Enthalpy
30th December 2008 - 12:41 AM
At least I understood your question more or less the right way.
Well, telling that an element has various valence numbers implies that these valence numbers are not a direct consequence of its electronic configuration. Anyone who would blindly believe the too simple models of electron shelves would be mislead into false deductions.
For instance, the "4 outer electrons" of Carbon are organized as 2 in a complete 2s shelf and 2 in incomplete 2p shelves. So CO is rather normal, but making CO2 supposes to deplete a filled 2s shelf - this is similar to making xenon fluoride.
On the other hand, Beryllium has a complete 2s shelf and the stability of CO should suggest Be is rather inert - but it certainly isn't. So nothing simple even with light atoms.
Now, if you take heavier atoms, the energies of many shelves overlap, so the image of filling completely one shelf before beginning the next one is false. Very false. Electrons fill partially many shelves at the same time, and may prefer one or the other depending on the chemical bonds with other elements.
This is a usual way to explain why many elements - rare earths group, Actinoids group, and others - can have very similar chemical properties: they are said to have the same outer electronic configuration, additional electrons filling a deeper shelf from one element to another. Of course, such a simplistic explanation is logically wrong.
In the case of Mercury, you may be disturbed if you've seen it in the first column of a compact form of Medeleev's table. But if you look at a wider form of the table, you'll see Mercury somewhere at the middle, and then having various valence numbers gets less disturbing. Good address there:
http://www.webelements.com/