Craig
16th November 2009 - 03:20 AM
rpenner is correct, this problem can be solved through the conservation of energy. Since they don't say anything about friction then the only thing that is going to slow down the roll of quarters is the pull of gravity as it moves up the incline. But initially it has a kinetic energy of 0.5*mass*velocity^2. They give you the angular velocity which can be converted into its linear velocity (or more precisely the tangential velocity on any point of the circle, imagine it as the tangential velocity at the top of the roll of quarters always so you can picture an arrow pointing off tangentially on the top of the circle pointing always in the direction of travel) by the product of the angular velocity times the radius of the roll of quarters. So that would be v = omega*radius = 0.02*45 = 0.9 meters/sec.
So you can picture the point on the top of the roll of quarters moving at a speed of 0.9 m/s in the direction that the roll of quarters is traveling in.
So its initial kinetic energy is 0.5*mass*0.9^2. When it comes to a stop all the initial kinetic energy of the roll of quarters has been converted into a potential energy due to its vertical height from the level surface that the incline lies upon. So you can just set the initial kinetic energy equal to the final potential energy and solve for the height. So you get: 0.5*mass*0.9^2 = mass*acceleration due to gravity*vertical height,
0.5*mass*0.9^2 = mass*9.8*height, the mass ratios away from each side of the equation leaving
0.5*0.9^2 = 9.8*height, solving for the height yields:
(0.5*0.9^2)/9.8 = height = 0.04133 meters or about 1.63 inches
It travels for a much longer distance up the incline, but the incline is only 15 degrees so vertically its final height is not all that much.