I was flipping around some formulas and i came up with e=m X gravity
(which is much faster than light). i also figured if we could use gravity like we use lasers or radio carrier frequencies we could communicate instantaneously.
it is said you cant transmit radio intelligence faster than the speed of light on either a laser or on a radio carrier as the info would lag behind the carrier going faster than c. But what about gravity? Gravity appears to be instantaneous (although a designer of a gravity detector stated that new black holes detected will lag behind the visible evidence). The military is experimenting with LIDAR (a variation of a detector I suggested back in the lete 1970's). But they are only trying to detect gravity as far as they state. The obvious thing to do would be to attempt to not only receive the waves but try to transmit on them. (I made some videos on
www.youtube.com/billyandtherockets on the subject. ) Has anyone out there ever built a low cost gravity wave detector/receiver ? I suppose the state of the art is about where the first spark gap transmitters were in the early days. Gravity has frewquencies around 10 ^-7 to 10^11 Hz with earth amplitudes of 10^-20
(F=wavelength/t ) waves are 10^-7 to 10^15 hz.
One experimentor using a circuit with capacitors and an opamp claimed to receive an intelligent series of clicks (something like the series of clicks i sent out on 146.520 megahertz at ten watts via a cubical quad beam antenna) but that was years before i began experimenting and he claimed the series came in the same way on several nights.
(google build your own gravity detector).
any ideas out there?

Eg = m x c on sguare

Eg - gravitational energy
m - mass
c - light speed

Gravity waves, like electromagnetic waves, travel at the speed of light.

Current theories and experiments suggest that, unlike EM waves, gravity is not slowed, refracted or otherwise impeded by matter.

16 billion miles per day. It may not be infinitely fast, amrit, but it's the fastest speed there is and that's nothing to sniff at.

Hi Billy,
C^2 does not have the same dimensions as m/s^2, thus cannot be replaced in the formula without an additional factor to equalize both sides of the equation.
Not being harsh, but you can't just exchange variables without considering the impact on the formula's equality.
Peace,
Ron