newton
20th February 2008 - 10:13 AM
QUOTE (turin+Jun 21 2007, 01:48 AM)
I wonder what's wrong with my current DVDs? I guess my poor eyesight saves me from the affliction of awareness of poor quality video.
if you look really close, you can see the pixels.
it's a "big" problem.
Enthalpy
21st February 2008 - 12:36 AM
Must be science-affliction.
midwestern
25th June 2008 - 08:05 PM
Both Blu-Ray and DVD's have the same quality. I can't figure out the admiration for the Blue, can you?
DavidD
26th June 2008 - 06:06 AM
QUOTE (midwestern+Jun 25 2008, 08:05 PM)
Both Blu-Ray and DVD's have the same quality. I can't figure out the admiration for the Blue, can you?
Maybe you can see better quality if you will stop cadr? but how I know there still used bluring motions in videos and thus no any diference,becouse esys looking abstractly...
Edit: I think in all videos need don't use motion bluring and use not 23-25 FPS, but 30 or maybe even 60 FPS!
midwestern
26th June 2008 - 05:16 PM
Some editing of your own DavidD would help me understand your post.
fanscape360
12th September 2008 - 08:14 PM
All right, if you are skeptical of Blu-ray or aren't sure quite what the big deal is, there's no better movie than Transformers to make you a believer.
On 1080p, the picture is crystal clear, the colors are vibrant, and the sound is amazing, I swear you can practically feel those freakin' robots.
Full of good bonus features that update in real-time (BD-Live capabilities). Plus Michael Bay talks about how they took each Transformer from toy to movie star. Definitely the most worthy of all my Blu-ray titles in terms of sight and sound.
www.transformersmovie.com
Alex with TF
DavidD
14th September 2008 - 04:11 PM
I sow 720i resolution at GT and it visible, that not picutre-frame movie, but bluring jingle bingle if there much motions in frame(s)...
Of course the same probably also at DVD quality...
But for me not very interesting blueray, since now everything is from internet you know, for free... Of course to download 25GB or 50 GB is not best solution, but I think you don't have in your eyes such resolution of 1080*1920=2073600 = 2Mpixels. Seems that human have about 6-7 milions of cells sensitive for colour light, but I don't know is there 6 milions for each colour or with all coulourse, if with all colourse then there is only 6/3=2 milions pixels resolution of human vision. So like blueray, but possible, that human usauly concentraiting his attention at only very limited object... and then real concentration resolution can be about 640*480=307200= 307 Kpixels. Of course when you waching movie you can look at many objects and thus repeat many times movie... But still in you brain will be recorded only about 10 KB in best case about this movie, that somebody fak somebody and somebody kill somebody and somebody is very profesional with guns and somebody with legs and somebody have nice car or shirts and so on. Also maybe you will remeber recorder faces in you brain with 5 KB each. Maybe even those faces are recorded by some spots on face and if there is very big nose or very some not usual, then maybe this only be recorded and normaly you will not recognise without some context information possible...
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.