kowalskil
Some of you might be interested in my very short article about causality.

http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/theo/cause3.html

Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia)
[SIZE=7]
Capracus
QUOTE (kowalski+)
My interpretation is based on the idea of NOMA, formulated by a biologist S.J. Gould.

NOMA is an erroneous assumption made by Gould, a scientist who should have known better. Gould failed to acknowledge that no proposition is immune to reasoned speculation, be it testable or not. Speculation based on an examination of the sum of relevant knowledge (science) will always trump that derived from a limited portion thereof (religion).
Mekigal
QUOTE (kowalskil+Jun 19 2012, 01:45 AM)
Some of you might be interested in my very short article about causality.

http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/theo/cause3.html

Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia)
[SIZE=7]

Did we meet already ? I saw your wiki page once before.

What did you think of my making 7s crawl across the worlds living room floor ( For any you that got it . I mean making 7s roll up stream or flash like a stop light .

Pretty good for someone who don't have a wiki page would you not say .

What do you think about predestination ?

The idea it is more than just causality , but more like a program .

O.K. class . See we got physicists hea!

I been looking at the 20 field . I got to take a closer look today . 5s in a single line. Oh yeah Mayans were on to something with that one .

It is not 5s like you think . Only 5s come out in the 20 field all lined up so pretty I could kiss them on the lips

What I mean is they line up in groups of ending in 5 . It is a skip , but the lines are well defined . I got to get the chart , but if I remember right . Yeah that is it
5,25,45,65,85, and so on
then
15,35,55,75,95 and so on

All neatly rapped up perfect like .
The primes are doing something funny I have not looked into yet
3s are mixed with prime in this fashion I can tell you that

I think we might have met or you were a drive by shooter maybe ? Don't remember . I do know I saw your wiki page before . When can I have a Wiki page ? Every bodies getting a wiki page but me . Did you bribe some one ? They can't even spell my relatives name right on there wiki page .

For you in the know . Ridgley married a Rigby so the new married last name was rigby but the maiden name was the middle name used . So the middle name is either Ridgley or Ridgely depending on the tree branch . It was John Stull who perverted it to Ridgley . That is my speculation . Pretty sound speculation , but I don't think anyone else is in that agreement with Me . My Dad sure is not . He thinks the Ridgely is a miss spelling . Go try and tell the Ridgely's that . The ones that never mixed with Greathouse blood or Rigby for that matter . By my calculations They have been Ridgely way before Ridgley ever showed up
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.