i need to do more research but just hear me out;
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
just a half baked idea
QUOTE (bigideas82654+Mar 16 2008, 07:07 PM)
i need to do more research but just hear me out;
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
just a half baked idea
Half-baked indeed
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
just a half baked idea
Half-baked indeed
QUOTE
just a half baked idea
Come back when it is fully baked and hot from the oven!
QUOTE (bigideas82654+Mar 16 2008, 07:07 PM)
i need to do more research but just hear me out;
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
just a half baked idea
Hey there!
A black hole is created when a massive object collapses in on itself to form a super - dense center, or rather, a singularity. The denseness of the singularity creates in immensely powerful gravitational field, which sucks in anything inside the event horizon - even light. Another very dense celestial object is the neutron star. Now, this is not nearly as dense as a black hole, but at a point inside called the "neutron drip", the neutrons are "squeezed" out because of the pressure. Now, if a black hole is even more dense than this, then how can atoms exist at the center?
- Gehn
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
just a half baked idea
Hey there!
A black hole is created when a massive object collapses in on itself to form a super - dense center, or rather, a singularity. The denseness of the singularity creates in immensely powerful gravitational field, which sucks in anything inside the event horizon - even light. Another very dense celestial object is the neutron star. Now, this is not nearly as dense as a black hole, but at a point inside called the "neutron drip", the neutrons are "squeezed" out because of the pressure. Now, if a black hole is even more dense than this, then how can atoms exist at the center?
- Gehn
Well that was clear. 
Thanks cheezy.
Thanks cheezy.
QUOTE (N O M+Mar 16 2008, 06:04 PM)
Well that was clear. Thanks cheezy.
Ya gotta give him credit for picking the correct thread to post in .
Thanks cheezy.Ya gotta give him credit for picking the correct thread to post in .
Cosmic Black Holes just do not exist, they are the result of incorrect mathematical assumptions.
here is an anaylsis of Sag A
here is an anaylsis of Sag A
QUOTE
Application of Gcentral spin to Our Galaxy's Central ? Black Hole ?
The Star S2, at the galactic heart confirms that a central super-massive black hole exists in the galactic center, according to physicist Rainer Schoedel, who with colleagues published the findings in the journal Nature "Star Orbit Nails Black Hole," published 17th October 2002.
' "We can now confidently say that a black hole does indeed exist at the center of our galaxy," said Schoedel, who works at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching, Germany. The source of the intense radio energy that is emitted from the center of the galaxy has been pinpointed to a span of 17 light-hours.
"No event like this one has ever been reported," said the European Southern Observatory, which manages some international telescopes used in the study. The astronomers found "unambiguously" that the star S2 is moving around Sagittarius A "like the Earth orbits the sun." '
ESGT calculations : actual situation
The period of the star S2 is 15.2 years and its distance from the center is about 17 light-hours or 1.9 X 10^10 km. From this data the calculated orbital velocity of S2 is 171 km sec^-1. Therefore at the center of our galaxy, the orbital energy constant for the central mass is
GSagittarius A = 5.6 X 10^14 km^3 sec^-2.
Assuming a basic Schwarzchild geometry, the radius of Sagittarius A would be about 30 light-seconds or 9 X 10^6 km, yielding the surface gravity of this central mass at 6.9 km/sec^2 and the escape velocity at 11,155 km sec^-1.
From Black Hole Theory: fantastic situation
However a black hole would have an escape velocity equal to the speed of light, which is 300,000 km sec^-1. Calculating back to an escape velocity of 300,000 km sec^-1, Sagittarus A would have to have a small radius, of about 78,000 km or 0.26 light-seconds, which is about 11% of the radius of our Sun.
Web Site Reference
Nature Article http://www.nature.com/nsu/021014/021014-6.html
Images http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/021...tre_eso_big.jpg
http://www.space.com/images/blackhole_new_021016_02,0.jpg
The Star S2, at the galactic heart confirms that a central super-massive black hole exists in the galactic center, according to physicist Rainer Schoedel, who with colleagues published the findings in the journal Nature "Star Orbit Nails Black Hole," published 17th October 2002.
' "We can now confidently say that a black hole does indeed exist at the center of our galaxy," said Schoedel, who works at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching, Germany. The source of the intense radio energy that is emitted from the center of the galaxy has been pinpointed to a span of 17 light-hours.
"No event like this one has ever been reported," said the European Southern Observatory, which manages some international telescopes used in the study. The astronomers found "unambiguously" that the star S2 is moving around Sagittarius A "like the Earth orbits the sun." '
ESGT calculations : actual situation
The period of the star S2 is 15.2 years and its distance from the center is about 17 light-hours or 1.9 X 10^10 km. From this data the calculated orbital velocity of S2 is 171 km sec^-1. Therefore at the center of our galaxy, the orbital energy constant for the central mass is
GSagittarius A = 5.6 X 10^14 km^3 sec^-2.
Assuming a basic Schwarzchild geometry, the radius of Sagittarius A would be about 30 light-seconds or 9 X 10^6 km, yielding the surface gravity of this central mass at 6.9 km/sec^2 and the escape velocity at 11,155 km sec^-1.
From Black Hole Theory: fantastic situation
However a black hole would have an escape velocity equal to the speed of light, which is 300,000 km sec^-1. Calculating back to an escape velocity of 300,000 km sec^-1, Sagittarus A would have to have a small radius, of about 78,000 km or 0.26 light-seconds, which is about 11% of the radius of our Sun.
Web Site Reference
Nature Article http://www.nature.com/nsu/021014/021014-6.html
Images http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/021...tre_eso_big.jpg
http://www.space.com/images/blackhole_new_021016_02,0.jpg
QUOTE (Zarkov+)
Cosmic Black Holes just do not exist, they are the result of incorrect mathematical assumptions.
Maybe in your pathetic, delusional world. In the real world, however, black holes do exist. Telling yourself that they don't will not change a thing.
And what is that article supposed to prove? Oh, wait. It doesn't prove anything that you said! Poor Zarkov doesn't even know what references he's citing now.
Maybe in your pathetic, delusional world. In the real world, however, black holes do exist. Telling yourself that they don't will not change a thing.
QUOTE
here is an anaylsis of Sag A
And what is that article supposed to prove? Oh, wait. It doesn't prove anything that you said! Poor Zarkov doesn't even know what references he's citing now.
QUOTE (Theory 1:+)
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
QUOTE (Theory 2:+)
Cosmic Black Holes just do not exist, they are the result of incorrect mathematical assumptions.
I think theory 1 is more likely to be true.
I think theory 1 is more likely to be true.
QUOTE (mudderrunner+Mar 17 2008, 05:26 PM)
QUOTE (Theory 1:+)
black holes have their own atom. it is an undiscovered atom most likely radioactive. the black hole smashes atoms it catches together and creates new black hole atoms.
QUOTE (Theory 2:+)
Cosmic Black Holes just do not exist, they are the result of incorrect mathematical assumptions.
I think theory 1 is more likely to be true.
Comparing two stupid theories id irrelevant. They are both wrong. bigideas82654's because he's just making random stuff up, Zerkoff's because he's an idiot who doesn't understand the maths.
I think theory 1 is more likely to be true.
Comparing two stupid theories id irrelevant. They are both wrong. bigideas82654's because he's just making random stuff up, Zerkoff's because he's an idiot who doesn't understand the maths.
Black holes are where all our missing objects are. Things like missing socks lost when doing laundry, car keys, and etc. They are also where our money goes most of the time! 
When or if they some day fade away, we can get our lost objects and money back!!! 
When a passerby asked a black hole, "What are you doing there?" It answered, "Just killing time."
Enough black hole "theory." Now it is time for dinner....
They are also where our money goes most of the time! When or if they some day fade away, we can get our lost objects and money back!!! When a passerby asked a black hole, "What are you doing there?" It answered, "Just killing time."
Enough black hole "theory." Now it is time for dinner....
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.