Fine Structure Of Proton 1/21,8

nalxhal

20th June 2008 - 04:40 PM

3. From function (26) we get length 0,225fermi

At first it seems that exist this length , but we find that proton has fine structure 1/21,8 or 2p.a , a is the fine structure of electron 1/137,035 .
So the angular momentum of proton is : mp.c.4,9fermi = 21,8.(h/2pi)First 5fermi is a characteristic nuclear length of atoms .
Second if we analyse more 4,9fermi as 1,96fermix2,5 = 1,96fermi.sqrt(2p)= lg , lg is gravity length , the electromagnetic lengt is lc=1,96fermi and existe lmax=2p.lc = 12,3fermi .The lengths lg,lc,lmax comes from hypotheses of first paper .So we can experementantly examine these hypotheses . 4,9fermi is the length of stable , constant atoms , from that length start Actinio

PAPERS ,left , Analysis of 2nd paper

http://nalxchal.blogspot.com

nalxhal

20th June 2008 - 07:24 PM

QUOTE (nalxhal+Jun 20 2008, 04:40 PM)

First 5fermi is a characteristic nuclear length of atoms .

4,9fermi is the length of stable , constant atoms , from that length start Actinio

the above sentences are wrong

Enthalpy

23rd June 2008 - 04:24 PM

Sure. And the other sentences are meaningless as well.

Are you trying to fool somebody? Or are you trying to believe you're a scientist?

AlphaNumeric

23rd June 2008 - 10:18 PM

[removed]

Secondly, it's a common display of ignorance amongst cranks that the coupling 'constants' in physics are constant. They aren't. They 'run' with energy in a way which is modelled by the beta-function, which is the parameter which sets the rate of 'flow' of the coupling with energy. And this is an experimental fact. The electromagnetic coupling strength is about 1/137 at low energies but at about 80~90GeV, of order the electroweak boson rest masses, it's approximately 1/128.

Hence, when a crank posts an explaination of the 137 factor, they demonstrate they don't know the mainstream model, they don't know the experimental data and they are doing nothing but numerology.

So do yourself a favour, bugger off and read a physics book. Actually look at what you're trying to model on a website other than Wikipedia.

nalxhal

26th June 2008 - 09:27 AM

QUOTE (AlphaNumeric+Jun 23 2008, 10:18 PM)

For a start, your opening post borders on such poor English you're either very bad at it or an idiot.

Secondly, it's a common display of ignorance amongst cranks that the coupling 'constants' in physics are constant. They aren't. They 'run' with energy in a way which is modelled by the beta-function, which is the parameter which sets the rate of 'flow' of the coupling with energy. And this is an experimental fact. The electromagnetic coupling strength is about 1/137 at low energies but at about 80~90GeV, of order the electroweak boson rest masses, it's approximately 1/128.

Hence, when a crank posts an explaination of the 137 factor, they demonstrate they don't know the mainstream model, they don't know the experimental data and they are doing nothing but numerology.

So do yourself a favour, bugger off and read a physics book. Actually look at what you're trying to model on a website other than Wikipedia.

Its true my English is bad

but you better study literature and not physics

Read the papers and you anderstaind more of what I understand .

Physics is not chiled poetry and songs to repeat for coins

AlphaNumeric

28th June 2008 - 05:24 PM

You completely ignored my criticism of your physics. The fine structure constant is not constant. It's a function of energy. So anyone who 'proves' that alpha = 1/137 is wrong and shows they don't even bother to research anything about the evidence of the fine structure constant.

PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.

To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.