QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Originally posted by Foxx There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either... 1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems OR 2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK. |
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:24 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:15 AM)
As I said when I first posted the thing I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility.
Again, Why don't you e-mail him and ask him for his phone number. Maybe he'll give it to you and you can set up a meeting.
Anyway, you can't find a single credible source for the quote. That also lends his story credibility.
I really couldn't care less about the Wing TV story, (which I had never heard about before) and is meaningless (to me) whether it's true or not.
The whole issue has nothing to do with this thread... just another Schneiby-Doo ob-fu-sk8tion...
like the constant ravings about rove, and 'smelly' things.
De-rail the topic, spread lies, attack the messenger, create straw-men, slander, swear & curse...
anything to muddy the waters.
Pure disinformationalist stuff there.
How's the lawsuit coming?
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
Again, Why don't you e-mail him and ask him for his phone number. Maybe he'll give it to you and you can set up a meeting.
Anyway, you can't find a single credible source for the quote. That also lends his story credibility.
I really couldn't care less about the Wing TV story, (which I had never heard about before) and is meaningless (to me) whether it's true or not.
The whole issue has nothing to do with this thread... just another Schneiby-Doo ob-fu-sk8tion...
like the constant ravings about rove, and 'smelly' things.
De-rail the topic, spread lies, attack the messenger, create straw-men, slander, swear & curse...
anything to muddy the waters.
Pure disinformationalist stuff there.
How's the lawsuit coming?
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:39 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Originally posted by Foxx There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either... 1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems OR 2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK. |
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 01:47 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:24 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:15 AM)
As I said when I first posted the thing I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility.
Again, Why don't you e-mail him and ask him for his phone number. Maybe he'll give it to you and you can set up a meeting.
Anyway, you can't find a single credible source for the quote. That also lends his story credibility.
I really couldn't care less about the Wing TV story, (which I had never heard about before) and is meaningless (to me) whether it's true or not.
The whole issue has nothing to do with this thread... just another Schneiby-Doo ob-fu-sk8tion...
like the constant ravings about rove, and 'smelly' things.
De-rail the topic, spread lies, attack the messenger, create straw-men, slander, swear & curse...
anything to muddy the waters.
Pure disinformationalist stuff there.
How's the lawsuit coming?
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.
He posted here jan 3rd http://www.campusprogress.org/page/communi...inson.eric/CLLG
and here http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dazinith/...66322803109158/
He posted here jan 4th http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320531.shtml
He posted here jan 11th http://www.caves.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=6259&
The post that started it on this forum. Jan 30th. http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59724
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Guest_Sentinel/Paul Isaac Jr posts reply feb 1st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383
Again, I don't know if this guy is the real paul Isaac Jr but no one can prove the real paul Isaac Jr said anything anyway.
What this DOES prove is CT sites are lying about the very people who would give their lives for them. SICK!
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
Again, Why don't you e-mail him and ask him for his phone number. Maybe he'll give it to you and you can set up a meeting.
Anyway, you can't find a single credible source for the quote. That also lends his story credibility.
I really couldn't care less about the Wing TV story, (which I had never heard about before) and is meaningless (to me) whether it's true or not.
The whole issue has nothing to do with this thread... just another Schneiby-Doo ob-fu-sk8tion...
like the constant ravings about rove, and 'smelly' things.
De-rail the topic, spread lies, attack the messenger, create straw-men, slander, swear & curse...
anything to muddy the waters.
Pure disinformationalist stuff there.
How's the lawsuit coming?
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.
He posted here jan 3rd http://www.campusprogress.org/page/communi...inson.eric/CLLG
and here http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dazinith/...66322803109158/
He posted here jan 4th http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320531.shtml
He posted here jan 11th http://www.caves.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=6259&
The post that started it on this forum. Jan 30th. http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59724
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Guest_Sentinel/Paul Isaac Jr posts reply feb 1st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383
Again, I don't know if this guy is the real paul Isaac Jr but no one can prove the real paul Isaac Jr said anything anyway.
What this DOES prove is CT sites are lying about the very people who would give their lives for them. SICK!
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 01:51 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:39 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Originally posted by Foxx There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either... 1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems OR 2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK. |
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
Funny how people like common sense make up complete lies and then writes up whole posts as if they have any credibility. There were firemen, police and dozens and dozens of other eyewitnesses who testified that they heard explosions, etc., and many of these statements were captured on video.

But it just goes to show you, that when a person is so wrapped up in promoting their own lies you can present all the evidence in the world, but it just won't matter.
In either case, back to the real people, who might have a slight interest in the truth...
Some of the Bin Laden conspiracy theorist, (magician in the cave who suspended the laws of physics on 9/11) people, you know the ones who hold an American flag in one hand, and a swastika on the other, while bragging about being ignorant, well they try to hang their hat on why they don't think explosives were used because that would mean thousands of people would have had to have been involved with the governments pre-planning and implementation of 9/11.

They try to sell the bogus theory that too many people would know about the governments crime and hence they would have reported it, and because they say no one has ever reported the crime that no crime was ever committed, hence the magician in the cave did it.
But here's the reality of the situation. Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands how fear is used to silence people from talking about what they know. How many other crimes done by the Mafia have included the silencing and killing of witnesses?
But irregardless of this, let's take a look at something very important. Of the hundreds, or maybe thousands of people who may have been directly or indirectly related to the crime of the century and have appeared to have been silent, consider this...
Much of the information that has come out over the past several years on what really happened on 9/11 have originated from sources within the government. More and more people within the government have LEAKED OUT critical information about what really happened.
WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAME FROM? Now the physics involved is just plain mathematics, ANY IDIOT KNOWS that buildings don't just collapse at NEAR free fall speeds, unless control demolition is used, but there are other bits and pieces of the 9/11 crime that has come out, as revealed by sources inside the government.

And of course they gotta be EXTREMELY CAREFUL. Would you tell the truth about a crime committed by the bush administration if they had your whole family by the balls? Even if a direct threat wasn't proven, all you need is an implied threat, like a horses head in your bed, it gets the message across loud and clear.
Some of these people have children and they know they'll be putting them in serious jeopardy if they so much as open their mouths.

Point being, while most of the people involved in the 9/11 crime directly or indirectly have appeared to have been silent the fact of the matter is that little bits of information have leaked out. If you expect them to come right out on fox news and confess what really happened, do you think it would do any good???
If some of the top brass, etc. admitted that our own government did 9/11 would fox news believe them or would they call them nut cases?
Point being the truth is an enemy of the state and it must be stopped any way it can, and intimidation, fear, risk reward is one way to deal with it, as is murder, so don't expect all the people who know what really happened to come up to the podium and start talking, because if they did, the first thing the media would do is TURN OFF THEIR MIKE.

But it just goes to show you, that when a person is so wrapped up in promoting their own lies you can present all the evidence in the world, but it just won't matter.
In either case, back to the real people, who might have a slight interest in the truth...
Some of the Bin Laden conspiracy theorist, (magician in the cave who suspended the laws of physics on 9/11) people, you know the ones who hold an American flag in one hand, and a swastika on the other, while bragging about being ignorant, well they try to hang their hat on why they don't think explosives were used because that would mean thousands of people would have had to have been involved with the governments pre-planning and implementation of 9/11.

They try to sell the bogus theory that too many people would know about the governments crime and hence they would have reported it, and because they say no one has ever reported the crime that no crime was ever committed, hence the magician in the cave did it.
But here's the reality of the situation. Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands how fear is used to silence people from talking about what they know. How many other crimes done by the Mafia have included the silencing and killing of witnesses?
But irregardless of this, let's take a look at something very important. Of the hundreds, or maybe thousands of people who may have been directly or indirectly related to the crime of the century and have appeared to have been silent, consider this...
Much of the information that has come out over the past several years on what really happened on 9/11 have originated from sources within the government. More and more people within the government have LEAKED OUT critical information about what really happened.
WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAME FROM? Now the physics involved is just plain mathematics, ANY IDIOT KNOWS that buildings don't just collapse at NEAR free fall speeds, unless control demolition is used, but there are other bits and pieces of the 9/11 crime that has come out, as revealed by sources inside the government.
And of course they gotta be EXTREMELY CAREFUL. Would you tell the truth about a crime committed by the bush administration if they had your whole family by the balls? Even if a direct threat wasn't proven, all you need is an implied threat, like a horses head in your bed, it gets the message across loud and clear.
Some of these people have children and they know they'll be putting them in serious jeopardy if they so much as open their mouths.
Point being, while most of the people involved in the 9/11 crime directly or indirectly have appeared to have been silent the fact of the matter is that little bits of information have leaked out. If you expect them to come right out on fox news and confess what really happened, do you think it would do any good???
If some of the top brass, etc. admitted that our own government did 9/11 would fox news believe them or would they call them nut cases?
Point being the truth is an enemy of the state and it must be stopped any way it can, and intimidation, fear, risk reward is one way to deal with it, as is murder, so don't expect all the people who know what really happened to come up to the podium and start talking, because if they did, the first thing the media would do is TURN OFF THEIR MIKE.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 02:39 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 5 2006, 02:35 AM)
Funny how people like common sense make up complete lies and then writes up whole posts as if they have any credibility. There were firemen, police and dozens and dozens of other eyewitnesses who testified that they heard explosions, etc., and many of these statements were captured on video.

But it just goes to show you, that when a person is so wrapped up in promoting their own lies you can present all the evidence in the world, but it just won't matter.
In either case, back to the real people, who might have a slight interest in the truth...
Some of the Bin Laden conspiracy theorist, (magician in the cave who suspended the laws of physics on 9/11) people, you know the ones who hold an American flag in one hand, and a swastika on the other, while bragging about being ignorant, well they try to hang their hat on why they don't think explosives were used because that would mean thousands of people would have had to have been involved with the governments pre-planning and implementation of 9/11.

They try to sell the bogus theory that too many people would know about the governments crime and hence they would have reported it, and because they say no one has ever reported the crime that no crime was ever committed, hence the magician in the cave did it.
But here's the reality of the situation. Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands how fear is used to silence people from talking about what they know. How many other crimes done by the Mafia have included the silencing and killing of witnesses?
But irregardless of this, let's take a look at something very important. Of the hundreds, or maybe thousands of people who may have been directly or indirectly related to the crime of the century and have appeared to have been silent, consider this...
Much of the information that has come out over the past several years on what really happened on 9/11 have originated from sources within the government. More and more people within the government have LEAKED OUT critical information about what really happened.
WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAME FROM? Now the physics involved is just plain mathematics, ANY IDIOT KNOWS that buildings don't just collapse at NEAR free fall speeds, unless control demolition is used, but there are other bits and pieces of the 9/11 crime that has come out, as revealed by sources inside the government.

And of course they gotta be EXTREMELY CAREFUL. Would you tell the truth about a crime committed by the bush administration if they had your whole family by the balls? Even if a direct threat wasn't proven, all you need is an implied threat, like a horses head in your bed, it gets the message across loud and clear.
Some of these people have children and they know they'll be putting them in serious jeopardy if they so much as open their mouths.

Point being, while most of the people involved in the 9/11 crime directly or indirectly have appeared to have been silent the fact of the matter is that little bits of information have leaked out. If you expect them to come right out on fox news and confess what really happened, do you think it would do any good???
If some of the top brass, etc. admitted that our own government did 9/11 would fox news believe them or would they call them nut cases?
Point being the truth is an enemy of the state and it must be stopped any way it can, and intimidation, fear, risk reward is one way to deal with it, as is murder, so don't expect all the people who know what really happened to come up to the podium and start talking, because if they did, the first thing the media would do is TURN OFF THEIR MIKE.
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt
What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt
What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...
I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?
A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt
Let me guess why they left that important part out..
SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.
Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?
A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.
Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?
A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF
First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.
SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.
Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?
A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.
Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?
A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF
First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.
“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers
there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt
And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION...
Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF
And here is the outright LIE...
Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF
And here is the outright LIE...
“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen
Note where these lairs but the "...."
Now for the REAL quote...
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF
With that alone I should rest my case.
These CT sites are dishonest.
Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???
MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".
I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.
...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING
SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.
It's time to see a transformer explosion.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF
MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".
I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.
...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING
SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.
It's time to see a transformer explosion.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF
“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers
When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.
But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF
First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.
This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
Fire officer Paul Isaac Jr. asserted that 9-11 was an inside job last September 11 at ground zero where mourners and protesters were gathered; “I know 9-11 was an inside job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too”, said Isaac.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bombs_inside_wtc.html
No such quote can be found anywhere but on conspiracy theory sites.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
Ha! That's rich! Sounds self-important don't it? The internet is filled with loony-tunes would be if they could be's. Looking in on the antics of these particular members of groupwankerscentral.com is like watching a terrible car crash in slow motion. Only it's a clown car I see crashing, and all the tragic gore is hidden by all those clowns' colorful facepaint! Don't know whether to laugh or cry really. Tch tch tch.
I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.
Not sure why I should know what he was posting on other boards.
I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.
Not sure why I should know what he was posting on other boards.
Because I posted it a few posts before you posted. Like I said it doesn't matter. What does matter is that these clowns are lying about people who don't deserve it. Even if he isn't Paul Isaac Jr.
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
It is not my job to keep track of your sock puppets, Schneibster. If you use one ID, you could be banned after a psychotic episode however people will understand the identity of the person you reference.
http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.
Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.
One of the great things about video on the Internet is they can see and hear things with their own eyes and ears, so all the mumbo jumbo, fake, phony, distorted lies people like you spew out of your mouth can be put in the trash where they belong.
People can watch that clip for themselves and see if they think it was doctored, like you try to imply, or if it reveals something you absolutely hate, THE TRUTH!
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
It is not my job to keep track of your sock puppets, Schneibster. If you use one ID, you could be banned after a psychotic episode however people will understand the identity of the person you reference.
I didn't know thinking was a job for you. I'll remember to concider you a retard in the future.
http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.
Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.
Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
--------------------------------
No one seemed to care, and this 'Guest' post was becoming buried til the 'Schnensable' decided to bring it back into the limelight...
--------------------------------
No one seemed to care, and this 'Guest' post was becoming buried til the 'Schnensable' decided to bring it back into the limelight...
Posted: Feb 1 2006, 09:15 pm
"I feel so bad for people like Paul who have to chase down these lies. (Assuming it is Paul. I like the fact that he left his e-mail which lends credibility)"
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60431
----------------------------
'Schneib'...errr... I mean 'Sens'...errr...I mean 'Common Sense', then turns around and admits that it was he who posted the 'Guest_Sentinel' post...
---------------------------
'credibility' ??? ... like an Urology site lends 'credibility'?
Like all Schitzoids, the 'Schneib' posts so much bs that he can't keep track of his own personalities, and minutes later is trying to shift 'authorship' of the "guest_post" back on the 'CT'ers...
---------------------------
'credibility' ??? ... like an Urology site lends 'credibility'?
Like all Schitzoids, the 'Schneib' posts so much bs that he can't keep track of his own personalities, and minutes later is trying to shift 'authorship' of the "guest_post" back on the 'CT'ers...
Posted Feb 5 2006, 01:30 am
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61248
You stupid fu<k, it was you CTers that brought up the quote. Let me guess, now we are creating CT puppets right?...
The 'thing' which interests me most is HOW did the 'Scheni-com-ensable' attach that 4 second video-edit to an Urology site ??? Amazing 'spook-games' go on in all these forums related to 9/11 events. Welcome to 'info-wars'...
----------------------
Since writing the above ...(I got interrupted with other business)... I come back to find the following...
Here... 'Common Sense' directs us back to a post that was made by 'Sensable'...
Again the luna-schneib can't keep his personalities separated and admits that he is 'Sensable' (although he has presented these personalities / posters as two separate individuals. Nice puppetry games, he accuses the CT'ers OF engaging in. Unbelievable that someone thinks they can fool others through the use of these methods. Of course, when you are on the losing end of the majority of 'evidentiary submissions'... you need 'sock-puppets' to enhance your position (as if they are MANY DIFFERENT POSTERS who all agree with this ob-fu-sk8tor.... (thanks for the 'new spelling'...'newton'? I think that's WHO came up with this appropriate spelling)
So now, at least we have determined by the facts that 'Commen / Common Sense' ...IS 'Sensible / Sensable...IS 'Guest_Sentinel'.
Gee, I wonder who the new 'Schentinel' IS ??? Is he a new incarnation of 'Schnensible', an imposter of the imposter of Paul Isaac Jr. or what? I have to take a break here and go back to the so-far unread posts (after the last one) to see the new developments.
Here... 'Common Sense' directs us back to a post that was made by 'Sensable'...
Again the luna-schneib can't keep his personalities separated and admits that he is 'Sensable' (although he has presented these personalities / posters as two separate individuals. Nice puppetry games, he accuses the CT'ers OF engaging in. Unbelievable that someone thinks they can fool others through the use of these methods. Of course, when you are on the losing end of the majority of 'evidentiary submissions'... you need 'sock-puppets' to enhance your position (as if they are MANY DIFFERENT POSTERS who all agree with this ob-fu-sk8tor.... (thanks for the 'new spelling'...'newton'? I think that's WHO came up with this appropriate spelling)
So now, at least we have determined by the facts that 'Commen / Common Sense' ...IS 'Sensible / Sensable...IS 'Guest_Sentinel'.
Gee, I wonder who the new 'Schentinel' IS ??? Is he a new incarnation of 'Schnensible', an imposter of the imposter of Paul Isaac Jr. or what? I have to take a break here and go back to the so-far unread posts (after the last one) to see the new developments.
Originally posted by Schneiby
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
Uhhh, no Schneiby... I'm not registered at Conspiracy Centeral.com as far as I know. I do remember looking at the site once or twice, but never recall 'posting' there.
again with the... 'conspiracy-sites selling subscriptions to support lies Makes me SICK routine'.
get a grip, Schneibster - you've been outed. There are ONLY 3 stooges here... You, Yid, and the Legendarian... the rest of your 'supporters' are imaginary elves to try to sell the idea, that there are just as many supporters of the official fairy tale as there are those who debunk it here daily.
BTW... How's the lawsuit coming

But it just goes to show you, that when a person is so wrapped up in promoting their own lies you can present all the evidence in the world, but it just won't matter.
In either case, back to the real people, who might have a slight interest in the truth...
Some of the Bin Laden conspiracy theorist, (magician in the cave who suspended the laws of physics on 9/11) people, you know the ones who hold an American flag in one hand, and a swastika on the other, while bragging about being ignorant, well they try to hang their hat on why they don't think explosives were used because that would mean thousands of people would have had to have been involved with the governments pre-planning and implementation of 9/11.

They try to sell the bogus theory that too many people would know about the governments crime and hence they would have reported it, and because they say no one has ever reported the crime that no crime was ever committed, hence the magician in the cave did it.
But here's the reality of the situation. Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands how fear is used to silence people from talking about what they know. How many other crimes done by the Mafia have included the silencing and killing of witnesses?
But irregardless of this, let's take a look at something very important. Of the hundreds, or maybe thousands of people who may have been directly or indirectly related to the crime of the century and have appeared to have been silent, consider this...
Much of the information that has come out over the past several years on what really happened on 9/11 have originated from sources within the government. More and more people within the government have LEAKED OUT critical information about what really happened.
WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAME FROM? Now the physics involved is just plain mathematics, ANY IDIOT KNOWS that buildings don't just collapse at NEAR free fall speeds, unless control demolition is used, but there are other bits and pieces of the 9/11 crime that has come out, as revealed by sources inside the government.
And of course they gotta be EXTREMELY CAREFUL. Would you tell the truth about a crime committed by the bush administration if they had your whole family by the balls? Even if a direct threat wasn't proven, all you need is an implied threat, like a horses head in your bed, it gets the message across loud and clear.
Some of these people have children and they know they'll be putting them in serious jeopardy if they so much as open their mouths.
Point being, while most of the people involved in the 9/11 crime directly or indirectly have appeared to have been silent the fact of the matter is that little bits of information have leaked out. If you expect them to come right out on fox news and confess what really happened, do you think it would do any good???
If some of the top brass, etc. admitted that our own government did 9/11 would fox news believe them or would they call them nut cases?
Point being the truth is an enemy of the state and it must be stopped any way it can, and intimidation, fear, risk reward is one way to deal with it, as is murder, so don't expect all the people who know what really happened to come up to the podium and start talking, because if they did, the first thing the media would do is TURN OFF THEIR MIKE.
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
QUOTE
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt
What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski |
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt
What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...
I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?
A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt
Let me guess why they left that important part out..
QUOTE
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.
Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?
A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.
Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?
A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF
First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera |
SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.
Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?
A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.
Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?
A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF
First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.
“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers
there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt
And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION...
QUOTE
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski
Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF
And here is the outright LIE...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| "I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski |
Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF
And here is the outright LIE...
“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen
Note where these lairs but the "...."
Now for the REAL quote...
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF
With that alone I should rest my case.
Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???
QUOTE
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore
MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".
I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.
...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING
SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.
It's time to see a transformer explosion.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore |
MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".
I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.
...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING
SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.
It's time to see a transformer explosion.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF
“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers
When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.
But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF
First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| "there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac |
This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
Fire officer Paul Isaac Jr. asserted that 9-11 was an inside job last September 11 at ground zero where mourners and protesters were gathered; “I know 9-11 was an inside job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too”, said Isaac.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bombs_inside_wtc.html
No such quote can be found anywhere but on conspiracy theory sites.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 02:27 AM)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 01:51 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:39 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...
1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems
OR
2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Originally posted by Foxx There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either... 1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems OR 2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK. |
Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.
by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...
Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.
If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
Ha! That's rich! Sounds self-important don't it? The internet is filled with loony-tunes would be if they could be's. Looking in on the antics of these particular members of groupwankerscentral.com is like watching a terrible car crash in slow motion. Only it's a clown car I see crashing, and all the tragic gore is hidden by all those clowns' colorful facepaint! Don't know whether to laugh or cry really. Tch tch tch.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 02:24 AM)
I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.
Not sure why I should know what he was posting on other boards.
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 02:53 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 02:24 AM)
I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.
Not sure why I should know what he was posting on other boards.
Because I posted it a few posts before you posted. Like I said it doesn't matter. What does matter is that these clowns are lying about people who don't deserve it. Even if he isn't Paul Isaac Jr.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:43 PM)
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 02:39 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
It is not my job to keep track of your sock puppets, Schneibster. If you use one ID, you could be banned after a psychotic episode however people will understand the identity of the person you reference.
QUOTE
anti-common sense
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.
Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.
One of the great things about video on the Internet is they can see and hear things with their own eyes and ears, so all the mumbo jumbo, fake, phony, distorted lies people like you spew out of your mouth can be put in the trash where they belong.
People can watch that clip for themselves and see if they think it was doctored, like you try to imply, or if it reveals something you absolutely hate, THE TRUTH!
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 03:06 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:43 PM)
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 02:39 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)
My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
It is not my job to keep track of your sock puppets, Schneibster. If you use one ID, you could be banned after a psychotic episode however people will understand the identity of the person you reference.
I didn't know thinking was a job for you. I'll remember to concider you a retard in the future.
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 5 2006, 03:08 AM)
QUOTE
anti-common sense
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.
Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 03:13 AM)
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 5 2006, 03:08 AM)
QUOTE
anti-common sense
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
Stop lying about what the fireman said...
http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.
Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
QUOTE
Guest_Sentinel - Posted: Feb 1 2006, 06:37 pm
The alleged Paul Isaac Jr 'quote'...
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383
Paul Isaac Jr
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com
The alleged Paul Isaac Jr 'quote'...
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383
Paul Isaac Jr
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com
--------------------------------
No one seemed to care, and this 'Guest' post was becoming buried til the 'Schnensable' decided to bring it back into the limelight...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Guest_Sentinel - Posted: Feb 1 2006, 06:37 pm The alleged Paul Isaac Jr 'quote'... http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383 Paul Isaac Jr Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com |
--------------------------------
No one seemed to care, and this 'Guest' post was becoming buried til the 'Schnensable' decided to bring it back into the limelight...
Posted: Feb 1 2006, 09:15 pm
"I feel so bad for people like Paul who have to chase down these lies. (Assuming it is Paul. I like the fact that he left his e-mail which lends credibility)"
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60431
----------------------------
'Schneib'...errr... I mean 'Sens'...errr...I mean 'Common Sense', then turns around and admits that it was he who posted the 'Guest_Sentinel' post...
QUOTE
Posted: Feb 5 2006, 01:15 am
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61243
"As I said when I first posted 'the thing' I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility."[/b]
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61243
"As I said when I first posted 'the thing' I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility."[/b]
---------------------------
'credibility' ??? ... like an Urology site lends 'credibility'?
Like all Schitzoids, the 'Schneib' posts so much bs that he can't keep track of his own personalities, and minutes later is trying to shift 'authorship' of the "guest_post" back on the 'CT'ers...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Posted: Feb 5 2006, 01:15 am http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61243 "As I said when I first posted 'the thing' I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility."[/b] |
---------------------------
'credibility' ??? ... like an Urology site lends 'credibility'?
Like all Schitzoids, the 'Schneib' posts so much bs that he can't keep track of his own personalities, and minutes later is trying to shift 'authorship' of the "guest_post" back on the 'CT'ers...
Posted Feb 5 2006, 01:30 am
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61248
You stupid fu<k, it was you CTers that brought up the quote. Let me guess, now we are creating CT puppets right?...
The 'thing' which interests me most is HOW did the 'Scheni-com-ensable' attach that 4 second video-edit to an Urology site ??? Amazing 'spook-games' go on in all these forums related to 9/11 events. Welcome to 'info-wars'...
----------------------
Since writing the above ...(I got interrupted with other business)... I come back to find the following...
QUOTE
Originally posted by 'Common Sense'
Posted: Feb 5 2006, 02:24 am
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61262
MY responce jan 31st...
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Posted: Feb 5 2006, 02:24 am
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61262
MY responce jan 31st...
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812
Here... 'Common Sense' directs us back to a post that was made by 'Sensable'...
Again the luna-schneib can't keep his personalities separated and admits that he is 'Sensable' (although he has presented these personalities / posters as two separate individuals. Nice puppetry games, he accuses the CT'ers OF engaging in. Unbelievable that someone thinks they can fool others through the use of these methods. Of course, when you are on the losing end of the majority of 'evidentiary submissions'... you need 'sock-puppets' to enhance your position (as if they are MANY DIFFERENT POSTERS who all agree with this ob-fu-sk8tor.... (thanks for the 'new spelling'...'newton'? I think that's WHO came up with this appropriate spelling)
So now, at least we have determined by the facts that 'Commen / Common Sense' ...IS 'Sensible / Sensable...IS 'Guest_Sentinel'.
Gee, I wonder who the new 'Schentinel' IS ??? Is he a new incarnation of 'Schnensible', an imposter of the imposter of Paul Isaac Jr. or what? I have to take a break here and go back to the so-far unread posts (after the last one) to see the new developments.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Originally posted by 'Common Sense' Posted: Feb 5 2006, 02:24 am http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61262 MY responce jan 31st... http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812 |
Here... 'Common Sense' directs us back to a post that was made by 'Sensable'...
Again the luna-schneib can't keep his personalities separated and admits that he is 'Sensable' (although he has presented these personalities / posters as two separate individuals. Nice puppetry games, he accuses the CT'ers OF engaging in. Unbelievable that someone thinks they can fool others through the use of these methods. Of course, when you are on the losing end of the majority of 'evidentiary submissions'... you need 'sock-puppets' to enhance your position (as if they are MANY DIFFERENT POSTERS who all agree with this ob-fu-sk8tor.... (thanks for the 'new spelling'...'newton'? I think that's WHO came up with this appropriate spelling)
So now, at least we have determined by the facts that 'Commen / Common Sense' ...IS 'Sensible / Sensable...IS 'Guest_Sentinel'.
Gee, I wonder who the new 'Schentinel' IS ??? Is he a new incarnation of 'Schnensible', an imposter of the imposter of Paul Isaac Jr. or what? I have to take a break here and go back to the so-far unread posts (after the last one) to see the new developments.
Originally posted by Schneiby
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
Uhhh, no Schneiby... I'm not registered at Conspiracy Centeral.com as far as I know. I do remember looking at the site once or twice, but never recall 'posting' there.
QUOTE
Originally posted by SchnenceiblepaulIsaacRove
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
again with the... 'conspiracy-sites selling subscriptions to support lies Makes me SICK routine'.
get a grip, Schneibster - you've been outed. There are ONLY 3 stooges here... You, Yid, and the Legendarian... the rest of your 'supporters' are imaginary elves to try to sell the idea, that there are just as many supporters of the official fairy tale as there are those who debunk it here daily.
BTW... How's the lawsuit coming
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
This was his reply:
- Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html
Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
This was his reply:
- Goodafternoon,
The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).
I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.
My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.
Take care
Sentinel
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
This was his reply:
Speculation? Opinion? Is that evidence of anything except his speculation or opinion? Where's the physics gone?
Computer Fogie! We need your help here! tell em that you'll only accept the physics evidence and not opinion and speculation.
- Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html
Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
This was his reply:
- Goodafternoon,
The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).
I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.
My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.
Take care
Sentinel
Speculation? Opinion? Is that evidence of anything except his speculation or opinion? Where's the physics gone?
Computer Fogie! We need your help here! tell em that you'll only accept the physics evidence and not opinion and speculation.
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
- Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html
Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
- Goodafternoon,
The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).
I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.
My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.
Take care
Sentinel
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 04:26 AM)
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. And while you're at it, how about you also
- Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html
Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
- Goodafternoon,
The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).
I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.
My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.
Take care
Sentinel
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. And while you're at it, how about you also
QUOTE (FOXX+)
...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew
to everyone else who you been paranoid and wrong on that score about?
to everyone else who you been paranoid and wrong on that score about?
You a$$ clowns continue to amaze me. What part of "There was never any mention about this subject at the memorial." do you not understand?
Now all of a sudden another a$$ clown joins the board. I guess they fit another clown in the car after all...
How do I know that quote if fake? Because it hasn't popped up ANYWHERE other than conspiracy sites. Now we have paul says there is no gag order. If that's the case why hasn't he pulled a sheehan and chained himself to the union hall doors forcing them to look into this? That's just one thing he could do. Why can't he get his face on one of those CT videos at least? Concidering 300 of his fellow brothers were murdered.
No thinking things through for these clowns.
Now all of a sudden another a$$ clown joins the board. I guess they fit another clown in the car after all...
How do I know that quote if fake? Because it hasn't popped up ANYWHERE other than conspiracy sites. Now we have paul says there is no gag order. If that's the case why hasn't he pulled a sheehan and chained himself to the union hall doors forcing them to look into this? That's just one thing he could do. Why can't he get his face on one of those CT videos at least? Concidering 300 of his fellow brothers were murdered.
No thinking things through for these clowns.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:15 AM)
You a$$ clowns continue to amaze me. What part of "There was never any mention about this subject at the memorial." do you not understand?
Now all of a sudden another a$$ clown joins the board. I guess they fit another clown in the car after all...
How do I know that quote if fake? Because it hasn't popped up ANYWHERE other than conspiracy sites. Now we have paul says there is no gag order. If that's the case why hasn't he pulled a sheehan and chained himself to the union hall doors forcing them to look into this? That's just one thing he could do. Why can't he get his face on one of those CT videos at least? Concidering 300 of his fellow brothers were murdered.
No thinking things through for these clowns.
That's what happens when governments cut funding for mental health programs. They just have to open the doors to the asylums and let them CT and UFO idiots loose on an unsuspecting public. Or in this case the internet. It is to cry over if it wasn't such hilarious entertainment for FREE. That's why I'm here. Forget the physics! Just bring out the CLOWN car again! I just love them guys taking pratfalls all over the shop! Wayhey! There they go again!
Now all of a sudden another a$$ clown joins the board. I guess they fit another clown in the car after all...
How do I know that quote if fake? Because it hasn't popped up ANYWHERE other than conspiracy sites. Now we have paul says there is no gag order. If that's the case why hasn't he pulled a sheehan and chained himself to the union hall doors forcing them to look into this? That's just one thing he could do. Why can't he get his face on one of those CT videos at least? Concidering 300 of his fellow brothers were murdered.
No thinking things through for these clowns.
That's what happens when governments cut funding for mental health programs. They just have to open the doors to the asylums and let them CT and UFO idiots loose on an unsuspecting public. Or in this case the internet. It is to cry over if it wasn't such hilarious entertainment for FREE. That's why I'm here. Forget the physics! Just bring out the CLOWN car again! I just love them guys taking pratfalls all over the shop! Wayhey! There they go again!
QUOTE (Foxx+)
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.
And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.
I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.
Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.
And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.
I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.
Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:23 AM)
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
This was his reply:
Speculation? Opinion? Is that evidence of anything except his speculation or opinion? Where's the physics gone?
Computer Fogie! We need your help here! tell em that you'll only accept the physics evidence and not opinion and speculation.
- Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html
Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
This was his reply:
- Goodafternoon,
The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).
I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.
My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.
Take care
Sentinel
Speculation? Opinion? Is that evidence of anything except his speculation or opinion? Where's the physics gone?
Computer Fogie! We need your help here! tell em that you'll only accept the physics evidence and not opinion and speculation.
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 05:40 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+)
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.
And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.
I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.
Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
So first it was Isaacs "opinion"? Then it was Isaacs "speculation"? And now it's Isaacs "belief"? Where do you come off presenting this as if it was evidence of anything but talk from any one of thousands of 'opinionated' and 'gullible' CT/UFO conspiracy types? Just ask Computer Fogie. He'll tell you what's evidence and what's not evidence.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.
And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.
I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.
Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
So first it was Isaacs "opinion"? Then it was Isaacs "speculation"? And now it's Isaacs "belief"? Where do you come off presenting this as if it was evidence of anything but talk from any one of thousands of 'opinionated' and 'gullible' CT/UFO conspiracy types? Just ask Computer Fogie. He'll tell you what's evidence and what's not evidence.
To the anonymous cowardly 'Guest' who hides behind his mask of anonymity, closely followed by the CS Schneiby 'gonna-get-ya-Foxx' parrot.
'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.
I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...
Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.
The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.
See the edge of the earth... and drop off it.
QUOTE
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company.
'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.
I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...
Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.
The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.
See the edge of the earth... and drop off it.
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 05:40 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+)
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.
And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.
I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.
Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
http://breakfornews.proboards44.com/index....ge=1#1137206090
I will E-mail him myself and ask him to prove who he says he is.
But like I said over and over again, It doesn't matter...
http://breakfornews.proboards44.com/index....ge=1#1137206090
I will E-mail him myself and ask him to prove who he says he is.
But like I said over and over again, It doesn't matter...
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt
What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.
This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...
I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?
A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt
Let me guess why they left that important part out..
This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...
I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?
A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt
Let me guess why they left that important part out..
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.
Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?
A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.
Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?
A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF
First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.
there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt
And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION...
there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt
And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION...
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski
Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF
And here is the outright LIE...
Note where these lairs but the "...."
Now for the REAL quote...
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF
With that alone I should rest my case.
These CT sites are dishonest.
Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???
Note where these lairs but the "...."
Now for the REAL quote...
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF
With that alone I should rest my case.
These CT sites are dishonest.
Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore
MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".
I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.
...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING
SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.
It's time to see a transformer explosion.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF
When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.
But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF
First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.
When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.
But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF
First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
Mindlessly calling me a shill wont make those facts go away.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.
And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.
I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.
Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
QUOTE
stallion4
New Member
member is offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
Re: Fireman Admits: 9-11 Inside Job
« Reply #5 on Feb 2, 2006, 9:35pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi everyone. I have an update concerning the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. posted the following on another message board on January 31, 2006:
Goodafternoon from NYC.
My name is Paul Isaac Jr and I'd like to bring something to the forefront. The story writen by Scott Magufka is false. There was never any interaction on the level they wrote about. As a matter of fact they wrote this false article in retaliation for my readingb the riot act to them at GZ. There is footage that is presented by Dylan Avery on Loosechange which shows just how angered I am at the event. These people (Not All) wer extemely disrespectfull at the event. They insulted many of the people in attendance who just asked them to tone it down a bit and then they turned really uglu by using profanity and one jerkoff grabbed himself to tell people to blow him. Thats when I got on them for there BS. I started by asking why they were acting so disrespectfully at such at the event and they began with the C/D charges and the Governemnt this and that. I told them to respect the families and others at the event as they were still in mourning over 911. They just kept up with the BS and scott looked quite uspet.
Heres the Qui-9 , If I had made such statements as they say? why would the NYPD detail who was right there in our faces be staging photo ops with me afterwards? Doesn't it seem quite odd that they would making photo ops with someone who is alledged to have made such innapropriate statement at a memorial?
Why were somay people coming up to me to thank me for reading the riot act to these idiots.
It seems that they needed to get back into the goodness of the movement being that 2 to 3 months prior there was the story going around that the snitched to the FBI on Revere Radio Network.
Anyone with half a brain can see that there is a clear indecation that thesae people are not on the up an up.
Why doesn't Mr Samartino state it. He only states that I was calling them CIA Disinfo ops and agent provacatures.
...
Paul Isaac Jr (Sentinel)
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com
If anyone wants more information from Mr. Isaac about this, request it by sending him an email.
To phaedrus:
Try this link for Loose Change Second Edition:
http://www.question911.com/links.php
New Member
member is offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
Re: Fireman Admits: 9-11 Inside Job
« Reply #5 on Feb 2, 2006, 9:35pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi everyone. I have an update concerning the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. posted the following on another message board on January 31, 2006:
Goodafternoon from NYC.
My name is Paul Isaac Jr and I'd like to bring something to the forefront. The story writen by Scott Magufka is false. There was never any interaction on the level they wrote about. As a matter of fact they wrote this false article in retaliation for my readingb the riot act to them at GZ. There is footage that is presented by Dylan Avery on Loosechange which shows just how angered I am at the event. These people (Not All) wer extemely disrespectfull at the event. They insulted many of the people in attendance who just asked them to tone it down a bit and then they turned really uglu by using profanity and one jerkoff grabbed himself to tell people to blow him. Thats when I got on them for there BS. I started by asking why they were acting so disrespectfully at such at the event and they began with the C/D charges and the Governemnt this and that. I told them to respect the families and others at the event as they were still in mourning over 911. They just kept up with the BS and scott looked quite uspet.
Heres the Qui-9 , If I had made such statements as they say? why would the NYPD detail who was right there in our faces be staging photo ops with me afterwards? Doesn't it seem quite odd that they would making photo ops with someone who is alledged to have made such innapropriate statement at a memorial?
Why were somay people coming up to me to thank me for reading the riot act to these idiots.
It seems that they needed to get back into the goodness of the movement being that 2 to 3 months prior there was the story going around that the snitched to the FBI on Revere Radio Network.
Anyone with half a brain can see that there is a clear indecation that thesae people are not on the up an up.
Why doesn't Mr Samartino state it. He only states that I was calling them CIA Disinfo ops and agent provacatures.
...
Paul Isaac Jr (Sentinel)
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com
If anyone wants more information from Mr. Isaac about this, request it by sending him an email.
To phaedrus:
Try this link for Loose Change Second Edition:
http://www.question911.com/links.php
http://breakfornews.proboards44.com/index....ge=1#1137206090
I will E-mail him myself and ask him to prove who he says he is.
But like I said over and over again, It doesn't matter...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| stallion4 New Member member is offline Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 20 Re: Fireman Admits: 9-11 Inside Job « Reply #5 on Feb 2, 2006, 9:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi everyone. I have an update concerning the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. posted the following on another message board on January 31, 2006: Goodafternoon from NYC. My name is Paul Isaac Jr and I'd like to bring something to the forefront. The story writen by Scott Magufka is false. There was never any interaction on the level they wrote about. As a matter of fact they wrote this false article in retaliation for my readingb the riot act to them at GZ. There is footage that is presented by Dylan Avery on Loosechange which shows just how angered I am at the event. These people (Not All) wer extemely disrespectfull at the event. They insulted many of the people in attendance who just asked them to tone it down a bit and then they turned really uglu by using profanity and one jerkoff grabbed himself to tell people to blow him. Thats when I got on them for there BS. I started by asking why they were acting so disrespectfully at such at the event and they began with the C/D charges and the Governemnt this and that. I told them to respect the families and others at the event as they were still in mourning over 911. They just kept up with the BS and scott looked quite uspet. Heres the Qui-9 , If I had made such statements as they say? why would the NYPD detail who was right there in our faces be staging photo ops with me afterwards? Doesn't it seem quite odd that they would making photo ops with someone who is alledged to have made such innapropriate statement at a memorial? Why were somay people coming up to me to thank me for reading the riot act to these idiots. It seems that they needed to get back into the goodness of the movement being that 2 to 3 months prior there was the story going around that the snitched to the FBI on Revere Radio Network. Anyone with half a brain can see that there is a clear indecation that thesae people are not on the up an up. Why doesn't Mr Samartino state it. He only states that I was calling them CIA Disinfo ops and agent provacatures. ... Paul Isaac Jr (Sentinel) Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com If anyone wants more information from Mr. Isaac about this, request it by sending him an email. To phaedrus: Try this link for Loose Change Second Edition: http://www.question911.com/links.php |
http://breakfornews.proboards44.com/index....ge=1#1137206090
I will E-mail him myself and ask him to prove who he says he is.
But like I said over and over again, It doesn't matter...
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt
What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.
QUOTE
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...
I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?
A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt
Let me guess why they left that important part out..
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory |
This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...
I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?
A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt
Let me guess why they left that important part out..
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.
Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?
A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.
Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?
A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF
First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.
QUOTE
“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers
there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt
And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers |
there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt
And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION...
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski
Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF
And here is the outright LIE...
QUOTE
“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen
Note where these lairs but the "...."
Now for the REAL quote...
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF
With that alone I should rest my case.
Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen |
Note where these lairs but the "...."
Now for the REAL quote...
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF
With that alone I should rest my case.
Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore
MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".
I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.
...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING
SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.
It's time to see a transformer explosion.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF
QUOTE
“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers
When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.
But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF
First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| “I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers |
When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.
But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF
First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
Mindlessly calling me a shill wont make those facts go away.
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 05:06 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 04:26 AM)
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. And while you're at it, how about you also
- Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:
[Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html
Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
- Goodafternoon,
The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).
I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.
My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.
Take care
Sentinel
Hi Stallion4.
Thanks for that clarification.
So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?
It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.
If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.
Thanks
Foxx
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. And while you're at it, how about you also
QUOTE (FOXX+)
...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew
to everyone else who you been paranoid and wrong on that score about?
_________________________________________________________________________
to everyone else who you been paranoid and wrong on that score about?
_________________________________________________________________________
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
To the anonymous cowardly 'Guest' who hides behind his mask of anonymity, closely followed by the CS Schneiby 'gonna-get-ya-Foxx' parrot.
'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.
I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...
Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.
The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.
See the edge of the earth... and drop off it.
But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to
'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.
I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...
Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.
The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.
See the edge of the earth... and drop off it.
But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to ...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew
to Mr Isaacs. So why not do the right thing and apologise to me and everyone else you mistook for Schneibster? Are you man enough? Or are you the coward and not me. I'm just here for the fun. Who wants to get in deeper with any of you wastes of cranium space? Who knows what you whackos are capable of? What I do know for sure is that you can't even tell I am NOT this Schneibster guy. So what else can't you tell in your wacky-baccy stupor? Who cares! I don't. I just come here for the clown performances. FREE entertainment is my 'thing' right now. it will eventually pall, I know. But not yet. So hop back into your clown car or the act without you won't be as funny. Those clowns! They make you wanna laugh and cry at the same time, don't they?
QUOTE
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company.
'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.
I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...
Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.
The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.
See the edge of the earth... and drop off it.
But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. |
'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.
I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...
Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.
The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.
See the edge of the earth... and drop off it.
But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to ...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew
to Mr Isaacs. So why not do the right thing and apologise to me and everyone else you mistook for Schneibster? Are you man enough? Or are you the coward and not me. I'm just here for the fun. Who wants to get in deeper with any of you wastes of cranium space? Who knows what you whackos are capable of? What I do know for sure is that you can't even tell I am NOT this Schneibster guy. So what else can't you tell in your wacky-baccy stupor? Who cares! I don't. I just come here for the clown performances. FREE entertainment is my 'thing' right now. it will eventually pall, I know. But not yet. So hop back into your clown car or the act without you won't be as funny. Those clowns! They make you wanna laugh and cry at the same time, don't they?
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 06:22 AM)
But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to
QUOTE (FOXX+)
...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew
to Mr Isaacs. So why not do the right thing and apologise to me and everyone else you mistook for Schneibster? Are you man enough? Or are you the coward and not me. I'm just here for the fun. Who wants to get in deeper with any of you wastes of cranium space? Who knows what you whackos are capable of? What I do know for sure is that you can't even tell I am NOT this Schneibster guy. So what else can't you tell in your wacky-baccy stupor? Who cares! I don't. I just come here for the clown performances. FREE entertainment is my 'thing' right now. it will eventually pall, I know. But not yet. So hop back into your clown car or the act without you won't be as funny. Those clowns! They make you wanna laugh and cry at the same time, don't they?
He just wants to fu<k with you. Just pay it no mind. It only makes him look stupider. If that's possible.
Every time I destroy his argument he brings up this non-issue as if it means something. Just let him destroy his own credibility. (I know, it's like blowing up an already falling building. Pointless. Heh!)
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
yeah? wow.
i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.
i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.
amazing.
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
yeah? wow.
i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.
i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.
amazing.
Where did I say cars? Can't you read? I said two long haul heavy rigs. And it sounded like an explosion to me. You weren't there, were you? What's wrong with you, making fun of a serious and haunting memory like that? Is this what you call discussion here? No wonder a lot of guests like me don't register. There are thousands of guests to this site according to the front page here. They don't register because of people like you. Who needs this kind of agro?
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
yeah? wow.
i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.
i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.
amazing.
Where did I say cars? Can't you read? I said two long haul heavy rigs. And it sounded like an explosion to me. You weren't there, were you? What's wrong with you, making fun of a serious and haunting memory like that? Is this what you call discussion here? No wonder a lot of guests like me don't register. There are thousands of guests to this site according to the front page here. They don't register because of people like you. Who needs this kind of agro?
did i say they were sounds that were distinct because of the materials used in their(the colliding objects) construction, or did i just assume that people would know that's what i meant.
boom vs. smack/crunch in english.
how dare you insinuate i don't have my own haunting memories, fellow traveller.
it's people like you that made me want to register.
Where were those located? In the basement, perhaps (where the power for the towers was introduced) ?
I don't recall any pictures of incoming power lines attached to the sides of the building?
Links... references (specific to the WTC) would be appreciated... anyone???
Let's see if there is ANY evidence that 'electrical transformers' were positioned in the towers where the fire-fighters reported brisant flashes.
IF there is NO evidence to support the claim that 'electrical transformers' were housed in the areas where fire-fighters reported brisant flashes, then that claim must be abandoned as any form of 'proof' or 'evidence'...
(Much like the Amazing Super-sonic jet-fuel theory is scientific nonsense)
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
The purpose of the government shills here is to
disrupt the discussion and drive people away
from it. This is typical shill methodology.
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is? I only know one group so easily gullible.
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul waist his time proving who he is to you? If I were him I would hit delete and mark your e-mail’s spam in the future. Paul appears to have integrity (something you are lacking) and might have read some of your posts.
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
The purpose of the government shills here is to
disrupt the discussion and drive people away
from it. This is typical shill methodology.
You mean how you distract people from Bush's real crimes? Yeah, you're "Pod People" alright.
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is? I only know one group so easily gullible.
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul waist his time proving who he is to you? If I were him I would hit delete and mark your e-mail’s spam in the future. Paul appears to have integrity (something you are lacking) and might have read some of your posts.
Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
Thanks, if you thought differently I would be worried.
Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
Thanks, if you thought differently I would be worried.

... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
I thought someone would pick on my post for this which is why I added the (insert disclaimer here) rather than bogging it down with a long disclaimer. None of us really needs to be reminded to carry some level of doubt about what one person claims another said. If you will reread my post you will see that I merely say that stallion4 gives an indication of what Paul's thoughts are, I don't in any way say that those are actually Paul's thoughts nor will I claim that without hearing from Paul himself.
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
Agreed, although on a forum such as this one, where non-specialists can post with "stage names", that might require a serious amount of "cleaning up". So much so, that even that might not be workable, unless some way of paying the moderators is found.
It's not only the ad hominems which dilute the value of the thread, but the constant linking to politics and other non-physics aspects of 911. Of course, as an undercurrent, that link has always been there and will always be there. Most people's motivation for debating the subject, I'm sure, has to do with the fact that 911 represented massive crimes, and getting into the physics of it can shed light on who the real criminals are.
My hope is that Scholar's for 911 Truth will attract a large following by technical scholars of the engineering, physics, and other scientific persuasions, who will be putting their good (real) names to whatever they post, and thus will have both the background and the sense of responsibility and ownership of their comments that they normally maintain in their other, scholarly, pursuits. If this is the case, then there should only be a minimum amount of moderation needed.
I would urge serious debaters on this thread to approach local faculty in engineering, physics, and applied mathematics, especially, to join Scholars for 911 Truth. Hopefully, a forum will be added there, soon. Anybody who is serious, on either side of the debate, cannot pretend that the "debate" here on this thread can possibly be anywhere near as valuable as a scholarly debate, elsewhere.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that any "regular" on this thread, no matter which side they are on, who claims that spending time on this thread is a better use of time than soliciting scholars for Scholars for 911 Truth (or creating coherent works which they themselves will submit to S911T), is not seeking the truth so much as enjoying arguing.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
I thought someone would pick on my post for this which is why I added the (insert disclaimer here) rather than bogging it down with a long disclaimer. None of us really needs to be reminded to carry some level of doubt about what one person claims another said. If you will reread my post you will see that I merely say that stallion4 gives an indication of what Paul's thoughts are, I don't in any way say that those are actually Paul's thoughts nor will I claim that without hearing from Paul himself.
Forgive me if I took your post out of context. The tone of the post seems to give more credence to stallion4's post than I thought it deserves. Even with the disclaimer it seemed to be a wink and a nod to stallion4's credibility. Your clarification gives me pause in my initial conclusion. I thought you were brought here by the CTers as so many others before you. While I'm still not sure what to make of you I will say you may not have deserved my tone. For that I apologize.
It's difficult to have a serious debate with these people since every time you say something which challenges the CT story they label you a shill out of hand. Others challenge your idententity as if that chages the facts some how. Ironically, I may have made the same mistake with you.
Again, I apologize.
I agree with Metemars on this one, and the site is a pretty honest, straight forward accumulation of information.
But let's get real here!
People like anti-Common Sense have no interest in the truth whatsoever, in fact "The truth makes him sick"
It seems to me that you might be able to categorize different groups of people...
1. People with some knowledge, logic and facts and desire to know the truth, these people know the government did 9/11.
2. People with a little bit of knowledge and a little bit of desire to understand the truth, but just haven't had the time to really dig into the details. They know the government has been lying about many things, but the jury is still out on what happened, because they just haven't been able to fully investigate it. These people might say, "We just don't know yet EITHER WAY"
3. Then you have the liars, who reject all knowledge and truth, people like anti-common sense, who hate the truth and consider the truth as an enemy to their way of life. These people may even know better than what they're saying, but since they are on a quest to save their phony self image, they'll lie, deny and purposely twist any and all facts in order to make the lies appear as reality.
to Mr Isaacs. So why not do the right thing and apologise to me and everyone else you mistook for Schneibster? Are you man enough? Or are you the coward and not me. I'm just here for the fun. Who wants to get in deeper with any of you wastes of cranium space? Who knows what you whackos are capable of? What I do know for sure is that you can't even tell I am NOT this Schneibster guy. So what else can't you tell in your wacky-baccy stupor? Who cares! I don't. I just come here for the clown performances. FREE entertainment is my 'thing' right now. it will eventually pall, I know. But not yet. So hop back into your clown car or the act without you won't be as funny. Those clowns! They make you wanna laugh and cry at the same time, don't they?
He just wants to fu<k with you. Just pay it no mind. It only makes him look stupider. If that's possible.
Every time I destroy his argument he brings up this non-issue as if it means something. Just let him destroy his own credibility. (I know, it's like blowing up an already falling building. Pointless. Heh!)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:06 AM)
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
yeah? wow.
i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.
i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.
amazing.
QUOTE (Common SCHNOOB+)
BLEE BLOO BLAH ON AND ON AND ON Heh!)
Uh oh, da Schnoob is freaking out again!
Uh oh, da Schnoob is freaking out again!
QUOTE (newton+Feb 5 2006, 06:52 AM)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:06 AM)
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
yeah? wow.
i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.
i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.
amazing.
Where did I say cars? Can't you read? I said two long haul heavy rigs. And it sounded like an explosion to me. You weren't there, were you? What's wrong with you, making fun of a serious and haunting memory like that? Is this what you call discussion here? No wonder a lot of guests like me don't register. There are thousands of guests to this site according to the front page here. They don't register because of people like you. Who needs this kind of agro?
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE (newton+Feb 5 2006, 06:52 AM)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:06 AM)
I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
yeah? wow.
i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.
i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.
amazing.
Where did I say cars? Can't you read? I said two long haul heavy rigs. And it sounded like an explosion to me. You weren't there, were you? What's wrong with you, making fun of a serious and haunting memory like that? Is this what you call discussion here? No wonder a lot of guests like me don't register. There are thousands of guests to this site according to the front page here. They don't register because of people like you. Who needs this kind of agro?
did i say they were sounds that were distinct because of the materials used in their(the colliding objects) construction, or did i just assume that people would know that's what i meant.
boom vs. smack/crunch in english.
how dare you insinuate i don't have my own haunting memories, fellow traveller.
it's people like you that made me want to register.
QUOTE
Originally posted by the Schneib
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.
Where were those located? In the basement, perhaps (where the power for the towers was introduced) ?
I don't recall any pictures of incoming power lines attached to the sides of the building?
Links... references (specific to the WTC) would be appreciated... anyone???
Let's see if there is ANY evidence that 'electrical transformers' were positioned in the towers where the fire-fighters reported brisant flashes.
IF there is NO evidence to support the claim that 'electrical transformers' were housed in the areas where fire-fighters reported brisant flashes, then that claim must be abandoned as any form of 'proof' or 'evidence'...
(Much like the Amazing Super-sonic jet-fuel theory is scientific nonsense)
QUOTE (zoktoberfest+Feb 5 2006, 08:58 AM)
Hello,
I have just listened to the audio of Steven Jones' lecture last week, which was good, but I'm annoyed that they cut the recording just as a questioner was trying to clarify the exact type of 'peer review' that his work had received.
my link:
http://www.911oz.com/link.phtml?id=125&nav_id=navbutt_125
I am also slightly concerned to discover that Dr. Jones has written a paper which claims to show evidence that Christ visited Ancient America:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/r...d%20figures.htm
He seems like a nice guy and I don't want to deny him his right to a bit of folly - he hasn't claimed that this paper was peer reviewed after all - but I'm just wondering how does this kind of belief affect his general scientific credibility?
A penny for your thoughts...
I have just listened to the audio of Steven Jones' lecture last week, which was good, but I'm annoyed that they cut the recording just as a questioner was trying to clarify the exact type of 'peer review' that his work had received.
my link:
http://www.911oz.com/link.phtml?id=125&nav_id=navbutt_125
I am also slightly concerned to discover that Dr. Jones has written a paper which claims to show evidence that Christ visited Ancient America:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/r...d%20figures.htm
He seems like a nice guy and I don't want to deny him his right to a bit of folly - he hasn't claimed that this paper was peer reviewed after all - but I'm just wondering how does this kind of belief affect his general scientific credibility?
A penny for your thoughts...
His physics are fine with me.
His spiritual beliefs are his own personal matters.
As long as he sticks to physical reality in his analysis
of the collapse of the towers and I have seen no indication
that he doesn´t - he can believe in his dog for all I care.
He is a physics professor - a person who by definition is an
authority on physics. I view him as such as the discussion
of the towers' collapse is concerned. Anyway, he's not the
only one who has taken the official fable apart using basic
physics.
I think you should try to refute his findings if you find anything
wrong with them. Ad hominen attacks are very transparent.
Oldest trick in the shill book.
I don't really spend any time on religious nonsense but even
some of the world's greatest scientists have believed in religious
fables. Still they were capable of momentous achievements
and inventions.
His spiritual beliefs are his own personal matters.
As long as he sticks to physical reality in his analysis
of the collapse of the towers and I have seen no indication
that he doesn´t - he can believe in his dog for all I care.
He is a physics professor - a person who by definition is an
authority on physics. I view him as such as the discussion
of the towers' collapse is concerned. Anyway, he's not the
only one who has taken the official fable apart using basic
physics.
I think you should try to refute his findings if you find anything
wrong with them. Ad hominen attacks are very transparent.
Oldest trick in the shill book.
I don't really spend any time on religious nonsense but even
some of the world's greatest scientists have believed in religious
fables. Still they were capable of momentous achievements
and inventions.
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
This psycho told lies about WMD's and torrorism
and only later admitted that the real orders and
reasons for attacking Iraq and Afghanistan came
from GOD. How about his credibility?
--------------------------------------------------------
5 February 2006 16:39
Bush: God told me to invade Iraq
President 'revealed reasons for war in private meeting'
By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
Published: 07 October 2005
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americ...ticle317805.ece
President George Bush has claimed he was told by God to invade Iraq and attack Osama bin Laden's stronghold of Afghanistan as part of a divine mission to bring peace to the Middle East, security for Israel, and a state for the Palestinians.
The President made the assertion during his first meeting with Palestinian leaders in June 2003, according to a BBC series which will be broadcast this month.
Article Length: 842 words (approx.)
and only later admitted that the real orders and
reasons for attacking Iraq and Afghanistan came
from GOD. How about his credibility?
--------------------------------------------------------
5 February 2006 16:39
Bush: God told me to invade Iraq
President 'revealed reasons for war in private meeting'
By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
Published: 07 October 2005
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americ...ticle317805.ece
President George Bush has claimed he was told by God to invade Iraq and attack Osama bin Laden's stronghold of Afghanistan as part of a divine mission to bring peace to the Middle East, security for Israel, and a state for the Palestinians.
The President made the assertion during his first meeting with Palestinian leaders in June 2003, according to a BBC series which will be broadcast this month.
Article Length: 842 words (approx.)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 04:40 PM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
The purpose of the government shills here is to
disrupt the discussion and drive people away
from it. This is typical shill methodology.
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:57 AM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is? I only know one group so easily gullible.
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul waist his time proving who he is to you? If I were him I would hit delete and mark your e-mail’s spam in the future. Paul appears to have integrity (something you are lacking) and might have read some of your posts.
Contentless straw man and ad hominem attacks
by the shills here as usual.
Anything to avoid the arguments.
Typical.
by the shills here as usual.
Anything to avoid the arguments.
Typical.
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:46 PM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 04:40 PM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
The purpose of the government shills here is to
disrupt the discussion and drive people away
from it. This is typical shill methodology.
You mean how you distract people from Bush's real crimes? Yeah, you're "Pod People" alright.
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 05:28 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:57 AM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is? I only know one group so easily gullible.
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul waist his time proving who he is to you? If I were him I would hit delete and mark your e-mail’s spam in the future. Paul appears to have integrity (something you are lacking) and might have read some of your posts.
Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 09:45 AM)
Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
Thanks, if you thought differently I would be worried.
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 05:51 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 09:45 AM)
Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
Thanks, if you thought differently I would be worried.
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 04:57 PM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
I thought someone would pick on my post for this which is why I added the (insert disclaimer here) rather than bogging it down with a long disclaimer. None of us really needs to be reminded to carry some level of doubt about what one person claims another said. If you will reread my post you will see that I merely say that stallion4 gives an indication of what Paul's thoughts are, I don't in any way say that those are actually Paul's thoughts nor will I claim that without hearing from Paul himself.
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 04:40 PM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.
Lon
Very astute, Lon.
You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.
I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).
That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.
The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.
Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).
This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...
All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...
Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...
You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.
A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.
The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.
We are seeing them in full play now.
How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?
I'm Still waiting
Foxx,
I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.
Lon
Agreed, although on a forum such as this one, where non-specialists can post with "stage names", that might require a serious amount of "cleaning up". So much so, that even that might not be workable, unless some way of paying the moderators is found.
It's not only the ad hominems which dilute the value of the thread, but the constant linking to politics and other non-physics aspects of 911. Of course, as an undercurrent, that link has always been there and will always be there. Most people's motivation for debating the subject, I'm sure, has to do with the fact that 911 represented massive crimes, and getting into the physics of it can shed light on who the real criminals are.
My hope is that Scholar's for 911 Truth will attract a large following by technical scholars of the engineering, physics, and other scientific persuasions, who will be putting their good (real) names to whatever they post, and thus will have both the background and the sense of responsibility and ownership of their comments that they normally maintain in their other, scholarly, pursuits. If this is the case, then there should only be a minimum amount of moderation needed.
I would urge serious debaters on this thread to approach local faculty in engineering, physics, and applied mathematics, especially, to join Scholars for 911 Truth. Hopefully, a forum will be added there, soon. Anybody who is serious, on either side of the debate, cannot pretend that the "debate" here on this thread can possibly be anywhere near as valuable as a scholarly debate, elsewhere.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that any "regular" on this thread, no matter which side they are on, who claims that spending time on this thread is a better use of time than soliciting scholars for Scholars for 911 Truth (or creating coherent works which they themselves will submit to S911T), is not seeking the truth so much as enjoying arguing.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 06:05 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 04:57 PM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac
... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.
I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).
Lon
Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.
Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?
I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.
Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
I thought someone would pick on my post for this which is why I added the (insert disclaimer here) rather than bogging it down with a long disclaimer. None of us really needs to be reminded to carry some level of doubt about what one person claims another said. If you will reread my post you will see that I merely say that stallion4 gives an indication of what Paul's thoughts are, I don't in any way say that those are actually Paul's thoughts nor will I claim that without hearing from Paul himself.
Forgive me if I took your post out of context. The tone of the post seems to give more credence to stallion4's post than I thought it deserves. Even with the disclaimer it seemed to be a wink and a nod to stallion4's credibility. Your clarification gives me pause in my initial conclusion. I thought you were brought here by the CTers as so many others before you. While I'm still not sure what to make of you I will say you may not have deserved my tone. For that I apologize.
It's difficult to have a serious debate with these people since every time you say something which challenges the CT story they label you a shill out of hand. Others challenge your idententity as if that chages the facts some how. Ironically, I may have made the same mistake with you.
Again, I apologize.
QUOTE
In fact, I would go so far as to say that any "regular" on this thread, no matter which side they are on, who claims that spending time on this thread is a better use of time than soliciting scholars for Scholars for 911 Truth (or creating coherent works which they themselves will submit to S911T), is not seeking the truth so much as enjoying arguing.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/
I agree with Metemars on this one, and the site is a pretty honest, straight forward accumulation of information.
But let's get real here!
People like anti-Common Sense have no interest in the truth whatsoever, in fact "The truth makes him sick"
It seems to me that you might be able to categorize different groups of people...
1. People with some knowledge, logic and facts and desire to know the truth, these people know the government did 9/11.
2. People with a little bit of knowledge and a little bit of desire to understand the truth, but just haven't had the time to really dig into the details. They know the government has been lying about many things, but the jury is still out on what happened, because they just haven't been able to fully investigate it. These people might say, "We just don't know yet EITHER WAY"
3. Then you have the liars, who reject all knowledge and truth, people like anti-common sense, who hate the truth and consider the truth as an enemy to their way of life. These people may even know better than what they're saying, but since they are on a quest to save their phony self image, they'll lie, deny and purposely twist any and all facts in order to make the lies appear as reality.
No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.
I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.
I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
Geez, a con man and an idiot. Actually one of them is both.
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
QUOTE (galdur+Feb 5 2006, 08:06 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
I suggest you tell Rove I'm not backing down no matter how many times you use projection tactics. No matter how many 4th graders like you he pays I'm going to continue exposing the facts. You pod people sure are morons.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
I suggest you tell Rove I'm not backing down no matter how many times you use projection tactics. No matter how many 4th graders like you he pays I'm going to continue exposing the facts. You pod people sure are morons.
How's the lawsuit going?
QUOTE (galdur+Feb 5 2006, 08:06 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
Another galdur/MMC post! Says it all, don't it?
You're not really interested in the physics or the truth, are you?
You are the same UFO conspiracy nut who has moved on to the 9/11 CD conspiracy bandwagon to do your usual sick stuff.
How do we know? Easy. As soon as someone posts any opinion or physics argument that disagrees with you conspiracy theory people, they are called a traitor, a shill, an obfuscator, a sock puppet, an agent and an enemy.
But your posts are so lame, they have a saying now in Physorg______"Another galdur/MMC post"!
Only because the "idiot" content is expected to be high in your posts and you never disappoint.
CT hypocrites and idiots like you are the ones who are sick, cynically mocking and sucking the innocent victims of 9/11 into your warped madness.
Steve1957 will tell you what god has in store for hypocrites like you. Ask him. He knows god personally, didn't you know! Just like Jones and all those other inbred cousins of yours and MMC who go to BYU! Isn't that the university that idiots like you like to call The Mother Ship! They must really churn out the best miseducated morons in the country if Jones 'work' haha quality is typical.
Oops! And here comes MMC's other inbred idiot cousin. JamesX and Galdur and MMC sound like they came from the same gene pond. Its too small and inbred to be called a proper gene pool.
A pond sounds about right for them because they like the feel of the"scum" word on their tongue a lot.
Aren't they original? Probably still only 2 yr old suckers by the sound of em. They believe anything their double jobbie heros want to sell em! Looks like the saying will have to be stretched to Another galdur/MMC/JamesX post!
You don't have to reply. We all know you're idiots. You don't have to prove it any more. We believe you already!
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
Another galdur/MMC post! Says it all, don't it?
You're not really interested in the physics or the truth, are you?
You are the same UFO conspiracy nut who has moved on to the 9/11 CD conspiracy bandwagon to do your usual sick stuff.
How do we know? Easy. As soon as someone posts any opinion or physics argument that disagrees with you conspiracy theory people, they are called a traitor, a shill, an obfuscator, a sock puppet, an agent and an enemy.
But your posts are so lame, they have a saying now in Physorg______"Another galdur/MMC post"!
Only because the "idiot" content is expected to be high in your posts and you never disappoint.
CT hypocrites and idiots like you are the ones who are sick, cynically mocking and sucking the innocent victims of 9/11 into your warped madness.
Steve1957 will tell you what god has in store for hypocrites like you. Ask him. He knows god personally, didn't you know! Just like Jones and all those other inbred cousins of yours and MMC who go to BYU! Isn't that the university that idiots like you like to call The Mother Ship! They must really churn out the best miseducated morons in the country if Jones 'work' haha quality is typical.
Oops! And here comes MMC's other inbred idiot cousin. JamesX and Galdur and MMC sound like they came from the same gene pond. Its too small and inbred to be called a proper gene pool.
A pond sounds about right for them because they like the feel of the"scum" word on their tongue a lot.
Aren't they original? Probably still only 2 yr old suckers by the sound of em. They believe anything their double jobbie heros want to sell em! Looks like the saying will have to be stretched to Another galdur/MMC/JamesX post!
You don't have to reply. We all know you're idiots. You don't have to prove it any more. We believe you already!
How's the lawsuit going?
From the Common chap -
"You pod people sure are morons."
Has anyone other than himself mentioned pods? This persons disregard for the truth is blatant and his desperation almost palpable.
Professor Jones on the explosives required says he is taking his cue from Hoffman.
"You pod people sure are morons."
Has anyone other than himself mentioned pods? This persons disregard for the truth is blatant and his desperation almost palpable.
Professor Jones on the explosives required says he is taking his cue from Hoffman.
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 09:43 PM)
QUOTE (galdur+Feb 5 2006, 08:06 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
Another galdur/MMC post! Says it all, don't it?
You're not really interested in the physics or the truth, are you?
You are the same UFO conspiracy nut who has moved on to the 9/11 CD conspiracy bandwagon to do your usual sick stuff.
How do we know? Easy. As soon as someone posts any opinion or physics argument that disagrees with you conspiracy theory people, they are called a traitor, a shill, an obfuscator, a sock puppet, an agent and an enemy.
But your posts are so lame, they have a saying now in Physorg______"Another galdur/MMC post"!
Only because the "idiot" content is expected to be high in your posts and you never disappoint.
CT hypocrites and idiots like you are the ones who are sick, cynically mocking and sucking the innocent victims of 9/11 into your warped madness.
Steve1957 will tell you what god has in store for hypocrites like you. Ask him. He knows god personally, didn't you know! Just like Jones and all those other inbred cousins of yours and MMC who go to BYU! Isn't that the university that idiots like you like to call The Mother Ship! They must really churn out the best miseducated morons in the country if Jones 'work' haha quality is typical.
Oops! And here comes MMC's other inbred idiot cousin. JamesX and Galdur and MMC sound like they came from the same gene pond. Its too small and inbred to be called a proper gene pool.
A pond sounds about right for them because they like the feel of the"scum" word on their tongue a lot.
Aren't they original? Probably still only 2 yr old suckers by the sound of em. They believe anything their double jobbie heros want to sell em! Looks like the saying will have to be stretched to Another galdur/MMC/JamesX post!
You don't have to reply. We all know you're idiots. You don't have to prove it any more. We believe you already!
I think it's the result of all the drugs in the 70's-80's. Paranoia is one of the many symptoms of drug use and must have been passed down from their crack whore mothers during pregnancy. Now all they have is filling the tires on their trailer home and repeating their insatiable paranoia by posting here 24-7. Unfortunately the term "Crack kills" doesn't always apply. Had there crack whore mothers aborted them due to drug use and sexual desease we wouldn't be here cleaning their mess.
If you're going to talk smack you're going to get smacked.
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951
This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.
Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.
You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
Another galdur/MMC post! Says it all, don't it?
You're not really interested in the physics or the truth, are you?
You are the same UFO conspiracy nut who has moved on to the 9/11 CD conspiracy bandwagon to do your usual sick stuff.
How do we know? Easy. As soon as someone posts any opinion or physics argument that disagrees with you conspiracy theory people, they are called a traitor, a shill, an obfuscator, a sock puppet, an agent and an enemy.
But your posts are so lame, they have a saying now in Physorg______"Another galdur/MMC post"!
Only because the "idiot" content is expected to be high in your posts and you never disappoint.
CT hypocrites and idiots like you are the ones who are sick, cynically mocking and sucking the innocent victims of 9/11 into your warped madness.
Steve1957 will tell you what god has in store for hypocrites like you. Ask him. He knows god personally, didn't you know! Just like Jones and all those other inbred cousins of yours and MMC who go to BYU! Isn't that the university that idiots like you like to call The Mother Ship! They must really churn out the best miseducated morons in the country if Jones 'work' haha quality is typical.
Oops! And here comes MMC's other inbred idiot cousin. JamesX and Galdur and MMC sound like they came from the same gene pond. Its too small and inbred to be called a proper gene pool.
A pond sounds about right for them because they like the feel of the"scum" word on their tongue a lot.
Aren't they original? Probably still only 2 yr old suckers by the sound of em. They believe anything their double jobbie heros want to sell em! Looks like the saying will have to be stretched to Another galdur/MMC/JamesX post!
You don't have to reply. We all know you're idiots. You don't have to prove it any more. We believe you already!
I think it's the result of all the drugs in the 70's-80's. Paranoia is one of the many symptoms of drug use and must have been passed down from their crack whore mothers during pregnancy. Now all they have is filling the tires on their trailer home and repeating their insatiable paranoia by posting here 24-7. Unfortunately the term "Crack kills" doesn't always apply. Had there crack whore mothers aborted them due to drug use and sexual desease we wouldn't be here cleaning their mess.
If you're going to talk smack you're going to get smacked.
QUOTE (brian+Feb 5 2006, 09:53 PM)
From the Common chap -
"You pod people sure are morons."
Has anyone other than himself mentioned pods? This persons disregard for the truth is blatant and his desperation almost palpable.
Professor Jones on the explosives required says he is taking his cue from Hoffman.
Hahaha! Jones takes his cue from Hoffman!
Idiot and idioter!
What a gas, man!
It's...like....galdur takes his cue from Foxx!
Oh the irony!
Sorry for using your favourite saying, Common Sense!
Hahaha! What a riot!
"You pod people sure are morons."
Has anyone other than himself mentioned pods? This persons disregard for the truth is blatant and his desperation almost palpable.
Professor Jones on the explosives required says he is taking his cue from Hoffman.
Hahaha! Jones takes his cue from Hoffman!
Idiot and idioter!
What a gas, man!
It's...like....galdur takes his cue from Foxx!
Oh the irony!
Sorry for using your favourite saying, Common Sense!
Hahaha! What a riot!
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:
Are you being paid to do this?
Are you being paid to do this?
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:
Are you being paid to do this?
Paid to suck up to Foxx:
galdur
JamesX
newton
etc..........................
Why else would they post no physics and just snipe at those who do and then call them shills etc..............
No one on the CT side is here to debate physics or truth. They're just here because they're crooks or just nuts. Either way, this forum used to be where intelligent people came to talk. Now with galdur, JamesX and the rest of these idiots, its become a place where people come to throw insults and laugh at anyone with any physics to discuss.
Just like in everything else, entropy has its way. In this case the idiots are aiding and abetting entropy in having its way sooner than normal. Is nothing beyond the pale for spammer-scammers and con-men and idiots? Where can one go now on the internet to speak with intelligent people if these forums are going to be overrun by hordes of cult followers and barbarians and loonies who will exploit even 9/11 victims for their perverted gratifications? Disgusting.
Are you being paid to do this?
Paid to suck up to Foxx:
galdur
JamesX
newton
etc..........................
Why else would they post no physics and just snipe at those who do and then call them shills etc..............
No one on the CT side is here to debate physics or truth. They're just here because they're crooks or just nuts. Either way, this forum used to be where intelligent people came to talk. Now with galdur, JamesX and the rest of these idiots, its become a place where people come to throw insults and laugh at anyone with any physics to discuss.
Just like in everything else, entropy has its way. In this case the idiots are aiding and abetting entropy in having its way sooner than normal. Is nothing beyond the pale for spammer-scammers and con-men and idiots? Where can one go now on the internet to speak with intelligent people if these forums are going to be overrun by hordes of cult followers and barbarians and loonies who will exploit even 9/11 victims for their perverted gratifications? Disgusting.
I have a question for all the CT's out there.
Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly
A] civil engineers,
B] licensed architects,
C] construction contractors or
D] demolition experts*,
Len
* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly
A] civil engineers,
B] licensed architects,
C] construction contractors or
D] demolition experts*,
Len
* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
lenbrazil is....
a) a government shill ?
professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?
c) iggy pop fan ?
d) all of the above ?
a) a government shill ?
c) iggy pop fan ?
d) all of the above ?
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:
Are you being paid to do this?
See hereward? This guy brazil respectfully posts pertinent questions..........
Are you being paid to do this?
See hereward? This guy brazil respectfully posts pertinent questions..........
QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.
Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly
A] civil engineers,
B] licensed architects,
C] construction contractors or
D] demolition experts*,
Len
* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
And what does he get for his trouble?......the political clown, brigade leader, that's who. Check it out for yourself.........
Bin Laden ?
apparently so....
Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly
A] civil engineers,
B] licensed architects,
C] construction contractors or
D] demolition experts*,
Len
* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
And what does he get for his trouble?......the political clown, brigade leader, that's who. Check it out for yourself.........
QUOTE (frater plecticus+Feb 6 2006, 12:31 AM)
lenbrazil is....
a) a government shill ?
professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?
c) iggy pop fan ?
d) all of the above ?
Can we wonder any more why this forum is a joke? and who is to blame?
a) a government shill ?
c) iggy pop fan ?
d) all of the above ?
Can we wonder any more why this forum is a joke? and who is to blame?
QUOTE
and who is to blame?
Bin Laden ?
Another post from galdur/fraterplecticus.
Says it all.
Says it all.
QUOTE
Says it all.
apparently so....
Another galdur/frater plecticus post! Says it all.
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 6 2006, 12:43 AM)
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:
Are you being paid to do this?
See hereward? This guy brazil respectfully posts pertinent questions..........
Are you being paid to do this?
See hereward? This guy brazil respectfully posts pertinent questions..........
QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.
Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly
A] civil engineers,
B] licensed architects,
C] construction contractors or
D] demolition experts*,
Len
* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
And what does he get for his trouble?......the political clown, brigade leader, that's who. Check it out for yourself.........
Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly
A] civil engineers,
B] licensed architects,
C] construction contractors or
D] demolition experts*,
Len
* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
And what does he get for his trouble?......the political clown, brigade leader, that's who. Check it out for yourself.........
QUOTE (frater plecticus+Feb 6 2006, 12:31 AM)
lenbrazil is....
a) a government shill ?
B) professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?
c) iggy pop fan ?
d) all of the above ?
Can we wonder any more why this forum is a joke? and who is to blame?
Don't worry 'guest' I'm used to that by now. It's the typical response of most (not all) CTs when asked a question they don't have an easy answer to. This is the kind of tatic used by people on the loosing side of an argument.
I've asked the same question on a few other forums and it seems to bend the CTs out of shape. They rationalize but they can't come up with a valid name. That no one with relevent expertise believes their theories should tell them something but don't want to get the message.
I currently spend too much time on forums as it is, but the lack of any expert backing for the "WTC was controlled demo theory" interests me enough that I'm willing to discuss it here if any CTs are willing to do so.
I won't reply to any more assinine posts and probably won't discuss other aspects of 9/11 here.
For the record I'm C) an Iggy fan though his output has been very uneven. That 'frater' seems to know this leads me to believe he 'knows' me from another fourum. I do live in Brazil but I'm American.
I can't argue with that, but I could also take it a step further and call their mindset for what it is. It's a cancer on humanity. The scum that destroys all the good things about the US.
It's the mindset of these people who not only lie their fanny's off, but encourage others to join them on their slippery slope to hell. It's the same mindset shared by the Germans who joined the Nazi party, and the same mindset of the KKK, who slaughtered innocent blacks.
It's the same mindset that justifies the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention our own US soldiers.
It's the scum of society that erodes everything that used to be decent about this country, it's called lies, deception, greed and hatred of the truth. And those are their good qualities.
Abraham Lincoln said, when this nation departs from the Lord it will collapse and so it is these people represent the epitome of the mindset of the people that are causing the demise of this nation, quickly, and they do it with lies that are so obvious, you have to be a complete brain dead moron to go along with it.
Little bush and his crony followers, such as the mindless liars on this board talk about home land security, justifying the hundreds of billions spent killing innocent children in Iraq, and while they're enraging billions of Arabs around the world, they're simultaneously closing down our military bases, and moving our remaining armies over seas.
It's called weakening our military defense at home and abroad, while making deals with President Fox of Mexico to let in millions and millions of Mexicans, who cross the boarder looking for work, nothing against the Mexican people, but the president is only ENCOURAGING more and more to come over.
And while this is going on our jobs are being shipped over seas, so that the middle class has lost it, yeah the Dow Jones has been holding it's own, but that's only a temporary artificial hype of hot air, about ready to explode any moment, because the jobs are being shipped over seas, and the few jobs left are being given to CHEAP LABOR.
But the scum bag, lying cronies on this board will fight you tooth and nail and say what a wonderful job King George is doing are protecting this place from terrorists, while boosting the economy.
They openly tell you they hate God and hate the truth, yet they totally support little bush, who claims to be a christian. Now why do you suppose that is??? Because wolves flock together, no matter what kinds of titles they give themselves, in fact the titles are generally deceptive in nature.
If a person is a liar, then he's a liar no matter what kind of title he or she has. And when and if they speak the truth the same holds true.
Professor Jones spoke the truth about the physics involved with 9/11, but since the idiot scum bags don't have the mental capacity to debate his points they use his title as a way of discrediting him. But remember the scum bags are hypocrites of the worse sort because they support little bush who calls himself a christian, mostly because the 'w' is so blatantly insincere.
I guess you can say birds of a feather flock together, which makes perfect sense that the worse scum of the nation, the people who support the murder of innocent people also support the most absurd lies of the 21'st century, IE; (the magician in the cave suspended the laws of physics on 9/11)
I guess we could all relax and look at these morons for what they are and not take it too seriously, after all they're much like a bunch of monkeys doing a circus act trying to imitate what they were taught. Although I shouldn't offend the monkeys, as at least they have some intelligence.
But in either case THEY WILL HAVE THEIR DAY. Maybe a rude awakening or maybe something else will shake them up so much that they finally see the light.
I can't argue with that, but I could also take it a step further and call their mindset for what it is. It's a cancer on humanity. The scum that destroys all the good things about the US.
It's the mindset of these people who not only lie their fanny's off, but encourage others to join them on their slippery slope to hell. It's the same mindset shared by the Germans who joined the Nazi party, and the same mindset of the KKK, who slaughtered innocent blacks.
It's the same mindset that justifies the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention our own US soldiers.
It's the scum of society that erodes everything that used to be decent about this country, it's called lies, deception, greed and hatred of the truth. And those are their good qualities.
Abraham Lincoln said, when this nation departs from the Lord it will collapse and so it is these people represent the epitome of the mindset of the people that are causing the demise of this nation, quickly, and they do it with lies that are so obvious, you have to be a complete brain dead moron to go along with it.
Little bush and his crony followers, such as the mindless liars on this board talk about home land security, justifying the hundreds of billions spent killing innocent children in Iraq, and while they're enraging billions of Arabs around the world, they're simultaneously closing down our military bases, and moving our remaining armies over seas.
It's called weakening our military defense at home and abroad, while making deals with President Fox of Mexico to let in millions and millions of Mexicans, who cross the boarder looking for work, nothing against the Mexican people, but the president is only ENCOURAGING more and more to come over.
And while this is going on our jobs are being shipped over seas, so that the middle class has lost it, yeah the Dow Jones has been holding it's own, but that's only a temporary artificial hype of hot air, about ready to explode any moment, because the jobs are being shipped over seas, and the few jobs left are being given to CHEAP LABOR.
But the scum bag, lying cronies on this board will fight you tooth and nail and say what a wonderful job King George is doing are protecting this place from terrorists, while boosting the economy.
They openly tell you they hate God and hate the truth, yet they totally support little bush, who claims to be a christian. Now why do you suppose that is??? Because wolves flock together, no matter what kinds of titles they give themselves, in fact the titles are generally deceptive in nature.
If a person is a liar, then he's a liar no matter what kind of title he or she has. And when and if they speak the truth the same holds true.
Professor Jones spoke the truth about the physics involved with 9/11, but since the idiot scum bags don't have the mental capacity to debate his points they use his title as a way of discrediting him. But remember the scum bags are hypocrites of the worse sort because they support little bush who calls himself a christian, mostly because the 'w' is so blatantly insincere.
I guess you can say birds of a feather flock together, which makes perfect sense that the worse scum of the nation, the people who support the murder of innocent people also support the most absurd lies of the 21'st century, IE; (the magician in the cave suspended the laws of physics on 9/11)
I guess we could all relax and look at these morons for what they are and not take it too seriously, after all they're much like a bunch of monkeys doing a circus act trying to imitate what they were taught. Although I shouldn't offend the monkeys, as at least they have some intelligence.
But in either case THEY WILL HAVE THEIR DAY. Maybe a rude awakening or maybe something else will shake them up so much that they finally see the light.
The bolded sections above will show the irony in them when everyone is reminded of what you are steve1957.
You are the cancer. Instead of rotting in jail for the self-confessed con-man and liar you are, society has seen fit to let you loose again on the world. That is what's wrong with society. They can't tell how sleazy and wicked you are because you now hide behind patriotism and religion. They are two of the favourite refuges and 'scalping grounds' for dirty rotten scoundrels like yourself. How dare you call anyone those names. You who have proven you are all those things and more. Just like your cronies here and in your scam gang. Shame on us for letting you out to lie and cheat and pervert once more. You and your cronies are what's wrong with the human race. You pull down the intelligence level and you push up the gullibility level, all at the same time. What a show of hypocrisy and stupidity. Get in the clown car with the rest, you idiot traitor and religious fraud.
a) a government shill ?
B) professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?
c) iggy pop fan ?
d) all of the above ?
Can we wonder any more why this forum is a joke? and who is to blame?
Don't worry 'guest' I'm used to that by now. It's the typical response of most (not all) CTs when asked a question they don't have an easy answer to. This is the kind of tatic used by people on the loosing side of an argument.
I've asked the same question on a few other forums and it seems to bend the CTs out of shape. They rationalize but they can't come up with a valid name. That no one with relevent expertise believes their theories should tell them something but don't want to get the message.
I currently spend too much time on forums as it is, but the lack of any expert backing for the "WTC was controlled demo theory" interests me enough that I'm willing to discuss it here if any CTs are willing to do so.
I won't reply to any more assinine posts and probably won't discuss other aspects of 9/11 here.
For the record I'm C) an Iggy fan though his output has been very uneven. That 'frater' seems to know this leads me to believe he 'knows' me from another fourum. I do live in Brazil but I'm American.
QUOTE
gadlur
No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.
I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.
I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
I can't argue with that, but I could also take it a step further and call their mindset for what it is. It's a cancer on humanity. The scum that destroys all the good things about the US.
It's the mindset of these people who not only lie their fanny's off, but encourage others to join them on their slippery slope to hell. It's the same mindset shared by the Germans who joined the Nazi party, and the same mindset of the KKK, who slaughtered innocent blacks.
It's the same mindset that justifies the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention our own US soldiers.
It's the scum of society that erodes everything that used to be decent about this country, it's called lies, deception, greed and hatred of the truth. And those are their good qualities.
Abraham Lincoln said, when this nation departs from the Lord it will collapse and so it is these people represent the epitome of the mindset of the people that are causing the demise of this nation, quickly, and they do it with lies that are so obvious, you have to be a complete brain dead moron to go along with it.
Little bush and his crony followers, such as the mindless liars on this board talk about home land security, justifying the hundreds of billions spent killing innocent children in Iraq, and while they're enraging billions of Arabs around the world, they're simultaneously closing down our military bases, and moving our remaining armies over seas.
It's called weakening our military defense at home and abroad, while making deals with President Fox of Mexico to let in millions and millions of Mexicans, who cross the boarder looking for work, nothing against the Mexican people, but the president is only ENCOURAGING more and more to come over.
And while this is going on our jobs are being shipped over seas, so that the middle class has lost it, yeah the Dow Jones has been holding it's own, but that's only a temporary artificial hype of hot air, about ready to explode any moment, because the jobs are being shipped over seas, and the few jobs left are being given to CHEAP LABOR.
But the scum bag, lying cronies on this board will fight you tooth and nail and say what a wonderful job King George is doing are protecting this place from terrorists, while boosting the economy.
They openly tell you they hate God and hate the truth, yet they totally support little bush, who claims to be a christian. Now why do you suppose that is??? Because wolves flock together, no matter what kinds of titles they give themselves, in fact the titles are generally deceptive in nature.
If a person is a liar, then he's a liar no matter what kind of title he or she has. And when and if they speak the truth the same holds true.
Professor Jones spoke the truth about the physics involved with 9/11, but since the idiot scum bags don't have the mental capacity to debate his points they use his title as a way of discrediting him. But remember the scum bags are hypocrites of the worse sort because they support little bush who calls himself a christian, mostly because the 'w' is so blatantly insincere.
I guess you can say birds of a feather flock together, which makes perfect sense that the worse scum of the nation, the people who support the murder of innocent people also support the most absurd lies of the 21'st century, IE; (the magician in the cave suspended the laws of physics on 9/11)
I guess we could all relax and look at these morons for what they are and not take it too seriously, after all they're much like a bunch of monkeys doing a circus act trying to imitate what they were taught. Although I shouldn't offend the monkeys, as at least they have some intelligence.
But in either case THEY WILL HAVE THEIR DAY. Maybe a rude awakening or maybe something else will shake them up so much that they finally see the light.
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 6 2006, 02:34 AM)
QUOTE
gadlur
No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.
I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.
I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
I can't argue with that, but I could also take it a step further and call their mindset for what it is. It's a cancer on humanity. The scum that destroys all the good things about the US.
It's the mindset of these people who not only lie their fanny's off, but encourage others to join them on their slippery slope to hell. It's the same mindset shared by the Germans who joined the Nazi party, and the same mindset of the KKK, who slaughtered innocent blacks.
It's the same mindset that justifies the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention our own US soldiers.
It's the scum of society that erodes everything that used to be decent about this country, it's called lies, deception, greed and hatred of the truth. And those are their good qualities.
Abraham Lincoln said, when this nation departs from the Lord it will collapse and so it is these people represent the epitome of the mindset of the people that are causing the demise of this nation, quickly, and they do it with lies that are so obvious, you have to be a complete brain dead moron to go along with it.
Little bush and his crony followers, such as the mindless liars on this board talk about home land security, justifying the hundreds of billions spent killing innocent children in Iraq, and while they're enraging billions of Arabs around the world, they're simultaneously closing down our military bases, and moving our remaining armies over seas.
It's called weakening our military defense at home and abroad, while making deals with President Fox of Mexico to let in millions and millions of Mexicans, who cross the boarder looking for work, nothing against the Mexican people, but the president is only ENCOURAGING more and more to come over.
And while this is going on our jobs are being shipped over seas, so that the middle class has lost it, yeah the Dow Jones has been holding it's own, but that's only a temporary artificial hype of hot air, about ready to explode any moment, because the jobs are being shipped over seas, and the few jobs left are being given to CHEAP LABOR.
But the scum bag, lying cronies on this board will fight you tooth and nail and say what a wonderful job King George is doing are protecting this place from terrorists, while boosting the economy.
They openly tell you they hate God and hate the truth, yet they totally support little bush, who claims to be a christian. Now why do you suppose that is??? Because wolves flock together, no matter what kinds of titles they give themselves, in fact the titles are generally deceptive in nature.
If a person is a liar, then he's a liar no matter what kind of title he or she has. And when and if they speak the truth the same holds true.
Professor Jones spoke the truth about the physics involved with 9/11, but since the idiot scum bags don't have the mental capacity to debate his points they use his title as a way of discrediting him. But remember the scum bags are hypocrites of the worse sort because they support little bush who calls himself a christian, mostly because the 'w' is so blatantly insincere.
I guess you can say birds of a feather flock together, which makes perfect sense that the worse scum of the nation, the people who support the murder of innocent people also support the most absurd lies of the 21'st century, IE; (the magician in the cave suspended the laws of physics on 9/11)
I guess we could all relax and look at these morons for what they are and not take it too seriously, after all they're much like a bunch of monkeys doing a circus act trying to imitate what they were taught. Although I shouldn't offend the monkeys, as at least they have some intelligence.
But in either case THEY WILL HAVE THEIR DAY. Maybe a rude awakening or maybe something else will shake them up so much that they finally see the light.
The bolded sections above will show the irony in them when everyone is reminded of what you are steve1957.
You are the cancer. Instead of rotting in jail for the self-confessed con-man and liar you are, society has seen fit to let you loose again on the world. That is what's wrong with society. They can't tell how sleazy and wicked you are because you now hide behind patriotism and religion. They are two of the favourite refuges and 'scalping grounds' for dirty rotten scoundrels like yourself. How dare you call anyone those names. You who have proven you are all those things and more. Just like your cronies here and in your scam gang. Shame on us for letting you out to lie and cheat and pervert once more. You and your cronies are what's wrong with the human race. You pull down the intelligence level and you push up the gullibility level, all at the same time. What a show of hypocrisy and stupidity. Get in the clown car with the rest, you idiot traitor and religious fraud.
Hmmm... seems like Yesitdid has called for back-ups from Apollo Hoax.com. These people consider themselves 'professional' de-bunkers of 'myths'. Too bad they didn't focus more attention on the original gov't FEMA Fairy Tale. They would have found a goldmine to debunk. Sorry AHers, the 'Guardian' already beat you to it on that 'official' story.
LenBrazil posted a very relevant thread over at AH entitled Participants' technical backgrounds...

Quote: Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Joined: Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 343
Location: Olinda, Brazil
Thread Started on Oct 20, 2005, 9:05 pm
I would be interested in knowing what peoples' technical backgrounds are. Many if not most of the arguments about CT [esp. 9/11] here revolve around technical issues. Many people make statements about scientific principles that make it sound like they have technical training, but they could just be avid readers. Sometimes these statements are made without attribution so knowing a person's background would be helpful in determining if they know what they are talking about.
I freely admit that my scientific background is close to zero even though my dad has a PhD in organic chemistry and was a scientific consultant. I can barely remember the science I learned in high school. I got a BA in History from Oberlin 18 years ago. I think my
LenBrazil posted a very relevant thread over at AH entitled Participants' technical backgrounds...
QUOTE

Quote: Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!
Joined: Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 343
Location: Olinda, Brazil
Thread Started on Oct 20, 2005, 9:05 pm
I would be interested in knowing what peoples' technical backgrounds are. Many if not most of the arguments about CT [esp. 9/11] here revolve around technical issues. Many people make statements about scientific principles that make it sound like they have technical training, but they could just be avid readers. Sometimes these statements are made without attribution so knowing a person's background would be helpful in determining if they know what they are talking about.
I freely admit that my scientific background is close to zero even though my dad has a PhD in organic chemistry and was a scientific consultant. I can barely remember the science I learned in high school. I got a BA in History from Oberlin 18 years ago. I think my