To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Forum Mafia
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Physforum > Comments / Suggestions

"THEY"
I am asking this in light of numerous threads recently complaining of the Forum Mafia behavior. While GENERALLY I have no problem with the Forum Mafia, I do believe their behavior goes too far at times. A few of them can be kind, friendly, and positive, while a few are consistently mean and nasty.

Since some certain Forum Mafia members prefer to spam individuals with negative feedback and obnoxious pictures, should these FM members have their add feedback capability taken from them? (If that is something that the moderators can program)

I feel the feedback is an unregulated section that is abused, and if one abuses it, they should not be allowed to use that function. At least for a time. Good behavior can earn back the use of the add feedback function. wink.gif And if the negative behavior continues again, something should happen. Maybe lose the ability permanently?

I am just sick and tired of seeing someone with a low feedback rating, only to find that there are 40 to 50 negative feedbacks (many with pictures or offensive statements) and they are all from 5 certain individuals....... Sometimes it is deserved, many times it is not.
Gehn
Well, most of the time the feedback is deserved.

- Gehn biggrin.gif
BigDumbWeirdo
Sometimes the spamming can get out of hand, but considering the most basic nature of this forum (entertainment for those interested in the subjects discussed) I have to say that I can't see how any behavior on this board goes "too far," unless one uses this board to seduce children or engage in some sort of money-making scam.
BigDumbWeirdo
Has anyone noticed the results of this poll, yet?
ROFL Say what you will about "la familia," but we don't take ourselves too seriously......
"THEY"
That is the reason why I put that option in there! rolleyes.gif

I *do* know you guys well enough to know that would be a popular vote. biggrin.gif

AND, that is why (most of the time) I like you guys. Much is done in humor (and seen that way by many), but some is extremely obnoxious (and also seen that way by many).

If there are complaints by a few select people that are agreeably (by the majority) crackpots, then there probably isn't much of a problem. But if there are many complains by many people, most of whom haven't even been attacked by FM, then there IS a problem.

Kindof like fart jokes. Majority of 4th graders (or 10 year olds) think they are funny. But there comes a time when people have matured enough (hopefully) that only about 25% think fart jokes are funny. So if 25% of the people think its funny, and the other 75% think it is immature........ Well, does the joke stink?

(sorry, had to!)
StevenA
Solution: Counter-mafia! biggrin.gif
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 5 2007, 03:39 PM)
Kindof like fart jokes. Majority of 4th graders (or 10 year olds) think they are funny. But there comes a time when people have matured enough (hopefully) that only about 25% think fart jokes are funny. So if 25% of the people think its funny, and the other 75% think it is immature........ Well, does the joke stink?

(sorry, had to!)

I guess that makes me a minority (YAY, affirmative action is on my side, now!) cause I'll never get tired of the look on someone's face when you fart in a car without a/c while it's pouring down rain....

WARNING: Vegans of all sorts should refrain from making fart jokes. Having been in the above described situation with a vegan who did the farting, I can tell you that the vegan lifestyle does NOT make for good fart jokes, rather it makes for good chemical warfare.... yick....
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE (StevenA+Dec 5 2007, 04:10 PM)
Solution:  Counter-mafia! biggrin.gif

How ironic that someone who has been critical of me without cause (except, maybe in defending DavidD, which of course is FM-like behavior) would choose to suggest an idea I have already suggested...
"THEY"
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Dec 5 2007, 01:23 PM)
How ironic that someone who has been critical of me without cause (except, maybe in defending DavidD, which of course is FM-like behavior) would choose to suggest an idea I have already suggested...

But is StevenA REALLY a retard like your last feedback to him suggest? I know he is smarter than I am in science...... dry.gif

Counter Mafia........ Isn't that what I do by passing out brownies for good behavior?

Maybe if I can get another 250 posts, I could become the Forum GodMother... I could reward you guys for good behavior, scold you when you are bad, and place horse heads in the beds of true crackpots....... Oh, I DO THAT ALL READY...
Sapo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 5 2007, 03:39 PM)
That is the reason why I put that option in there! rolleyes.gif

I *do* know you guys well enough to know that would be a popular vote. biggrin.gif

AND, that is why (most of the time) I like you guys. Much is done in humor (and seen that way by many), but some is extremely obnoxious (and also seen that way by many).

If there are complaints by a few select people that are agreeably (by the majority) crackpots, then there probably isn't much of a problem. But if there are many complains by many people, most of whom haven't even been attacked by FM, then there IS a problem.

Kindof like fart jokes. Majority of 4th graders (or 10 year olds) think they are funny. But there comes a time when people have matured enough (hopefully) that only about 25% think fart jokes are funny. So if 25% of the people think its funny, and the other 75% think it is immature........ Well, does the joke stink?

(sorry, had to!)

ohmy.gif That was a long time ago, by forum standards. Besides, your smaller half liked it! biggrin.gif

BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 5 2007, 04:45 PM)
But is StevenA REALLY a retard like your last feedback to him suggest?  I know he is smarter than I am in science......  dry.gif

Yes. One can be both intelligent yet socially retarted. Look at the feedback StevenA has dished out, to people with whom he's never interacted on this forum. He negged me for no apparent reason, except maybe to defend an obvious DullardD, which is hypocritical, since that's just the sort of behavior the FM is accused of... (note how I snuck a childish lil insult in there, hehe I'm so clever...)
He probably does know more math than I do, but that he goes around giving negs apparently just for fun, or to defend "open-minded free-thinkers" who stink up this forum with psuedoscience is pure stupidity.
And yes, you are a kind person who passes out brownies as they are earned, and for that I thoroughly enjoy your "company" on this forum. smile.gif
"THEY"
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Dec 5 2007, 02:05 PM)
Yes.

ohmy.gif I could say something in defense of that answer, but I don't know if I am at liberty to say it.........

Another point, I have given negs for behavior that I have read, while I was not part of the conversation myself. And because of that I have been accused of coming from left field to sucker punch, which I guess is right. So I explained my reason. So people sometimes give negs from what they read...

I would assume, if you were to flame me and call me nasty things (which I know you won't, you my freeeeeeind) that you would get a few negs yourself, cause I know you aint the only one that likes me! I would do it for you too, unless you deserved it....... wink.gif
"THEY"
Everyone keep voting!

Big Dumb Weirdo, thanks for taking my abuse today. I don't think I have you converted JUST YET........ But I will.
yor_on
Well. As long as there are no 'Moderators' manipulating results:)
Fifty nine percent loving it?
The silent majority or??

Ahem:)

Awhh only fiftytwo? point ninetyfour???
Well.. Then it must be correct:)
"THEY"
Last chance to vote........
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 5 2007, 08:02 PM)
Everyone keep voting!

Big Dumb Weirdo, thanks for taking my abuse today. I don't think I have you converted JUST YET........ But I will.

Hehe, my pleasure. I love debating a subject with rational people even more than I love assaulting cranks with the blunt instruments of stupidity that are their own ideas.
I don't think you'll convert me, but I'll say something you might appreciate:
While I don't believe the FM should be "disbanded" (not that such could be done, as it has no official status) I do think that some members (drum roll please, here come the names) such as Alpha, N O M, and Dallas should lower the standards by which they judge other members. I respect the knowledge, intelligence and judgement of all three of those, but I think their criticisms are the root of this issue.

Therefore, I issue a call to those named.
N O M, Alpha, Dallas: I ask you three intelligent and knowledgable members of the Mafia to lower your standards for the sake of us all. When those who have a decent understanding of science post mistakes, do not attack, but rather correct them. When someone posts something that seems full of crankery, give them a few more posts before you neg them, that they may show their post to be a a miscommunication, rather than a delusion.
Do these things for us, your fellow wiseguys, that we may earn back the respect of rational members like THEY and MeBigGuy, and become an unstoppable wave of reason, knowledge and intelligence. Once this is done, we will crash upon the shores of this forum with such force as to make a tsunami seem to be little splash, and wash away the stain of idiocy once and for all!
"THEY"
AMEN!

Can I also add 5doughnut to the pot? He seems to spam freely, although I don't see him post much anymore. Rabbit has been my other problem spammer too, but I think someone threw him on the BBQ. Haven't seen any bean turds lately. I have heard that rabbit tastes like chicken, but there is no nutritional value. rolleyes.gif

By the way, GOOD AIM BDW! What rifle did you use?
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 6 2007, 04:08 PM)
By the way, GOOD AIM BDW! What rifle did you use?

Ruger M-77 bolt action .270 wsm cal. Bushnell Legend with a 3X9X40 Scope
biggrin.gif
Confused2
QUOTE
N O M, Alpha, Dallas: I ask you three intelligent and knowledgable members of the Mafia to lower your standards for the sake of us all.


I thought you had the highest IQ in some state or other.. ?? .. I'll avoid the obvious conclusion.

Please submit evidence to demonstrate that
1/ N O M is anything more (or less) than a kid who reads science fiction **
2/ Alpha has any knowledge of anything
3/ Dallas has anything above the social skills of a child with severe attention deficit problems. In fairness he can produce some good stuff but this is balanced out by the way his lack of communication skills send him barking .. I could go on but I won't.

I don't think the little group you have selected can possibly 'lower their standards' .. they didn't have any in the first place.

** Edit .. possibly a rather unpleasant kid .. but I could be wrong.

C2

Hi Tikay smile.gif
"THEY"
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Dec 6 2007, 01:16 PM)
Ruger M-77 bolt action .270 wsm cal. Bushnell Legend with a 3X9X40 Scope
biggrin.gif

Ahhhhhh, why yes, of course! Nice, long barrel for a clean snipe. A little too long for a petite thing like me, but very efficient. Nice choice!
Confused2
Instead of posting evidence BigDumbWeirdo has added 'You're an idiot' to my feedback. I rest my case.
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE (Confused2+Dec 6 2007, 04:50 PM)

I thought you had the highest IQ in some state or other.. ?? .. I'll avoid the obvious conclusion.

Please submit evidence to demonstrate that
1/ N O M is anything more (or less) than a kid who reads science fiction **
2/ Alpha has any knowledge of anything
3/ Dallas has anything above the social skills of a child with severe attention deficit problems. In fairness he can produce some good stuff but this is balanced out by the way his lack of communication skills send him barking .. I could go on but I won't.

I don't think the little group you have selected can possibly 'lower their standards' .. they didn't have any in the first place.

** Edit .. possibly a rather unpleasant kid .. but I could be wrong.

C2

Hi Tikay  smile.gif

I had the highest IQ recorded in my home state. That doesn't prevent me from recognizing intelligence in others. The fact that you seem to think it does clues me in as to your level of intelligence.

Why don't YOU supply proof that they are those things?
As for directly answering your challenge...

Dallas posted this in response to a request for help. Not very unsociable of him, is it?
Dallas also refrained from negging me, despite my seemingly idiotic post in the 0.9r = 1 thread.

As for Alpha, he's helped me with math in PMs, which I'm not going to share with you, unless he specifically asks that I do so. Take as evidence the positive feedback he's recieved from Dallas and Euler...

N O M has consistantly shown himself to be hostile towards cranks and respectful of those who have the intelligence to contribute in this community. Once again, look at his feedback for proof.

All three of them also have plenty of negs from the idiots on this site.
What more proof could you ask for?
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE (Confused2+Dec 6 2007, 05:06 PM)
Instead of posting evidence BigDumbWeirdo has added 'You're an idiot' to my feedback. I rest my case.

Yep. No evidence whatsoever have I posted to refute your claims, which are -coincidentally enough- backed up by no evidence.
And just so you know I'm not running away from anything, I'll call you an idiot here, too. Idiot.
"THEY"
In C2's defense, by you calling him an idiot, you have thus called ME an idiot. I have no idea what has gone on to where you guys are ganging up on him, but I have had great conversations with C2 in the past. He knows far more than I do, and has helped me out a lot. I have a lot of respect for him.

Do that again and I may contemplate spiking your brownies with exlax!

Bet you didn't mean to insult me, did ya? But you did.
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 6 2007, 05:38 PM)
In C2's defense, by you calling him an idiot, you have thus called ME an idiot.  I have no idea what has gone on to where you guys are ganging up on him, but I have had great conversations with C2 in the past.  He knows far more than I do, and has helped me out a lot.  I have a lot of respect for him.

Do that again and I may contemplate spiking your brownies with exlax!

Bet you didn't mean to insult me, did ya?  But you did.

I don't doubt you. I believe your claim that you've had great conversations with him in the past.
And no, by calling him an idiot I have expressed a different opinion of him than yours. I have also expressed a different opinion of him than I hold of you. He might well be a great conversationalist, but to come on this thread and assume I can't acknowledge someone else's intelligence simply because I myself claim to be intelligent, to assume I would not respond to him simply because I did not do so before reviewing his posting history and forming an opinion based on it and his latest couple of posts to me, to call Dallas' quote to rpenner "pseudoscience" and to criticize people without any evidence is... well... Idiotic.
If he can hold a good conversation with me in a week or so, I'll give him credit for that, and pos him, and if he can keep it up, I'll apologize for calling him an idiot and change my opinion from "he's an idiot," to "he's said some idiotic things," which is by no means a criticism. I've said some idiotic things myself, as has everyone else.
"THEY"
You definitely don't have to agree with me (just like we are "friends", but we aren't agreeing right now - I have no problem with it) but one should realize the impact that statements can make. I always thought that having a high IQ meant you thought more logically than others. Does that mean my IQ is higher than yours?? blink.gif

I gotta go, I have backed myself into a corner by posting too much today. I have 2 hours to finish my work. <pulls hair out and shrieks>
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 6 2007, 06:14 PM)
I always thought that having a high IQ meant you thought more logically than others.  Does that mean my IQ is higher than yours??  blink.gif


Well, IQ is a measure more of one's speed of thought than anything. A person with a very low IQ isn't necessarily incapable of logical thought.
And it's possible you have a higher IQ. My IQ isn't so high as all of that (I'd really rather not talk about it, to be honest, because I feel like a braggart every time I do, and because it's not a definitive measure of intelligence, merely a rough guess of one's potential for intelligence.)

see this.

QUOTE
I gotta go, I have backed myself into a corner by posting too much today.  I have 2 hours to finish my work.  <pulls hair out and shrieks>

I'm sorry to hear that! Good luck with your work!
xtrmn8r
Hi All,

I have always thought of IQ as the ability to learn. Having an IQ above the bell curve doesn't necessarily make you smart, just look at me....um... Well anyway, I have an above average IQ but not the discipline required for excelling. I always felt I wasted my years in college, but it sure was fun.
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE (xtrmn8r+Dec 6 2007, 07:19 PM)
Hi All,

I have always thought of IQ as the ability to learn. Having an IQ above the bell curve doesn't necessarily make you smart, just look at me....um...  Well anyway, I have an above average IQ but not the discipline required for excelling. I always felt I wasted my years in college, but it sure was fun.

Me too. If you look through my previous posts, you'll find where I explained to PhotoJack my handle.
I never even attended college, despite having a high IQ and excelling in science and history classes. That was about the dumbest thing I ever did, and if I could go back and change one thing in my life, it would be that.

(For those who might actually care, I am going to be attending college starting this summer. I'm going for an AA with a pre-major in chemistry, and you all get just 1 guess as to what subject I'll be studying for my graduate degree biggrin.gif )

Also, I'd like to point out that I and others labelled X here as a crank after reading only one or two posts of his. Since then, he has proven my judgement wrong with intelligent thought, logic and now, humility. smile.gif None of which are qualities of a crank.
soundhertz
I took a Mensa test. Got all the questions right. That was not supposed to be possible. They put my iq at some ridiculous number. I refused membership. Am I a genius? Not even close. Miles and miles away. Can barely remember the college trig I got c's in. I met a genius, an 10 year old kid who was taking college level genetics courses. Now HE was a genius. I'm just good at taking abstract tests. iq schmyque.

just got in under the wire with this edit. BigD, this wasn't intended as a slight against you by any means, just against the iq rating system.
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE (soundhertz+Dec 6 2007, 11:10 PM)

just got in under the wire with this edit.  BigD, this wasn't intended as a slight against you by any means, just against the iq rating system.

I don't take it as such. I've met people with higher IQs than mine (the schizophrenic friend I mentioned to Parsons, check my history) who certainly weren't nearly as intelligent as I (in my opinion) and I've met people with lower IQs who made me look like an utter numbskull.

I do think it's a good indicator of a person's potential for intelligence (people with higher IQs DO tend to be much smarter) but actual intelligence is too slippery to pin down with a test such as Mensa's.
occidental
Just to add to the fire, I wanted to share something I read on another site regarding the forum mafia. (yes, you appear to be "famous") It seems the mafia is also accused of being disinformation plants. Of course, the "wackjobs" on that site make the claim about almost anyone that disagrees with their "theories", but its still funny.

Quote dissident:
QUOTE
After the first 30/50 pages of trolls corner (particularlly the exchanges between grumps and rumpl4skin [And the... I'll say 'sloppy' denial of being a plant) I was convinced grumpy was disinfo. Azzazaz pointing out how physorg is run (by grumpy and the physorg mafia) only solidified that.

I cant make this stuff up (link to breakfornews.com)



"THEY"
Ok, so I will now complete this thread. Since 11 voters chose to fall into my web ohmy.gif and voted as Forum Mafia, those eleven votes are not counted. biggrin.gif

So the real poll results stands as this:
13 votes for YES = 81.75%
3 votes for NO = 18.75%

now to get the moderators attention..........
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 7 2007, 03:41 PM)
Ok, so I will now complete this thread. Since 11 voters chose to fall into my web ohmy.gif and voted as Forum Mafia, those eleven votes are not counted. biggrin.gif

So the real poll results stands as this:
13 votes for YES = 81.75%
3 votes for NO = 18.75%

now to get the moderators attention..........

No fair!
The cranks got their votes counted, the FM should, too! (Our votes should be counted as 9/10 no's.)
So 13 Yes and 13 No.
"THEY"
biggrin.gif

In a court of law, would they allow a known mafioso to stand on the jury for a trial of a member mafioso who committed murder? No.........

Nice try.

Aw, c'mon, you guys know I am sly!!..... And you chose not to vote yes or no.

Next time, THINK before you vote on one of my polls. I usually use SOME form of psychology or another. LOL

Oh, now i just ruined my chances at further polls. Now you know my trick. ph34r.gif
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 7 2007, 04:06 PM)
biggrin.gif

In a court of law, would they allow a known mafioso to stand on the jury for a trial of a member mafioso who committed murder?  No.........


Would they allow a member of a rival family on the jury, either? What about someone who belongs to a group that called for the destruction of all organized crime? No, because they too have a bias, merely in the opposite direction.
Also, do you REALLY think it's accurate to compare us to murderer's?

QUOTE
Nice try.

Aw, c'mon, you guys know I am sly!!.....  And you chose not to vote yes or no.

Next time, THINK before you vote on one of my polls.  I usually use SOME form of psychology or another.  LOL

Oh, now i just ruined my chances at further polls.  Now you know my trick. ph34r.gif

I did think... I thought "should I vote how I feel on the subject, or should I vote the way I want to vote, given the choices" then I voted.
I'm only here to amuse myself, and the same should be true of anyone who doesn't have a specific question for members like AlphaNumeric, Euler, Dallas, BenTheMan...

TO ALL WHO WOULD CALL FOR THE DISBANDING OF THE FM.
1: It will not happen. We have NO official status to disband.
2: Read this post of mine in which I issue a call for tolerance. Each and every one of you who does not support me in this is just as guilty as anyone in the FM of "ganging up" on anyone. You cannot tell me that you merely want to solve the problem, as my idea would solve the problem with a minimum of disruption to the board. Each and every member who does not support me in this does not want the problem solved, they want the FM punished.
3: New members who want to learn from this board WILL find themselves at a serious disadvantage without the FM to persecute the cranks. Pseudoscience WILL become more accepted on these boards, and many intelligent members WILL leave.
Think about it.

No-one but THEY has shown any support for my idea. What does that say to the moderators, I wonder?
"THEY"
Points taken. I don't want to see the FM disbanded either. Most of you guys are pretty cool.

Tolerance.............
If we were a group of 10 year olds out on the school playground, and 1/3 of the group was standing around yelling idiots, retards, losers! etc, 1/3 of the group was standing around telling the group yelling insults to "grow up", and 1/3 are standing around not getting involved either way, which group gets a "talkin to" from the playground supervisor? The insulters... wink.gif

Insults aren't nice, and shouldn't HAVE to be tolerated. We in an entirity should not have had to tolerate Zephir so long. That is what started this whole mess. I was here in the BZ (Before Zephir) days, and crank science wasn't around much. Zephir started this whole downward spiral. And since he was allowed to post his garbage 50 times a day, others have followed. The solution isn't with the FM, it is with the moderators.

I would LOVE to see the FM stay around, and be able to harrass the TRUE offenders (I will mention Zephir since he is banned). Pick their theories apart. But you must remember, the biggest offenders are here for a reason - they seem to all have enough of a mental disorder that they are dilusioned that they are the only people in the world that are right. These biggest offenders will not go away if they are being insulted (there is still one floating around here that I know). They actually are here because they ARE getting attention. So lets just quit feeding the trolls, since that is what they want. Lets get moderators FORCED into a position of not allowing pseudoscience.

my suggestion on how to do that would be for some of the highest educated (and open minded) to be able to tell a moderator that someone needs to go, and that person Goes. Byebye. I say this because I don't believe there is anyone left at Physorg that knows physics, otherwise they would be posting as part of the board like they used to.

Must work......... Will argue more later (or tomorrow) if you want.

</end rant>
BigDumbWeirdo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 7 2007, 05:35 PM)
Tolerance.............
If we were a group of 10 year olds out on the school playground, and 1/3 of the group was standing around yelling idiots, retards, losers! etc, 1/3 of the group was standing around telling the group yelling insults to "grow up", and 1/3 are standing around not getting involved either way, which group gets a "talkin to" from the playground supervisor?  The insulters...  wink.gif

But that group DOESN'T describe us.
It's more like 10% of the group is standing around yelling "idiot, numbskull, retard!!!" 20% is pointing out the idiots, numbskulls and retards and yelling "Idiot, numbskull, retard!!!" then pointing at the rest and saying "you're cool!" 10% is pointing out the idiots, numbskulls and retards and saying "You guys need to start learning, let us help!" and helping those who need it, 20% of the group is standing around doing nothing, and 20% is the idiots, numbskulls and retards who are giving the wrong answers to tomorrow's test to the final 20%.
And those like mr_homm and AlphaNumeric are simply... the teachers smile.gif
QUOTE
Insults aren't nice, and shouldn't HAVE to be tolerated.  We in an entirity should not have had to tolerate Zephir so long.  That is what started this whole mess.  I was here in the BZ (Before Zephir) days, and crank science wasn't around much.  Zephir started this whole downward spiral.  And since he was allowed to post his garbage 50 times a day, others have followed.  The solution isn't with the FM, it is with the moderators.

True, if you want a final solution to the issue. I'm not so sure I do. I'd rather see the board itself make the cranks feel unwelcome than to simply appeal to the moderators to kick them off. This gives them more chances to change their ways. Remember, some people who just want attention will do anything to get it. Including learning.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Insults aren't nice, and shouldn't HAVE to be tolerated.  We in an entirity should not have had to tolerate Zephir so long.  That is what started this whole mess.  I was here in the BZ (Before Zephir) days, and crank science wasn't around much.  Zephir started this whole downward spiral.  And since he was allowed to post his garbage 50 times a day, others have followed.  The solution isn't with the FM, it is with the moderators.

True, if you want a final solution to the issue. I'm not so sure I do. I'd rather see the board itself make the cranks feel unwelcome than to simply appeal to the moderators to kick them off. This gives them more chances to change their ways. Remember, some people who just want attention will do anything to get it. Including learning.

I would LOVE to see the FM stay around, and be able to harrass the TRUE offenders (I will mention Zephir since he is banned).  Pick their theories apart.  But you must remember, the biggest offenders are here for a reason - they seem to all have enough of a mental disorder that they are dilusioned that they are the only people in the world that are right.  These biggest offenders will not go away if they are being insulted (there is still one floating around here that I know).  They actually are here because they ARE getting attention.  So lets just quit feeding the trolls, since that is what they want.  Lets get moderators FORCED into a position of not allowing pseudoscience.

Some of us still hold to the slim chance that these idiots who only want atention for their theories might actually learn something and start putting their creative talents to work in more useful ways. I'd LOVE to see Farsight or StevenA lay aside their egos and misconceptions and be able to discuss subjects without making such ridiculous claims as they do now. As for Parsons, he's my... Hobby. I have no hope that he will come to his senses, I just enjoy baiting him for the most part. Cruel, yes, but he had a lifetime of choices in which he could have improved himself, made himself something better than he is, and he chose not to... I don't think it's wrong to convict a man who commits a crime, then walks into the courtroom to brag about it, and I don't think it's wrong to amuse yourself at the expense of someone who chose to believe ridiculous things and think in illogical ways, then signs up for a forum devoted to physics and science topics.

QUOTE
my suggestion on how to do that would be for some of the highest educated (and open minded) to be able to tell a moderator that someone needs to go, and that person Goes.  Byebye.  I say this because I don't believe there is anyone left at Physorg that knows physics, otherwise they would be posting as part of the board like they used to.

AlphaNumeric. Dallas. Euler. BenTheMan. NeoDevin. mr_homm...
They've all posted several times since I joined...
Zarabtul
Well I had to go with the first choice. I was compelled to stop in here though am positiv4e I want no part of the discussions with the true cranks the "Forum Mafia." When I find a scientific community that won't steal my idea's while shunning me then I may give a cripe about the world. Until then i will let the Great Jesus Christ's proclamations continue to come to pass.

May God Bless you all with the ability to learn to be the body of Christ and stop thinki8ng someone is just gonna come save your worthless hide and you don't have to work to make heaven ON Earth...


Turn into energy and wait out the next Ice Age start over again and see how far you get. Seriously this scientific community has ben about as helpful as a pak of haters.

Got any more games Geoff? As you're Certainly not of Lordly Calibur just as I have stated in the past, present, and future.

Lord Elf,

Zacharia_Andrew_Pain
GENEUS
rolleyes.gif ...... now that's why we need the FM. laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
vkamath
QUOTE (GENEUS+)
...... now that's why we need the FM.


Sure..Why not? Thanks Forum Mafia Sock Puppet.
GENEUS
QUOTE (vkamath+Dec 8 2007, 03:43 PM)
QUOTE (GENEUS+)
...... now that's why we need the FM.


Sure..Why not? Thanks Forum Mafia Sock Puppet.

You're welcome. smile.gif
Confused2
As Gehn is keen to demonstrate

If you start with N Type_A trolls and you introduce M Type_B trolls to control them

(N + M) > N
occidental
(N-M)<N
Mr. Robin Parsons
The FM need to be gotten out, removed or disbanded by whatever means possible.

They are a cankerous boil upon the very name of Science
N O M
QUOTE (Mr. Robin Parsons+Dec 10 2007, 07:39 AM)
The FM need to be gotten out, removed or disbanded by whatever means possible.

They are a cankerous boil upon the very name of Science

laugh.gif That's rich.

...um, parsons, this is a physics site. You know, about actual physics. Not the pretend stuff you and your cohorts play with here. You are not a scientist, you have never been or ever will be a scientist, you are merely a crank.

The FM don't attack real scientists parsons, just the pretend ones like you.
Sapo
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 7 2007, 04:06 PM)
biggrin.gif

In a court of law, would they allow a known mafioso to stand on the jury for a trial of a member mafioso who committed murder?  No.........

Nice try.

Aw, c'mon, you guys know I am sly!!.....  And you chose not to vote yes or no.

Next time, THINK before you vote on one of my polls.  I usually use SOME form of psychology or another.  LOL

Oh, now i just ruined my chances at further polls.  Now you know my trick. ph34r.gif

Hi, THEY. The trick was in the question of course. How could any of the FM give an honest vote?

But, you knew that anyway. smile.gif Like a fox, hm?
Sapo
QUOTE (N O M+Dec 9 2007, 06:42 PM)
laugh.gif That's rich.

...um, parsons, this is a physics site. You know, about actual physics. Not the pretend stuff you and your cohorts play with here. You are not a scientist, you have never been or ever will be a scientist, you are merely a crank.

The FM don't attack real scientists parsons, just the pretend ones like you.

() has a cohort? Fellow carton-campers, well-versed in misdirection? I wonder that () wastes ()'s talents here. laugh.gif
tikay
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 5 2007, 03:36 PM)


Another point, I have given negs for behavior that I have read, while I was not part of the conversation myself.

I have given a couple of negs for that reason, and plenty of positives for good reason, in areas I did not participate within...I think there is no harm in having feedback when you aren't part of the thread, but you should at least hint at why in that feedback...I suppose, for good measure.

BTW I did not vote because...I didn't completely agree with any of the few choices.
It was kind of like being IQ tested...not enough answers to choose from darling!

How about....one like....The forum mafia should have all feedback that is utterly abusive removed....thus bringing balance back to the forum!

So much is completely sick and derogatory and humiliating and gross...they would lose in the game.

A glass bottles coming out of someones arse! Little retarded kids, and any retarded person for that matter should be taken out, pictures of nasty NASTY toilets and the like are not fitting to the caliber of a place I like to hang out...today i thought of leaving again, but for good...this time and I wondered what I would do with the time it might free up and I knew I would be bored but I have no further theories and I don't always read the science, except the news...

Bla bla bla lala palooza...I don't know why those sick feedback are still allowed in here. Maybe pictures should be eliminated altogether in feedback.
People are nasty enough without all that.

My two cents.
tikay
QUOTE (Confused2+Dec 6 2007, 02:50 PM)


Hi Tikay smile.gif

Hi dollface! wub.gif
tikay
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Dec 6 2007, 01:58 PM)


Therefore, I issue a call to those named.
N O M, Alpha, Dallas: I ask you three intelligent and knowledgable members of the Mafia to lower your standards for the sake of us all. When those who have a decent understanding of science post mistakes, do not attack, but rather correct them.

This part was really good! IMO
Boneidol
QUOTE ("THEY"+Dec 5 2007, 06:51 PM)
I am asking this in light of numerous threads recently complaining of the Forum Mafia behavior. While GENERALLY I have no problem with the Forum Mafia, I do believe their behavior goes too far at times. A few of them can be kind, friendly, and positive, while a few are consistently mean and nasty.

Since some certain Forum Mafia members prefer to spam individuals with negative feedback and obnoxious pictures, should these FM members have their add feedback capability taken from them? (If that is something that the moderators can program)

I feel the feedback is an unregulated section that is abused, and if one abuses it, they should not be allowed to use that function. At least for a time. Good behavior can earn back the use of the add feedback function. wink.gif And if the negative behavior continues again, something should happen. Maybe lose the ability permanently?

I am just sick and tired of seeing someone with a low feedback rating, only to find that there are 40 to 50 negative feedbacks (many with pictures or offensive statements) and they are all from 5 certain individuals....... Sometimes it is deserved, many times it is not.

Well said!





TheDoc
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Dec 7 2007, 11:51 PM)
But that group DOESN'T describe us.
It's more like 10% of the group is standing around yelling "idiot, numbskull, retard!!!" 20% is pointing out the idiots, numbskulls and retards and yelling "Idiot, numbskull, retard!!!" then pointing at the rest and saying "you're cool!" 10% is pointing out the idiots, numbskulls and retards and saying "You guys need to start learning, let us help!" and helping those who need it, 20% of the group is standing around doing nothing, and 20% is the idiots, numbskulls and retards who are giving the wrong answers to tomorrow's test to the final 20%.
And those like mr_homm and AlphaNumeric are simply... the teachers smile.gif


Equally well said!
Boneidol
QUOTE (TheDoc+Aug 2 2008, 04:01 PM)
Equally well said!

Nah, THEY's comment was at least 36.227% better.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.