QUOTE (adoucette+May 3 2011, 06:29 PM)
Well that's ALSO what the IAEA is saying.
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/f...hima200311.htmlIf you want to provide a reliable SOURCE that shows that the level of radiation in the DryWell of these reactors, filled with a complete fuel load, is in someway abnormal, please do so.
Arthur
There are no other radiation reading like that from any other dry wells in the world. That is all you need to know to understand that something most unusual has taken place.
adoucette
4th May 2011 - 02:19 PM
QUOTE (Krypton+May 4 2011, 08:35 AM)
There are no other radiation reading like that from any other dry wells in the world. That is all you need to know to understand that something most unusual has taken place.
Some other source besides your ASSERTION that these values mean anything bad is needed.
From the TEPCO data on April 17th
Reactor 1
Dry Well: 121.4 Sv/hr
Suppression chamber: 97.5 Sv/hr
Reactor 2
Dry Well: N/A
Suppression Chamber: 131 Sv/hr
Reactor 3
Dry Well: 253.2 Sv/hr
Suppression Chamber: 103.9 Sv/hr
So actually, the readings in Reactors 5 & 6 are far below the reactors with problems.
Arthur
Capracus
2nd November 2011 - 08:30 AM
Edit.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.