP" spam?)
K) Based on your "Project Nemo" web document your understanding of electromagnetic propagation is roughly that of a college freshman. A really, really, dumb freshman.

Did I get that right? Do you really expect us to take your silly name, obviously phony company, and childish writing (you're not a native English speaker, are you?) seriously? Dude, move out of your parents' basement. Nobody's buying this nonsense. I should attend this THz expo just to watch people laugh at you behind your back. THz technology can be used for some pretty cool stuff--medical imaging, close-range detection, and the like. But it's nonpropagation through air/water seems to put a crimp in your evil plans for telecommunications domination.

Or am I really supposed to believe that a non-pedigreed, unpublished, "scientist" with a made-up name working out of a garage just managed to rewrite like three hundred years of basic physics?

And why on earth, if you're going to make up a name for yourself, would you choose such a dippy one?
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Mar 29 2006, 01:28 PM)
Let me get this straight. From five minutes of looking at your website, and doing some internet searches:

A) Your "company" hasn't updated its webpages in two years.
cool.gif Your chief scientist is named for a fictional character
C) ...and once tried to partner with Saddam Hussein
D) ...and likes to write cranky rants on the internet about overthrowing the government.
E) You plan to use THz radiation as a new communications medium, despite the fact that THz doesn't propagate well through air.
F) Your corporate address appears to be collocated with somebody's private residence.
G) You have no working technology to show. Just ideas. Bad ones.
H) You like to talk about aether and Tesla (crank alert! crank alert!)
I) You also appear to be developing a scheme for broadband communications to submarines using ELF, oblivious to considerations of Shannon's law.
J) "Dr." Ben-Hur doesn't seem to have published anything. Ever. Nor can I figure out where he got his degree. (But I can guess...Did he reply to a "COLLEGE.DEGREES.CHEEP" spam?)
K) Based on your "Project Nemo" web document your understanding of electromagnetic propagation is roughly that of a college freshman. A really, really, dumb freshman.

Did I get that right? Do you really expect us to take your silly name, obviously phony company, and childish writing (you're not a native English speaker, are you?) seriously? Dude, move out of your parents' basement. Nobody's buying this nonsense. I should attend this THz expo just to watch people laugh at you behind your back. THz technology can be used for some pretty cool stuff--medical imaging, close-range detection, and the like. But it's nonpropagation through air/water seems to put a crimp in your evil plans for telecommunications domination.

Or am I really supposed to believe that a non-pedigreed, unpublished, "scientist" with a made-up name working out of a garage just managed to rewrite like three hundred years of basic physics?

And why on earth, if you're going to make up a name for yourself, would you choose such a dippy one?

Dear Colleague:

I appreciate and respect your opinions. As you are aware there are numerous scientific claims that seem to be overly ambitious in nature, and granted there are some that are. I will not defend what I already know because it only will continue to get more complicated. As you stated this forum is not the place for new discoveries but for proven antiquated technology. The 4G handsets you speak of cannot operate without a system that provides the energy broadcasted. So yes, first the transmission system then the 4G handsets to receive and transmit data.

Some of us have more freedom than others to do what is necessary to inform and educate others like yourself. I have liberty to do what is right without the fear of consequences because I accept full responsibility and accountability for my actions and results. The conference in WDC is to inform those of what is available in the terahertz field.

Peer reviews are not necessary for technology developed. And the serious technical implications of what I have written about are not to be in the hands of the
consumer. Creditability is earned not given by the voices of others. If I need to run into a rabbit hole its not to escape. I do understand your points of view and can appreciate your concerns. My classification with confidential data is tailored specifically to my requirements and the ones that issue and monitor it. Your level of expertise is different than mine thus we operate and move in different circles.

As for my political opinions they are mixed with my scientific ethics. I have God given rights and I intend to use them without compromise. I am sure that you are a fine scientist and have a great deal to contribute to science, I only hope that you view this with an open mind and wait for the end results. Time will give you the answers you seek and the time is very short.

Sincerely,
Dr. Judah Ben-Hur
gaiacomm
I think that 300 years is long enough for the current laws. I think its time to update them...dont you?
Skeptic
I guess I overloaded you with questions. Here, I'll make it easy.

Where did you get your PhD?

Let's start with that. I'm not convinced that you're a real PhD. Legitimate PhDs can write complete sentences that make sense. Prove me wrong.

Oh, and the conference you're talking about is the kind that charges everybody $1500 to attend. That's called "mutual masturbation." It doesn't sound particularly legit.

Also I find it interesting that after making fun of you for not updating your webpage...lo and behold, you've added a new copyright date and an announcement of the conference. Amazing!
Skeptic
To see just how crackpotty these Gaicomm nutters are, I highly suggest a trip to their website (www.gaiacomminternational.com), where you can download a fascinating document called "20 Business Applications for Tera-Hertz Technology." It's hilarious. It's poorly written, filled with errors, inaccuracies, lies, and just plain wrong information. Oh, and it describes how they can use their communications scheme as a superdeedooper super weapon to remotely incinerate caves.

Honestly guys, if you're going to just make stuff up, why not claim you can use THz for time travel too? It wouldn't be any less believable.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Mar 30 2006, 09:12 PM)
I guess I overloaded you with questions. Here, I'll make it easy.

Where did you get your PhD?

Let's start with that. I'm not convinced that you're a real PhD. Legitimate PhDs can write complete sentences that make sense. Prove me wrong.

Oh, and the conference you're talking about is the kind that charges everybody $1500 to attend. That's called "mutual masturbation." It doesn't sound particularly legit.

Also I find it interesting that after making fun of you for not updating your webpage...lo and behold, you've added a new copyright date and an announcement of the conference. Amazing!

You really should read what you write! Does it make sense to you?
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Mar 30 2006, 09:29 PM)
To see just how crackpotty these Gaicomm nutters are, I highly suggest a trip to their website (www.gaiacomminternational.com), where you can download a fascinating document called "20 Business Applications for Tera-Hertz Technology." It's hilarious. It's poorly written, filled with errors, inaccuracies, lies, and just plain wrong information. Oh, and it describes how they can use their communications scheme as a superdeedooper super weapon to remotely incinerate caves.

Honestly guys, if you're going to just make stuff up, why not claim you can use THz for time travel too? It wouldn't be any less believable.

This is a forum for intellectual discussion, not for bashing without cause. Its quite obvious that you are intimidated by new information that you just don;t understand. You feel so lost not knowing that the world of physics is not just 101.
Skeptic
Look, honestly I'd love to have an intellectual discussion with you. But you can't convince me where you got your PhD. You write as if you have severe mental problems. Your communication skills are poor.

Normally, I wouldn't descend to personal attacks, but what you're doing makes me mad! You're trying, based on what I read on your webpages, to get the government to fund your crackpot schemes. That's wrong! People are dying in Iraq because there isn't enough money to properly armor their vehicles. You want the government to give you money to build your untested, unproved devices? You have no preliminary hardware--just designs. Your science is ludicrous. It's evil to ask the government to fund your nonsense when that money could be put to better use.

I can't respect you for that. You're doing the country a disservice.

And why are you so ashamed of your supposed PhD? Why won't you tell us where and when you got it?
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Mar 30 2006, 11:15 PM)
Look, honestly I'd love to have an intellectual discussion with you. But you can't convince me where you got your PhD. You write as if you have severe mental problems. Your communication skills are poor.

Normally, I wouldn't descend to personal attacks, but what you're doing makes me mad! You're trying, based on what I read on your webpages, to get the government to fund your crackpot schemes. That's wrong! People are dying in Iraq because there isn't enough money to properly armor their vehicles. You want the government to give you money to build your untested, unproved devices? You have no preliminary hardware--just designs. Your science is ludicrous. It's evil to ask the government to fund your nonsense when that money could be put to better use.

I can't respect you for that. You're doing the country a disservice.

And why are you so ashamed of your supposed PhD? Why won't you tell us where and when you got it?

It is quite obvious that you have a poor since of direction. As for degrees...that is irrelevant considering who is asking. What matters are facts. You must be related to the ones that misunderstood Galileo and others that attempted to shift the paradigm in science. I think it is better to start with a design then the hardware...

Why don;t you volunteer to go to Iraq and save the world or is better to throw stones from afar. I can;t help you answer your questions because i don;t care to play ping pong today. Just step out of the box just for a moment....

This is a forum for science discussion...even if it seems a bit odd and different.

Skeptic
As for degrees...that is irrelevant considering who is asking.

No it's not. You advertise your degree in your signature. So tell us, where did it come from? I call you out, sir. I assert that you don't really have a PhD. I say you are lying. Prove me wrong. If you don't want people picking on your degree, don't advertise it.

You must be related to the ones that misunderstood Galileo and others that attempted to shift the paradigm in science.

Galileo could explain his ideas. He didn't hide behind a cloak of trade secrecy. He could offer proof of his ideas. Again, I call you out. You are unable to explain your ideas. Also, Galileo could write in a convincing manner, user proper spelling and full sentences. People could understand what Galileo wrote.

I think it is better to start with a design then the hardware

All things begin with design. I agree with you there. For years--based on googling your name--you've been yammering about your design. But you've not built anything. Here, I'll give you an analogy:

I've invented a car that runs on nuclear fusion produced by old banana peels. What? You say you can't produce fusion from banana peels? Well, I can. See I'm applying some ideas that Tesla had, and I've found brand new physics principles that prove that banana peel fusion is possible. Oh, I can't tell you what they are--you might steal them. And it's true I haven't produced a working engine yet, but it's all designed on paper and ready to go. Just give me a bucket of money and I'll make one for you. Mind you, I can't explain the science to you, because it's too radical. No, I haven't published anything about this, but don't worry--my design is really good. Also I'm super smart. I have a degree and everything. I won't tell you where I got it, though.

In no way whatsoever is the preceding paragraph any different than anything you've said, Mr. Ben-Hur (if that is your real name). It is EXACTLY like what you claim. It's a trivially disproved statement, couched in terms of radical physics and trade secrecy with absolutely no proof.

Why don't you volunteer to go to Iraq and save the world or is better to throw stones from afar.

I don't care to waste my life on a war that's premised upon a lie. The best I can do is ensure the government spends its money wisely. Funding your company is not wise. It is a waste. In fact, if you were a publically traded company, I'd assume you were a pump-and-dump scam, and I'd sic the SEC on you.

This is a forum for science discussion

Fine. Explain your science. How are you going to make THz waves (all methods I know of produce less than ~10 W of power--most of them produce in the mW to nW range)? How can your scheme work, when everyone knows that THz radiation has extremely short propagation distances?

You don't get to violate the laws of physics like that. Show me any evidence at all that this can work.

Prove to me that you aren't another loon. Is that really too much to ask?

And if you won't cough up where you got your "degree," will you at least explain how you came by your name?
Skeptic
Gaiacomm's web page proudly trumpets the fact that it received the "Frost and Sullivan 2004 Wi-Max Technology Innovation of the Year" award at the "Excellence in Mobile Communications Awards Banquet." Let's see what this means....

Frost and Sullivan, according to their webpages, gave 15 awards banquets in 2005. At those banquets, they awarded over 250 awards, including things like: "Intelligent Heated Washer Fluid System Emerging Technology Award" and "Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Technologies Company of the Year".

I'm not sure what F&S's deal is, but they sound rather like the Special Olympics: everyone gets a prize just for entering.

This is not by any stretch of the imagination a prestigious award for Gaiacomm, and that fact that it's all they have to brag about is pretty sad.
gaiacomm
Dear Skeptic:

Now lets see here. First and last to find out about the name thing and degree thing may I suggest you contact the Doctor thru email or by phone. I am not Judah Ben-Hur but gaiacomm. I contact him and he gives me info to use, so why not contact him directly and ask him yourself. That would save this tic tack toe game that is played here. This again is a forum for discussion and intellectual debate. As for the science applied I believe someone has the right to change the rules. As for English grammar, well most scientists and other people don;t seem to care. In America we are quick to criticize others and point fingers at what we don;t understand. We are quick to judge others that are different and label those that don;t seem to follow the rules as criminals and crooks. Some Americans like yourself take so much for granted. Science was built on change and most of your leaps in science were accomplished by those that did not carry a prestigious school name behind them. There is genius everywhere just waiting for their chance to explain their ideas but afraid of people like you who are quick to place them in a box. We are all scientists with great ideas, all we need is for someone to help us nurture it without the fear of ignorance holding us back. We place too much creditability on credentials and not actual creativity and ideas. Memorizing and testing does not guarantee results, just look at technology now designed by our graduates...our planet is warming, etc all overseen by learned scientists who have the answers and who will challenge them? We have gas prices going higher, dropped calls on our phones, cheaters on their science discoveries (KOREA StemCells), learned degreed men and women who are our leaders and let Katrina get thru, we have space shuttles that blow up designed by PHD;s at NASA, we still run our cars on GASOLINE designed by PHD;s, our food chain and water supply is poisoned by our PHD;s, (DUPONT) we have faulty equipment in the battlefield designed by our PHD;s,(LOCKHEED) we have leaders making decisions on your life and liberty....by PHD;s (US STATE DEPT, FBI, NSA.) We have animals being tested on by PHD;s, we have disease not stopped by our PHD;s billions of dollars each year and no cures, and you worry about wasted dollars?, We have drug companies run by PHD;s that keep us medicated with no cures, we have PHD;s that do nothing but wait for a new medal. People are dying each day by the lack of technology to save them. And we depend on our learned PHD;s to save us? PhDs and ENRON?, PhDs and GM?, PhDs and the mines in West Virginia? PhDs still can;t fix the foam problem on the Shuttle? PhDs that run the WHITE HOUSE? PHD;s that cannot fix the dikes in New Orleans?

So it seems that some PHD;s have gotten us in trouble with the planet. But who are you to care or make a change? Every human being including yourself has ideas and wish that they could come to fruition but there our obstacles preventing that. People like you who are ignorant of your ignorance are dangerous. But the good news is that this is the internet and you are not a PEER REVIEWER with SCIENCE. You are just a Skeptic that wishes to be proved wrong or right so a hidden ego can be satisfied.
Skeptic
This again is a forum for discussion and intellectual debate.

Agreed. And if a moderator believes I've been off topic, they're more than welcome to delete this thread. But you, either in your "gaiacomm" personality or "Ben-Hur" personality started this. You are the one posting information (plugging your company actually) that led me to discover your outrageous claims.

As for the science applied I believe someone has the right to change the rules.

Agreed. But you get to change the rules only if you can prove some competency. Gaiacomm/Ben-Hur have nothing to show for themselves apart from crackpot ideas. No prototypes. Nothing that proves they can send THz waves round the world to communicate, vaporize, scan, or do anything else useful. Stephen Hawking, Ed Witten, Richard Feynman, Einstein--those guys can change the rules. They could clearly communicate their ideas in an open source forum and design experiments to prove the correctness of their revolutionary ideas. Tesla--an engineer--worked open source, too. He shot out patent after patent for things that actually worked. He showed people how his stuff worked and didn't hide behind a veil of trade secrecy. See the difference between you and them?

And the few concepts you toss out are amazingly vague. You don't say how you'll generate THz radiation, or what power level. It's just an idea--a bad one at that.

As for English grammar, well most scientists and other people don;t seem to care.

Incorrect. Legitimate institutions of higher learning teach proper writing skills as vital to the education of a scientist. Ideas must be clearly communicated amongst scientists. Your statement implies you don't know any real scientists, as you'd know they're often some of the pickiest people when it comes to grammar.

People like you who are ignorant of your ignorance are dangerous.

Coming from you, this is, hands down, the funniest thing I've read all day. Again, you are the dangerous ones, as you're attempting to get public funds for a crackpot scheme. I'm merely trying to get you to articulate what it is you claim to be able to do. The funny thing is, if you'd actually listened to me--explained Mr. Hur's credentials, explained your scheme in plain scientific language, described your proposed apparatus--you could have helped your case.

I'm not sure the rest of your rant is worth replying to. It's clear that none of you have real science degrees and are jealous of those that do.

I think the good news in all of this is that based on your writings, you're all so crackpotty that there's little hope of anyone accidentally taking you seriously and funding you. Oh, you can probably fool some rich, dumb V.C. into tossing you a buck or two, but for the most part the government is more discerning and ought to be able to detect your B.S. That being said, there's all that unfortunate business with the CIA and remote viewing, and a bunch of recent nonsense about federal funding of healing through prayer studies. The government doesn't have a perfect record in this arena. But given your childish writing style, inability to explain your hypotheses coherently, and lack of academic credentials--all of which have become clear though this conversation--I'm much less worried now about you getting hold of any of my tax dollars. You're all just too loony. You get people's interest when you talk about 4G, but when it comes down to brass tacks and you start talking nonsense, and it becomes clear you don't have anything to demonstrate, most people are going to be able to detect the foul stench of B.S.

Have fun playing "scientist," and going to your self-congratulatory awards ceremonies (Wi-Max award: hilarious!). As for myself, I'm done with this thread (so go on, you get to have the last word; you know you want it), though I'll be sure to check you guys out from time to time to make sure you haven't scammed any public funding.

You are just a Skeptic that wishes to be proved wrong or right so a hidden ego can be satisfied.

Um, no. Please note that I make no claims about myself. Unlike the good Doctor, I'm not trying to impress you with my credentials. I have no need to be proved right or wrong--I'm not the one making claims. It's up to you to prove your claims, and you don't seem to be able to do this. It's true that this is the internet, and not real peer review. And sadly, you can't even pass this simple step. You'd never hack a real peer review! I'm just a guy who doesn't want to see tax money wasted. A lot of the stuff in your rant pisses me off too, in fact! The rather poor design of the Space Shuttle, the levees, the folks running the government--they're all annoying. And they're all in the past. The levees are gone, the Space Shuttle's crashed, and the government is already fudged up. I'm trying to prevent future tragedy by pointing out that the GaiacHur emperor has no clothes. You gotta pick your battles, you know?

This thread seems to have gotten quite a few views. I'll ask these other readers to comment: Do GaiacHur's arguments convince you? Do they sound like anything other than net cranks? Would you invest in their business? Do you also find THz frequencies an odd choice for a communications system? Do their fanciful superweapon schemes make you more or less inclined to believe them? How likely is it that a bunch of uncredentialed bozos have rewritten modern physics? What's the deal with Frost & Sullivan? Should I be impressed with their silly award? Inquiring minds want to know!
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Mar 31 2006, 06:13 PM)
This again is a forum for discussion and intellectual debate.

Agreed. And if a moderator believes I've been off topic, they're more than welcome to delete this thread. But you, either in your "gaiacomm" personality or "Ben-Hur" personality started this. You are the one posting information (plugging your company actually) that led me to discover your outrageous claims.

As for the science applied I believe someone has the right to change the rules.

Agreed. But you get to change the rules only if you can prove some competency. Gaiacomm/Ben-Hur have nothing to show for themselves apart from crackpot ideas. No prototypes. Nothing that proves they can send THz waves round the world to communicate, vaporize, scan, or do anything else useful. Stephen Hawking, Ed Witten, Richard Feynman, Einstein--those guys can change the rules. They could clearly communicate their ideas in an open source forum and design experiments to prove the correctness of their revolutionary ideas. Tesla--an engineer--worked open source, too. He shot out patent after patent for things that actually worked. He showed people how his stuff worked and didn't hide behind a veil of trade secrecy. See the difference between you and them?

And the few concepts you toss out are amazingly vague. You don't say how you'll generate THz radiation, or what power level. It's just an idea--a bad one at that.

As for English grammar, well most scientists and other people don;t seem to care.

Incorrect. Legitimate institutions of higher learning teach proper writing skills as vital to the education of a scientist. Ideas must be clearly communicated amongst scientists. Your statement implies you don't know any real scientists, as you'd know they're often some of the pickiest people when it comes to grammar.

People like you who are ignorant of your ignorance are dangerous.

Coming from you, this is, hands down, the funniest thing I've read all day. Again, you are the dangerous ones, as you're attempting to get public funds for a crackpot scheme. I'm merely trying to get you to articulate what it is you claim to be able to do. The funny thing is, if you'd actually listened to me--explained Mr. Hur's credentials, explained your scheme in plain scientific language, described your proposed apparatus--you could have helped your case.

I'm not sure the rest of your rant is worth replying to. It's clear that none of you have real science degrees and are jealous of those that do.

I think the good news in all of this is that based on your writings, you're all so crackpotty that there's little hope of anyone accidentally taking you seriously and funding you. Oh, you can probably fool some rich, dumb V.C. into tossing you a buck or two, but for the most part the government is more discerning and ought to be able to detect your B.S. That being said, there's all that unfortunate business with the CIA and remote viewing, and a bunch of recent nonsense about federal funding of healing through prayer studies. The government doesn't have a perfect record in this arena. But given your childish writing style, inability to explain your hypotheses coherently, and lack of academic credentials--all of which have become clear though this conversation--I'm much less worried now about you getting hold of any of my tax dollars. You're all just too loony. You get people's interest when you talk about 4G, but when it comes down to brass tacks and you start talking nonsense, and it becomes clear you don't have anything to demonstrate, most people are going to be able to detect the foul stench of B.S.

Have fun playing "scientist," and going to your self-congratulatory awards ceremonies (Wi-Max award: hilarious!). As for myself, I'm done with this thread (so go on, you get to have the last word; you know you want it), though I'll be sure to check you guys out from time to time to make sure you haven't scammed any public funding.

You are just a Skeptic that wishes to be proved wrong or right so a hidden ego can be satisfied.

Um, no. Please note that I make no claims about myself. Unlike the good Doctor, I'm not trying to impress you with my credentials. I have no need to be proved right or wrong--I'm not the one making claims. It's up to you to prove your claims, and you don't seem to be able to do this. It's true that this is the internet, and not real peer review. And sadly, you can't even pass this simple step. You'd never hack a real peer review! I'm just a guy who doesn't want to see tax money wasted. A lot of the stuff in your rant pisses me off too, in fact! The rather poor design of the Space Shuttle, the levees, the folks running the government--they're all annoying. And they're all in the past. The levees are gone, the Space Shuttle's crashed, and the government is already fudged up. I'm trying to prevent future tragedy by pointing out that the GaiacHur emperor has no clothes. You gotta pick your battles, you know?

This thread seems to have gotten quite a few views. I'll ask these other readers to comment: Do GaiacHur's arguments convince you? Do they sound like anything other than net cranks? Would you invest in their business? Do you also find THz frequencies an odd choice for a communications system? Do their fanciful superweapon schemes make you more or less inclined to believe them? How likely is it that a bunch of uncredentialed bozos have rewritten modern physics? What's the deal with Frost & Sullivan? Should I be impressed with their silly award? Inquiring minds want to know!

Dear Skeptic:

Thank You!
gaiacomm
I forgot about this: http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:LdjWLH...us&ct=clnk&cd=1
gaiacomm
It seems that these scientists referenced Project Nemo and Ben-Hur in their published paper: http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:X9P5Xz...&ct=clnk&cd=125

Maybe Ben-Hur is smarter than we think....
Unregistered
From the article: "With sensing applications and short-range communications possible in the 10- to 100-m range, the technology and applications for THz waves are growing rapidly." and "The obvious disadvantages of communications at THz frequencies arise from the strong absorption through the atmosphere (Fig. 3) caused by water vapor"

Article discusses imaging uses and spectroscopy and points out that terahertz communications are good for only very short distances like maybe a LAN or in space where there is no air.

This isn't tech that will revolutionize the telecom industry. We'll never see THZ cell phones, which is what gaicomm seems to suggest. It also doesn't talk about THZ as a weapon.

I agree with the skeptic. What exactly are you selling or proposing? I cant tell from your website or postings. Skeptic's right, your hard to understand.
Unregistered
The second article references Nemo in regards to the cost of satellite antennas and says nothing about the science. I am not impressed.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Unregistered+Mar 31 2006, 07:12 PM)
From the article: "With sensing applications and short-range communications possible in the 10- to 100-m range, the technology and applications for THz waves are growing rapidly." and "The obvious disadvantages of communications at THz frequencies arise from the strong absorption through the atmosphere (Fig. 3) caused by water vapor"

Article discusses imaging uses and spectroscopy and points out that terahertz communications are good for only very short distances like maybe a LAN or in space where there is no air.

This isn't tech that will revolutionize the telecom industry. We'll never see THZ cell phones, which is what gaicomm seems to suggest. It also doesn't talk about THZ as a weapon.

I agree with the skeptic. What exactly are you selling or proposing? I cant tell from your website or postings. Skeptic's right, your hard to understand.

I can only say that we all must wait and see.

But I can;t imagine how these organizations at this conference would be associated with something that could not be possible. How many of you can stand with these experts? I don;t think that our US Government is that stupid...maybe gaiacomm is more than we think!

Washington, DC • May 15-16, 2006


26 Leading Experts from: AFOSR, ARL, AFRL/SNHC, ONR, NIST, NASA, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Motorola, Bell Labs/Lucent Technologies, SAIC, Jefferson National Laboratories, Microtech, Spire, TeraView, MIT, RPI, JHU/APL, Phiar, SafeView, Innosys and Gaiacomm examine:


Latest Government Needs & Initiatives in:
• Homeland Security Applications
• Defense Applications
• Explosives, Standoff Detection and Chem-Bio Detection



Emerging Commercial Applications in
• Communications Using Next Generation Circuits Operating at THz Frequencies
• Sensing & Imaging with THz Waves in Biomedicine



Major Breakthroughs in THz Technologies and
Subsystems
gaiacomm
Seems that history once again will repeat itself. Terhertz vs ?

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:pSIbhD...us&ct=clnk&cd=1
Unregistered
QUOTE (gaiacomm+Mar 31 2006, 07:17 PM)

QUOTE

But I can;t imagine how these organizations  at this conference would be associated with something that could not be possible. How many of you can stand with these experts?



The conference website says it costs $1495 to $1795 to come to the conference. Do they make you pay as a speaker? As long as they get people to pay that much to come they probably dont care who's speaking. None of the sponsors are government. NMIA,AIE,NAF are private groups. Also I figure that when they're inviting people they dont' tell them who else is coming. Not a good argument.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Unregistered+Mar 31 2006, 07:28 PM)
QUOTE (gaiacomm+Mar 31 2006, 07:17 PM)

QUOTE

But I can;t imagine how these organizations  at this conference would be associated with something that could not be possible. How many of you can stand with these experts?



The conference website says it costs $1495 to $1795 to come to the conference. Do they make you pay as a speaker? As long as they get people to pay that much to come they probably dont care who's speaking. None of the sponsors are government. NMIA,AIE,NAF are private groups. Also I figure that when they're inviting people they dont' tell them who else is coming. Not a good argument.

Everyone knows whats going on.....Don;t fool yourself! These Icon companies and institutuions will not make fools of themseleves.

I forgot this one:http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:w_yL1J9uuUAJ:www.barks.com/2003/03-10hist.html+the+battle+of+the+currents&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3
Citizen Arcane
Maybe I can bring some additional perspective to this discussion. I received a flyer in the mail about the THz Conference, and was surprised to see Gaiacomm listed. I Googled them to see what they were up to lately and found this site.

I actually a heard a pitch from them a while ago. Now because they "classified" their pitch as proprietary and confidential, I'll respect their wishes and not discuss its content. I will say that it wasn't any more enlightening than the previously mentioned "Project Nemo" documents.

Ben-Hur really does exist, and that really does appear to be his name. I've no idea what he's a doctor of, or where his degree came from. I didn't ask and he didn't say, and on some level, I think it's kind of snobby to ask that. He's sort of what you'd expect from his writing style: loud, brash, and arrogant. Oddly enough, he appears to be a native English speaker, despite what that bizarre writing style would lead you to believe. He couldn't explain his technology any better in person than he could via the few papers he's deigned to put on the web. In large measure this was due to a near paranoid fear that he'd give away some important trade secret. He'd speak only in very general terms, and rarely approached the specifics. I've spent nearly two decades working in "the scientific community," so I think I've got a pretty good handle on how scientists talk and handle themselves. Ben-Hur did not, in my opinion, come off sounding like a scientist. Like the discussion here, whenever one would object to his ideas as wrong or unphysical, rather than trying to explain them in clearer language, or even scientific language, he'd merely imply that his "theories" were too radical to be understood by a conventional scientist.

Like Skeptic pointed out, there was lots that was worrisome about the company beforehand. One of my colleagues googled their corporate address too and found it located in a residential neighborhood. Kind of funny to contrast that with the "7000 employees by the end of the decade" prediction in one of their press releases. Of course, isn't that how Apple started? (Apple actually produced real products, of course.) Nice catch on the Frost award, by the way. At the time I noted that the Frost press release wasn't consistent about the actual name of the award, and wondered how legitimate it was. I should have thought to look and see how many awards they give per month. I think I shall coin the term "award mill." Searching online for information about Gaiacomm, as near as I could reconstruct, the president (not Ben-Hur, but another guy) used to have some kind of high-paid job that might have had something to do with telecommunications. Sounds like he gave it up, because he wanted to try running his own company. I was envisioning someone with too much money on their hands who was a bit naive. I suspect he hooked up with Ben-Hur, whom I suppose some might consider to be a charismatic figure, insofar as loud brashness is charismatic, and Ben-Hur sold him on his THz ideas.

As Skeptic and Unregistered point out, THz is useful technology for medical imaging and detection over very close range. I imagine if you could come up with a cheap way of producing THz radiation in the 0.1-1 W range, you could even produce a pretty high bandwidth local (hundreds of feet) communications system. But that would be the kind of thing that would speed up my LAN; not radically alter my cell phone. The high absorption coefficient of air and water rule out THz as a scheme for cell transmission. The claims of submarine communication are particularly outrageous. The absorption of THz frequencies in water is HUGE. Like Skeptic said, that's why you use ELF to talk to subs. Light and radio waves don't penetrate the water so well, you know. And the project Nemo documentation does allude to scanning football field size areas and making some kind of weapon of mass destruction (is that a word?) weapons with the technology. Both ideas are simply rubbish.

The problem is, if you only quickly glance at Gaiacomm material, all you see is some stuff about 4G cell phone networks and a lot of reasonable sounding telecommunications buzzwords. You have to dig into their material before you stumble on all the really ludicrous stuff. In my case, that's what happened. Someone had heard about their technology, but just at the "new wireless paradigm" level, and invited them in to talk. They sent some read-ahead material, but because it was in the form of a paper with equations and things, and not a PowerPoint brief, nobody read it. Nobody, that is, until it got to me. I pointed out all the crazy stuff in their material, but my colleagues wanted to hear them out. We listed to their pitch, then metaphorically patted them on their heads and sent them on their way. Everyone was horrified by what they heard, and suffice it to say that "terahertz" is now the running office joke, the all-purpose punchline. I read some of their online (not the proprietary stuff!) writings to my wife, who isn't a scientist. She laughed her head off, then insisted I was making it up. She was horrified too to learn that it was for real. "I can't believe they're that naive!" She said. "How do they think they're going to sell their stuff writing that kind of junk?"

So my overall impression was that they're a well-meaning, but naive bunch. I don't think they're out to deliberately scam anyone. Ben-Hur really believes he's discovered some heretofore unknown physics, and has easily adopted the mantle of victimhood that makes it easy for him to identify with Galileo and Tesla as two persecuted but ultimately correct guys. When he meets an objection or a criticism, he filters it through his persecuted worldview (those mainstream scientist are just jealous and don't understand!) instead of considering how to respond rationally. You can see that in this discussion forum. He won't entertain the notion that he might be wrong. He doesn't attempt to explain his ideas in a scientific manner. He just quotes some irrelevant articles about the history of electric power distribution, and a couple of foreign journal articles that are only tangentially related to his claims. As anyone who is a scientist or engineer knows, that's not the way real science is done.

The moral? I shouldn't worry too much that Gaiacomm will be getting any big government contracts anytime soon. You can rest assured in your knowledge that your taxes will continue to pay for Alaskan bridges-to-nowhere, and $600 toilet seats for the military. Bridge builders and toilet seat manufacturers have at least realized that they need to show a real, live, physical object to get paid outrageous sums of money. Gaiacomm hasn't figured that one out yet, and based on their history of net postings, has for years just assumed that having vaguely articulated ideas on paper will be enough to get them a payout someday. Like I said, it's a naive outlook, and one that has no clue how government funding actually works.

I hope that they give up on their silly ideas about global telecommunications dominance, WMDs, and massive scanners, and refocus into building faster local wireless devices. Although that would still be technically quite difficult to do (remember kids, making THz radiation is HARD), at least it's not impossible, as underwater and long distance air communication would be at THz frequencies.

I think Skeptic is a bit harsh on Ben-Hur. Yes, haha he's got a funny name and won't say where he went to school. I've heard funnier names, and talked to way dumber people who actually admit where they got their degrees. Ben-Hur would certainly help his case by giving a short academic bio, slowing down and editing what he writes, and working on producing prototypes of his systems. Making fun of him, although it might make you feel good, isn't that productive. And it's reaching for the low-hanging fruit anyway, don't you think?

I'll ask him nicely. Doctor Ben-Hur: Over the past few years you seem to be repeating the same cycle again and again (based on my google searches and the hits I get in this forum, and Ariana, and ChemTrails, and AboveTopSecret, and lots of other weird sites). You make some improbable claims with no proof, and then a bunch of know-it-alls jump all over you for it. You throw up a few smokescreens, refuse to talk science, and then go away. You promise a demonstration of your technology or a major announcement in just a few months. But nothing ever materializes.

Nobody will take you seriously this way. You have to demonstrate something. You've just posted a couple of things about Edison and Tesla. Note what they did: they had great ideas, and they proved them by building things. They didn't ask the government to fund them; they just built simple prototypes that demonstrated their ideas, and worked their way up from there. If you think you've got something really new and amazing, stop asking for millions of dollars to build a full-fledged system. Make something small. Show us you can send THz radiation through water. Give us one really good demonstration, and THEN you'll excite people. And if you can't do that, then think about partnering with someone who CAN write and explain things. Put your ideas out there for people to consider. Go ahead and patent it first, if you're worried about it being stolen.

It's clear from reading comments directed at you on the internet that you're not well respected. Put together a brief bio of yourself. Tell us what you've done, where you went to school, what you've published, what you've invented. Should you have to do that? No, of course not. In a perfect world, everyone would be judged on the quality of their ideas, and not where they went to school. But it's not a perfect world. You've got a lot of critics, and they all seem to get turned off by hearing your title, but being given no idea where it came from. Defend yourself! Please?

As for the rest of Gaiacomm...good luck to you guys. I've got my doubts about your CTO, but I'm suspecting you're all pretty well off, and won't starve if this Gaiacomm thing doesn't get off the ground. You really should update the material on your website. It hasn't substantively changed since I looked at it last year. Your press releases are all banal things, and we've discussed the horror of the Project Nemo document. Write some professional looking stuff. Hire an editor and maybe an image consultant. I'm sorry, but you just don't seem credible. Your ideas keep getting knocked, and you're not able to defend them.

Sorry to ramble on so long. I've always been fascinated by junk science and its adherents, and am always disappointed when I watch people arguing about it on the net. You're an idiot! No, you are! No you suck! YOU SUCK! Bah. That's not the way to convince anyone. I've tried to write a reasoned response that can help allay the fears of skeptics like Skeptic that Gaiacomm is going to steal a fat contract from the government, and that can help Gaiacomm to better understand how they can be taken seriously. It's an experiment on my part, and I'm interested to see how it's received.

Oh, and as for that conference. Man, I go to a lot of conferences of various sorts. They're all either free, or charge like $50 to pay for the coffee, donuts, and room. Do people really pay $1500 to hear other people talk? I'm in the wrong business! I need to go into the conference business!
gaiacomm
Dear Citizen Arcane:

I would like to thank you for your honest assessment (opinion) of Gaiacomm's technology and myself. I also give you permission to expose who you are, the time we met, where we met, the discussions we had on the technology and the company and or organization you are affiliated with. The Non-Disclosure document you signed can now be superseded.

Since you met me in person maybe you could tell the readers about my physical appearance which is quite obvious and recognizable.


That bit of information would at least let the readers know who you really are. A non registered guest is not good enough to understand your creditability. Once you give us your real name and associated information then I will respond in kind.

Sincerely,
Dr. Judah Ben-Hur
CTO
Gaiacomm International
www.gaiacomminternational.com
Citizen Arcane
I shall decline Dr. Ben-Hur's kind offer to identify my employer. You did not, in fact, make me or my colleagues sign a NDA. Your presentation transmitted only a few particulars that I do not see in open source literature, and since it is my firm belief that at least one those particulars violates further laws of physics and practical engineering considerations (relating to the means of generation of the THz frequencies), no good could come of airing it in this forum. I believe that my employer suffered some embarassment at being connected with this affair, and would prefer not to have their name associated with it. Pehaps you find it hypocritical that I ask you to explain yourself while I do not disclose my own particulars. Perhaps you are correct. But I haven't claimed any credentials. I'm not selling anything. You're the one claiming credentials and a radical, possibly nonphysical, idea. The burden of proof, then, lies with you.

I have no stake in seeing Gaiacomm succeed or fail. I'm not on an ego trip, and am merely trying to add something constructive. You and the readers of this forum are more than welcome to attend my words or dismiss them. Actually, I'd love to have the sort of bandwidth on my cell phone that THz frequencies could provide. In that regard, I'd love to see your company produce something.

As to your personal appearance, I'm fairly bad with faces and terrible with descriptions. The best I can do is say you're in your late 40s, probably about 6" tall, dark hair and a somewhat swarthy, Mediterranean complexion. I think you may have had glasses, a mustache, a cheap suit, and an analog watch with a shiny silver band, and looked not unlike the "Soup Nazi" from Seinfeld. (Yes, dear readers, I'm not the sort of person who'd make a good robbery witness.)

Thank you for reading my assessment. Yes, they're mostly opinions (except for the FACT that THz goes through water like a feather through lead; it DOESN'T). They're also the opinions of colleagues who have also met you and read your literature, so I don't think I'm off base.

May I make another suggestion? Make good use of your time at the conference! I see a lot of legitimate sounding institutions on the list. JHU-APL, Motorola, Raytheon, and others. They'll send scientists and engineers, I hope. Get together with them. Float your ideas. I understand your reluctance to get into trade secret issues, but explain to them in general terms: "Hey guys, we've got a plan to communicate across the globe and under the water with THz frequencies. Got any advice?" They'll say, "Yer nuts! THz doesn't propagate that far," and then you explain why it does. These are people far more qualified than I to pass judgement on your ideas. Don't just give a lame marketing presentation about 4G, get into some specifics about your plan. Use them as a sounding board.

I challenge you, in fact. (This will be a really, really good exercise for you.) Go to the conference, talk to as many scientists and engineers as you can. Take notes. Listen to their criticisms or praise. Good scientists always criticise, because good ideas are obvious, but sometimes bad ones aren't. Then come back here and tell us what you learned. Tell us what they said to you. Be honest. You'll win tons of points telling us what they didn't like about your ideas; way more than you'll earn if you just say, "Bah! They laugh at my ideas! Fools!" All ideas need to be challenged. That's how they become good strong ideas. Please take full advantage of this opportunity. You'll get lots out of it, I guarantee.

I'll be awaiting your report here in May. Perhaps the myself and other readers can take a critical look at the criticisms leveled against you. I'm an equal opportunity critic. Bon conference!
gaiacomm
To Citizen Arcane:

I understand your position not to place yourself and your employer in public domain. As now you understand why I do what I do (maybe).
But to Identify yourself should not be a problem. Or in fact you could even email me directly or by phone ask me a question, this way only you and I would know. But that is too easy a task. Its better to play here and pretend, right?

Its difficult to be open and honest with people that you have no idea who they are or what they are capable of is it not?

The content of your response was expected. I appreciate your change in tone.

Your recommendations and constructive criticism's will be noted.

Time will expose the truth in fact.

Sincerely,
Dr. Judah Ben-Hur


PS: I don't like watches...
gaiacomm
One last insert:

http://www.thznetwork.org/wordpress/index.php/archives/222
Gaycomm
Press release: 1 April 2006

Hello, my name is Dr. Barabbas, CTO of Gaycomm. We are designing the new 5G cellular network, using our patented Gigas and Yottas (GAY) Hertz frequencies. Giga is 10^9 and Yotta is 10^24, so this means 10^33 Hertz. This high frequency means we can transmit a huge amount of information--what we call Jiggajillions of bits per second!

Our frequencies are so high, they actually go backwards in time. Our revolutionary system will allow you to receive messages before they're sent! Mainstream scientists may scoff at this and demand proof, but I've totally designed everything and I just know it will work. My psychic advisor channeled Nikola Tesla and he explained to me how to build it, and I looked in a physics book and copied some equations out of it and one of them even has an integral sign in it so you know it's real impressive. I've got diagrams and everything! And I've got a fancy Ph.D. It says so on that piece of paper up on my wall. No, not the one that says "Dr. Barabbas is the registered owner of a Seiko timepiece," the other one, the one from the University of Nigeria University College of Higher Learning.

Some day we're going to rule the airwaves and then you'll be sorry you laughed at us. We haven't built anything yet, but don't worry. We can have a prototype ready in a week if you just give us $50 million. This will allow our company to add on to the tool shed in my dad's backyard that's currently our headquarters. Then we'll buy all kinds of neat science stuff and machines that go ping and we'll make a device for you. It can't be that hard to build, I've got plans and everything!

So you just think about that before you laugh at me and persecute me like Galileo. Because if you do, I'll irradiate you with my GAYHz wave. I've got trained sharks with GAY beams that will hunt you down and spray GAYHz all over you and then you'll be sorry that you laughed at me and my crummy degree.

So remember our company's name: Gaycomm. Our motto is: "Our technology is totally gay." And if you don't buy my stuff I'll like sell it to Osama Bin Laden or something. That'll show you. YOU CALL ME MAD, BUT I AM THE SANEST MAN IN THE WORLD HAHAHAHAHAHAHA KNEEL BEFORE DR. BARABBAS!!!!one111!!!1!
Your fellow human (yfh)
OMG, lol.
Someone just made fun of gaiacomm really bad...
lol.
Your Fellow Romulan
And best of all, it seems to have scared Gaiacomm away! Watching that "discussion" reminded me of the adage about how arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics--even if you win you're still retarded. Ben-Hur's ideas might be ridiculous, but so is arguing with a net.crank. You're just wasting your typing, dudes. These guys always have an (incomprehensible) answer for everything.

Hey Judah (heh heh), please post a picture of yourself, K? We'd all like to see what you look like, and I can't afford to go to the conference. Is the "Soup Nazi" analogy right? "No terahertz for you!"

"Our technology is totally gay" is pretty funny BTW, though the judges also would have accepted "our technology is teh ghey" or "you've been terapwned!"

Oh, and has anybody ever watched "Ben-Hur" all the way through, or do you just watch the chariot race? Every easter I seem to see that scene on TV, but I never catch the movie at the beginning. You think Dr. B-H has one of those spike things on the wheels on his car? Schweet!!!!
Jizzudah Bizzen-Hizzur
Yo, yo, whatup mah homies? Dis is J to tha B to tha hypenated H, dawgs! I be droppin' tha phatest Tizzerhizzertz technology. Y'all best be down wif mah theories, dawgs, else I pop a cap in yo stank behinds.

I be spinnin' some dope rhymes at the THzizzle conference. Come on down and check out my phat beats. Stop by backstage and fire up a blunt with me after the show.

Peace out, dawgs. Stay off tha' pipe, an' don't forget to wipe.
Stupid Flanders
Judah, just admit you don't have a PhD and you don't have workable technology. Nobody believes you. Has anyone ever taken you seriously?
gaiacomm
It is quite obvious that the responses and comments generated thus far are generated from sophomoric minded individuals with too much time on their hands. If you are scientists or students of science you may wish to consider your priorities in life and decide if your comments are of those that hold a BS/MS/PHD or even a HS Diploma. If you are educated you may like to ask yourself why you do what you do. It does not bother me at all that you make fun of what scares you or what you don;t understand. And its quite obvious that you are not aware that having a degree does not guarantee that you have knowledge. There are allot of people on this planet that are smarter than you think. Look around you and you may be surprised of how misinformed you are of the world around you.

I take no offense to your ranting, it is your individual right and only demonstrates to the readers how you seem to be ignorant of your ignorance.
Stupid Flanders
QUOTE (gaiacomm+Apr 7 2006, 03:29 AM)
And its quite obvious that you are not aware that having a degree does not guarantee that you have knowledge.

But not having a degree usually guarantees that you don't have knowledge.

I say again, has anybody taken this seriously? I understand you got an award from a company that exists to hand out awards like peppermint candies to a preschool, and I understand that you're going to be speaking at a phony conference that pretty much exists only to make money. Have you ever given a pitch to a government agency? To a manufacturer? To a university?

All you have to do is own up to where/when you got your degree, and you'd shut up a whole bunch of people. I've googled you, and every forum you enter to advertise your stuff the same thing happens. People ask how you're a Dr. and you fail to reply. Kind of sounds like you don't really have a degree or are ashamed of it. You have yet after years and years to prove anyone wrong.

I'm glad you don't mind if people make fun of you, because I think that's what you have to look forward to for the rest of your life. Particularly given the fact that you're never going to actually build anything. And as far as the level of immaturity, I'd say your immaturity (it's not real mature to bluster about this cool new science that you won't describe, or give yourself some credentials) is being met with immaturity. We can't debate you rationally, so we might as well make fun of you.

But hey if adds to your persecution complex, then good for you.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Stupid Flanders+Apr 7 2006, 02:35 PM)
QUOTE (gaiacomm+Apr 7 2006, 03:29 AM)
And its quite obvious that you are not aware that having a degree does not guarantee that you have knowledge.

But not having a degree usually guarantees that you don't have knowledge.

I say again, has anybody taken this seriously? I understand you got an award from a company that exists to hand out awards like peppermint candies to a preschool, and I understand that you're going to be speaking at a phony conference that pretty much exists only to make money. Have you ever given a pitch to a government agency? To a manufacturer? To a university?

All you have to do is own up to where/when you got your degree, and you'd shut up a whole bunch of people. I've googled you, and every forum you enter to advertise your stuff the same thing happens. People ask how you're a Dr. and you fail to reply. Kind of sounds like you don't really have a degree or are ashamed of it. You have yet after years and years to prove anyone wrong.

I'm glad you don't mind if people make fun of you, because I think that's what you have to look forward to for the rest of your life. Particularly given the fact that you're never going to actually build anything. And as far as the level of immaturity, I'd say your immaturity (it's not real mature to bluster about this cool new science that you won't describe, or give yourself some credentials) is being met with immaturity. We can't debate you rationally, so we might as well make fun of you.

But hey if adds to your persecution complex, then good for you.



Only time will tell the truth...and I have plenty of time!

I know that is not the answer you wished for. But this is the internet.....
Choad McBlob
This site is boring. We need more Ben Hur.

Yo, Bennie, how's it hangin' bro? You got an explanation yet why your THz can travel through air and water, while everyone else's goes only like couple of centimeters??
Your fellow human (yfh)
QUOTE
Yo, Bennie, how's it hangin' bro? You got an explanation yet why your THz can travel through air and water, while everyone else's goes only like couple of centimeters??

Some kinda insanely high frequency? If it travels through the air, I'd suspect potential birds falling out of the sky in that area. Heheh.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Choad McBlob+Apr 17 2006, 12:35 AM)
This site is boring. We need more Ben Hur.

Yo, Bennie, how's it hangin' bro? You got an explanation yet why your THz can travel through air and water, while everyone else's goes only like couple of centimeters??

hz to carry the terhertz (Interlace)...and then pump up the volume!!!! (smile)
gaiacomm
I hear rumor that a demo will be demostrated at the conference as a surprise....
Monkey Boy
I heard a rumor that you were going to give a crappy talk with a bunch of PowerPoint slides consisting of images you'd stolen off the web, babble something incoherent about terahertz and your magical mixing method with low frequency waves, and then sit back with a self-satisfied grin, knowing that none of the other morons that paid two grand to be there are going to ask you any hard-hitting questions in you little mutual jerk-off session conference.

Doubleyou-tee-eff? What are you going to do, light up a Tesla coil? Turn off all the lights and stick a flashlight under your chin and make spooky noises? Whip out a cell phone and go, "Look at me, I'm totally talking on THz!!!" Face it, "Dr." Madeupname, you've got nothin'. Your company's got nothin'. You don't have a real degree, your company doesn't exist, you haven't produced or patented anything, you never will produce or patent everything, nobody takes you seriously, and the best you can show for all your work is a PHONY AWARD.

Can't you just imagine what a Gaiacomm company meeting looks like? I imagine Judah sitting in a garage, playing with a laser pointer and making spaceship noises. Then the company president and a couple other guys come into the garage, and they all sit down on cardboard boxes marked "XMAS DECORATNS" and start their meeting.

President: I hereby call our weekly business meeting to order.
Judah continues making laser noises.
President: Judah, knock that off.
Judah keeps making noises, pretending to fly the pointer like a spaceship.
President: Judah, what have I told you about that? Now quit it!
Judah: Is someone talking to me? I thought I heard something. Hmmm...maybe if they called me Doctor I'd hear better.
President: GODDAMMIT LARRY, QUIT MESSING AROUND.
Judah: I TOLD YOU TO QUIT CALLING ME LARRY!!!! YOU KNOW I CHANGED IT TO DR. BEN-HUR.
President: [grabbing away the pointer] Fine, whatever "Dr." Ben-Hur. Now, last time we were discussing what color our THz waves should be. I vote for purple.

And then the garage door opens up, and some soccer mom starts to drive an SUV in, stops, gets out and starts screaming: "FOR THE LAST TIME, GET OFF YOUR LAZY ASSES AND MOW THE LAWN! LARRY, WHAT DID I TELL YOU ABOUT INVITING YOUR GOOD FOR NOTHING FRIENDS OVER HERE? NOW MOVE THAT CRAP OUT OF MY WAY AND HELP ME UNLOAD THESE GROCERIES!!!!"

I'm sure it looks something like that. But good luck at your little conference. Have fun playing scientist with the big boys, and maybe if you're a good boy and don't interrupt too much you'll get another cool prize.
Captain Obvious
Anyone else get the feeling this conference is going to be like a high school science fair in a posh neighborhood where all the Indian and Asian kids whose dads are medical doctors do really spiffy genetics projects, and Judah is like the one poor white trash kid that shows up with a baking soda volcano?

Let's think about the attendee list again: NASA, Raytheon, Motorola, MIT, Mitretech, Gaiacomm....Will all those entities that will still exist next year and be pumping out product please take one step forward? Uh-uh, not so fast there Judah.

I bet all the "cool kids" from the legitimate companies take him out back of the convention hall, give him an atomic wedgie, and take his lunch money.

Or maybe this is like "Carrie." They've invited Judah, they'll let him get up on stage to talk, and he'll be all "you like me, you really like me," and then they'll dump a bucket of pig blood on his head. Of course, instead of laying psychoincinerative powers on them, he'll just cry and run off the stage. They'll feel bad for a moment, but then the convention staff will bring out a tray of fresh bagels and those little jelly jars and some pastries, and they'll forget all about it. Meanwhile, Judah will be in weeping in the bathroom until someone comes in to give him a swirly.
Thunder from Down Under
OMG, dudes, you are teh funny!

I live close to where the conference is--will try to sneak in and bring back a report about the good doctor and how his presentation goes over. maybe I can get his autograph.


Let me add myself to the chorus of people asking: WHERE DID YOU GET YOUR DEGREE?

Why is that so hard to answer? I don't know one person in the world that won't tell you where they went to school except you.

PLEEEEEAAAAAAAASSSSSEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
Skeptic
These responses are hilarious! This is starting to look like a fark.com forum. Monkey Boy and Capt. Obvious (I wonder if J. B-H. will demand you tell him where you got your rank) have probably hit the nail on the head.

It's impossible to take these guys seriously. PLEASE, if anyone makes it to this conference, give us a full report. I can't imagine Gaiacomm can do any better explaining their loopy ideas to a room of their "peers" than they can on the 'net. That talk is going to be comedy gold for sure.
Gaycomm
My Conference Diary

15 May

8:00 am -- Arrive at conference. I was so totally stoked. But when I went to pick up my nametag, I find it says "Judah Fart Hur," and lists my occupation as Chief Booger Picker. People around me were snickering. I try to get them to print a new one.

8:15 am -- I give up trying to change it, and alter the badge with the crayon I brought.

8:20 am -- Hit the snack table. I stock up on lemon pastries, shoving them into my bag. The Mexican busboy yells at me and tells me to stop it, and takes them away from me. I'll show him!

8:30 am -- I go to the bathroom. While in there the Motorola engineers grab me and give me a swirly. They think they're so cool, just because their technology actually works.

8:45 am -- Finish drying my hair under the handdryers.

9:00 am -- Awaiting the first presentation. Nobody will sit next to me.

9:15 am -- I ask the speaker how THz technology could be applied to whatever it was they were talking about. It takes five minutes for the laughter to die down.

9:30 am -- Next speaker. I hope I understand him better than the last guy.

9:45 am -- I interrupt to ask him how THz would improve his technology. Someone throws a half-eaten cream danish at me.

10:15 am -- I'm getting ready to ask another question, but am interrupted by the entire audience "harrumphing."

10:30 am -- The next speaker admonishes me before she begins and says I'm not to ask questions.

11:00 am -- What's a "blanket party"? I keep hearing people mumbling that word.

12:00 pm -- Lunchtime! Nobody will eat with me. I think they're afraid of my towering intellect.

1:00 pm -- That's strange. Lunch is over, and I was going to go into the auditorium, but nobody's in there! It's empty.

1:30 pm -- For some reason they moved to the auditorium next door. The speaker must not be that good, because everyone booed when I walked in.

2:30 pm -- I need another bathroom break.

5:00 pm -- Some people apparently think it's funny to glue someone to the toilet seat. I don't. It took the fire department hours to pry my butt off the seat. The firemen kept laughing while they were doing it. I think they thought my badge was funny. If they'd put "Dr. " on the badge like they were supposed to I bet these guys wouldn't laugh.

I hope tomorrow goes better.

======

GAYCOMM: Our technology is totally gay!
Unregistered
Oh snap!

Gaiacomm = pwned!!!!

laugh.gif tongue.gif biggrin.gif rolleyes.gif smile.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
Conference Attendee
The Giacomm website claims Dr. Judah Ben-Hur is the Keynote speaker at the 4th Thz conference in Washington DC May 15 and 16, 2006. The actual Keynote speaker Is Dr. X-C Zhang of Rensselaer Polytechnic.

Dr. Ben-Hur's paper was the second last of the day.

I'm sure this was an oversight on someones part.
Conference Nonattendee
Whoah! Slow down there. You mean Gaiacomm lied about something? Are you serious?

Dang, I wonder how bad the last speaker was, if Jewey Ben-Honkeytonk were the next-to-last. That dude must have actually been wearing a tinfoil hat and talking about Time Cube or something.

Seriously, how was the talk? Did people laugh? Did he demonstrate anything, or just bluster about how much better his retarded "science" is than existing, proven technology? Did they throw things? Did anyone stand up and do the Nelson Muntz "Ha-HA!" at him? Was his hair wet from the swirleys?
Conference attendee
With one notable exception, the papers at this conference were quite good. The poor guy following the esteemed doctor spoke on "Progress in Material Research for Thz Technology." We all felt sorry for him, having to follow the complete blather of Ben-Hur.

Dr. BH's talk was a bizarre compilation of antique photos, techno- mumbo jumbo, and repeated exclamations about how broad his knowledge base was. I left half way through to make some phone call, visit the men's room, and take up smoking. I knew he was a problem when he declared in his opening remarks that Gaiacomm was "an American company, in America, building stuff for Americans." He also had ITAR warnings pasted on many of his charts. As this is an open conference, and I assume some non us citizens were present, he either violated the law, or just put the warning on for looks.

Frankly, if any hostile power were to adapt this technology, it would set them back decades.

Dr. BH blew though most of his densely worded charts, I suspect because many of the people in the room had degrees in electro magnetics, optics, and solid state physics. One of his assistants came up to finish the talk, again blasting through unreadable charts and assuring us the Maxwell's work was incomplete, and thank Abe Lincoln they were here to save the day.

At the end one stunned guy asked how much of this had been demonstrated. "About 30%" was the opaque reply. A further question of "Had he actually communicated with a submarine?" was answered "Yes". This pretty much killed the discussion.

I've run into these wackos before, and they call up asking "Hey, would you like to see my Completely Improbable Machine? A Big Government Agency is interested." Sure, why not? Then they call Big Company B and say "Hey, Big Company B is interested in my CIM. Wanna see it?" Having done this a few times, they can legitimately say "Company A, B, and C are interested, as id Govt agenda D,E, and F" Yeah, we're INTERESTED, but we ain't convinced.

The THZ conference is a legit conference, and whether it's worth the admission is up to the attendees. The issue is it IS a legit conference, and this one loony got in, which build up his legitimacy while damaging that of the conference.

Does BAH have a legit degree? Probably not. Will he get funding? Possible, but not from my company. Does he have some insight into the universe that has eluded the rest of us for the past century or not? I doubt he can do much more than copy stuff out of textbooks, and not even do that very well. He's whining that his Senator (Bob Graham, FL) can;t MAKE the defense department use or even look at his exciting technology. Too bad, so sad. Ultimately, the self correcting nature of science will push this guy into the pink sheets, where he belongs.

Hope there aren't too many typos here, but I do belong to the Legitimate Scientists Club and my degree is U Southern Cal, 1982 MSEE - electro magnetics.

gaiacomm
Dear Learned Members and Guests:


As promised I will give you an honest assessment of the Terahertz Conference I attended May 15, 2006 and was a Guest Speaker as well.

The majority of speakers were all scientists and engineers with varied backgrounds and disciplines. The organizations represented and speakers were in attendance to give progress reports of active research and analysis of what they discovered while using terahertz radiation. Some discussed the generation techniques, while others discussed their immediate uses (terahertz) in detection, image and hardware that generate terahertz.

My discussion was about the use of Hertz and Terahertz waves (The Art of Global Wireless Communications) and their potential use as a carrier of intelligent information (Broadband Communications). I was the only speaker who spoke on wireless communications technology. All others had as in the past spoke of their 4 year progress from 4 previous conferences with some conclusions with emphasis that more research and funding was needed to get to the completion of their original concept. Each speaker had 30 minutes to give a comprehensive overview of his or her progress as did I.

There were speakers from our Government as well that gave their requirements and progress relative to terahertz research. In that two day conference there were including myself over half of the worlds scientists and engineers who are considered knowledgeable in their respective discipline with emphasis on terahertz radiation and its use in potential applications in various fields of science, government, military, and commercial. As for myself I did gain knowledge from listening to each speaker present their facts and findings some conceptual, some proof of concept and some with active product. The goal its seems is to perfect an imaging and sensing technology that can sniff out and identify objects. It also seems that there is active experimentation to develop hardware that can be used to detect and identify. There were some 80 people in attendance most were directly represented from various government and commercial organizations that wished to be briefed on what progress has been made since the last conference.

My presentation was received with mixed reviews as expected. The presentation was comprehensive and direct without fluff and non-verifiable claims. From the commercial side there was contention and disbelief from the claims I made. One representative from a very large defense contractor walked out saying "this is bullshit" but within 5 minutes returned to listen to the rest of my claims relative to their competitive interest. There were some that smiled in disbelief, some laughed, and others took serious notes. A measurable percentage however took me seriously and insisted that I contact them later and discuss collaboration. Those that seemed to be of serious interest were government, military, and 3 non-defense contractor representatives. There were 2 wireless research companies that were an attendance and also insisted that we exchange data. I accepted serious contact information from those that took me seriously. As for the rest, I am not sure of their final thoughts.

A question asked by a learned scientist was how did I interlace the hertz signal with the terahertz? My answer was that of proprietary nature. The only true way to solve that puzzle is to demonstrate that technique with an operational model, which in a very short time I will. The second question was how much hardware is built to demo transmission thru seawater, etc. My answer was 30 percent active hardware. The generation of terahertz waves is not a problem as demonstrated by others that explained how they were able to. My presentation was the collective representation of what others have worked on for some time. Wireless communications using terahertz was not contested, the technique was. In order to help others understand it will be to the interest of others for me to demo a working system in WDC at another conference specifically tailored around terahertz being used in global wireless communications.

I was encouraged by some to continue to move forward as I will to further help others understand this new paradigm shift in wireless technology. And yes I did mention the potential application of this technology to be developed into a weapon of mass destruction by the understanding of the principles of electrostriction, etc.
Submarine communications was also mentioned as was other subjects of potential.

In closing I wish to thank those that believe me and those that do not. It’s difficult but not impossible to change principles of science as long as you listen and learn along the way and not get distracted by those that do not understand.

Sincerely,

Dr. Judah Ben-Hur
Gaiacomm International
www.gaiacomminternational.com


Skeptic

Well, thanks for giving us an assessment of your time at the conference. That's a big plus for you. Did you ever talk directly, during downtime, with a real scientist or engineer and have them evaluate your ideas? (Again, for the record, real scientists are engineers are people who will tell you where they got their degree and have a record of publishing or a working device that can be independently verified. Often, they can be identified by the fact that they work for real companies that don't exist only on paper and receive made-up awards.)

QUOTE
The presentation was comprehensive and direct without fluff and non-verifiable claims.


And then you say...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
The presentation was comprehensive and direct without fluff and non-verifiable claims.


And then you say...

My answer was that of proprietary nature.


Claiming that your "science" is proprietary means it's nonverifiable. Also that it's not real science, which is done in the open. Maybe I can draw an analogy for you. David Copperfield is an illusionist. He does a pretty good card trick where he allows someone to free-select a card, which is then reshuffled. He sprays the cards at a window, and "magically" the selected card is stuck to the outside of the window. If you ask him how he does it, he won't tell you (it's reasonably easy to figure out for yourself, though), since it's a proprietary secret. That's cool. The guy has to make a living, and if everyone could go around doing it he'd starve. Now suppose instead that he was claiming he had a revolutionary new science that allows cards to pass through glass. You ask him how it works, but he says he won't tell you because it's proprietary. Wrong answer. That's not how science or technology works. That's how scams work. Remember Tesla. He published stuff open source, he demonstrated to other scientists, he built things that worked, and he patented. By my count, you're 0 for 3 on that score.

By the way, there is no such thing as "interlacing" THz and Hz. One could modulate a THz wave with a Hz frequency, but it'd be pointless. One could also transmit a Hz frequency and a THz frequency at the same time, but you'd use different methods to generate the two waves, and it'd still be pointless (Hz go far, THz go short).

QUOTE
The only true way to solve that puzzle is to demonstrate that technique with an operational model, which in a very short time I will.


A quick google search says you've been saying this for years. Nobody believes you.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
The only true way to solve that puzzle is to demonstrate that technique with an operational model, which in a very short time I will.


A quick google search says you've been saying this for years. Nobody believes you.

And yes I did mention the potential application of this technology to be developed into a weapon of mass destruction by the understanding of the principles of electrostriction, etc.
Submarine communications was also mentioned as was other subjects of potential.


And if nobody blew a raspberry at you, threw something, or outright laughed, the audience is as dumb as you are. Those are insane ravings.

QUOTE
It’s difficult but not impossible to change principles of science as long as you listen and learn along the way and not get distracted by those that do not understand.


No, it's very difficult to change fundamental principles of science and for good reason. You have to convince other scientists with solid logical arguments and demonstrate independently verifiable effects.

Running around pretending to be a scientist, throwing an unwarranted "Dr." in front of your name, and making stuff up does not make you intelligent. It makes you retarded.

Remind us again where you got your degree....Oh, that's right, you don't really have one.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+May 17 2006, 06:02 PM)
Well, thanks for giving us an assessment of your time at the conference. That's a big plus for you. Did you ever talk directly, during downtime, with a real scientist or engineer and have them evaluate your ideas? (Again, for the record, real scientists are engineers are people who will tell you where they got their degree and have a record of publishing or a working device that can be independently verified. Often, they can be identified by the fact that they work for real companies that don't exist only on paper and receive made-up awards.)

QUOTE
The presentation was comprehensive and direct without fluff and non-verifiable claims.


And then you say...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
The presentation was comprehensive and direct without fluff and non-verifiable claims.


And then you say...

My answer was that of proprietary nature.


Claiming that your "science" is proprietary means it's nonverifiable. Also that it's not real science, which is done in the open. Maybe I can draw an analogy for you. David Copperfield is an illusionist. He does a pretty good card trick where he allows someone to free-select a card, which is then reshuffled. He sprays the cards at a window, and "magically" the selected card is stuck to the outside of the window. If you ask him how he does it, he won't tell you (it's reasonably easy to figure out for yourself, though), since it's a proprietary secret. That's cool. The guy has to make a living, and if everyone could go around doing it he'd starve. Now suppose instead that he was claiming he had a revolutionary new science that allows cards to pass through glass. You ask him how it works, but he says he won't tell you because it's proprietary. Wrong answer. That's not how science or technology works. That's how scams work. Remember Tesla. He published stuff open source, he demonstrated to other scientists, he built things that worked, and he patented. By my count, you're 0 for 3 on that score.

By the way, there is no such thing as "interlacing" THz and Hz. One could modulate a THz wave with a Hz frequency, but it'd be pointless. One could also transmit a Hz frequency and a THz frequency at the same time, but you'd use different methods to generate the two waves, and it'd still be pointless (Hz go far, THz go short).

QUOTE
The only true way to solve that puzzle is to demonstrate that technique with an operational model, which in a very short time I will.


A quick google search says you've been saying this for years. Nobody believes you.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
The only true way to solve that puzzle is to demonstrate that technique with an operational model, which in a very short time I will.


A quick google search says you've been saying this for years. Nobody believes you.

And yes I did mention the potential application of this technology to be developed into a weapon of mass destruction by the understanding of the principles of electrostriction, etc.
Submarine communications was also mentioned as was other subjects of potential.


And if nobody blew a raspberry at you, threw something, or outright laughed, the audience is as dumb as you are. Those are insane ravings.

QUOTE
It’s difficult but not impossible to change principles of science as long as you listen and learn along the way and not get distracted by those that do not understand.


No, it's very difficult to change fundamental principles of science and for good reason. You have to convince other scientists with solid logical arguments and demonstrate independently verifiable effects.

Running around pretending to be a scientist, throwing an unwarranted "Dr." in front of your name, and making stuff up does not make you intelligent. It makes you retarded.

Remind us again where you got your degree....Oh, that's right, you don't really have one.

Thank you.
Beethoven Fan
While flipping through a book discarded by our library, I found this marvelous
quote:

"According to Leon Brillouin, there are three kinds of scientists: (a) those who
have a strictly conservative attitude, prejudiced against all change, and interested
only in new developments and applications of well-established methods and
principles; (b) those with a progressive attitude who are ready to welcome new
ideas and discoveries; and ( c ) those whose revolutionary or rather
metaphysical attitudes gives them a tendancy to take their desires for realities
and to interest themselves in theories which lack a solid experimental basis.
Obviously, we wish to include ourselves in the second category by showing why
the first attitude is not admissable in the field which interests us today."

--Didier Bertrand. chapter: "Chemical Constitution and Biological Activity"
book: "Wave Mechanics and Molecular Biology" edited by Louis de Broglie,
Addison-Wesley, 1966. [the book is about applying quantum mechanics
to problems of large bio-molecules]

Naturally, I include myself also in the second category. In science, there is
also a saying, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
I welcome new ideas and new discoveries, but I need to see proof. The
bigger the discovery, the more convincing must be the evidence. Most
scientists I know are in this camp.

Yes, I was at the "4th Annual Terahertz Systems Conference", although I'm
not sure I would go again. At least it only cost me my time. Someone from
our research group was a speaker, and he got two free passes. The economics
of these conferences is another thread entirely....

Yes, I heard the Gaiacomm talk. To be generous, Ben-Hur falls into category ( c )
from above, taking his desires for realities, and interesting himself in ideas
which are completely lacking in a solid experimental basis.

You can show with a few lines of trigonometry that modulating a 1 Hz carrier
wave with a 1 THz signal yields widely separated frequency components
which would clearly be subject to different attenuations. Yes, there are Schumann
resonances in the ionosphere, but they are narrow and dispersive. Likewise for
anything geomagnetic (which may be lossy at ~few Hz as well).

Ben-Hur was politely asked a question about this point, and his reply was,
"That's proprietary." Which means to me, "I have no proof."

He showed no pictures of anything Gaiacomm has built. He showed no eye
diagrams of any data Gaiacomm has transmitted. He showed nothing that
backs any of his implausible claims. Despite the fact that he claims to
have built "30%" of it.

I could go on. He invokes isotropic antennas, and magnetic monopoles...

Ben-Hur might be able to snow some Venture Capitalists with this bluff.
Clearly he snowed the non-specialist (probably non-technical) conference
organizer.

I don't care what his name is, or where his degree is from (if he has one).
I do care about bluster with no evidence. I do care that he has turned
the word "Terahertz" into a joke in some companies.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Beethoven Fan+May 19 2006, 11:51 PM)
While flipping through a book discarded by our library, I found this marvelous
quote:

"According to Leon Brillouin, there are three kinds of scientists: (a) those who
have a strictly conservative attitude, prejudiced against all change, and interested
only in new developments and applications of well-established methods and
principles; (cool.gif those with a progressive attitude who are ready to welcome new
ideas and discoveries; and ( c ) those whose revolutionary or rather
metaphysical attitudes gives them a tendancy to take their desires for realities
and to interest themselves in theories which lack a solid experimental basis.
Obviously, we wish to include ourselves in the second category by showing why
the first attitude is not admissable in the field which interests us today."

--Didier Bertrand. chapter: "Chemical Constitution and Biological Activity"
book: "Wave Mechanics and Molecular Biology" edited by Louis de Broglie,
Addison-Wesley, 1966. [the book is about applying quantum mechanics
to problems of large bio-molecules]

Naturally, I include myself also in the second category. In science, there is
also a saying, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
I welcome new ideas and new discoveries, but I need to see proof. The
bigger the discovery, the more convincing must be the evidence. Most
scientists I know are in this camp.

Yes, I was at the "4th Annual Terahertz Systems Conference", although I'm
not sure I would go again. At least it only cost me my time. Someone from
our research group was a speaker, and he got two free passes. The economics
of these conferences is another thread entirely....

Yes, I heard the Gaiacomm talk. To be generous, Ben-Hur falls into category ( c )
from above, taking his desires for realities, and interesting himself in ideas
which are completely lacking in a solid experimental basis.

You can show with a few lines of trigonometry that modulating a 1 Hz carrier
wave with a 1 THz signal yields widely separated frequency components
which would clearly be subject to different attenuations. Yes, there are Schumann
resonances in the ionosphere, but they are narrow and dispersive. Likewise for
anything geomagnetic (which may be lossy at ~few Hz as well).

Ben-Hur was politely asked a question about this point, and his reply was,
"That's proprietary." Which means to me, "I have no proof."

He showed no pictures of anything Gaiacomm has built. He showed no eye
diagrams of any data Gaiacomm has transmitted. He showed nothing that
backs any of his implausible claims. Despite the fact that he claims to
have built "30%" of it.

I could go on. He invokes isotropic antennas, and magnetic monopoles...

Ben-Hur might be able to snow some Venture Capitalists with this bluff.
Clearly he snowed the non-specialist (probably non-technical) conference
organizer.

I don't care what his name is, or where his degree is from (if he has one).
I do care about bluster with no evidence. I do care that he has turned
the word "Terahertz" into a joke in some companies.

Thank you.
gaiacomm
History has proven that scientific, academic achievement and progress is always contested especially when the current system of science or academics is challenged with competition, replacement or extinction.
Skeptic
QUOTE (gaiacomm+May 20 2006, 02:53 PM)
History has proven that scientific, academic achievement and progress is always contested especially when the current system of science or academics is challenged with competition, replacement or extinction.

Yeah, and you know what? Here's how those contests go. There are four steps, one possible branch:

1-- Challenge: I've got an amazing radical new idea! It challenges everything you know, breaks all the rules, and seems totally ludicrous.

2-- Response: You idea is crap, because of the following objections....

3a--Challenger: Ugga bugga! Magic! Stop oppressing me! Proprietary information! God told me! Hand waving!

4a--Response: Whatever. K THX BYE. PWNED!!!!!!

3b--Challenger: Look, I'll show you a verifiable, replicatable, double-blind experiment that shows why I'm right.

4b--Response: Dang! I was wrong. You, sir, have righteously pwned me.

Einstein is an example of the "b" branch above. Judah, Pons and Fleishman, Sheldrake, that Newman guy with the free energy machines are examples of "a".

Just because people laugh at you and make fun of you, and point out why your ideas are stupid DOES NOT--repeat DOES NOT--mean you're a persecuted, misunderstood genius. It most likely means you're a freaking crackpot, especially if they make fun of you year after year after year, and the best response you can come up with to their criticisms is "proprietary."

And here's a hint--nothing keeps science and academia going like competition, replacement, and extinction. Opening new frontiers is where the action is. The very fact that you trot out this tired old cliche pretty much proves you have no connection whatsoever with the scientific and academic communities. You're a fake. A fraud. A nutcase.

And what's up with quoting messages and saying "Thank You" at the end? Is that supposed to be clever? You just can't come up with anything better?

gaiacomm
Science can either evolve through trial and error, through creating a revolution through abrupt change or remain constant by stagnation.
peterj
I just attended the THz conference in D.C. This guy Judah Ben-Hur and his side-kick, Matt Hanna, are complete nut cases! But they provided a lot of amusement for all of the other attendees. Some of their claims were absolutley hilarious!

For instance, did you know that the insect called the "tree hopper" uses hollowed-out plant stems as a THz cavity, to communicate across the jungle? And apparently, whales and dolphins have been using global wireless communication protocols for centuries!

Oh well. As long as they don't rip off innocent and naive people, I guess they're harmless...
gaiacomm
QUOTE (peterj+May 24 2006, 09:07 PM)
I just attended the THz conference in D.C. This guy Judah Ben-Hur and his side-kick, Matt Hanna, are complete nut cases! But they provided a lot of amusement for all of the other attendees. Some of their claims were absolutley hilarious!

For instance, did you know that the insect called the "tree hopper" uses hollowed-out plant stems as a THz cavity, to communicate across the jungle? And apparently, whales and dolphins have been using global wireless communication protocols for centuries!

Oh well. As long as they don't rip off innocent and naive people, I guess they're harmless...

May we suggest you state the facts and not fiction.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navc...+communications
Skeptic
QUOTE (gaiacomm+May 25 2006, 05:13 PM)

May we suggest you state the facts and not fiction.


"Dr." Judah admonishing someone to state facts and not fiction is the single funniest thing I have read all week.

I'm not sure what his web link is supposed to prove. Treehoppers don't use THz frequencies to communicate, as far as I can tell, so I'm not sure what it has to do with anything. But the Gaiacomm literature, such as it is, does have a lot of non sequitur asides to animal communication. Because their stuff is all so childishly written, it's impossible to figure out why they bother talking about dolphins and ants and whatnot. I think it has something to do with their encoding scheme. But since "Dr." Judah isn't able to cogently explain anything, we'll never know.

To echo what the other poster said about the ripping off innocent and naive people, I tend to agree. It's pretty easy to fool VC types. I bet that's how Hanna got hooked up with "Dr." Judah in the first place. That's fine. VCs tend to have way too much money to throw around. I do worry a bit about the government wasting money (my tax money) on this, but I think the existence of forums like this is a good preventative measure. Someone will get around to googling "Dr." Judah's name, and they'll see what a nutcase he is, and that'll be the end of that. Every post this guy makes digs him in deeper and deeper. Isn't it amazing how they don't respond to any of the substantive arguments against them? After years, he refuses to give a bio of himself, tell us where his degree came from. They've never responded to the fact that their F&S award is a complete sham for a company that hands the out like Gideons hand out bibles. A big demonstration is always just around the corner, but never materializes. With no product, Gaiacomm isn't raking in any money, so you have to wonder what "Dr." Judah's real job is. I'm guessing Wal-Mart greeter.

So tell us, "Dr.", what's next on the old Gaiacomm agenda? Where's your next conference? Are you raising up an army of psychic tree hoppers with THz lasers?
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+May 25 2006, 05:53 PM)
QUOTE (gaiacomm+May 25 2006, 05:13 PM)

May we suggest you state the facts and not fiction.


"Dr." Judah admonishing someone to state facts and not fiction is the single funniest thing I have read all week.

I'm not sure what his web link is supposed to prove. Treehoppers don't use THz frequencies to communicate, as far as I can tell, so I'm not sure what it has to do with anything. But the Gaiacomm literature, such as it is, does have a lot of non sequitur asides to animal communication. Because their stuff is all so childishly written, it's impossible to figure out why they bother talking about dolphins and ants and whatnot. I think it has something to do with their encoding scheme. But since "Dr." Judah isn't able to cogently explain anything, we'll never know.

To echo what the other poster said about the ripping off innocent and naive people, I tend to agree. It's pretty easy to fool VC types. I bet that's how Hanna got hooked up with "Dr." Judah in the first place. That's fine. VCs tend to have way too much money to throw around. I do worry a bit about the government wasting money (my tax money) on this, but I think the existence of forums like this is a good preventative measure. Someone will get around to googling "Dr." Judah's name, and they'll see what a nutcase he is, and that'll be the end of that. Every post this guy makes digs him in deeper and deeper. Isn't it amazing how they don't respond to any of the substantive arguments against them? After years, he refuses to give a bio of himself, tell us where his degree came from. They've never responded to the fact that their F&S award is a complete sham for a company that hands the out like Gideons hand out bibles. A big demonstration is always just around the corner, but never materializes. With no product, Gaiacomm isn't raking in any money, so you have to wonder what "Dr." Judah's real job is. I'm guessing Wal-Mart greeter.

So tell us, "Dr.", what's next on the old Gaiacomm agenda? Where's your next conference? Are you raising up an army of psychic tree hoppers with THz lasers?

Only time will tell the truth.

And we have plenty of that...
Skeptic
QUOTE (gaiacomm+May 25 2006, 09:29 PM)

Only time will tell the truth.

And we have plenty of that...

Yup. Just as I suspected. For the approximately ten-thousandth time, Judah has refused to explain why he calls himself "Dr."

That's because he doesn't really have a degree. He's a liar. I call you out Judah. Prove me wrong. Oh wait, you won't. You'll just say "time will tell" or "thank you."

You have plenty of time because everything else you have is bullshit. Honestly, even the retards in the "9/11 was a big consipiracy, they blew up the buildings with explosives and that wasn't really a plane that hit the Pentagon" thread will at least try to explain their loopy ideas and their credentials. You won't even do that.

"Hi, I'm Dr. Ben-Hur and I've got a really great scheme to talk at a bajillion bits per second to anyone in the world (or blow them up) using the same technology that dolphins use!"

"Ummm, OK, show me something. By the way where did you get your degree?"

"Whaaaaaaaahhhhh! Quit asking me that! i can't tell you, you'll steal my ideas. But they will work. Honest. They really will because I'm super smart even though I've never had anything published or invented anything. Trust me. It's all written on napkins in my coat pocket."

Honestly, you're like a kindergartener, pretending to be a scientist. You're not even a good quack. The true crackpot will at least try to convince people their right by explaining their ideas. You won't even do that. Not only are you a failure at being a scientist, you're a failure among the other net.loons. You truly have nothing going for you. How's that Wal-Mart job working for you? 'Cause your scientist schtick is getting old.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+May 26 2006, 02:55 AM)
QUOTE (gaiacomm+May 25 2006, 09:29 PM)

Only time will tell the truth.

And we have plenty of that...

Yup. Just as I suspected. For the approximately ten-thousandth time, Judah has refused to explain why he calls himself "Dr."

That's because he doesn't really have a degree. He's a liar. I call you out Judah. Prove me wrong. Oh wait, you won't. You'll just say "time will tell" or "thank you."

You have plenty of time because everything else you have is bullshit. Honestly, even the retards in the "9/11 was a big consipiracy, they blew up the buildings with explosives and that wasn't really a plane that hit the Pentagon" thread will at least try to explain their loopy ideas and their credentials. You won't even do that.

"Hi, I'm Dr. Ben-Hur and I've got a really great scheme to talk at a bajillion bits per second to anyone in the world (or blow them up) using the same technology that dolphins use!"

"Ummm, OK, show me something. By the way where did you get your degree?"

"Whaaaaaaaahhhhh! Quit asking me that! i can't tell you, you'll steal my ideas. But they will work. Honest. They really will because I'm super smart even though I've never had anything published or invented anything. Trust me. It's all written on napkins in my coat pocket."

Honestly, you're like a kindergartener, pretending to be a scientist. You're not even a good quack. The true crackpot will at least try to convince people their right by explaining their ideas. You won't even do that. Not only are you a failure at being a scientist, you're a failure among the other net.loons. You truly have nothing going for you. How's that Wal-Mart job working for you? 'Cause your scientist schtick is getting old.

Your opinion will be noted.

Thank you.
gaiacomm
I wonder what this is?

Satcom negotiating to buy IP Planet
World Group Holdings chairman Zvi Barinboim: We'll consider raising capital on the London Stock Exchange.
Guy Hadass 28 Feb 05 17:36


Satcom Systems has announced that it is negotiating to acquire IP Planet Network Ltd. for NIS 36 million. Satcom is controlled by Zvi Barinboim's World Group Holdings (TASE: WRGR). IP Planet, a provider of connectivity solutions for telecommunications operators in Africa and the Middle East, is controlled by Shaul Alovitz's Eurocom Communications, Arison Holdings, Shrem Fudim Kelner & Co. (TASE: SFK) subsidiary Polar Investments (TASE: PLR), foreign investors, and CEO Erez Gissin.
Last year, IP Planet, now an acquisition target, bid against Barinboim for Satcom. The two companies are in similar businesses. Satcom provides local and international communications services, mainly by satellite. In September 2004, it acquired Gaiacomm International, a provider of mobile communications services via Iridium Satellite LLC.

Satcom chairman Moshe Avraham said, "The acquisition of IP Planet fits in well with our growth strategy, which includes expanding market share in existing territories, penetrating new territories, and penetrating complementary niches, in order to turn Satcom into a global communications services provider, offering customers full communications solutions with a range of technologies.

"The synergy between the two companies is obvious, and will cut costs and increase the profitability of the merged company."

Avraham said, "We greatly appreciate Gissin's abilities and talents, and he will continue as CEO of IP Planet."

Barinboim said, "On the basis of the two companies' growth rates in recent years, the expected sales of the merged company will turn it into a significant player in the communications market, with global deployment. We are considering other possibilities overseas, including other acquisitions, and we'll also consider raising capital on the London Stock Exchange."

Satcom posted NIS 55.8 million in revenue in January-September 2004, compared with NIS 38 million in the corresponding period of 2003, an increase of 47%. It posted a net profit of NIS 7.2 million in January-September 2004, compared with NIS 7 million in the corresponding period of 2003, which included NIS 2.1 million in one-time revenue from a conceded loan.

Published by Globes [online], Israel business news - www.globes.co.il - on February
Skeptic
Yes, I too wonder what that is. It appears to be a poorly written 15-month-old press release. Let’s look at the companies it mentions. World Group Holdings Ltd. is an Israeli company that doesn’t actually produce anything. It just invests in and acquires other companies. A Google search for “World Group Holdings Ltd” nets just 73 hits, which tells us something about their prestige. Searching for Zvi Barinboim results in a picture of someone who looks like the illegitimate offspring of Alec Baldwin (the younger version, not the old puffy one) and a can of motor lubricant. My monitor got oily just displaying the guy.

The press release mentions Satcom Systems. Now a Google search for Satcom Systems reveals a company by that name in this country, but they appear to be a small subcontractor that helps install satellite stations.

Digression {
By the way, their webpages are rather interesting. See http://www.satcomsystems.net/about-satcom-systems.html for example. The second picture down is BIMA, the Berkeley Illinois Maryland Association, Millimeter Array. See http://astro.berkeley.edu/ral/bima_page.html . The third picture down is part of the Allen Telescope Array. See http://www.astro.uva.nl/encyclopedie/exoplaneten.html . These are both radio astronomy projects for which, as far as I can tell from their webpages, Satcom had nothing to do. Clicking on Satcom’s “Key Specialists” page reveals tiny thumbnails of several people, including a guy holding a fish, a picture of Popeye, and a cartoon cat. They provide global communications, too, assuming that by “global communications” you mean wifi access in a single Idaho town.
}

I suspect that what the press release means isn’t Satcom Systems but Satcom Systems Ltd., or Gilat Satcom. (Note to writers of press releases: get your company names straight.) This is yet another obscure Israeli company. They are “value added resellers” of Iridium service. Overall they seem to just repackage and resell and provide access rather than actually producing anything new and unique.

So it’s clear we’re not dealing with real sophisticated, cutting-edge companies. The press release indicates that Satcom bought Gaiacomm. Oooookay. That implies what exactly? Gaiacomm, a company that doesn’t produce anything, was purchased by a company that resells voice and data services, which was in turn bought by a holding company. Wow! Thanks for telling us that Judah. That just clears everything right up.

Interestingly, Gaiacomm claims to be a provider of Iridium Satellite communications services (although a google search suggests they offer this service only in Israel). However, their webpages don’t discuss this, or explain what it means. Do they resell Iridium service? They don’t seem to manufacture Iridium phones. A google search for Iridium and Gaiacomm nets just 45 hits, or 18 if you remove those that include the phrase “September 2004” and physorg.com, and none of these elaborate on what Gaiacomm does in the Iridium arena.

So, Judah, I do indeed wonder what that is. I wonder why you’re showing it to us, when it serves only to dig your hole deeper. So to summarize (for any new readers that don’t want to look at previous messages in this thread):

(a) Judah Ben-Hur (if that is his real name) refuses to say why he calls himself “Dr.” and can’t point to any legitimate scientific work he’s done.
(b) Gaiacomm is a company that seems to exist at somebody’s house (their own webpages give their address as 8626 Heather Run Drive South, Jacksonville, Florida, 32256-9534; do a google satellite view on it—it’s residential) and doesn’t produce anything.
(c ) Gaiacomm likes to trumpet facts that sound impressive until you research them (their Wi-Max award came from a company that hands out hundreds of arbitrary awards per year, they got bought up by another pointless company, etc.)
(d) They refuse to explain what their technology is, how it works, or give a demonstration. The few bits of information they do release are scientifically implausible and generally laughable.

So please explain why anyone should take you seriously. Does anyone honestly expect a revolution in science to come from these jokers? Revolutions in science come from academia, or from industry that actually produces new and innovative products. It doesn’t come from “value added repackagers.”

Once again, Judah, you’ve been....PWNED!!!!

I wonder which response he'll use: "Thank you" or "your opinions have been noted."
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+May 26 2006, 12:32 PM)
Yes, I too wonder what that is. It appears to be a poorly written 15-month-old press release. Let’s look at the companies it mentions. World Group Holdings Ltd. is an Israeli company that doesn’t actually produce anything. It just invests in and acquires other companies. A Google search for “World Group Holdings Ltd” nets just 73 hits, which tells us something about their prestige. Searching for Zvi Barinboim results in a picture of someone who looks like the illegitimate offspring of Alec Baldwin (the younger version, not the old puffy one) and a can of motor lubricant. My monitor got oily just displaying the guy.

The press release mentions Satcom Systems. Now a Google search for Satcom Systems reveals a company by that name in this country, but they appear to be a small subcontractor that helps install satellite stations.

Digression {
By the way, their webpages are rather interesting. See http://www.satcomsystems.net/about-satcom-systems.html for example. The second picture down is BIMA, the Berkeley Illinois Maryland Association, Millimeter Array. See http://astro.berkeley.edu/ral/bima_page.html . The third picture down is part of the Allen Telescope Array. See http://www.astro.uva.nl/encyclopedie/exoplaneten.html . These are both radio astronomy projects for which, as far as I can tell from their webpages, Satcom had nothing to do. Clicking on Satcom’s “Key Specialists” page reveals tiny thumbnails of several people, including a guy holding a fish, a picture of Popeye, and a cartoon cat. They provide global communications, too, assuming that by “global communications” you mean wifi access in a single Idaho town.
}

I suspect that what the press release means isn’t Satcom Systems but Satcom Systems Ltd., or Gilat Satcom. (Note to writers of press releases: get your company names straight.) This is yet another obscure Israeli company. They are “value added resellers” of Iridium service. Overall they seem to just repackage and resell and provide access rather than actually producing anything new and unique.

So it’s clear we’re not dealing with real sophisticated, cutting-edge companies. The press release indicates that Satcom bought Gaiacomm. Oooookay. That implies what exactly? Gaiacomm, a company that doesn’t produce anything, was purchased by a company that resells voice and data services, which was in turn bought by a holding company. Wow! Thanks for telling us that Judah. That just clears everything right up.

Interestingly, Gaiacomm claims to be a provider of Iridium Satellite communications services (although a google search suggests they offer this service only in Israel). However, their webpages don’t discuss this, or explain what it means. Do they resell Iridium service? They don’t seem to manufacture Iridium phones. A google search for Iridium and Gaiacomm nets just 45 hits, or 18 if you remove those that include the phrase “September 2004” and physorg.com, and none of these elaborate on what Gaiacomm does in the Iridium arena.

So, Judah, I do indeed wonder what that is. I wonder why you’re showing it to us, when it serves only to dig your hole deeper. So to summarize (for any new readers that don’t want to look at previous messages in this thread):

(a) Judah Ben-Hur (if that is his real name) refuses to say why he calls himself “Dr.” and can’t point to any legitimate scientific work he’s done.
(cool.gif Gaiacomm is a company that seems to exist at somebody’s house (their own webpages give their address as 8626 Heather Run Drive South, Jacksonville, Florida, 32256-9534; do a google satellite view on it—it’s residential) and doesn’t produce anything.
(c ) Gaiacomm likes to trumpet facts that sound impressive until you research them (their Wi-Max award came from a company that hands out hundreds of arbitrary awards per year, they got bought up by another pointless company, etc.)
(d) They refuse to explain what their technology is, how it works, or give a demonstration. The few bits of information they do release are scientifically implausible and generally laughable.

So please explain why anyone should take you seriously. Does anyone honestly expect a revolution in science to come from these jokers? Revolutions in science come from academia, or from industry that actually produces new and innovative products. It doesn’t come from “value added repackagers.”

Once again, Judah, you’ve been....PWNED!!!!

I wonder which response he'll use: "Thank you" or "your opinions have been noted."

I like the fact that you are our little researcher of facts and fiction. You are providing the entertainment that is required to continue the show! You and others like you are asking the right questions and providing the commentary that is needed to continue what we seek. The answers you seek are not on the internet.

You are being entertained by those that wish it so. This statement that you make proves that you are not as learned as you claim to come across:

So please explain why anyone should take you seriously. Does anyone honestly expect a revolution in science to come from these jokers? Revolutions in science come from academia, or from industry that actually produces new and innovative products. It doesn’t come from “value added repackagers.”


Research autodidatict in science...

Oh yes..enjoy the show!
Skeptic
QUOTE
I like the fact that you are our little researcher of facts and fiction.


Thank you. Since you're not providing any facts, I figured someone should.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
I like the fact that you are our little researcher of facts and fiction.


Thank you. Since you're not providing any facts, I figured someone should.

You are providing the entertainment that is required to continue the show!


I find you to be extraordinarily entertaining. You're completely clueless. The amount of abuse you can endure without snapping is quite incredible. Again and again, in this forum and others, for years and years, people have asked you very simple questions that you either refuse to answer or reply to with nonsequiturs.

QUOTE
You and others like you are asking the right questions and providing the commentary that is needed to continue what we seek. The answers you seek are not on the internet.


I've no idea what this means, but if you imagine Judah taking a big (PPffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttt!) hit on some chronic right before he says it, it kind of makes sense. "The answers aren't on the net, man. They're like inside of you or something. Whoah! I just blew my mind, man! Hand me the Cheetos, dude."

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
You and others like you are asking the right questions and providing the commentary that is needed to continue what we seek. The answers you seek are not on the internet.


I've no idea what this means, but if you imagine Judah taking a big (PPffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttt!) hit on some chronic right before he says it, it kind of makes sense. "The answers aren't on the net, man. They're like inside of you or something. Whoah! I just blew my mind, man! Hand me the Cheetos, dude."

Research autodidatict in science...


I assume you mean "autodidactic," which means "self-taught," as in "Judah Ben-Hur's autodidactic spelling skills are atrocious." By this statement, and your persistent refusal to explain why you call yourself "Dr." I am left to assume that you have granted your PhD to yourself. Nice dude. Real classy.

And I reiterate my statement about innovation. New, mold-breaking ideas that bend the currently understood rules of physics do not come from companies that are mere value-added repackagers that never get around to creating actual devices and are unable to describe their methods. New drugs come from medical companies with actual PhDs on their staffs or academic hospitals; they don't come from marketing companies. (Well, except for crap like Enzyte, but I'm talking about drugs that actually work.) Motorola comes up with new frequency usage schemes and improved devices (albeit not ones that violate the laws of physics); not my local phone company. The fact that you're surprised that nobody takes you seriously demonstrates exactly how out of touch you are. You're not doing science. You're not a scientist. You're just playing make-believe. Nobody is buying your snake-oil.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+May 26 2006, 02:43 PM)
QUOTE
I like the fact that you are our little researcher of facts and fiction.


Thank you. Since you're not providing any facts, I figured someone should.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
I like the fact that you are our little researcher of facts and fiction.


Thank you. Since you're not providing any facts, I figured someone should.

You are providing the entertainment that is required to continue the show!


I find you to be extraordinarily entertaining. You're completely clueless. The amount of abuse you can endure without snapping is quite incredible. Again and again, in this forum and others, for years and years, people have asked you very simple questions that you either refuse to answer or reply to with nonsequiturs.

QUOTE
You and others like you are asking the right questions and providing the commentary that is needed to continue what we seek. The answers you seek are not on the internet.


I've no idea what this means, but if you imagine Judah taking a big (PPffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttt!) hit on some chronic right before he says it, it kind of makes sense. "The answers aren't on the net, man. They're like inside of you or something. Whoah! I just blew my mind, man! Hand me the Cheetos, dude."

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
You and others like you are asking the right questions and providing the commentary that is needed to continue what we seek. The answers you seek are not on the internet.


I've no idea what this means, but if you imagine Judah taking a big (PPffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttt!) hit on some chronic right before he says it, it kind of makes sense. "The answers aren't on the net, man. They're like inside of you or something. Whoah! I just blew my mind, man! Hand me the Cheetos, dude."

Research autodidatict in science...


I assume you mean "autodidactic," which means "self-taught," as in "Judah Ben-Hur's autodidactic spelling skills are atrocious." By this statement, and your persistent refusal to explain why you call yourself "Dr." I am left to assume that you have granted your PhD to yourself. Nice dude. Real classy.

And I reiterate my statement about innovation. New, mold-breaking ideas that bend the currently understood rules of physics do not come from companies that are mere value-added repackagers that never get around to creating actual devices and are unable to describe their methods. New drugs come from medical companies with actual PhDs on their staffs or academic hospitals; they don't come from marketing companies. (Well, except for crap like Enzyte, but I'm talking about drugs that actually work.) Motorola comes up with new frequency usage schemes and improved devices (albeit not ones that violate the laws of physics); not my local phone company. The fact that you're surprised that nobody takes you seriously demonstrates exactly how out of touch you are. You're not doing science. You're not a scientist. You're just playing make-believe. Nobody is buying your snake-oil.

I apologize for not doing my spell check...oh great one!

I believe that you should address your concerns and comments to Judah Ben-Hur himself and not me. Why is it you don;t post your real name and background for us all to see who hides behind the looking glass or are you afraid of your TRUTH?

You rant and cast stones at everyone who are different than you and yet you are afraid to come out into the light for us to see you. At least Judah Ben-Hur is
not afraid to post enough information of himself for others to see and judge. You hide as a child does when it storms outside late at night.

What if Ben-Hur is right? We all hope that he is wrong so we can feel better about ourselves. Its quite unfortunate that we all don;t understand this person but at least he is consistent.

His ideas are no different than those of the past of which we take so much for granted. Its quite obvious that this learned topic became an off-topic on this website.

Your quote: I find you to be extraordinarily entertaining. You're completely clueless. The amount of abuse you can endure without snapping is quite incredible. Again and again, in this forum and others, for years and years, people have asked you very simple questions that you either refuse to answer or reply to with nonsequiturs.

Yes, I agree the amount of abuse is quite a feat in itself.

May I suggest you focus your energies on something easier for you to understand rather than this rather complicated episode in science. You have the right to continue your rants, but from what I have read you seem to have gotten nowhere...still stuck in the mud. Why not abandon this quest for the Holy Grail of science and go home?

After all you are but a poster on the internet....
gaiacomm
Something I found...or maybe a freak of science?

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:X9P5XzJ...&ct=clnk&cd=110
gaiacomm
And another strike in science:

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:njCV1iO...&ct=clnk&cd=102
Skeptic
QUOTE
I believe that you should address your concerns and comments to Judah Ben-Hur himself and not me.


In the past, Judah has used this account (see previous postings, some of which claim to be from him). It also appears to be used by an unnamed individual. For all I know, it's always Judah, and he suffers from multiple personality disorder.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
I believe that you should address your concerns and comments to Judah Ben-Hur himself and not me.


In the past, Judah has used this account (see previous postings, some of which claim to be from him). It also appears to be used by an unnamed individual. For all I know, it's always Judah, and he suffers from multiple personality disorder.

Why is it you don;t post your real name and background for us all to see who hides behind the looking glass or are you afraid of your TRUTH?


For the simple fact that I am making no claims here. Judah is the one who signs himself as "Dr." Judah is the one who claims to have a transmission method that is physically impossible. I make no claims as to my educational background, and all I do is point out trivial objections to Judah's work which neither you nor him can answer.

QUOTE
You rant and cast stones at everyone who are different than you and yet you are afraid to come out into the light for us to see you.


Do you know why I rant? It's because you are evil. You and Judah both. You are nothing more than scam artists. It has been explained to you time and time again why your science is bogus. And yet you continue to attempt to swindle money from naive investors. I don't particularly care if you swindle a VC or a private company. But if you get so much as one dollar of my tax money, I'll have the attorney general investigate your company for fraud so fast you'll think you're stuck in a THz wave. Attempting to waste tax money on a stupid, impossible scheme is evil. It angers me to see con artists like you try to make a quick buck.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
You rant and cast stones at everyone who are different than you and yet you are afraid to come out into the light for us to see you.


Do you know why I rant? It's because you are evil. You and Judah both. You are nothing more than scam artists. It has been explained to you time and time again why your science is bogus. And yet you continue to attempt to swindle money from naive investors. I don't particularly care if you swindle a VC or a private company. But if you get so much as one dollar of my tax money, I'll have the attorney general investigate your company for fraud so fast you'll think you're stuck in a THz wave. Attempting to waste tax money on a stupid, impossible scheme is evil. It angers me to see con artists like you try to make a quick buck.

What if Ben-Hur is right?


And what if I suddenly start crapping dollar bills tomorrow? It sure would be cool, but it's not going to happen.

QUOTE
His ideas are no different than those of the past of which we take so much for granted.


Yes they are. Judah's ideas, insofar as I can interpret them, violate basic electromagnetic propagation principles (terahertz frequencies don't penetrate far in air and even less far in water), information theory (he's trying to send many bits of information over ELF), and basic electromagnetic physics ("mixing" ELF and THz). He hasn't, as far as I can tell, explained how he'll even generate THz frequencies (it's pretty difficult). Even a real scientist doesn't get to do that. You want to break the currently understood laws of nature, you better be able to come up with an experiment or demonstration.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
His ideas are no different than those of the past of which we take so much for granted.


Yes they are. Judah's ideas, insofar as I can interpret them, violate basic electromagnetic propagation principles (terahertz frequencies don't penetrate far in air and even less far in water), information theory (he's trying to send many bits of information over ELF), and basic electromagnetic physics ("mixing" ELF and THz). He hasn't, as far as I can tell, explained how he'll even generate THz frequencies (it's pretty difficult). Even a real scientist doesn't get to do that. You want to break the currently understood laws of nature, you better be able to come up with an experiment or demonstration.

Yes, I agree the amount of abuse is quite a feat in itself.


Remember that Judah came here first, advertising his participation in that conference. You come to my party and stick your wang in the mashed potatoes (to quote an unpleasant rap song), and you gotta expect to take some heat for it. Like I said, it gladdens my heart knowing that in the future when people google for Judah's name, they'll get this site (and every other forum he's acted kooky on--his letter to Saddam Hussein is a freaking riot) and think twice about giving him money. He's digging the hole, I'm just providing the shovel.

QUOTE
May I suggest you focus your energies on something easier for you to understand rather than this rather complicated episode in science.


You may, but I'll ignore the suggestion. There's nothing complicated about this. Judah is a crackpot. Gaiacomm is a company with a proven track record of doing absolutely nothing worthwhile. Judah's snake-oil is easily debunked by someone with only a passing knowledge of physics. He's managed to buffalo some naive ex-telecom types into giving him a job. As long as he continues to spew his nonsense on the web, I think I'll be there to point out that the emperor hasn't any clothes.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
May I suggest you focus your energies on something easier for you to understand rather than this rather complicated episode in science.


You may, but I'll ignore the suggestion. There's nothing complicated about this. Judah is a crackpot. Gaiacomm is a company with a proven track record of doing absolutely nothing worthwhile. Judah's snake-oil is easily debunked by someone with only a passing knowledge of physics. He's managed to buffalo some naive ex-telecom types into giving him a job. As long as he continues to spew his nonsense on the web, I think I'll be there to point out that the emperor hasn't any clothes.

You have the right to continue your rants, but from what I have read you seem to have gotten nowhere...still stuck in the mud.


Just like Gaiacomm. How many years in existence and not a single piece of THz technology to show for it. The really funny thing about it is that eventually they'll have burned through whatever capital they have, and Judah will still be a big fake with crappy writings who can't produce anything, and then they're going to finally see they've been fooled. Oh, that's going to be an ugly day when the other four or so Gaiacomm employees realize they've been had and take it out on Judah.

QUOTE
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:X9P5XzJ...&ct=clnk&cd=110


Haven't you done this one before? It's a paper with nothing to do with THz that quotes a "paper" by Judah in the context of satellite antennas. What's your point? Oh, you haven't got one. You were hoping I wouldn't read it.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:X9P5XzJ...&ct=clnk&cd=110


Haven't you done this one before? It's a paper with nothing to do with THz that quotes a "paper" by Judah in the context of satellite antennas. What's your point? Oh, you haven't got one. You were hoping I wouldn't read it.

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:rZvw13g...&ct=clnk&cd=112


Again, haven't you shown this one before on this forum? It's another foreign paper having nothing to do with THz that cites Judah in the context of antennas.

QUOTE
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:njCV1iO...&ct=clnk&cd=102


I don't even know what to say about this one. It mentions Gaiacomm, but it's like the worst PowerPoint presentation in the history of the world. It's so badly done it gave me cancer reading it.

Congratulations, dumbass, you just quoted three completely irrelevant papers (well, two papers and a bad presentation). They cite Judah's horrible web documentation, which has been discussed here ad nauseum. Legitimate scientific work cites other legitimate science--not crummy web docs.

I must conclude from this that whereas Judah's a crackpot, you're either insane or retarded. What is the point in linking to those?

You see the pattern here? I ask simple questions. Explain your technology. Where did Judah get his degree? When will you build something? The answers are, respectively, silence, silence, and "soon." If it sounds like I'm a broken record, or stuck in the mud, it's because you stubbornly refuse to answer any of my very simple questions. You want me to go away, just answer them already. And by "answer" I mean something with details.
gaiacomm
Readers, now you get our point?
Skeptic
Yes, readers, does ANYONE get their point? They claim they have revolutionary technology, but can't explain or demonstrate it. When challenged they link to obscure foreign journal articles that have NOTHING to do with the matter at hand. They're scam artists, pure and simple. No different than peddlars of free energy machines, cold fusion, or communication with the dead.

Does anyone else care to weigh in here, or is just me and Judah/some guy that's not Judah?
gaiacomm
Hello.....nobody cares anymore...this topic is saturated with nonsense now... so you as far as I can see will be alone unless someone else wishes to bash and rant to feel good about themseleves. If you have some science to discuss may I suggest you leave the gaiacomm alone and go somewhere else in cyberspace.

WE are laughing out loud!

Repeat:


I believe that you should address your concerns and comments to Judah Ben-Hur himself and not me. Why is it you don;t post your real name and background for us all to see who hides behind the looking glass or are you afraid of your TRUTH?

You rant and cast stones at everyone who are different than you and yet you are afraid to come out into the light for us to see you. At least Judah Ben-Hur is
not afraid to post enough information of himself for others to see and judge. You hide as a child does when it storms outside late at night.

What if Ben-Hur is right? We all hope that he is wrong so we can feel better about ourselves. Its quite unfortunate that we all don;t understand this person but at least he is consistent.

His ideas are no different than those of the past of which we take so much for granted. Its quite obvious that this learned topic became an off-topic on this website.

Your quote: I find you to be extraordinarily entertaining. You're completely clueless. The amount of abuse you can endure without snapping is quite incredible. Again and again, in this forum and others, for years and years, people have asked you very simple questions that you either refuse to answer or reply to with nonsequiturs.

Yes, I agree the amount of abuse is quite a feat in itself.

May I suggest you focus your energies on something easier for you to understand rather than this rather complicated episode in science. You have the right to continue your rants, but from what I have read you seem to have gotten nowhere...still stuck in the mud. Why not abandon this quest for the Holy Grail of science and go home?

After all you are but a poster on the internet....


End of Messages............ wub.gif


Ps: You may have the word...
Skeptic
Alright, I'll take that word.

The word is <b>fraud</b>. That's what Judah is, and that's what Gaiacomm is. I'd caution investors to stay far away from them. But don't take my word for it--go to your nearest University and ask someone in the physics department if it's possible to use THz frequencies as a global communications medium. They'll be glad to explain why it won't work. Gaiacomm exists solely to dupe investors out of money.

PS, I--and my colleagues--are laughing at you. Judah's insistence on not explaining his "degree" is hilarious. Everybody knows he's a big fake, and quite possibly insane.

Thanks for the fun, Gaiacomm. It's been a pleasure eviscerating you. I'll keep checking in on you from time to time. It'll be interesting to see what kind of dodges you come up with in the future to explain why you never produce anything.

Mods, can we close this thread now, since no one else seems to be interested in talking?
gaiacomm
Terahertz Conference on 4G Wireless Technologies

A conference is being planned to demonstrate the use of terahertz frequencies in terahertz wireless communications. Gaiacomm International will be the keynote exhibiter of their proposed 4G wireless technology. The conference is planned to be held in WDC. Times and dates will be announced later. All interested persons will be invited to attend the conference which will be d-classified. Military (Nato), government, defense contractors etc. will be invited to a special CLASSIFIED demonstration of the gaiacomm weapons system and the Identify-Detection system using terahertz. Other companies that have similar product will also attend.
The gaiacomm website and other media outlets will keep you informed.
www.gaiacomminternational.com
Skeptic
to demonstrate the use of terahertz frequencies in terahertz wireless communications

Ah, yet another classy Gaiacomm press release. The redundancy in that sentence is priceless.

Gaiacomm International will be the keynote exhibiter of their proposed 4G wireless technology.

They're exhibiting their proposed technology? In other words, they still won't have anything real to show. They'll just be exhibiting the same old dumb unworkable ideas.

The conference is planned to be held in WDC.

NOBODY (but you) uses that abbreviation. Nobody. Call it Washington, D.C. and people will have a clue what you're talking about.

to a special CLASSIFIED demonstration of the gaiacomm weapons system

The government is allowed to classify things, not you. Call it what you want, it won't be classified. Haha, is this the THz weapon of mass destruction? What are you going to do, bore someone to death with one of your retarded presentations?

Other companies that have similar product will also attend.

Are the SNIFFEX people going to be there too? Are the Quadro Tracker guys still around? Hey, maybe you can get some of the folks over in the "WTC brought down by nuclear weapons" thread to show up too. Maybe Uri Gellar can attend and bend some spoons. You're all selling nonsense after all.

I predict this conference will happen, and will be very successful. If by "conference" you mean Judah and some other quacks renting a conference room at a Gaithersburg Super 8 (they'll be sandwiched between the local Brownie troop meeting and an AA meeting), and if by "successful" you mean that said quacks will all have a good time on their companies' per diem which they'll blow hiring skeevy escorts and filling up on Krispy Kremes.
Kaeroll
Skeptic, I commend you. You are doing all who Google the good "Doctor's" credentials a great service in your persistence and patience with Gaycomm.
gaiacomm
Debunkers are scientific skeptics who attempt to disprove and pursue what they consider to be false, unscientific, bizarre or abnormal claims. The ultimate intent of the debunking, according to some, is to conclusively disprove the validity of an event, theory, and/or phenomenon by exposing it as nonsense. According to Wiktionary, debunk means To discredit, or expose to ridicule the falsehood or the exaggerated claims of something.

Topics that many debunkers focus on include U.F.O.s, claimed paranormal phenomena, research outside mainstream science, or general pseudoscience. The debunker is applied when a professional performs research and/or writes an article with the specific intent of proving or disproving a bizarre or abnormal claim, such as those about U.F.O.s or other paranormal phenomena, and conclusively disproves the validity of the event and/or object.

As a slang term, debunking is the act of disproval of a proposal or theory, generally in an academic or scientific sense. The term debunk originated in 1923, when American novelist William Woodward (1874-1950) used it to mean to "take the bunk out of things."

Often the term "debunkery" is not limited to arguments about scientific validity. It can also be used in a more general sense at attempts to discredit any opposing point of view, such as that of a political opponent. However, the further debunkery is removed from objective argument of fact, the more likely it is to become just another form of propaganda. The TV show (as of 2005) MythBusters debunks current urban legends and myths.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunker

Skeptic
And now for something completely different. With apologies to the Black Eyed Peas (for the fuddy-duddys at Gaiacomm, they're a group of young people that sing the Rock and Roll music on the phonographic records):

"What you gon' do with all that bunk?
All that bunk in Gaiacomm's trunk?
I'ma de-, de-, de-, de-, debunk,
Gonna debunk their 4G junk."

Thanks folks, I'm here all week. Tip your waitress.

======================

I'm not sure what the point of posting the wikiarticle is. Yes, I'm here to debunk Gaiacomm's claims. Of course, since their claims boil down to, "We are going to one day produce a global communications system that violates basic principles of electromagnetism and information theory, and can also be used to create a weapon of mass destruction as well as scan a football field full of shipping containers in a few seconds, but we're not going to explain the specifics and we haven't built anything yet, and we've never published in legitimate scientific journals, and our CTO doesn't appear to have an actual degree," it's not really that hard. It'd be way more interesting if they'd actually talk specifics on how they're going to generate THz radiation, but you know THAT will never happen.

To make it easy for Gaiacomm, I have provided a mutiple choice response form that they can use to reply to this post:

[] Thank you, your opinions have been noted.
[] Perhaps this will answer your questions {link to irrelevant article about butterflies in a Ukranian chemistry journal here}
[] Time will tell.
[] Just wait and see.
[] I don't have to tell you where I got my degree, you should just believe me.
[] I'm gaiacomm, not Judah Ben Hur, why don't you send questions for Judah to me, I mean him. Because I'm not him.
[] We're going to have a conference in WDC and we will WORMSINMYBRAINGETTHEMOUT demonstrate our technology there. Very soon.
[] Did I mention that we won the Wi-Max award? It's shiny.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Jun 7 2006, 04:26 PM)
And now for something completely different. With apologies to the Black Eyed Peas (for the fuddy-duddys at Gaiacomm, they're a group of young people that sing the Rock and Roll music on the phonographic records):

"What you gon' do with all that bunk?
All that bunk in Gaiacomm's trunk?
I'ma de-, de-, de-, de-, debunk,
Gonna debunk their 4G junk."

Thanks folks, I'm here all week. Tip your waitress.

======================

I'm not sure what the point of posting the wikiarticle is. Yes, I'm here to debunk Gaiacomm's claims. Of course, since their claims boil down to, "We are going to one day produce a global communications system that violates basic principles of electromagnetism and information theory, and can also be used to create a weapon of mass destruction as well as scan a football field full of shipping containers in a few seconds, but we're not going to explain the specifics and we haven't built anything yet, and we've never published in legitimate scientific journals, and our CTO doesn't appear to have an actual degree," it's not really that hard. It'd be way more interesting if they'd actually talk specifics on how they're going to generate THz radiation, but you know THAT will never happen.

To make it easy for Gaiacomm, I have provided a mutiple choice response form that they can use to reply to this post:

[] Thank you, your opinions have been noted.
[] Perhaps this will answer your questions {link to irrelevant article about butterflies in a Ukranian chemistry journal here}
[] Time will tell.
[] Just wait and see.
[] I don't have to tell you where I got my degree, you should just believe me.
[] I'm gaiacomm, not Judah Ben Hur, why don't you send questions for Judah to me, I mean him. Because I'm not him.
[] We're going to have a conference in WDC and we will WORMSINMYBRAINGETTHEMOUT demonstrate our technology there. Very soon.
[] Did I mention that we won the Wi-Max award? It's shiny.

A thought from cyberspace:

Why would someone with a technology proposed by gaiacomm post the inner workings of the mechanics or the math on the internet for all to see and copy. What if gaiacomm is right about the weapon system and some other scientist from Iran figures it out or just maybe there is a missing piece that gaiacomm missed that is discovered by Iran or North Korea or China or even Russia (who is still pissed about losing the cold war). Scientists have such egos that they tend to disclose too much. What if Judah ben-hur is right? And what if the other side who hates the free world decides to use it to destroy your way of life? If he is wrong then we all can laugh at him and call him crazy....but if there is that small chance that he is right..then what happens?

I say he is right...you say he is wrong.... now do you really wish for ben-hur to really tell you how things work while others are listening or is it just easier to make fun and hope that your enemy thinks another way. Just think if Iran had this weapon that could incinerate Israel! Do you wish for ben-hur to give his ideas and data away to BAD MEN? I think it is easier to make fun of ben-hur and his technology...its better that way.....

I found this on the internet:

The case for regime change in the USA

A president and respected physicist of a Californian technologies company dips into journalism to make his case for a more transparent United States of America.

"Strange times are those in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and a fool" - Plato

"And those who perform jihad for us, we shall certainly guide them in our ways, and God is surely with the doers of good." (Quran XXXIX; 69)

"You have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad." (Hadith)

To all who read and understand: it is time to take the next step in understanding. After careful and meticulous research, including access to files and data guarded by the United States Government, I have uncovered information that has been written about, talked about, read about, and in many cases silenced to protect and to confuse those who wish to uncover its not so guarded secrets.

Careful and planned exposure of this information seems to be the only way to begin the process of enlightenment of not just the American people but all peoples of this planet who are considered common men and women.

We cannot blame the "United States Government" for our woes, but ourselves for allowing our own Constitution to manipulate and control not just us but others in its path towards imperial rule, which by the way was why some people left England to come to the Americas to rid themselves of that tyranny. True democracy does not impede growth or dominate others. It was established to be a beacon for those who wish to call on its existence and only that. We do not have the right to impose democracy on nations or peoples who do not truly ask for it.

The United States in its own right is a terrorist country imposing pseudo-democratic policies through crafty methods - controlling without regard to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! Regime change within the United States should be seriously considered.

Fact: the United States has in its possession weapons of mass destruction, so why does not the United Nations impose restrictions against the United States?

Fear is the reason why no nation or individual will want to go up against this Goliath! Well I have a small stone, I know where to throw it, and if I have to by myself so be it.

The fact that Thomas Jefferson who co-authored the now infamous doctrine of democracy himself was an advocate of slaves.

Hypocrisy runs through the veins of the elite American people who control the destinies and lives of so many people.

What we all must learn is that the power in change is in the people that make up the majority of the civilized and so-called uncivilized world.


What gives this small group of people their control over us is the fact that they know we all will not collectively give up our lives to get back control of the government and rid ourselves of the self-serving politicians and business executives that control what we eat, where we sleep, who to like and not like, what to read, what to write, how to dress, how and who to love, who to hate, what race is superior, who gets education, who not, where to travel, who lives, who dies, who eats, who does not eat, who gets elected in office, who does not get elected, who is popular and who is not, who is "in" who is not, what clothes to wear, what not, what movie or music star is in, which one is not, who to disrespect who to not, who to be prejudice to and who to not, what freedoms we have and have not, who gets destroyed, who not, who must accept the "way" and who not, who goes to prison, and who not, and the list goes on into infinity.

Remember that in the Constitution it does allow for bloodless regime change within the government as long as we stand together and collectively vote for our freedoms back. Rid ourselves of the electoral college and other manipulative organizations that are self-serving their own agendas at the expense, hard work and lives of so many innocent and misguided people that are here within the borders of despair.

The French Government should formally request that the Statue of Liberty be returned to France. We all know what it was for.

The United States has over many years systematically infiltrated other nations to "weed" out the non-conformers to the so-called Democratic process and replace those with the showroom dummies of democracy. Granted, the United States has some freedom of movement for its people but not the way it was originally intended. Look at Africa, South America, and parts of Europe, Asia and other nations that are sucking the teat of the cow and its sour milk.

Collectively, we the people of the world should stand up and be counted on to rid ourselves of individuals who are ignorant of their own ignorance and replace this Constitution with one that includes all religions, all peoples, all races, all nations and all who feel left out and want to be what they want to be without the constraints of prejudice and restrictive law. Not to run lawless but have the right to be an individual and collectively correct this turmoil we are in.

The Earth is trying to warn us that we are spinning out of control and that we need to correct ourselves soon or the earth will rid itself of this infection and parasite called mankind that is slowly destroying its primary intent to allow its inhabitants the freedom to live be fruitful and multiply to the extent of finding a way to leave this planet and journey to others and spread some sort of reason rather than an infectious spore.

I am a physicist and a patriot who, through years of being silent, had almost forgotten my obligations. It is high time I and others like me use our intellect and technology to stand up against an oppressor and rid ourselves of this infection. We are a legion that wants to live a life of peace and respect for all living things and have considerations for those who are different and look for ways to truly accommodate those who are slow in understanding.

We do not need your help just your patience and understanding of what we are about.

We are America's best-kept secret that just got out of the "keep".

Judah Ben-Hur Physicist Gaiacomm Corporation http://www.gaiacomm.org
Skeptic
QUOTE
Why would someone with a technology proposed by gaiacomm post the inner workings of the mechanics or the math on the internet for all to see and copy.


Because that's how science works? You guys are going far beyond what, say, Nextel or Motorola might do. Motorola says, "Hey we got plans for a phone that'll pack another 10 MHz of processing power" or "Our new phone's going to improve the acceptable SNR by another 8 dB," that's just engineering. That falls in the realm of proprietary information. You guys are claiming to shatter the laws of physics. You don't get to call that a trade secret. You publish it and get a sweet Nobel or MacArthur genius grant. Or you patent it and license it and make big bucks.

Your protests on the grounds "what if the bad guys get a hold of this" is bullshit and you know it. If a bunch of noobs like you can figure it out, then the bad guy scientists can figure it out too. In fact, just by telling people that you can make a weapon out of THz, you've doomed the Earth (by your logic). Now the bad guys know where to focus their research. Screw the yellowcake and the plans for giant cannons! The Iraqis and North Koreans and going to be research THz now! Your only hope is to publish your findings so the good guys can get cracking and produce a weapon first. (Atomic weapons ring a bell? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?)

So basically, it boils down to you're making wacky claims, but don't want to back them up, and then get all bent out of shape when we ask you to prove them. Hey, I can change straw into gold. Really. Want me to prove it? Too bad. If I tell you, then everyone will know. My claim is just as dumb as yours.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Why would someone with a technology proposed by gaiacomm post the inner workings of the mechanics or the math on the internet for all to see and copy.


Because that's how science works? You guys are going far beyond what, say, Nextel or Motorola might do. Motorola says, "Hey we got plans for a phone that'll pack another 10 MHz of processing power" or "Our new phone's going to improve the acceptable SNR by another 8 dB," that's just engineering. That falls in the realm of proprietary information. You guys are claiming to shatter the laws of physics. You don't get to call that a trade secret. You publish it and get a sweet Nobel or MacArthur genius grant. Or you patent it and license it and make big bucks.

Your protests on the grounds "what if the bad guys get a hold of this" is bullshit and you know it. If a bunch of noobs like you can figure it out, then the bad guy scientists can figure it out too. In fact, just by telling people that you can make a weapon out of THz, you've doomed the Earth (by your logic). Now the bad guys know where to focus their research. Screw the yellowcake and the plans for giant cannons! The Iraqis and North Koreans and going to be research THz now! Your only hope is to publish your findings so the good guys can get cracking and produce a weapon first. (Atomic weapons ring a bell? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?)

So basically, it boils down to you're making wacky claims, but don't want to back them up, and then get all bent out of shape when we ask you to prove them. Hey, I can change straw into gold. Really. Want me to prove it? Too bad. If I tell you, then everyone will know. My claim is just as dumb as yours.

What if Judah ben-hur is right?


And what if monkeys fly out of my butt? Same probability. Zip.

QUOTE
Do you wish for ben-hur to give his ideas and data away to BAD MEN?


I expect Mr. Hur to explain his ideas, or build a demonstration. So far, he's been "all poot and no turd" as they say in Texas. Actually, the best thing he could do for the country would be to sell his ideas to the BAD MEN. Imagine the bad guys wasting years and years of effort trying to decypher his nonsense and fiddling around with pointless technology instead of cooking up bioweapons and nuclear bombs. Now that would be a benefit to society! Judah, I implore you, pitch your ideas to America's enemies.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Do you wish for ben-hur to give his ideas and data away to BAD MEN?


I expect Mr. Hur to explain his ideas, or build a demonstration. So far, he's been "all poot and no turd" as they say in Texas. Actually, the best thing he could do for the country would be to sell his ideas to the BAD MEN. Imagine the bad guys wasting years and years of effort trying to decypher his nonsense and fiddling around with pointless technology instead of cooking up bioweapons and nuclear bombs. Now that would be a benefit to society! Judah, I implore you, pitch your ideas to America's enemies.

After careful and meticulous research, including access to files and data guarded by the United States Government, I have uncovered information that has been written about, talked about, read about, and in many cases silenced to protect and to confuse those who wish to uncover its not so guarded secrets.


Taken literally, this means that Judah has participated in a felony. Those without security clearances are not allowed to access classified information. The entire rant you posted, which I've seen before, is pretty cranky, don't you think? I'm gobsmacked by the stuff you post thinking it's helping your cause. Who is this I'm corresponding with? Are you really so self-unaware that you can't step back and look how you're presenting yourselves? Trust me: everybody thinks you're a loon. Normal people would not post something like that in their defense. I know I tend to be pretty irreverant and rude, but right now I'm being serious: I honestly think you may be suffering from a mental problem. A sane individual does not do things like that. I sincerely wish you would submit yourself for psychiatric evaluation. But on the plus side, dang, dude, I don't even have to do anything to point out what a bunch of nutcases you are--you're doing all the work for me!

By the way, you forgot to check off the second box on my form--the irrelevant link to pointless information.

May I ask what your day job is? When you and Judah and the rest of the Gaiacomm staff aren't sitting around your moms' basement, rubbing your hands together and cackling evilly, what do you do to pay the bills? Gaiacomm's not producing anything. I can't believe there's that many naive VC people running around anymore to shovel money at you. Does you day job involve the phrase "thank you, drive through"?
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Jun 7 2006, 06:44 PM)
QUOTE
Why would someone with a technology proposed by gaiacomm post the inner workings of the mechanics or the math on the internet for all to see and copy.


Because that's how science works? You guys are going far beyond what, say, Nextel or Motorola might do. Motorola says, "Hey we got plans for a phone that'll pack another 10 MHz of processing power" or "Our new phone's going to improve the acceptable SNR by another 8 dB," that's just engineering. That falls in the realm of proprietary information. You guys are claiming to shatter the laws of physics. You don't get to call that a trade secret. You publish it and get a sweet Nobel or MacArthur genius grant. Or you patent it and license it and make big bucks.

Your protests on the grounds "what if the bad guys get a hold of this" is bullshit and you know it. If a bunch of noobs like you can figure it out, then the bad guy scientists can figure it out too. In fact, just by telling people that you can make a weapon out of THz, you've doomed the Earth (by your logic). Now the bad guys know where to focus their research. Screw the yellowcake and the plans for giant cannons! The Iraqis and North Koreans and going to be research THz now! Your only hope is to publish your findings so the good guys can get cracking and produce a weapon first. (Atomic weapons ring a bell? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?)

So basically, it boils down to you're making wacky claims, but don't want to back them up, and then get all bent out of shape when we ask you to prove them. Hey, I can change straw into gold. Really. Want me to prove it? Too bad. If I tell you, then everyone will know. My claim is just as dumb as yours.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Why would someone with a technology proposed by gaiacomm post the inner workings of the mechanics or the math on the internet for all to see and copy.


Because that's how science works? You guys are going far beyond what, say, Nextel or Motorola might do. Motorola says, "Hey we got plans for a phone that'll pack another 10 MHz of processing power" or "Our new phone's going to improve the acceptable SNR by another 8 dB," that's just engineering. That falls in the realm of proprietary information. You guys are claiming to shatter the laws of physics. You don't get to call that a trade secret. You publish it and get a sweet Nobel or MacArthur genius grant. Or you patent it and license it and make big bucks.

Your protests on the grounds "what if the bad guys get a hold of this" is bullshit and you know it. If a bunch of noobs like you can figure it out, then the bad guy scientists can figure it out too. In fact, just by telling people that you can make a weapon out of THz, you've doomed the Earth (by your logic). Now the bad guys know where to focus their research. Screw the yellowcake and the plans for giant cannons! The Iraqis and North Koreans and going to be research THz now! Your only hope is to publish your findings so the good guys can get cracking and produce a weapon first. (Atomic weapons ring a bell? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?)

So basically, it boils down to you're making wacky claims, but don't want to back them up, and then get all bent out of shape when we ask you to prove them. Hey, I can change straw into gold. Really. Want me to prove it? Too bad. If I tell you, then everyone will know. My claim is just as dumb as yours.

What if Judah ben-hur is right?


And what if monkeys fly out of my butt? Same probability. Zip.

QUOTE
Do you wish for ben-hur to give his ideas and data away to BAD MEN?


I expect Mr. Hur to explain his ideas, or build a demonstration. So far, he's been "all poot and no turd" as they say in Texas. Actually, the best thing he could do for the country would be to sell his ideas to the BAD MEN. Imagine the bad guys wasting years and years of effort trying to decypher his nonsense and fiddling around with pointless technology instead of cooking up bioweapons and nuclear bombs. Now that would be a benefit to society! Judah, I implore you, pitch your ideas to America's enemies.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Do you wish for ben-hur to give his ideas and data away to BAD MEN?


I expect Mr. Hur to explain his ideas, or build a demonstration. So far, he's been "all poot and no turd" as they say in Texas. Actually, the best thing he could do for the country would be to sell his ideas to the BAD MEN. Imagine the bad guys wasting years and years of effort trying to decypher his nonsense and fiddling around with pointless technology instead of cooking up bioweapons and nuclear bombs. Now that would be a benefit to society! Judah, I implore you, pitch your ideas to America's enemies.

After careful and meticulous research, including access to files and data guarded by the United States Government, I have uncovered information that has been written about, talked about, read about, and in many cases silenced to protect and to confuse those who wish to uncover its not so guarded secrets.


Taken literally, this means that Judah has participated in a felony. Those without security clearances are not allowed to access classified information. The entire rant you posted, which I've seen before, is pretty cranky, don't you think? I'm gobsmacked by the stuff you post thinking it's helping your cause. Who is this I'm corresponding with? Are you really so self-unaware that you can't step back and look how you're presenting yourselves? Trust me: everybody thinks you're a loon. Normal people would not post something like that in their defense. I know I tend to be pretty irreverant and rude, but right now I'm being serious: I honestly think you may be suffering from a mental problem. A sane individual does not do things like that. I sincerely wish you would submit yourself for psychiatric evaluation. But on the plus side, dang, dude, I don't even have to do anything to point out what a bunch of nutcases you are--you're doing all the work for me!

By the way, you forgot to check off the second box on my form--the irrelevant link to pointless information.

May I ask what your day job is? When you and Judah and the rest of the Gaiacomm staff aren't sitting around your moms' basement, rubbing your hands together and cackling evilly, what do you do to pay the bills? Gaiacomm's not producing anything. I can't believe there's that many naive VC people running around anymore to shovel money at you. Does you day job involve the phrase "thank you, drive through"?

"Strange times are those in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and a fool" - Plato
Skeptic
Oh, is it time to play quote random people and pretend that it makes a point?

"Crazy people who are productive are geniuses. Crazy people who are rich are eccentric. But crazy people who are neither productive nor rich are just plain crazy." --Michael Gelb [Note that the gaiacomm folks are not productive, and judging by their cruddy website, not rich. Hmmmm...]

The Galileo Argument: "Some authors want you to know they're suffering for their beliefs. For example, 'Scientists scoffed at Copernicus and Galileo; they laughed at Edison, Tesla and Marconi; they won't give my ideas a fair hearing either. But time will be the judge. I can wait; I am patient; sooner or later science will be forced to admit that all matter is built, not of atoms, but of tiny capsules of TIME.'" --http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html

Next?
gaiacomm
interesting......

Before I forget...it seems that gaiacomm got the funds.....not from the USA!

Lets see the faces now...
gaiacomm
http://www.nathanstubblefield.com/
Skeptic
Heheheh, so Gaiacomm has scammed some foreign investment. Good for you, and thanks for not wasting my tax money. And I see you've linked to a nineteenth century version of Judah--some hillbilly that invented a pointless communications method. As I recall, Stubblefield's method used the antenna's near-field and some kind of limited earth conducting transmission method with audio induction (i.e., no modulation of a carrier wave).

Only Gaiacomm would provide a link to an outdated comms method produced by a forgotton inventor and think it's meaningful. Although, since Stubblefield actually farmed melons in his spare time, unlike Judah he could actually be said to have produced something useful.

Help! I'll be out of town for the next month or so. I need someone else to fill in here for me and put down Gaiacomm's bullshit. Any takers?
gaiacomm
It seems that countries outside the USA think more out of the box than the closed minds of American Society. Gaiacomm will go as planned.

One more link to gaiacomm: http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/new/Christofilos.htm
Skeptic
It's apparently link to obscure "scientists" day! Cool. Here's one:

Rene Blondlot

Blondlot "discovered" N-Rays. He published (are you listening, Judah) his finding in journals, and others tried to replicate the results. Interestingly enough, rigorous scientist would get negative results, while sloppy scientists (who didn't follow double-blinding protocol) got positive results. Blondlot's downfall came at a demonstration for physicist Robert Wood. Blondlot was carrying out experiments in a darkened room, having an assistant move an armature attached to an N-ray prism, and calling out changes in the readings from his instruments. When the lights came up, there was Wood holding the prism in his hands. It had never been in the apparatus. Blondlot lived an obscure life after that, and was basically never heard from again.

And this is why we real scientists submit our findings for peer review. When others can replicate our results consistently, then that piece of knowledge is added to the "scientific mainstream." If your results can't be replicated (cold fusion) or worse yet are never published so other can examine them (Gaiacomm), then your claims get ignored and people make fun of you. Real scientists have balls. Big brass shiny ones (bigger than Stephen Colbert's even). They put their money where their mouths are and publish. Wannabes, like Gaiacomm, have tiny microscopic balls, refuse to publish, and wonder why people make fun of them and ostracise them. Oh, and real scientists have real degrees, too. Just wanted to flog that dead horse a bit more.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Jun 12 2006, 04:32 PM)
It's apparently link to obscure "scientists" day! Cool. Here's one:

Rene Blondlot

Blondlot "discovered" N-Rays. He published (are you listening, Judah) his finding in journals, and others tried to replicate the results. Interestingly enough, rigorous scientist would get negative results, while sloppy scientists (who didn't follow double-blinding protocol) got positive results. Blondlot's downfall came at a demonstration for physicist Robert Wood. Blondlot was carrying out experiments in a darkened room, having an assistant move an armature attached to an N-ray prism, and calling out changes in the readings from his instruments. When the lights came up, there was Wood holding the prism in his hands. It had never been in the apparatus. Blondlot lived an obscure life after that, and was basically never heard from again.

And this is why we real scientists submit our findings for peer review. When others can replicate our results consistently, then that piece of knowledge is added to the "scientific mainstream." If your results can't be replicated (cold fusion) or worse yet are never published so other can examine them (Gaiacomm), then your claims get ignored and people make fun of you. Real scientists have balls. Big brass shiny ones (bigger than Stephen Colbert's even). They put their money where their mouths are and publish. Wannabes, like Gaiacomm, have tiny microscopic balls, refuse to publish, and wonder why people make fun of them and ostracise them. Oh, and real scientists have real degrees, too. Just wanted to flog that dead horse a bit more.

Thank you for comment.

Have a nice trip.....(smile)
gaiacomm
Suggestion:

Why not have a debate webcasted so you can put in end to your rants.

I am sure that Judah would pay for the webcast. This would give you what you have been wishing for, for years..answers to your questions in a public forum on the internet for millions to view and witness. It would be open for as many scientists, or whoever you can muster against one Man..Judah.

The offer is made to you....now who has BALLS?
Skeptic
Nice idea, but ultimately pointless. It's a bit like the way creationists always want to debate actual scientists about evolution. Scientists almost always never agree to the debates, because it's pointless. Creationists speak a language outside that of science. What's the point in arguing with someone who can just go, "god did it," and that's that?

Same with Judah. He's refused everywhere else to answer any real questions. He hides behind childish claims of proprietary information, and silly paens that play upon our fears if the Bad People got a hold of his ideas. Besides, there's no need to a teleconference to answer the question of where his degree came from. He could just answer. He's the one claiming to have the degree, not me. He makes claims, he needs to back them up.

I'd honestly like to have a dialogue with him, but it's evidently pretty hard. It should start with him explaining his qualifications, and can expand from there into an explanation of how he manages to violate physics with THz waves that travel far through atmosphere and sea, and information theory with his absurd data rates. I guess he's pretty busy. He probably has to control a couple of sock puppets at the gaiacomm company meetings, and it's pretty tiring when you've got one on each hand, on maybe one on a foot and you have to do all the different voices.

So no, I'm not going to teleconference with him, but I'm sure you already knew that. Why go to all the trouble to set up a video conference, when Judah could just reply to questions here in this forum? He could take as much time as he needs to consider his answers. But no, much better to throw up a smokescreen of a flashy teleconference so you can later whine, "But we aaaaaaaasked you to a debate."

More typical nonsense from Gaiacomm.
Kaeroll
I notice Mr Ben-Hur still refuses to post any credentials.

Have you not patented your plans?
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Skeptic+Jun 12 2006, 06:48 PM)
Nice idea, but ultimately pointless. It's a bit like the way creationists always want to debate actual scientists about evolution. Scientists almost always never agree to the debates, because it's pointless. Creationists speak a language outside that of science. What's the point in arguing with someone who can just go, "god did it," and that's that?

Same with Judah. He's refused everywhere else to answer any real questions. He hides behind childish claims of proprietary information, and silly paens that play upon our fears if the Bad People got a hold of his ideas. Besides, there's no need to a teleconference to answer the question of where his degree came from. He could just answer. He's the one claiming to have the degree, not me. He makes claims, he needs to back them up.

I'd honestly like to have a dialogue with him, but it's evidently pretty hard. It should start with him explaining his qualifications, and can expand from there into an explanation of how he manages to violate physics with THz waves that travel far through atmosphere and sea, and information theory with his absurd data rates. I guess he's pretty busy. He probably has to control a couple of sock puppets at the gaiacomm company meetings, and it's pretty tiring when you've got one on each hand, on maybe one on a foot and you have to do all the different voices.

So no, I'm not going to teleconference with him, but I'm sure you already knew that. Why go to all the trouble to set up a video conference, when Judah could just reply to questions here in this forum? He could take as much time as he needs to consider his answers. But no, much better to throw up a smokescreen of a flashy teleconference so you can later whine, "But we aaaaaaaasked you to a debate."

More typical nonsense from Gaiacomm.

I see that the challenge was to difficult for you. Maybe we need to think of something else. Its difficult to challenge one Man is it not?

I assume that Judah would not mind going over his background and technology as long as it is live on the internet. This way people can ask what they like and get instant results. There are allot of scientists and enthusiasts that would appreciate solving this riddle of is he right or wrong. The time spent playing cat and mouse with words on the internet can be resolved with internet technology...with webcam and all.

So one last time...Deal or No Deal?

Your decision will let the readers know who really wishes to fly with eagles.....or turkeys!
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Kaeroll+Jun 12 2006, 06:48 PM)
I notice Mr Ben-Hur still refuses to post any credentials.

Have you not patented your plans?

The content of this document is protected by Copyright (©) Gaiacomm International Corporation, which is the exclusive property of Gaiacomm International Corporation.
 Federal protection of trade secrets under 18 USC 1832
The content of this document shall not be copied, published, modified, transmitted, distributed, or in anyway exploited, except as expressly permitted by Gaiacomm International Corporation. Violations hereof will be enforced by law.
 
Gaiacomm International Corporation reserves the right to change the content of this document.
Kaeroll
Uh huh. But is it patented? And is Mr Ben-Hur going to post his credentials?

If you wish me to direct my question to him, please provide an email at which I can contact him. Send it to me privately if you don't wish to publish his email publicly.
gaiacomm
QUOTE (Kaeroll+Jun 12 2006, 07:20 PM)
Uh huh. But is it patented? And is Mr Ben-Hur going to post his credentials?

If you wish me to direct my question to him, please provide an email at which I can contact him. Send it to me privately if you don't wish to publish his email publicly.

No patents have been issued for reasons of patent laws. Patents tend to allow others a chance to duplicate and in some cases not play by certain rules of law.

Now to the background... its never been posted all these years for reasons only Judah knows. The live broadcast is the best way to go LIVE without rehearsal.
Kaeroll
I'm not entirely familiar with patent law, but it still seems suspicious that not even the concept has been registered.

You still fail to provide a means of contacting Mr Ben-Hur.
Kaeroll
Double post:

Having attempted to email Mr Ben-Hur using the only email I could find on Gaiacomm's website, and having had said email returned to me due to jbh@gaiacomminternational.com and, evidently, info@gaiacomminternational.com being non-existent, I have to wonder if, despite others' claims to the contrary, Gaiacomm actually exists at all. Even as a phony, delusional, one-man operation from a garage somewhere in a housing estate.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.