Dark Energy's DNA Origin
DNA and living organisms emit biophotons, which radiation is coherent and blackbody, i.e. not thermal. DNA's biophotonic emissions provide a holographic biofield for the generation of physical structures. A seed, for instance, changes itself from a particle state into the tree's biofield for the purpose of self-reproduction. From the systems point of view a seed or genotype constitutes the phenotype tree system's input and output.
According to Systems Cosmology if we reverse the expansion of the universe in time, we'll find that the universe does not have a big bang origin, but a seed origin. In other words we'll find that a cosmic seed or cosmic DNA constitutes the genotype of the phenotype cosmic system. Also we'll find that just as a tree is the seed's way of making reproductions of itself, the universe is the cosmic DNA's way of making reproductions of itself. In a word, we'll find that life constitutes the cosmic system's input and output.
Thus the observation of a tree system allows us to infer that our universe yields life because the universe itself is the product of a seed of life. Based on this inference it is logical to propose that evidently dark energy -- also called vacuum energy or zero-point field -- is the cosmic DNA's life energy.
Predictably dark energy -- that fuels the expansion of our universe -- is the same as the quantum vacuum's zero-point energy, as well as the cosmic microwave radiation. The reason is that they all seem to originate from the cosmic DNA's biophoton emissions, which blackbody radiation provides a holographic biofield for the generation of the physical universe.
Based on the fact that the biophotonic radiation emitted by DNA is coherent we may predict also that the cosmic DNA's biophotonic field or "dark energy" is equally coherent.
Kazmer Ujvarosy
sources? 
Sources? Do you mean the kind of sources that show magnetic fields as 'lines' of flux with nice pictures of iron filings in 'lines' over a magnet? No need for sources.
I read somewhere something about an accidental observation where dna was placed in a chamber and studied with a laser. One person removed the dna. The second continued measurement and analysis not knowing the dna was removed. The laser still provided information about the dna. Does anyone have better info on this?
I read somewhere something about an accidental observation where dna was placed in a chamber and studied with a laser. One person removed the dna. The second continued measurement and analysis not knowing the dna was removed. The laser still provided information about the dna. Does anyone have better info on this?
That sounds a bit like Kirlian photography which is supposed to show an entire leaf even after part of the leaf has been torn off. Or a missing finger on a hand. The missing part is supposed to show as an orange glow but I have my sincere doubts about all of it 
I was thinking after watching alot of science channel, and looking at some cool pictures on the internet. That i cant beleive they dont know what a black hole is. Everything in space is obvious, nothing is hidden, its just up to use to somehow decode the information we get. Therefor, after my survey on the subject had a thought about the formation of these "black holes".
It seems to me the most mysterious dimension we know of on earth is electromagnetic radiation. Every star gives off this stuff, and interelated to mass, it produces gravity. We all have seen picturs of coliding galaxies, and it is a very beautiful scene, mathematically, as well as esthetically. So I was thinking about these galaxies and thier colisions, and trying to relate them to dark matter, or "black holes". My first thought on the subject was the two would ultimately collide and collapse. This is wrong, collapse doesnt sound right, it doesn't even feel right. It may be true in explosions, but not concerning the formation of black holes.
I then thought large electomagnetic forces surrounding galaxies, the same electromagnetic force around stars but on a much larger scale, a galaxy scale. Then I remember reading all the articles about how diverse galaxy structure is, and I thought to myself, is it possible that two galaxies(or 2 stars) can gravity dance while coming closer to eachother. This kind of centrifugal force is ridiculously mathematical. Anyways, back to the action, so the two bodies are coming closer and in turn moving faster. What does this do to the Center? I think, just like a star needs enough mass to start the reaction. I think "Black Holes" require rotation of emmense amounts of electromagnetic forces gravitating inward, thus infinitely accelerating inward aproaching speeds beyond the speed of light.
Truth is saying, "every action, has a reaction" but in translation that could mean every end has a beginning, also every ying has a yang, Im not sure I made my point yet. I am suggesting solar systems, even galaxies are the positives, just like the positive charge in atoms. And naturally, there are negatives, in this reality those negatives are Black Holes. Thier function is the reciprocal of the positives function, apparently, that means accelerating, heating, and condensing matter magically.
So Im sure all these thoughts have been thought of before, and im not booming with confidence about this theory, but to me, i can't see it happen any other way. I am suggesting Black Holes are these random sex collisions b/w two rotating electromagnetic feilds, and are relatively fewer compared to the numbers of stars, but not to the number of galaxies. There are so many holes in this theory, thats why im open to others opinions. If you got questions, please ask me cause then i can think of the answerd with you, cause believe me, i havent nearly done the research.
It seems to me the most mysterious dimension we know of on earth is electromagnetic radiation. Every star gives off this stuff, and interelated to mass, it produces gravity. We all have seen picturs of coliding galaxies, and it is a very beautiful scene, mathematically, as well as esthetically. So I was thinking about these galaxies and thier colisions, and trying to relate them to dark matter, or "black holes". My first thought on the subject was the two would ultimately collide and collapse. This is wrong, collapse doesnt sound right, it doesn't even feel right. It may be true in explosions, but not concerning the formation of black holes.
I then thought large electomagnetic forces surrounding galaxies, the same electromagnetic force around stars but on a much larger scale, a galaxy scale. Then I remember reading all the articles about how diverse galaxy structure is, and I thought to myself, is it possible that two galaxies(or 2 stars) can gravity dance while coming closer to eachother. This kind of centrifugal force is ridiculously mathematical. Anyways, back to the action, so the two bodies are coming closer and in turn moving faster. What does this do to the Center? I think, just like a star needs enough mass to start the reaction. I think "Black Holes" require rotation of emmense amounts of electromagnetic forces gravitating inward, thus infinitely accelerating inward aproaching speeds beyond the speed of light.
Truth is saying, "every action, has a reaction" but in translation that could mean every end has a beginning, also every ying has a yang, Im not sure I made my point yet. I am suggesting solar systems, even galaxies are the positives, just like the positive charge in atoms. And naturally, there are negatives, in this reality those negatives are Black Holes. Thier function is the reciprocal of the positives function, apparently, that means accelerating, heating, and condensing matter magically.
So Im sure all these thoughts have been thought of before, and im not booming with confidence about this theory, but to me, i can't see it happen any other way. I am suggesting Black Holes are these random sex collisions b/w two rotating electromagnetic feilds, and are relatively fewer compared to the numbers of stars, but not to the number of galaxies. There are so many holes in this theory, thats why im open to others opinions. If you got questions, please ask me cause then i can think of the answerd with you, cause believe me, i havent nearly done the research.