To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Big Bang
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Space > Space

Puzzler
Hi - Have a question - the basic theory of the big bang is that it began as a singularity. Most explanations talk about a super heated ball of expanding matter. One of the properties of a singularity (from people like Hawkin) is that time ceases to exist. So if there is no time there can be no movement and no movement surely means no heat?

Regards
Quatermass
The idea of the big bang is that everything began in a very small area and expanded from there. This was said to be a singularity, which is no more than a mathematical idea. There is no evidence such a thing can exist.

There is also a slight problem with gravity. Matter forms after 10^-32 of a second and at that point, gravity kicks in and the end of inflation/expansion.

Time is essentially change, but having said that, a singularity if such a thing existed would be ultimately inert and so as you point out, there would be no time. Even inside a black hole, there would be no movement, so as you point out, no heat.
Quatermass
Good to see you back again, Cusa.

Inflation is just something made up to explain the uniformity of the CMB. I don't know why BB-er's are hung up on a singularity. If such a thing existed, it would be ultimately stable. Better to believe that matter and energy appeared over a large area and expanded from that. It would solve a number of problems.
AlexG
This is 1/4M saying "it can't be so because I don't believe it".

He and Mitch are definitely in the same league.
AlexG
QUOTE (Quatermass+Apr 18 2009, 03:16 PM)
I've had a look at many of your recent posts and I can see you are just here to insult people instead of joining in debate. You seem to know no science so I suspect you are a little child who uses daddy's computer when he is out and when you go back to school, you boast to the other kids about how you posted on a science forum and that you were smarter than all of them put together.

The dreams of childhood. rolleyes.gif

Debate? With you? laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

Since your contributions consist of 'I don't believe it, so it isn't so', I'm at a loss as to how to 'debate'. You've stated that the equations of physics mean nothing to you, you don't know any math, you've got only the most simplistic of understanding, and if you don't see it outside your window, it doesn't exist.

My degree in physics is now thirty-five years old, and I haven't worked as a physicist, so I don't claim to be one, but I've forgotten more about physics than you've ever known. And if I'd forgotten nothing, it would still be more than you've ever known.

PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.