RussoCat
16th March 2008 - 07:51 AM
Ok, quantum physics guys, I have a question and would like to know your perspective. If you hit a billiards ball at with the exact same inputs (speed of the ball hitting it, direction, mass...etc) then you should always get the same output. One to one, right? Well then, what about the Universe? Or to make it easy a small Universe. If all the matter condenced at a certain time with certain direction, speed mass...etc, would it be correct to say that the resultant Universe at any given moment was the only possible Universe that could be, given these inputs? This is without life being involved, would the Universe behave entirely as predicted given a snapshot of an early state? All the variables are known. I suppose that we do not know enough about the way our Universe works to make a prediction from a snapshot anyways, but that aside are there events that do not occur from a previous event and therefore take away an aspect of Fate from the moment of creation?
DavidD
16th March 2008 - 11:09 AM
I have special my theory, which can answer to this question. All cosmos and universe consist of smallest balls, which smaller than leptons... This balls are in contanct all the time. They motions combinations creating all universe... Those balls filling infinity space, so those balls positions can't be predicted, becouse need analize infinity...
On the over hand, if you don't like my theory, and our universe is somehow isolated from infinity, then answer is that all events are known before they become. But it's still too hard calculate all this...
N O M
16th March 2008 - 08:02 PM
QUOTE (DavidD+Mar 17 2008, 12:09 AM)
my balls are smaller than leptons...
That explains quite a lot
Shard
22nd March 2008 - 09:46 AM
I have similer theory to the OP. The problem with it is that you first have to prove that the behavior of each existing particle is predictable, given whatever its initial circumstances are. i.e. you have to prove that nothing can ever be random, which is technologically impossible today.
This (these) theories are dangerous because if they could somehow be proven, they would disprove God.
DavidD
22nd March 2008 - 01:32 PM
Those theories nor dangerous nor possible. You will be unable with supercomputer precisly simulate 10 balls, becouse balls function is random and thus can't be integrated or somthing and thus becouse balls motions is analog, need infinity computation speed even for 10 balls simulation. But as I said, space is infinity and need examine infinity information and then maybe you can do somthing with vectors or so, but when I was asking question about two balls, nobody was unable to answer
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=20692
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.