To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Basic Physics
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > General Sci-Tech Discussions > Other Sci-Tech Topics
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148

Common Sense
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...


Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.

If I were all of those things it still beats being you.
Lon Waters
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:24 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:15 AM)
As I said when I first posted the thing I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility.

Again, Why don't you e-mail him and ask him for his phone number. Maybe he'll give it to you and you can set up a meeting. wink.gif

Anyway, you can't find a single credible source for the quote. That also lends his story credibility.

I really couldn't care less about the Wing TV story, (which I had never heard about before) and is meaningless (to me) whether it's true or not.

The whole issue has nothing to do with this thread... just another Schneiby-Doo ob-fu-sk8tion...

like the constant ravings about rove, and 'smelly' things.

De-rail the topic, spread lies, attack the messenger, create straw-men, slander, swear & curse...

anything to muddy the waters.

Pure disinformationalist stuff there.

How's the lawsuit coming? biggrin.gif

It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon
Guest
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:39 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...


Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.

If I were all of those things it still beats being you.


Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.
Common Sense
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 01:47 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:24 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:15 AM)
As I said when I first posted the thing I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility.

Again, Why don't you e-mail him and ask him for his phone number. Maybe he'll give it to you and you can set up a meeting. wink.gif

Anyway, you can't find a single credible source for the quote. That also lends his story credibility.

I really couldn't care less about the Wing TV story, (which I had never heard about before) and is meaningless (to me) whether it's true or not.

The whole issue has nothing to do with this thread... just another Schneiby-Doo ob-fu-sk8tion...

like the constant ravings about rove, and 'smelly' things.

De-rail the topic, spread lies, attack the messenger, create straw-men, slander, swear & curse...

anything to muddy the waters.

Pure disinformationalist stuff there.

How's the lawsuit coming? biggrin.gif

It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon

I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.

He posted here jan 3rd http://www.campusprogress.org/page/communi...inson.eric/CLLG

and here http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dazinith/...66322803109158/

He posted here jan 4th http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320531.shtml

He posted here jan 11th http://www.caves.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=6259&



The post that started it on this forum. Jan 30th. http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59724

My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812

Guest_Sentinel/Paul Isaac Jr posts reply feb 1st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383


Again, I don't know if this guy is the real paul Isaac Jr but no one can prove the real paul Isaac Jr said anything anyway.

What this DOES prove is CT sites are lying about the very people who would give their lives for them. SICK!
Common Sense
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 01:51 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:39 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...


Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.

If I were all of those things it still beats being you.


Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.

What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!
steve1957
Funny how people like common sense make up complete lies and then writes up whole posts as if they have any credibility. There were firemen, police and dozens and dozens of other eyewitnesses who testified that they heard explosions, etc., and many of these statements were captured on video.
user posted image

But it just goes to show you, that when a person is so wrapped up in promoting their own lies you can present all the evidence in the world, but it just won't matter.

In either case, back to the real people, who might have a slight interest in the truth...

Some of the Bin Laden conspiracy theorist, (magician in the cave who suspended the laws of physics on 9/11) people, you know the ones who hold an American flag in one hand, and a swastika on the other, while bragging about being ignorant, well they try to hang their hat on why they don't think explosives were used because that would mean thousands of people would have had to have been involved with the governments pre-planning and implementation of 9/11.

user posted image

They try to sell the bogus theory that too many people would know about the governments crime and hence they would have reported it, and because they say no one has ever reported the crime that no crime was ever committed, hence the magician in the cave did it.

But here's the reality of the situation. Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands how fear is used to silence people from talking about what they know. How many other crimes done by the Mafia have included the silencing and killing of witnesses?

But irregardless of this, let's take a look at something very important. Of the hundreds, or maybe thousands of people who may have been directly or indirectly related to the crime of the century and have appeared to have been silent, consider this...

Much of the information that has come out over the past several years on what really happened on 9/11 have originated from sources within the government. More and more people within the government have LEAKED OUT critical information about what really happened.

WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAME FROM? Now the physics involved is just plain mathematics, ANY IDIOT KNOWS that buildings don't just collapse at NEAR free fall speeds, unless control demolition is used, but there are other bits and pieces of the 9/11 crime that has come out, as revealed by sources inside the government.

user posted image

And of course they gotta be EXTREMELY CAREFUL. Would you tell the truth about a crime committed by the bush administration if they had your whole family by the balls? Even if a direct threat wasn't proven, all you need is an implied threat, like a horses head in your bed, it gets the message across loud and clear.

Some of these people have children and they know they'll be putting them in serious jeopardy if they so much as open their mouths.
user posted image

Point being, while most of the people involved in the 9/11 crime directly or indirectly have appeared to have been silent the fact of the matter is that little bits of information have leaked out. If you expect them to come right out on fox news and confess what really happened, do you think it would do any good???

If some of the top brass, etc. admitted that our own government did 9/11 would fox news believe them or would they call them nut cases?

Point being the truth is an enemy of the state and it must be stopped any way it can, and intimidation, fear, risk reward is one way to deal with it, as is murder, so don't expect all the people who know what really happened to come up to the podium and start talking, because if they did, the first thing the media would do is TURN OFF THEIR MIKE.
user posted image
reasonwhy
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)


My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812

Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).
Common Sense
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 02:39 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)


My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812

Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).

Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...
Common Sense
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 5 2006, 02:35 AM)
Funny how people like common sense make up complete lies and then writes up whole posts as if they have any credibility. There were firemen, police and dozens and dozens of other eyewitnesses who testified that they heard explosions, etc., and many of these statements were captured on video.
user posted image

But it just goes to show you, that when a person is so wrapped up in promoting their own lies you can present all the evidence in the world, but it just won't matter.

In either case, back to the real people, who might have a slight interest in the truth...

Some of the Bin Laden conspiracy theorist, (magician in the cave who suspended the laws of physics on 9/11) people, you know the ones who hold an American flag in one hand, and a swastika on the other, while bragging about being ignorant, well they try to hang their hat on why they don't think explosives were used because that would mean thousands of people would have had to have been involved with the governments pre-planning and implementation of 9/11.

user posted image

They try to sell the bogus theory that too many people would know about the governments crime and hence they would have reported it, and because they say no one has ever reported the crime that no crime was ever committed, hence the magician in the cave did it.

But here's the reality of the situation. Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands how fear is used to silence people from talking about what they know. How many other crimes done by the Mafia have included the silencing and killing of witnesses?

But irregardless of this, let's take a look at something very important. Of the hundreds, or maybe thousands of people who may have been directly or indirectly related to the crime of the century and have appeared to have been silent, consider this...

Much of the information that has come out over the past several years on what really happened on 9/11 have originated from sources within the government. More and more people within the government have LEAKED OUT critical information about what really happened.

WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAME FROM? Now the physics involved is just plain mathematics, ANY IDIOT KNOWS that buildings don't just collapse at NEAR free fall speeds, unless control demolition is used, but there are other bits and pieces of the 9/11 crime that has come out, as revealed by sources inside the government.

user posted image

And of course they gotta be EXTREMELY CAREFUL. Would you tell the truth about a crime committed by the bush administration if they had your whole family by the balls? Even if a direct threat wasn't proven, all you need is an implied threat, like a horses head in your bed, it gets the message across loud and clear.

Some of these people have children and they know they'll be putting them in serious jeopardy if they so much as open their mouths.
user posted image

Point being, while most of the people involved in the 9/11 crime directly or indirectly have appeared to have been silent the fact of the matter is that little bits of information have leaked out. If you expect them to come right out on fox news and confess what really happened, do you think it would do any good???

If some of the top brass, etc. admitted that our own government did 9/11 would fox news believe them or would they call them nut cases?

Point being the truth is an enemy of the state and it must be stopped any way it can, and intimidation, fear, risk reward is one way to deal with it, as is murder, so don't expect all the people who know what really happened to come up to the podium and start talking, because if they did, the first thing the media would do is TURN OFF THEIR MIKE.
user posted image

Stop lying about what the fireman said...

QUOTE
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski


http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt

What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski


http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt

What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.

“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory


This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...

I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.

I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever
.

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt

Let me guess why they left that important part out..

QUOTE
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera


SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.

Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?

A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.

Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?

A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF

First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera


SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.

Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?

A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.

Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?

A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF

First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.

“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers


there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt

And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION... blink.gif

QUOTE
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski


Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF

And here is the outright LIE...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski


Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF

And here is the outright LIE...

“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen


Note where these lairs but the "...."

Now for the REAL quote...

I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF

With that alone I should rest my case. wink.gif These CT sites are dishonest.

Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???

QUOTE
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore



MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".

I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.

...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING


SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.

It's time to see a transformer explosion.

http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion

All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.

SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore



MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".

I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.

...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING


SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.

It's time to see a transformer explosion.

http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion

All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.

SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers


When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.

But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF

First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.

QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

Fire officer Paul Isaac Jr. asserted that 9-11 was an inside job last September 11 at ground zero where mourners and protesters were gathered; “I know 9-11 was an inside job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too”, said Isaac.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bombs_inside_wtc.html



No such quote can be found anywhere but on conspiracy theory sites.
Guest
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 02:27 AM)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 01:51 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 01:39 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 01:34 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Originally posted by Foxx
There is really ONLY one of two plausible explainations for your actions and shenanigans on this thread, Schneiby... either...

1 - You have serious emotional & psychological problems

OR

2 - You ARE a gov't disinformationalist SPOOK.


Actually, upon reflection ... the above traits seem to be the same character abnormalities anyway.

by Schneiby
Will the lunacy ever end...


Apparently not as long as you keep posting here.

If I were all of those things it still beats being you.


Hey Common Sense, what do you think 4 impotent years of getting things wrong and twisted has done to Foxx1957 inside? Frustration on such a grand and sustained scale can't be good for the original PARANOIA and LUNACY that that drove him into the arms of galdur and his other groupwanker lovers here. Wonder what it must be like to be trapped in that impotent head of his? Oh, it's a hamster in a cage! THAT explains it. No room left over for even half a brain. Maybe galdur is his idiot son? That would explain a lot too.

What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!


Ha! That's rich! Sounds self-important don't it? The internet is filled with loony-tunes would be if they could be's. Looking in on the antics of these particular members of groupwankerscentral.com is like watching a terrible car crash in slow motion. Only it's a clown car I see crashing, and all the tragic gore is hidden by all those clowns' colorful facepaint! Don't know whether to laugh or cry really. Tch tch tch.
Lon Waters
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 02:24 AM)

I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.


Not sure why I should know what he was posting on other boards.
Common Sense
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 02:53 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 02:24 AM)

I guess the fact that he was posting on other boards before this one is lost on you.


Not sure why I should know what he was posting on other boards.

Because I posted it a few posts before you posted. Like I said it doesn't matter. What does matter is that these clowns are lying about people who don't deserve it. Even if he isn't Paul Isaac Jr.
reasonwhy
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:43 PM)
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 02:39 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)


My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812

Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).

Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...

It is not my job to keep track of your sock puppets, Schneibster. If you use one ID, you could be banned after a psychotic episode however people will understand the identity of the person you reference.

steve1957
QUOTE
anti-common sense

Stop lying about what the fireman said...


http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

user posted image

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.

Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.

One of the great things about video on the Internet is they can see and hear things with their own eyes and ears, so all the mumbo jumbo, fake, phony, distorted lies people like you spew out of your mouth can be put in the trash where they belong.

People can watch that clip for themselves and see if they think it was doctored, like you try to imply, or if it reveals something you absolutely hate, THE TRUTH!
Common Sense
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 03:06 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:43 PM)
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 02:39 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 4 2006, 06:24 PM)


My responce jan 31st http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812

Schneibster is referencing a Sock puppet (Sensible) of his Sock puppet (Common Sense).

Moron, I made it clear a long time ago any member with a SENCE theme in the name is me. How can it be a sock puppet if I tell you who I am. geez, the dumb a$$es here...

It is not my job to keep track of your sock puppets, Schneibster. If you use one ID, you could be banned after a psychotic episode however people will understand the identity of the person you reference.

I didn't know thinking was a job for you. I'll remember to concider you a retard in the future. wink.gif
Common Sense
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 5 2006, 03:08 AM)
QUOTE
anti-common sense

Stop lying about what the fireman said...


http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

user posted image

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.

Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...
Guest
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 03:13 AM)
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 5 2006, 03:08 AM)
QUOTE
anti-common sense

Stop lying about what the fireman said...


http://iwilltryit.com/fireman1.htm

user posted image

Here's the link to just one of the many groups of firemen videos.

Now be ashamed and apologize for lying again.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...

I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.
Foxx
QUOTE
Guest_Sentinel  - Posted: Feb 1 2006, 06:37 pm

The alleged Paul Isaac Jr 'quote'...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383

Paul Isaac Jr
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com


--------------------------------

No one seemed to care, and this 'Guest' post was becoming buried til the 'Schnensable' decided to bring it back into the limelight...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Guest_Sentinel  - Posted: Feb 1 2006, 06:37 pm

The alleged Paul Isaac Jr 'quote'...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60383

Paul Isaac Jr
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com


--------------------------------

No one seemed to care, and this 'Guest' post was becoming buried til the 'Schnensable' decided to bring it back into the limelight...

Posted: Feb 1 2006, 09:15 pm

"I feel so bad for people like Paul who have to chase down these lies. (Assuming it is Paul. I like the fact that he left his e-mail which lends credibility)"

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=60431



----------------------------

'Schneib'...errr... I mean 'Sens'...errr...I mean 'Common Sense', then turns around and admits that it was he who posted the 'Guest_Sentinel' post...

QUOTE
Posted: Feb 5 2006, 01:15 am

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61243

"As I said when I first posted 'the thing' I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility."[/b]


---------------------------

'credibility' ??? ... like an Urology site lends 'credibility'?

Like all Schitzoids, the 'Schneib' posts so much bs that he can't keep track of his own personalities, and minutes later is trying to shift 'authorship' of the "guest_post" back on the 'CT'ers...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Posted: Feb 5 2006, 01:15 am

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61243

"As I said when I first posted 'the thing' I didn't know if it was true or not. Only that his e-mail gives it credibility."[/b]


---------------------------

'credibility' ??? ... like an Urology site lends 'credibility'?

Like all Schitzoids, the 'Schneib' posts so much bs that he can't keep track of his own personalities, and minutes later is trying to shift 'authorship' of the "guest_post" back on the 'CT'ers...

Posted Feb 5 2006, 01:30 am

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61248

You stupid fu<k, it was you CTers that brought up the quote. Let me guess, now we are creating CT puppets right?...


The 'thing' which interests me most is HOW did the 'Scheni-com-ensable' attach that 4 second video-edit to an Urology site ??? Amazing 'spook-games' go on in all these forums related to 9/11 events. Welcome to 'info-wars'...

----------------------

Since writing the above ...(I got interrupted with other business)... I come back to find the following...

QUOTE
Originally posted by 'Common Sense'

Posted: Feb 5 2006, 02:24 am

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61262

MY responce jan 31st...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812



Here... 'Common Sense' directs us back to a post that was made by 'Sensable'...

Again the luna-schneib can't keep his personalities separated and admits that he is 'Sensable' (although he has presented these personalities / posters as two separate individuals. Nice puppetry games, he accuses the CT'ers OF engaging in. Unbelievable that someone thinks they can fool others through the use of these methods. Of course, when you are on the losing end of the majority of 'evidentiary submissions'... you need 'sock-puppets' to enhance your position (as if they are MANY DIFFERENT POSTERS who all agree with this ob-fu-sk8tor.... (thanks for the 'new spelling'...'newton'? I think that's WHO came up with this appropriate spelling)

So now, at least we have determined by the facts that 'Commen / Common Sense' ...IS 'Sensible / Sensable...IS 'Guest_Sentinel'.

Gee, I wonder who the new 'Schentinel' IS ??? Is he a new incarnation of 'Schnensible', an imposter of the imposter of Paul Isaac Jr. or what? I have to take a break here and go back to the so-far unread posts (after the last one) to see the new developments.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Originally posted by 'Common Sense'

Posted: Feb 5 2006, 02:24 am

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61262

MY responce jan 31st...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=59812



Here... 'Common Sense' directs us back to a post that was made by 'Sensable'...

Again the luna-schneib can't keep his personalities separated and admits that he is 'Sensable' (although he has presented these personalities / posters as two separate individuals. Nice puppetry games, he accuses the CT'ers OF engaging in. Unbelievable that someone thinks they can fool others through the use of these methods. Of course, when you are on the losing end of the majority of 'evidentiary submissions'... you need 'sock-puppets' to enhance your position (as if they are MANY DIFFERENT POSTERS who all agree with this ob-fu-sk8tor.... (thanks for the 'new spelling'...'newton'? I think that's WHO came up with this appropriate spelling)

So now, at least we have determined by the facts that 'Commen / Common Sense' ...IS 'Sensible / Sensable...IS 'Guest_Sentinel'.

Gee, I wonder who the new 'Schentinel' IS ??? Is he a new incarnation of 'Schnensible', an imposter of the imposter of Paul Isaac Jr. or what? I have to take a break here and go back to the so-far unread posts (after the last one) to see the new developments.

Originally posted by Schneiby
What do you expect from a guy who's a member of, get this... "Conspiracy Centeral.com". Heh!


Uhhh, no Schneiby... I'm not registered at Conspiracy Centeral.com as far as I know. I do remember looking at the site once or twice, but never recall 'posting' there.

QUOTE
Originally posted by SchnenceiblepaulIsaacRove
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You SEE him using his hands as he describes the sound of pancaking floors yet you continue to lie about it. You make me sick...


again with the... 'conspiracy-sites selling subscriptions to support lies Makes me SICK routine'.

get a grip, Schneibster - you've been outed. There are ONLY 3 stooges here... You, Yid, and the Legendarian... the rest of your 'supporters' are imaginary elves to try to sell the idea, that there are just as many supporters of the official fairy tale as there are those who debunk it here daily.

BTW... How's the lawsuit coming biggrin.gif
stallion4
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
    Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:

    [Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html


    Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?

This was his reply:
    Goodafternoon,


    The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).

    I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.

    My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.


    Take care


    Sentinel
So as you can see, Mr. Isaac still stands by the Randy Levelo article, except for the part about the gag order, which he says was speculation on his part.
Guest
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person.  I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
    Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:

          [Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.

          http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html


    Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?


This was his reply:
    Goodafternoon,


    The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).

    I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.

    My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.


    Take care


    Sentinel

So as you can see, Mr. Isaac still stands by the Randy Levelo article, except for the part about the gag order, which he says was speculation on his part.


Speculation? Opinion? Is that evidence of anything except his speculation or opinion? Where's the physics gone?

Computer Fogie! We need your help here! tell em that you'll only accept the physics evidence and not opinion and speculation.
Foxx
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person. I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
    Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:

    [Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html


    Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?
This was his reply:
    Goodafternoon,


    The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).

    I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.

    My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.


    Take care


    Sentinel
So as you can see, Mr. Isaac still stands by the Randy Levelo article, except for the part about the gag order, which he says was speculation on his part.

Hi Stallion4.

Thanks for that clarification.

So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?

It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.

If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.

Thanks

Foxx





Guest
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 04:26 AM)
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person.  I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
    Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:

          [Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.

          http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html


    Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?

This was his reply:
    Goodafternoon,


    The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).

    I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.

    My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.


    Take care


    Sentinel

So as you can see, Mr. Isaac still stands by the Randy Levelo article, except for the part about the gag order, which he says was speculation on his part.

Hi Stallion4.

Thanks for that clarification.

So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?

It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.

If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.

Thanks

Foxx


Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. And while you're at it, how about you also
QUOTE (FOXX+)
...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew


to everyone else who you been paranoid and wrong on that score about?
Common Sense
You a$$ clowns continue to amaze me. What part of "There was never any mention about this subject at the memorial." do you not understand?

Now all of a sudden another a$$ clown joins the board. I guess they fit another clown in the car after all... blink.gif

How do I know that quote if fake? Because it hasn't popped up ANYWHERE other than conspiracy sites. Now we have paul says there is no gag order. If that's the case why hasn't he pulled a sheehan and chained himself to the union hall doors forcing them to look into this? That's just one thing he could do. Why can't he get his face on one of those CT videos at least? Concidering 300 of his fellow brothers were murdered.

No thinking things through for these clowns.
Guest
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:15 AM)
You a$$ clowns continue to amaze me. What part of "There was never any mention about this subject at the memorial." do you not understand?

Now all of a sudden another a$$ clown joins the board. I guess they fit another clown in the car after all... blink.gif

How do I know that quote if fake? Because it hasn't popped up ANYWHERE other than conspiracy sites. Now we have paul says there is no gag order. If that's the case why hasn't he pulled a sheehan and chained himself to the union hall doors forcing them to look into this? That's just one thing he could do. Why can't he get his face on one of those CT videos at least? Concidering 300 of his fellow brothers were murdered.

No thinking things through for these clowns.


That's what happens when governments cut funding for mental health programs. They just have to open the doors to the asylums and let them CT and UFO idiots loose on an unsuspecting public. Or in this case the internet. It is to cry over if it wasn't such hilarious entertainment for FREE. That's why I'm here. Forget the physics! Just bring out the CLOWN car again! I just love them guys taking pratfalls all over the shop! Wayhey! There they go again!
stallion4
QUOTE (Foxx+)
Hi Stallion4.

Thanks for that clarification.

So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?

It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.

If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.

Thanks

Foxx


No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.

And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.

I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.

Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.
Guest
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:23 AM)
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person.  I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
    Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:

          [Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.

          http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html


    Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?



This was his reply:
    Goodafternoon,


    The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).

    I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.

    My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.


    Take care


    Sentinel


So as you can see, Mr. Isaac still stands by the Randy Levelo article, except for the part about the gag order, which he says was speculation on his part.


Speculation? Opinion? Is that evidence of anything except his speculation or opinion? Where's the physics gone?

Computer Fogie! We need your help here! tell em that you'll only accept the physics evidence and not opinion and speculation.






QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 05:40 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+)
Hi Stallion4.

Thanks for that clarification.

So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?

It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.

If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.

Thanks

Foxx


No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.

And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.

I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.

Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.


So first it was Isaacs "opinion"? Then it was Isaacs "speculation"? And now it's Isaacs "belief"? Where do you come off presenting this as if it was evidence of anything but talk from any one of thousands of 'opinionated' and 'gullible' CT/UFO conspiracy types? Just ask Computer Fogie. He'll tell you what's evidence and what's not evidence.


Foxx
To the anonymous cowardly 'Guest' who hides behind his mask of anonymity, closely followed by the CS Schneiby 'gonna-get-ya-Foxx' parrot.

QUOTE
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company.


'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.

I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...

Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.

The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.

See the edge of the earth... and drop off it. biggrin.gif
Common Sense
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 05:40 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+)
Hi Stallion4.

Thanks for that clarification.

So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?

It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.

If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.

Thanks

Foxx


No problem, Foxx. I thought that I should post what I did because the Paul Isaac Jr. that I've been communicating with on public message boards has made it clear that he wants his side of the story to be heard regarding the encounter he had with WING TV at ground zero last September - and I didn't want his effort to go unnoticed here since some who are reading this message board think that he might be an imposter, which I don't believe is the case.

And I also thought that it was important to clarify that Mr. Isaac has also stated on a public message board that he stands behind another article (except for the part about the gag order) that was written long before the WING TV article, in which he stated that there were explosives planted in the WTC buildings - he's only refuting the WING TV article.

I noticed that 'Common Sense' posted a bunch of info on Mr. Isaac earlier, however failed to post the Randy Lavello article where Isaac stated that he believed that there were explosives planted in those buildings. If you google 'Paul Isaac Jr.', that article comes up every time - so it's telling that 'Common Sense' wouldn't post the Lavello article along with the other information that was posted.

Anyway, keep up the good fight, Foxx and everyone else that cares enough to expose the true bastards that perpetrated 9-11 along with their traitorous shills that are helping them cover their crimes up.

QUOTE
stallion4
New Member

member is offline







Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
  Re: Fireman Admits: 9-11 Inside Job
« Reply #5 on Feb 2, 2006, 9:35pm » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi everyone. I have an update concerning the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. posted the following on another message board on January 31, 2006:


Goodafternoon from NYC.

My name is Paul Isaac Jr and I'd like to bring something to the forefront. The story writen by Scott Magufka is false. There was never any interaction on the level they wrote about. As a matter of fact they wrote this false article in retaliation for my readingb the riot act to them at GZ. There is footage that is presented by Dylan Avery on Loosechange which shows just how angered I am at the event. These people (Not All) wer extemely disrespectfull at the event. They insulted many of the people in attendance who just asked them to tone it down a bit and then they turned really uglu by using profanity and one jerkoff grabbed himself to tell people to blow him. Thats when I got on them for there BS. I started by asking why they were acting so disrespectfully at such at the event and they began with the C/D charges and the Governemnt this and that. I told them to respect the families and others at the event as they were still in mourning over 911. They just kept up with the BS and scott looked quite uspet.

Heres the Qui-9 , If I had made such statements as they say? why would the NYPD detail who was right there in our faces be staging photo ops with me afterwards? Doesn't it seem quite odd that they would making photo ops with someone who is alledged to have made such innapropriate statement at a memorial?

Why were somay people coming up to me to thank me for reading the riot act to these idiots.

It seems that they needed to get back into the goodness of the movement being that 2 to 3 months prior there was the story going around that the snitched to the FBI on Revere Radio Network.

Anyone with half a brain can see that there is a clear indecation that thesae people are not on the up an up.


Why doesn't Mr Samartino state it. He only states that I was calling them CIA Disinfo ops and agent provacatures.
...

Paul Isaac Jr (Sentinel)
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com


If anyone wants more information from Mr. Isaac about this, request it by sending him an email.

To phaedrus:

Try this link for Loose Change Second Edition:
http://www.question911.com/links.php


http://breakfornews.proboards44.com/index....ge=1#1137206090

I will E-mail him myself and ask him to prove who he says he is.

But like I said over and over again, It doesn't matter...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
stallion4
New Member

member is offline







Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
  Re: Fireman Admits: 9-11 Inside Job
« Reply #5 on Feb 2, 2006, 9:35pm » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi everyone. I have an update concerning the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. posted the following on another message board on January 31, 2006:


Goodafternoon from NYC.

My name is Paul Isaac Jr and I'd like to bring something to the forefront. The story writen by Scott Magufka is false. There was never any interaction on the level they wrote about. As a matter of fact they wrote this false article in retaliation for my readingb the riot act to them at GZ. There is footage that is presented by Dylan Avery on Loosechange which shows just how angered I am at the event. These people (Not All) wer extemely disrespectfull at the event. They insulted many of the people in attendance who just asked them to tone it down a bit and then they turned really uglu by using profanity and one jerkoff grabbed himself to tell people to blow him. Thats when I got on them for there BS. I started by asking why they were acting so disrespectfully at such at the event and they began with the C/D charges and the Governemnt this and that. I told them to respect the families and others at the event as they were still in mourning over 911. They just kept up with the BS and scott looked quite uspet.

Heres the Qui-9 , If I had made such statements as they say? why would the NYPD detail who was right there in our faces be staging photo ops with me afterwards? Doesn't it seem quite odd that they would making photo ops with someone who is alledged to have made such innapropriate statement at a memorial?

Why were somay people coming up to me to thank me for reading the riot act to these idiots.

It seems that they needed to get back into the goodness of the movement being that 2 to 3 months prior there was the story going around that the snitched to the FBI on Revere Radio Network.

Anyone with half a brain can see that there is a clear indecation that thesae people are not on the up an up.


Why doesn't Mr Samartino state it. He only states that I was calling them CIA Disinfo ops and agent provacatures.
...

Paul Isaac Jr (Sentinel)
Rsqsrvs@yahoo.com


If anyone wants more information from Mr. Isaac about this, request it by sending him an email.

To phaedrus:

Try this link for Loose Change Second Edition:
http://www.question911.com/links.php


http://breakfornews.proboards44.com/index....ge=1#1137206090

I will E-mail him myself and ask him to prove who he says he is.

But like I said over and over again, It doesn't matter...

“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski


http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt

What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.

QUOTE
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory


This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...

I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.

I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever
.

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt

Let me guess why they left that important part out..

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory


This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...

I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.

I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever
.

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt

Let me guess why they left that important part out..

“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera


SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.

Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?

A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.

Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?

A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF

First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.

QUOTE
“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers


there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt

And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION... blink.gif

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers


there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt

And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION... blink.gif

"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski


Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF

And here is the outright LIE...

QUOTE
“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen


Note where these lairs but the "...."

Now for the REAL quote...

I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF

With that alone I should rest my case. wink.gif These CT sites are dishonest.

Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen


Note where these lairs but the "...."

Now for the REAL quote...

I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF

With that alone I should rest my case. wink.gif These CT sites are dishonest.

Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???

“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore



MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".

I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.

...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING


SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.

It's time to see a transformer explosion.

http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion

All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.

SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

QUOTE
“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers


When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.

But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF

First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers


When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.

But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF

First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.

"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.


Mindlessly calling me a shill wont make those facts go away.
Guest
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 05:06 AM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 04:26 AM)
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 5 2006, 04:08 AM)
I've been communicating with Paul Isaac Jr. for a couple of weeks now, and from what I can tell, the PIJ a.k.a. Sentinel that has posted on this board is the same person.  I asked Paul this on another public message board a few days ago:
    Hi Paul. Thanks for stopping by to explain your side of the story. I deleted the WING TV post after you contacted me over at Revere and told me that it was BS. However, I'd like to know what your thoughts are about what happened on 9-11. Do you believe that there were explosives planted in those buildings or not? Sorry if I'm putting you on the spot by asking you that question - so don't answer it if it makes you too uncomfortable to answer it here. I only ask the question because in another article that I've read, written by Randy Lavello, you're quoted as saying that members of the FDNY believe that there were explosives in the WTC buildings. Here's the excerpt that I'm referring to:

          [Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr.] explained to me that, “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department’s Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. “There were definitely bombs in those buildings,” he told me.

          http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html


    Is this article accurate? Is the gag order true?


This was his reply:
    Goodafternoon,


    The only part of the Randy Levelo article that was incorrect was the Woolsey gag order. There can only be a gag order by by a judge or the Department of justice in regards to a crimminal investigation. The only one that I'm aware of was the DOJ asking members of the FDNY and NYPD to not discuss the points of the case regarding the mosouie (Spelled wrong).

    I had asked that this part be romeved as it was a statement made in specualtion and not in fact. I am only an aux to the department meaning Civil Defense Emergency Volunteer Auxiliary Firefighter under the NYS Emergency Defense Act 1951. We have enough politics that we're fighting regarding the FDNY following the Law by having the proper number of personell and running this program right. The FDNY has alot of bad management politics and it seems they think they're an exception to the rule of law.

    My opinion on the collapse is clear: there appears to be shape charges going off at the MER floors which is not accessable to te general public. These floors are where the have the machines that run the elevator systems and other maintainance equipment. Who ever had the access to these areas to place these explsives had a part in it.


    Take care


    Sentinel


So as you can see, Mr. Isaac still stands by the Randy Levelo article, except for the part about the gag order, which he says was speculation on his part.

Hi Stallion4.

Thanks for that clarification.

So can we assume that the poster 'Sentinel' here IS actually Paul Isaac Jr. ?

It would be good to get confirmation from you that the 'Sentinel' who posted here is the same person as you have been coresponding with.

If so please relate to him that we welcome him and would like to hear his story regarding the truth of events under question..., and that we apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew.

Thanks

Foxx


Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company. And while you're at it, how about you also
QUOTE (FOXX+)
...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew


to everyone else who you been paranoid and wrong on that score about?


_________________________________________________________________________


QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
To the anonymous cowardly 'Guest' who hides behind his mask of anonymity, closely followed by the CS Schneiby 'gonna-get-ya-Foxx' parrot.

QUOTE
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company.


'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.

I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...

Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.

The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.

See the edge of the earth... and drop off it. biggrin.gif


But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to
QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Who's this we, Mr Foxx, the royal plural? You can speak for yourself. Don't drag me into your slimy company.


'WE', are those who speak the truth... are the majority of intelligent posters who congregate here to discuss the physics & science of 9/11 events... and have no need to hide behind 'anonymous' Guest posts... or plural identities.

I certainly DO NOT include 'puppet-GUESTS' amongst my 'compatriots'...

Register and identify yourself, or as far as I am concerned you're not worth the time I have spent responding to your Home-Office bs in THIS post.

The same goes for ALL other 'Schneiby-Guests'.

See the edge of the earth... and drop off it. biggrin.gif


But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to ...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew


to Mr Isaacs. So why not do the right thing and apologise to me and everyone else you mistook for Schneibster? Are you man enough? Or are you the coward and not me. I'm just here for the fun. Who wants to get in deeper with any of you wastes of cranium space? Who knows what you whackos are capable of? What I do know for sure is that you can't even tell I am NOT this Schneibster guy. So what else can't you tell in your wacky-baccy stupor? Who cares! I don't. I just come here for the clown performances. FREE entertainment is my 'thing' right now. it will eventually pall, I know. But not yet. So hop back into your clown car or the act without you won't be as funny. Those clowns! They make you wanna laugh and cry at the same time, don't they?

Common Sense
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 06:22 AM)
But you still haven't apologised to me and all the others you've wronged in your arrogant ignorance of who you speak to. Why? You already had to
QUOTE (FOXX+)
...apologize for associating his 'forum identity' with the likes of the Schneiby crew


to Mr Isaacs. So why not do the right thing and apologise to me and everyone else you mistook for Schneibster? Are you man enough? Or are you the coward and not me. I'm just here for the fun. Who wants to get in deeper with any of you wastes of cranium space? Who knows what you whackos are capable of? What I do know for sure is that you can't even tell I am NOT this Schneibster guy. So what else can't you tell in your wacky-baccy stupor? Who cares! I don't. I just come here for the clown performances. FREE entertainment is my 'thing' right now. it will eventually pall, I know. But not yet. So hop back into your clown car or the act without you won't be as funny. Those clowns! They make you wanna laugh and cry at the same time, don't they?

He just wants to fu<k with you. Just pay it no mind. It only makes him look stupider. If that's possible.

Every time I destroy his argument he brings up this non-issue as if it means something. Just let him destroy his own credibility. (I know, it's like blowing up an already falling building. Pointless. Heh!)
newton
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:06 AM)

I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.


yeah? wow.

i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.

i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.

amazing.
JamesX
QUOTE (Common SCHNOOB+)
BLEE BLOO BLAH ON AND ON AND ON Heh!)


Uh oh, da Schnoob is freaking out again!
Guest
QUOTE (newton+Feb 5 2006, 06:52 AM)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:06 AM)

I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.


yeah? wow.

i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.

i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.

amazing.


Where did I say cars? Can't you read? I said two long haul heavy rigs. And it sounded like an explosion to me. You weren't there, were you? What's wrong with you, making fun of a serious and haunting memory like that? Is this what you call discussion here? No wonder a lot of guests like me don't register. There are thousands of guests to this site according to the front page here. They don't register because of people like you. Who needs this kind of agro?
Foxx
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon


Very astute, Lon.

You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.

I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).

That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.

The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.

Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).

This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...

All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...

Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...

You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.

A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.

The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.

We are seeing them in full play now.

How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?

I'm Still waiting biggrin.gif









Lon Waters
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon
newton
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE (newton+Feb 5 2006, 06:52 AM)
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:06 AM)

I witnessed a head-on smash between two longhaul heavy rigs one night. It sounded just like a bomb going off. They were both diesel so no 'bang' from the tanks, just diesel oil everywhere. The emergency people were hosing it off the freeway tarmac for ages. I'll never forget that night or that sound as long as I live. Wasn't much left of the truckies. Just like a bomb. Bits of trucks and things everywhere. Did me good to talk about it. Thanks.


yeah? wow.

i've heard dozens of car crashes. they sound like car crashes.

i've heard lots of explosions. they sound like explosions.

amazing.


Where did I say cars? Can't you read? I said two long haul heavy rigs. And it sounded like an explosion to me. You weren't there, were you? What's wrong with you, making fun of a serious and haunting memory like that? Is this what you call discussion here? No wonder a lot of guests like me don't register. There are thousands of guests to this site according to the front page here. They don't register because of people like you. Who needs this kind of agro?

did i say they were sounds that were distinct because of the materials used in their(the colliding objects) construction, or did i just assume that people would know that's what i meant.

boom vs. smack/crunch in english.

how dare you insinuate i don't have my own haunting memories, fellow traveller.

it's people like you that made me want to register.
Foxx
QUOTE
Originally posted by the Schneib
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.


Where were those located? In the basement, perhaps (where the power for the towers was introduced) ?

I don't recall any pictures of incoming power lines attached to the sides of the building?

Links... references (specific to the WTC) would be appreciated... anyone???

Let's see if there is ANY evidence that 'electrical transformers' were positioned in the towers where the fire-fighters reported brisant flashes.

IF there is NO evidence to support the claim that 'electrical transformers' were housed in the areas where fire-fighters reported brisant flashes, then that claim must be abandoned as any form of 'proof' or 'evidence'...

(Much like the Amazing Super-sonic jet-fuel theory is scientific nonsense)





zoktoberfest
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/44892

Go Seattle!!! Rain on Pittsburgh's parade!
Foxx
QUOTE (zoktoberfest+Feb 5 2006, 08:58 AM)
hereward
Hello,

I have just listened to the audio of Steven Jones' lecture last week, which was good, but I'm annoyed that they cut the recording just as a questioner was trying to clarify the exact type of 'peer review' that his work had received.

my link:
http://www.911oz.com/link.phtml?id=125&nav_id=navbutt_125

I am also slightly concerned to discover that Dr. Jones has written a paper which claims to show evidence that Christ visited Ancient America:

http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/r...d%20figures.htm

He seems like a nice guy and I don't want to deny him his right to a bit of folly - he hasn't claimed that this paper was peer reviewed after all - but I'm just wondering how does this kind of belief affect his general scientific credibility?

A penny for your thoughts...


galdur
His physics are fine with me.

His spiritual beliefs are his own personal matters.
As long as he sticks to physical reality in his analysis
of the collapse of the towers and I have seen no indication
that he doesn´t - he can believe in his dog for all I care.

He is a physics professor - a person who by definition is an
authority on physics. I view him as such as the discussion
of the towers' collapse is concerned. Anyway, he's not the
only one who has taken the official fable apart using basic
physics.

I think you should try to refute his findings if you find anything
wrong with them. Ad hominen attacks are very transparent.
Oldest trick in the shill book.

I don't really spend any time on religious nonsense but even
some of the world's greatest scientists have believed in religious
fables. Still they were capable of momentous achievements
and inventions.
Lon Waters
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon


Very astute, Lon.

You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.

I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).

That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.

The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.

Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).

This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...

All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...

Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...

You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.

A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.

The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.

We are seeing them in full play now.

How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?

I'm Still waiting biggrin.gif

Foxx,

I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.

Lon
Guest
This psycho told lies about WMD's and torrorism
and only later admitted that the real orders and
reasons for attacking Iraq and Afghanistan came
from GOD. How about his credibility?

--------------------------------------------------------

5 February 2006 16:39


Bush: God told me to invade Iraq

President 'revealed reasons for war in private meeting'


By Rupert Cornwell in Washington

Published: 07 October 2005

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americ...ticle317805.ece

President George Bush has claimed he was told by God to invade Iraq and attack Osama bin Laden's stronghold of Afghanistan as part of a divine mission to bring peace to the Middle East, security for Israel, and a state for the Palestinians.

The President made the assertion during his first meeting with Palestinian leaders in June 2003, according to a BBC series which will be broadcast this month.

Article Length: 842 words (approx.)
Guest
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 04:40 PM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon


Very astute, Lon.

You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.

I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).

That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.

The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.

Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).

This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...

All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...

Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...

You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.

A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.

The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.

We are seeing them in full play now.

How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?

I'm Still waiting biggrin.gif

Foxx,

I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.

Lon

The purpose of the government shills here is to
disrupt the discussion and drive people away
from it. This is typical shill methodology.

Common Sense
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon

Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.

Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?

I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.

Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.
reasonwhy
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:57 AM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon

Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.

Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is? I only know one group so easily gullible. dry.gif

I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.

Why would Paul waist his time proving who he is to you? If I were him I would hit delete and mark your e-mail’s spam in the future. Paul appears to have integrity (something you are lacking) and might have read some of your posts.
galdur
Contentless straw man and ad hominem attacks
by the shills here as usual.

Anything to avoid the arguments.

Typical.
Common Sense
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 04:46 PM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 04:40 PM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon


Very astute, Lon.

You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.

I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).

That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.

The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.

Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).

This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...

All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...

Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...

You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.

A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.

The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.

We are seeing them in full play now.

How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?

I'm Still waiting biggrin.gif

Foxx,

I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.

Lon

The purpose of the government shills here is to
disrupt the discussion and drive people away
from it. This is typical shill methodology.

You mean how you distract people from Bush's real crimes? Yeah, you're "Pod People" alright. dry.gif
Common Sense
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 05:28 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:57 AM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon

Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.

Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is? I only know one group so easily gullible. dry.gif

I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.

Why would Paul waist his time proving who he is to you? If I were him I would hit delete and mark your e-mail’s spam in the future. Paul appears to have integrity (something you are lacking) and might have read some of your posts.

Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.
reasonwhy
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 09:45 AM)


Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.

Thanks, if you thought differently I would be worried. tongue.gif
galdur
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 5 2006, 05:51 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 09:45 AM)


Yeah, I already know you're a dumb a$$ who believes everything he reads as long as it confirms his world view. You don't have to drive the point home.

Thanks, if you thought differently I would be worried. tongue.gif


biggrin.gif

Lon Waters
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 04:57 PM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon

Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.

Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?

I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.

Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.

I thought someone would pick on my post for this which is why I added the (insert disclaimer here) rather than bogging it down with a long disclaimer. None of us really needs to be reminded to carry some level of doubt about what one person claims another said. If you will reread my post you will see that I merely say that stallion4 gives an indication of what Paul's thoughts are, I don't in any way say that those are actually Paul's thoughts nor will I claim that without hearing from Paul himself.
metamars
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 04:40 PM)
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 07:10 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by Lon Waters
It is a curiosity that this WING_TV thing would become any kind of an issue on this board. The original link to the WING-TV article was buried deep in a very long and very old post. Nobody at the time took any note nor long remembered the post or its content. Months later Guest_Sentinel checks in to debunk it. There weren't more than 1 or 2 responses to that, IIRC, and again things moved on to other topics until Sentinel checked in. WING-TV articles and quotes don't seem to be in general circulation here, and nobody that I can tell is giving the Loose Change video much credence. I can understand Paul wanting to clear up the misuse of his name (and it appears that did happen), but all in all it does not seem to me to have been a concern here, until of course things gained a new life with the recent posts.

Lon


Very astute, Lon.

You don't seem to post much, but it seems you are following the thread closely.

I'm sure you recall how the shape-shifting Schneibster first posted the Bankers Trust anomaly (attempting to relate that 'somehow' to WTC 7).

That was immediately shot down, which caused a temporary 12 hr pause while the opposing forces re-grouped.

The Schneibies came back with another (what they thought would be another 'killer') - the 4 second clip from 'Urology.com' which was also quickly exposed as some sort of 'spook exercise'.

Caught... they had to abandon that clip & it's 'source'... then tried to turn it around to claim that they had 'exposed' the 'lies' from a 'CT' site, and had to expose the original site (from which they gleaned the edited clip).

This exposed further evidence (which they tied to hide in the first place)...

All of a sudden, it becomes a matter of 'damage control'...

Quick... ob-fu-sk8te... change topics... twist, squirm, accuse...bring out the straw-man...circumvent the original topics in any way possible...

You have to admit the Home-Office Schneiby crew has done a good job over the last numerous pages since the Bankers Trust Amazing Flying Columns (and horizontal projectiles) & the Urology exposure to try to hide & bury this evidence through ob-fu-sk8tion.

A casual observer or newcomer would be quite confused by this flurry of activity on the part of Home-Office, but we who understand the truth about WHAT is going on are not confused at all by the bull in the China Shop.

The YID 'Yesitdid' has been fairly quiet through all of this. Perhaps he remembers my admonition (back in December) to WATCH what Schneibsters next ploys entail.

We are seeing them in full play now.

How's the lawsuit coming, Schneibster?

I'm Still waiting biggrin.gif

Foxx,

I am following the thread very closely. Despite all of the rancor which makes wading through the posts very difficult, there is good information here. I am, however, continually wondering why there is such invective on a physics forum, repeated character assassinations and even a death threat. I guess I am old school, I was taught that scientific discussion are best persued without emotional appeals or attacking the other person. Science is best served, or so I thought, with the free flow of ideas and discussion about them. The hostility that one finds on this forum prevents that from happening to some degree. For myself, I am reluctant to post for not wanting to get mired in such exchanges, I would not be surprised if others felt the same. I would really like to see this kind of discussion on a moderated forum where the moderator simply cleaned up the personal attacks and insults without censoring the core ideas.

Lon

Agreed, although on a forum such as this one, where non-specialists can post with "stage names", that might require a serious amount of "cleaning up". So much so, that even that might not be workable, unless some way of paying the moderators is found.

It's not only the ad hominems which dilute the value of the thread, but the constant linking to politics and other non-physics aspects of 911. Of course, as an undercurrent, that link has always been there and will always be there. Most people's motivation for debating the subject, I'm sure, has to do with the fact that 911 represented massive crimes, and getting into the physics of it can shed light on who the real criminals are.

My hope is that Scholar's for 911 Truth will attract a large following by technical scholars of the engineering, physics, and other scientific persuasions, who will be putting their good (real) names to whatever they post, and thus will have both the background and the sense of responsibility and ownership of their comments that they normally maintain in their other, scholarly, pursuits. If this is the case, then there should only be a minimum amount of moderation needed.

I would urge serious debaters on this thread to approach local faculty in engineering, physics, and applied mathematics, especially, to join Scholars for 911 Truth. Hopefully, a forum will be added there, soon. Anybody who is serious, on either side of the debate, cannot pretend that the "debate" here on this thread can possibly be anywhere near as valuable as a scholarly debate, elsewhere.

In fact, I would go so far as to say that any "regular" on this thread, no matter which side they are on, who claims that spending time on this thread is a better use of time than soliciting scholars for Scholars for 911 Truth (or creating coherent works which they themselves will submit to S911T), is not seeking the truth so much as enjoying arguing.


http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/




Common Sense
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 06:05 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 04:57 PM)
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon

Why should Paul need stallion4 to speak for him? He has the site address if this is true.

Anyone can say they are Paul Isaac Jr. Why are you so eager to believe stallion4 who posts on CT sites without confirmation of who this Paul is?

I have sent my own e-mail to Paul just to see what I get. I asked him to post pictures of himself which may be on the net proving who he is and others which aren't posted on the net.

Why would Paul come to a board saying the quote of a gag order is wrong when it's not the quote we posted here. No mention of a gag order was in the quote we posted. Logically stallion4's post doesn't even make sense.

I thought someone would pick on my post for this which is why I added the (insert disclaimer here) rather than bogging it down with a long disclaimer. None of us really needs to be reminded to carry some level of doubt about what one person claims another said. If you will reread my post you will see that I merely say that stallion4 gives an indication of what Paul's thoughts are, I don't in any way say that those are actually Paul's thoughts nor will I claim that without hearing from Paul himself.

Forgive me if I took your post out of context. The tone of the post seems to give more credence to stallion4's post than I thought it deserves. Even with the disclaimer it seemed to be a wink and a nod to stallion4's credibility. Your clarification gives me pause in my initial conclusion. I thought you were brought here by the CTers as so many others before you. While I'm still not sure what to make of you I will say you may not have deserved my tone. For that I apologize.

It's difficult to have a serious debate with these people since every time you say something which challenges the CT story they label you a shill out of hand. Others challenge your idententity as if that chages the facts some how. Ironically, I may have made the same mistake with you.

Again, I apologize.
steve1957
QUOTE
In fact, I would go so far as to say that any "regular" on this thread, no matter which side they are on, who claims that spending time on this thread is a better use of time than soliciting scholars for Scholars for 911 Truth (or creating coherent works which they themselves will submit to S911T), is not seeking the truth so much as enjoying arguing.


http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/


I agree with Metemars on this one, and the site is a pretty honest, straight forward accumulation of information.

But let's get real here!

People like anti-Common Sense have no interest in the truth whatsoever, in fact "The truth makes him sick"

It seems to me that you might be able to categorize different groups of people...

1. People with some knowledge, logic and facts and desire to know the truth, these people know the government did 9/11.

2. People with a little bit of knowledge and a little bit of desire to understand the truth, but just haven't had the time to really dig into the details. They know the government has been lying about many things, but the jury is still out on what happened, because they just haven't been able to fully investigate it. These people might say, "We just don't know yet EITHER WAY"

3. Then you have the liars, who reject all knowledge and truth, people like anti-common sense, who hate the truth and consider the truth as an enemy to their way of life. These people may even know better than what they're saying, but since they are on a quest to save their phony self image, they'll lie, deny and purposely twist any and all facts in order to make the lies appear as reality.

galdur
No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.

I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.
Common Sense
Geez, a con man and an idiot. Actually one of them is both.
Common Sense
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951

This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...
galdur
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951

This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...

No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.

Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.

You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.
Common Sense
QUOTE (galdur+Feb 5 2006, 08:06 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951

This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...

No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.

Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.

You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.

I suggest you tell Rove I'm not backing down no matter how many times you use projection tactics. No matter how many 4th graders like you he pays I'm going to continue exposing the facts. You pod people sure are morons.
JamesX
How's the lawsuit going?

Guest
QUOTE (galdur+Feb 5 2006, 08:06 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951

This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...

No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.

Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.

You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.


Another galdur/MMC post! Says it all, don't it?

You're not really interested in the physics or the truth, are you?

You are the same UFO conspiracy nut who has moved on to the 9/11 CD conspiracy bandwagon to do your usual sick stuff.

How do we know? Easy. As soon as someone posts any opinion or physics argument that disagrees with you conspiracy theory people, they are called a traitor, a shill, an obfuscator, a sock puppet, an agent and an enemy.

But your posts are so lame, they have a saying now in Physorg______"Another galdur/MMC post"!

Only because the "idiot" content is expected to be high in your posts and you never disappoint.

CT hypocrites and idiots like you are the ones who are sick, cynically mocking and sucking the innocent victims of 9/11 into your warped madness.

Steve1957 will tell you what god has in store for hypocrites like you. Ask him. He knows god personally, didn't you know! Just like Jones and all those other inbred cousins of yours and MMC who go to BYU! Isn't that the university that idiots like you like to call The Mother Ship! They must really churn out the best miseducated morons in the country if Jones 'work' haha quality is typical.

Oops! And here comes MMC's other inbred idiot cousin. JamesX and Galdur and MMC sound like they came from the same gene pond. Its too small and inbred to be called a proper gene pool.

A pond sounds about right for them because they like the feel of the"scum" word on their tongue a lot.

Aren't they original? Probably still only 2 yr old suckers by the sound of em. They believe anything their double jobbie heros want to sell em! Looks like the saying will have to be stretched to Another galdur/MMC/JamesX post!

You don't have to reply. We all know you're idiots. You don't have to prove it any more. We believe you already!
JamesX
How's the lawsuit going?
brian
From the Common chap -

"You pod people sure are morons."

Has anyone other than himself mentioned pods? This persons disregard for the truth is blatant and his desperation almost palpable.

Professor Jones on the explosives required says he is taking his cue from Hoffman.



Rove loves CTers
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 5 2006, 09:43 PM)
QUOTE (galdur+Feb 5 2006, 08:06 PM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 08:04 PM)
OK, you guys are going to have to become a bit more inventive. You people have been saying "Shill" since the begining of this thread to anyone who disagrees with you. It's pathetic.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=28951

This is the first post which degraded the rest. Of course it was a CTer...

No, just to you and the 4-5 carbon copies of you
who are here to disrupt the discussion and drive
people away from it. Your tactics are very trans-
parent, revealing you as a cheap shill.

Similar scum using the same shill tactics are all
over the net trying to destroy 9/11 discussion.

You don't fool me pal. Your kind is a dime a dozen.


Another galdur/MMC post! Says it all, don't it?

You're not really interested in the physics or the truth, are you?

You are the same UFO conspiracy nut who has moved on to the 9/11 CD conspiracy bandwagon to do your usual sick stuff.

How do we know? Easy. As soon as someone posts any opinion or physics argument that disagrees with you conspiracy theory people, they are called a traitor, a shill, an obfuscator, a sock puppet, an agent and an enemy.

But your posts are so lame, they have a saying now in Physorg______"Another galdur/MMC post"!

Only because the "idiot" content is expected to be high in your posts and you never disappoint.

CT hypocrites and idiots like you are the ones who are sick, cynically mocking and sucking the innocent victims of 9/11 into your warped madness.

Steve1957 will tell you what god has in store for hypocrites like you. Ask him. He knows god personally, didn't you know! Just like Jones and all those other inbred cousins of yours and MMC who go to BYU! Isn't that the university that idiots like you like to call The Mother Ship! They must really churn out the best miseducated morons in the country if Jones 'work' haha quality is typical.

Oops! And here comes MMC's other inbred idiot cousin. JamesX and Galdur and MMC sound like they came from the same gene pond. Its too small and inbred to be called a proper gene pool.

A pond sounds about right for them because they like the feel of the"scum" word on their tongue a lot.

Aren't they original? Probably still only 2 yr old suckers by the sound of em. They believe anything their double jobbie heros want to sell em! Looks like the saying will have to be stretched to Another galdur/MMC/JamesX post!

You don't have to reply. We all know you're idiots. You don't have to prove it any more. We believe you already!

I think it's the result of all the drugs in the 70's-80's. Paranoia is one of the many symptoms of drug use and must have been passed down from their crack whore mothers during pregnancy. Now all they have is filling the tires on their trailer home and repeating their insatiable paranoia by posting here 24-7. Unfortunately the term "Crack kills" doesn't always apply. Had there crack whore mothers aborted them due to drug use and sexual desease we wouldn't be here cleaning their mess.

If you're going to talk smack you're going to get smacked.
Guest
QUOTE (brian+Feb 5 2006, 09:53 PM)
From the Common chap -

"You pod people sure are morons."

Has anyone other than himself mentioned pods? This persons disregard for the truth is blatant and his desperation almost palpable.

Professor Jones on the explosives required says he is taking his cue from Hoffman.


Hahaha! Jones takes his cue from Hoffman!

Idiot and idioter!

What a gas, man!

It's...like....galdur takes his cue from Foxx!

Oh the irony!

Sorry for using your favourite saying, Common Sense!

Hahaha! What a riot!
hereward
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:

Are you being paid to do this?

Guest
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:

Are you being paid to do this?


Paid to suck up to Foxx:

galdur
JamesX
newton
etc..........................

Why else would they post no physics and just snipe at those who do and then call them shills etc..............

No one on the CT side is here to debate physics or truth. They're just here because they're crooks or just nuts. Either way, this forum used to be where intelligent people came to talk. Now with galdur, JamesX and the rest of these idiots, its become a place where people come to throw insults and laugh at anyone with any physics to discuss.

Just like in everything else, entropy has its way. In this case the idiots are aiding and abetting entropy in having its way sooner than normal. Is nothing beyond the pale for spammer-scammers and con-men and idiots? Where can one go now on the internet to speak with intelligent people if these forums are going to be overrun by hordes of cult followers and barbarians and loonies who will exploit even 9/11 victims for their perverted gratifications? Disgusting.


lenbrazil
I have a question for all the CT's out there.

Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly


A] civil engineers,


B] licensed architects,


C] construction contractors or


D] demolition experts*,


Len

* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.
frater plecticus
lenbrazil is....

a) a government shill ?

cool.gif professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?

c) iggy pop fan ?

d) all of the above ?

Guest
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:

Are you being paid to do this?


See hereward? This guy brazil respectfully posts pertinent questions..........


QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.

Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly


A] civil engineers,


B] licensed architects,


C] construction contractors or


D] demolition experts*,


Len

* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.


And what does he get for his trouble?......the political clown, brigade leader, that's who. Check it out for yourself.........

QUOTE (frater plecticus+Feb 6 2006, 12:31 AM)
lenbrazil is....

a) a government shill ?

cool.gif professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?

c) iggy pop fan ?

d) all of the above ?


Can we wonder any more why this forum is a joke? and who is to blame?
frater plecticus
QUOTE
and who is to blame?


Bin Laden ?
Guest
Another post from galdur/fraterplecticus.

Says it all.
frater plecticus
QUOTE
Says it all.


apparently so....
another guest
Another galdur/frater plecticus post! Says it all.
lenbrazil
QUOTE (Guest+Feb 6 2006, 12:43 AM)
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 5 2006, 11:18 PM)
It seems that the tone of this forum has deteriorated even further. I have a question for those who are constantly spamming these threads with vicious personal attacks:

Are you being paid to do this?


See hereward? This guy brazil respectfully posts pertinent questions..........


QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.

Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly


A] civil engineers,


B] licensed architects,


C] construction contractors or


D] demolition experts*,


Len

* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.


And what does he get for his trouble?......the political clown, brigade leader, that's who. Check it out for yourself.........

QUOTE (frater plecticus+Feb 6 2006, 12:31 AM)
lenbrazil is....

a) a government shill ?

B) professional "official conspiracy theory promoter" ?

c) iggy pop fan ?

d) all of the above ?


Can we wonder any more why this forum is a joke? and who is to blame?

Don't worry 'guest' I'm used to that by now. It's the typical response of most (not all) CTs when asked a question they don't have an easy answer to. This is the kind of tatic used by people on the loosing side of an argument.

I've asked the same question on a few other forums and it seems to bend the CTs out of shape. They rationalize but they can't come up with a valid name. That no one with relevent expertise believes their theories should tell them something but don't want to get the message.

I currently spend too much time on forums as it is, but the lack of any expert backing for the "WTC was controlled demo theory" interests me enough that I'm willing to discuss it here if any CTs are willing to do so.

I won't reply to any more assinine posts and probably won't discuss other aspects of 9/11 here.

For the record I'm C) an Iggy fan though his output has been very uneven. That 'frater' seems to know this leads me to believe he 'knows' me from another fourum. I do live in Brazil but I'm American.

steve1957
QUOTE
gadlur

No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.

I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.


I can't argue with that, but I could also take it a step further and call their mindset for what it is. It's a cancer on humanity. The scum that destroys all the good things about the US.

It's the mindset of these people who not only lie their fanny's off, but encourage others to join them on their slippery slope to hell. It's the same mindset shared by the Germans who joined the Nazi party, and the same mindset of the KKK, who slaughtered innocent blacks.

It's the same mindset that justifies the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention our own US soldiers.

It's the scum of society that erodes everything that used to be decent about this country, it's called lies, deception, greed and hatred of the truth. And those are their good qualities.

Abraham Lincoln said, when this nation departs from the Lord it will collapse and so it is these people represent the epitome of the mindset of the people that are causing the demise of this nation, quickly, and they do it with lies that are so obvious, you have to be a complete brain dead moron to go along with it.

Little bush and his crony followers, such as the mindless liars on this board talk about home land security, justifying the hundreds of billions spent killing innocent children in Iraq, and while they're enraging billions of Arabs around the world, they're simultaneously closing down our military bases, and moving our remaining armies over seas.

It's called weakening our military defense at home and abroad, while making deals with President Fox of Mexico to let in millions and millions of Mexicans, who cross the boarder looking for work, nothing against the Mexican people, but the president is only ENCOURAGING more and more to come over.

And while this is going on our jobs are being shipped over seas, so that the middle class has lost it, yeah the Dow Jones has been holding it's own, but that's only a temporary artificial hype of hot air, about ready to explode any moment, because the jobs are being shipped over seas, and the few jobs left are being given to CHEAP LABOR.

But the scum bag, lying cronies on this board will fight you tooth and nail and say what a wonderful job King George is doing are protecting this place from terrorists, while boosting the economy.

They openly tell you they hate God and hate the truth, yet they totally support little bush, who claims to be a christian. Now why do you suppose that is??? Because wolves flock together, no matter what kinds of titles they give themselves, in fact the titles are generally deceptive in nature.

If a person is a liar, then he's a liar no matter what kind of title he or she has. And when and if they speak the truth the same holds true.

Professor Jones spoke the truth about the physics involved with 9/11, but since the idiot scum bags don't have the mental capacity to debate his points they use his title as a way of discrediting him. But remember the scum bags are hypocrites of the worse sort because they support little bush who calls himself a christian, mostly because the 'w' is so blatantly insincere.

I guess you can say birds of a feather flock together, which makes perfect sense that the worse scum of the nation, the people who support the murder of innocent people also support the most absurd lies of the 21'st century, IE; (the magician in the cave suspended the laws of physics on 9/11)

I guess we could all relax and look at these morons for what they are and not take it too seriously, after all they're much like a bunch of monkeys doing a circus act trying to imitate what they were taught. Although I shouldn't offend the monkeys, as at least they have some intelligence.

But in either case THEY WILL HAVE THEIR DAY. Maybe a rude awakening or maybe something else will shake them up so much that they finally see the light.
Guest
QUOTE (steve1957+Feb 6 2006, 02:34 AM)
QUOTE
gadlur

No, they are not on any quest to save their
self image, they work on supporting lies,
official lies. Their procedure in this regard
is basic. It has all been seen before. This is
nothing new.

I view those bozos as enemy, traitors.


I can't argue with that, but I could also take it a step further and call their mindset for what it is. It's a cancer on humanity. The scum that destroys all the good things about the US.

It's the mindset of these people who not only lie their fanny's off, but encourage others to join them on their slippery slope to hell. It's the same mindset shared by the Germans who joined the Nazi party, and the same mindset of the KKK, who slaughtered innocent blacks.

It's the same mindset that justifies the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention our own US soldiers.

It's the scum of society that erodes everything that used to be decent about this country, it's called lies, deception, greed and hatred of the truth. And those are their good qualities.

Abraham Lincoln said, when this nation departs from the Lord it will collapse and so it is these people represent the epitome of the mindset of the people that are causing the demise of this nation, quickly, and they do it with lies that are so obvious, you have to be a complete brain dead moron to go along with it.

Little bush and his crony followers, such as the mindless liars on this board talk about home land security, justifying the hundreds of billions spent killing innocent children in Iraq, and while they're enraging billions of Arabs around the world, they're simultaneously closing down our military bases, and moving our remaining armies over seas.

It's called weakening our military defense at home and abroad, while making deals with President Fox of Mexico to let in millions and millions of Mexicans, who cross the boarder looking for work, nothing against the Mexican people, but the president is only ENCOURAGING more and more to come over.

And while this is going on our jobs are being shipped over seas, so that the middle class has lost it, yeah the Dow Jones has been holding it's own, but that's only a temporary artificial hype of hot air, about ready to explode any moment, because the jobs are being shipped over seas, and the few jobs left are being given to CHEAP LABOR.

But the scum bag, lying cronies on this board will fight you tooth and nail and say what a wonderful job King George is doing are protecting this place from terrorists, while boosting the economy.

They openly tell you they hate God and hate the truth, yet they totally support little bush, who claims to be a christian. Now why do you suppose that is??? Because wolves flock together, no matter what kinds of titles they give themselves, in fact the titles are generally deceptive in nature.

If a person is a liar, then he's a liar no matter what kind of title he or she has. And when and if they speak the truth the same holds true.

Professor Jones spoke the truth about the physics involved with 9/11, but since the idiot scum bags don't have the mental capacity to debate his points they use his title as a way of discrediting him. But remember the scum bags are hypocrites of the worse sort because they support little bush who calls himself a christian, mostly because the 'w' is so blatantly insincere.

I guess you can say birds of a feather flock together, which makes perfect sense that the worse scum of the nation, the people who support the murder of innocent people also support the most absurd lies of the 21'st century, IE; (the magician in the cave suspended the laws of physics on 9/11)

I guess we could all relax and look at these morons for what they are and not take it too seriously, after all they're much like a bunch of monkeys doing a circus act trying to imitate what they were taught. Although I shouldn't offend the monkeys, as at least they have some intelligence.

But in either case THEY WILL HAVE THEIR DAY. Maybe a rude awakening or maybe something else will shake them up so much that they finally see the light.


The bolded sections above will show the irony in them when everyone is reminded of what you are steve1957.

You are the cancer. Instead of rotting in jail for the self-confessed con-man and liar you are, society has seen fit to let you loose again on the world. That is what's wrong with society. They can't tell how sleazy and wicked you are because you now hide behind patriotism and religion. They are two of the favourite refuges and 'scalping grounds' for dirty rotten scoundrels like yourself. How dare you call anyone those names. You who have proven you are all those things and more. Just like your cronies here and in your scam gang. Shame on us for letting you out to lie and cheat and pervert once more. You and your cronies are what's wrong with the human race. You pull down the intelligence level and you push up the gullibility level, all at the same time. What a show of hypocrisy and stupidity. Get in the clown car with the rest, you idiot traitor and religious fraud.
Foxx
Hmmm... seems like Yesitdid has called for back-ups from Apollo Hoax.com. These people consider themselves 'professional' de-bunkers of 'myths'. Too bad they didn't focus more attention on the original gov't FEMA Fairy Tale. They would have found a goldmine to debunk. Sorry AHers, the 'Guardian' already beat you to it on that 'official' story.

LenBrazil posted a very relevant thread over at AH entitled Participants' technical backgrounds...

QUOTE


user posted image

Quote: Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!

Joined: Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 343
Location: Olinda, Brazil

Thread Started on Oct 20, 2005, 9:05 pm

I would be interested in knowing what peoples' technical backgrounds are. Many if not most of the arguments about CT [esp. 9/11] here revolve around technical issues. Many people make statements about scientific principles that make it sound like they have technical training, but they could just be avid readers. Sometimes these statements are made without attribution so knowing a person's background would be helpful in determining if they know what they are talking about.

I freely admit that my scientific background is close to zero even though my dad has a PhD in organic chemistry and was a scientific consultant. I can barely remember the science I learned in high school. I got a BA in History from Oberlin 18 years ago. I think my talent in arguing with CTists lies in spotting logical holes [as opposed to technical ones] in their arguments.

Many of you have mentioned your backgrounds in various posts. But I think having one place where people discuss their technical backgrounds would be helpful to me and others. I am not just talking about degrees and jobs. I think saying for example "I'm high school drop out and cab driver but have read dozens of technical books about...." would be valid.

Hopefully no one will be prone to exaggeration

I debated about where to place this thread. One could argue it belongs in General Discussion or that it make just as much sense to put in Apollo Hoax as here, but in the end I decided this was the most appropriate place.

Quotes:

Bertrand Russell - "I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt"

To paraphrase Mark Twain "The CTists' claims are both convincing and true, unfortunately what's convincing is not true, and what's true is not convincing"



Numerous 'associates' signed into the thread explaining their 'technical backgrounds'...I.E -

Fnord Fred

echnaton

Bob B.

frenat

gwiz

Al Johnson

Jay Utah

PhantomWolf

sts60

craiglamson

nomuse

PeterB

{and YID / 'Yesitdid' ... under the name of 'jaydeehess' }

(No comment from LenBrazil on any of those persons technical background... no matter how weak and unrelated to 9/11 events those persons 'technical qualifications' were)

Then a person (who had been classed as a 'CTer') decided to post his own....

QUOTE (->
QUOTE


user posted image

Quote: Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!

Joined: Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 343
Location: Olinda, Brazil

Thread Started on Oct 20, 2005, 9:05 pm

I would be interested in knowing what peoples' technical backgrounds are. Many if not most of the arguments about CT [esp. 9/11] here revolve around technical issues. Many people make statements about scientific principles that make it sound like they have technical training, but they could just be avid readers. Sometimes these statements are made without attribution so knowing a person's background would be helpful in determining if they know what they are talking about.

I freely admit that my scientific background is close to zero even though my dad has a PhD in organic chemistry and was a scientific consultant. I can barely remember the science I learned in high school. I got a BA in History from Oberlin 18 years ago. I think my talent in arguing with CTists lies in spotting logical holes [as opposed to technical ones] in their arguments.

Many of you have mentioned your backgrounds in various posts. But I think having one place where people discuss their technical backgrounds would be helpful to me and others. I am not just talking about degrees and jobs. I think saying for example "I'm high school drop out and cab driver but have read dozens of technical books about...." would be valid.

Hopefully no one will be prone to exaggeration

I debated about where to place this thread. One could argue it belongs in General Discussion or that it make just as much sense to put in Apollo Hoax as here, but in the end I decided this was the most appropriate place.

Quotes:

Bertrand Russell - "I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt"

To paraphrase Mark Twain "The CTists' claims are both convincing and true, unfortunately what's convincing is not true, and what's true is not convincing"



Numerous 'associates' signed into the thread explaining their 'technical backgrounds'...I.E -

Fnord Fred

echnaton

Bob B.

frenat

gwiz

Al Johnson

Jay Utah

PhantomWolf

sts60

craiglamson

nomuse

PeterB

{and YID / 'Yesitdid' ... under the name of 'jaydeehess' }

(No comment from LenBrazil on any of those persons technical background... no matter how weak and unrelated to 9/11 events those persons 'technical qualifications' were)

Then a person (who had been classed as a 'CTer') decided to post his own....

BSc (Hons) in Biochemistry (got a first, and am still rather jazzed about that!) in 2001, with a number of years' experience in protein structure research. Currently I'm doing something completely different developing blood diagnostic devices.

I took A-levels in chemistry, biology, physics and mathematics, and aced them all. While that doesn't provide me with in-depth technical knowledge, it does provide an adequate background to recognise a fair amount of scientific and technical BS when I see it (such as David Groves's experiments, tucked away in the appendices of Dark Moon).


Although 'Objective Len' had not responded to any of the previous posters, no more than 1/2 hr later after the above post... Len posted this reply regarding the above persons 'technical qualifications'...

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.cg...ge=1#1130164786

QUOTE
Originally posted by LenBrazil

Great you have a science degree in an unrelated field [no offense] we can quote as an expert on such subjects as

why WTCs 1 & 2 collapsed

if they fell too quickly

why WTC 7 collapsed

if it fell to quickly

if the hole in the Pentagon was the right size

whether the wreckage of flights 77 and 93 corresponds to the "official" explanation

if it's possible to make a cell phone call from a plane


Amazing 'logic' by LenBrazil.

In essence he argues that even though his "scientific background is close to zero", he feels qualified to attack persons with the above technical qualifications as posted by the "CTer".... completely dismissing the fact that his attack-statement could be equally applied to each of the previous posters, (nevertheless ...'they'... shared his anti-conspiratorial 'beliefs'... so he did not apply the same level of 'dismissal' to those other posters.

'This one' loves semantics, (even moreso than his compatriot YID).

Now that the 'introductions' are over, carry on...

Len, what do you bring related to science or physics to this thread?


Foxx
QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.

Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly


A] civil engineers,


B] licensed architects,


C] construction contractors or


D] demolition experts*,


Len

* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.

BTW, Len... this question has been addressed here before.

Perhaps you should go back to the beginning of the thread and read through the whole thing, so that you are not simply proposing questions that have already been addressed (both here and at AH).

Let's not go round in circles... (just for your convenience).

I think this non-starter question was best addressed by metamars.

The question you ask seems to you (I'm sure) to be more relevant than it really is.

Cheers

Foxx





Foxx
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 08:03 AM)
QUOTE
Originally posted by the Schneib
All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.


Where were those located? In the basement, perhaps (where the power for the towers was introduced) ?

I don't recall any pictures of incoming power lines attached to the sides of the building?

Links... references (specific to the WTC) would be appreciated... anyone???

Let's see if there is ANY evidence that 'electrical transformers' were positioned in the towers where the fire-fighters reported brisant flashes.

IF there is NO evidence to support the claim that 'electrical transformers' were housed in the areas where fire-fighters reported brisant flashes, then that claim must be abandoned as any form of 'proof' or 'evidence'...

(Much like the Amazing Super-sonic jet-fuel theory is scientific nonsense)

Well... as 'they' are doing all they can to ignore, ob-fu-sk8te, and change the topic... I have to post this again in an attempt to bring the topic back to an objective scientific discussion.

The Gov't CTers proposed that the brisant flashes were caused by electrical transformer explosions.

I believe that I have asked the believers in this fairy tale to support such statements scientifically or with REAL FACTS.

Is my above scientific, logical and reasonable query out of order?

Can anyone provide evidence to show where the transformers were located in the WTC towers OR wtc 7 ???

Brisant flashes were testified to by objective fire-fighters. I accept their testimony as evidence of nothing more than brisant flashes.

The question is HOW could these brisant flashes be explained by anything other than detonations of pre-positioned explosives?

The proposition has been put forward by the gravity-driven collapse supporters that these 'may' have been caused by 'transformer explosions'.

The only thing we have to do NOW... is to show that there WERE transformers at the locations which the fire-fighters referred to... and THEN we will be able to support this postulation.

Apart from 'evidence' that there WERE transformers capable of exploding at those locations...

...This theory has no more relevance (even less), than the explosives theory.

PS - I still want to know how that 4 sec. clip was attached to the Urology website.

You posted it Schnei... errr I mean 'Common Sense'....

Please explain?

How's the lawsuit coming? biggrin.gif






adoucette
Refresh my memory Foxx.

QUOTE
fire-fighters reported brisant flashes


I didn't know what brisant meant until I read the word in this thread and looked it up.

Kinda surprised (after hearing some of their Audio) that your typical NY Firefighter would be familiar with the term.


Arthur
reasonwhy
QUOTE (adoucette+Feb 5 2006, 08:42 PM)
Refresh my memory Foxx.

QUOTE
fire-fighters reported brisant flashes


I didn't know what brisant meant until I read the word in this thread and looked it up.

Kinda surprised (after hearing some of their Audio) that your typical NY Firefighter would be familiar with the term.


Arthur

Arthur,
What are you suggesting?
Foxx
QUOTE (adoucette+Feb 6 2006, 04:42 AM)
Refresh my memory Foxx.

QUOTE
fire-fighters reported brisant flashes


I didn't know what brisant meant until I read the word in this thread and looked it up.

Kinda surprised (after hearing some of their Audio) that your typical NY Firefighter would be familiar with the term.


Arthur

cue... Stallion4

Or do I have to do everything myself??? biggrin.gif


reasonwhy
Foxx,

WTC 7 is pretty easy to find:
QUOTE
Power to WTC 7 entered at 13,800 volts (V), was stepped down to 480/277 V by silicone oil-filled transformers in individual masonry vaults on the 5th floor, and was distributed throughout the building. On each floor, one of the 277 legs was tapped and stepped down to supply single-phase 120-V branch circuits. The main system had ground fault protection.

An array of fuels typically associated with offices was distributed throughout much of the building. In addition, WTC 7 contained 10 transformers at street level, 12 transformers on the 5th floor, and 2 dry transformers on the 7th floor. The Con Ed substation contained (outside the building footprint) eight 30-foot-wide transformers that supplied 13-kilovolt ampere (kVA) power to the 6th floor of the building.



http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:RzaYQt...us&ct=clnk&cd=1
Foxx
QUOTE (adoucette+Feb 6 2006, 04:42 AM)
Refresh my memory Foxx.

QUOTE
fire-fighters reported brisant flashes


I didn't know what brisant meant until I read the word in this thread and looked it up.

Kinda surprised (after hearing some of their Audio) that your typical NY Firefighter would be familiar with the term.


Arthur

Refreshing your memory, arthur...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&...1320#entry40843

A Christmas present for YID...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
fire-fighters reported brisant flashes


I didn't know what brisant meant until I read the word in this thread and looked it up.

Kinda surprised (after hearing some of their Audio) that your typical NY Firefighter would be familiar with the term.


Arthur

Refreshing your memory, arthur...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&...1320#entry40843

A Christmas present for YID...

Originally posted by Stallion4
Here are witnesses saying that they heard loud explosions in rapid sequence and saw orange and red flashes resembling controlled demolition BEFORE the towers "collapsed" at the WTC on 9-11:[/b]


# From THE NEW YORK TIMES:

Assistant Fire Commissioner: "I thought . . . before . . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they . . . blow up a building. . . ?”

Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt



# Edward Cachia FDNY WTC2 explosions before collapse: “It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down.”

Link to quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...chia_Edward.txt



# From The San Francisco Chronicle / SFGate.com:

Captain of Emergency Medical Services: "somewhere around the middle of the world trade center there was this orange and red flash coming out ... initially it was just one flash then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode ... and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides ... as far as could see these popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building"

Link to quote:
http://sfgate.com/gate/pictures/2005/09/10...rin_deshore.pdf


Oh, come now YID... I have watched your dances before about the 'noises' associated with explosions at the WTC prior to the building collapse... "Bodies falling to the pavement and causing great booms heard across the river"... If the fact was not so disturbing your 'explaination' would be hilarious.

I'll give you that... 'THAT IS' one Amazing Contortional Dance, but I've already seen that one.

What I want to see is...

Let's see the dance about the 'brisant flashes' associated with these sounds. biggrin.gif

Were these just a 'lightshow' to accompany the falling of those bodies, perhaps ???

Sorry, I haven't been able to find any vids of these flashes at WTC...(although I suspect that our friendly NIST LIARS may have some in their vast video library which they are reticent to release - all collected with the signing of non-disclosure agreements)...

But here are some 'brisant flash vids' from a demolition site which match the witnesses description... (surely you remember these from Jones-In's 'RDX' post from a year ago?)...

user posted image

(Where ARE these 'brisant flashes' - Why did no witnesses talk about those obvious 'signatures' ??? - 'Jones-In')

Watch the second looping video capture at the home page of ImplosionWorld... ( it goes by REAL Quick, so ...you will have to refresh your browser to see it replayed)...

http://www.implosionworld.com/

From this page ... http://www.implosionworld.com/cinema.htm

1/ Brisant Flashes - play the second from the left (bottom row) - Ford Hotel Buffalo, NY... (see any 'brisant flashes' there ??? starting about 23.000)

2/ 'Puffs of Dust' -Oh, Gee... look at those 'puffs of dust' exploding from the Southwark Towers Philadelphia, PA - (next vid... 3rd from left / bottom row)... see anything looking like those at WTC ???

3/ Brisant Flashes - Putnam Street Bridge - Mariette, OH - you will have to pay attention... they are very quick (6th from left / bottom row)

4/ More 'Puffs of Dust' - Jefferson Davis Hospital - Houston, TX - (7th from left / bottom row)

5/ More 'Puffs of Dust' Schuyikill Falls Tower - Philadelphia, PA - (9th from left / bottom row) ... lower levels near the beginning of the video... Gee, must be 'pancaking floors' pushing out dust, right? Heh biggrin.gif

6/ Collateral Damage - don't worry about it here, no need to protect surrounding buildings (as there were none), just let'em fall over... Cracker & Coker Towers - Purvis, MS (10th from left / bottom row)

OK, YID - Sorry, didn't want to confuse you with 'other issues' such as 'puffs of dust' etc...

Please don't disappointment me (and others)... I have promised them to see an Amazing Dance with regard to the Brisant Flashes, so please don't drift off on other issues. Put on your Michael Jackson shoes, boy.

Give us the Amazing Word Dance to explain how the textual messages from the firefighter witnesses (pointed out above from the recently released 9-11 emergency tapes, who claimed to see such 'brisant flashes' BEFORE the towers fell), can be explained through sophistry.

C,mon now - I know you can do it. Give us a laugh as we head into this Christmas season of Cheer.

I'm looking forward to it. Please hold-off on your 'holidays' til we see your new dance. biggrin.gif Maybe you would like to choose adoucette as a new 'dancing' partner ?

Hey, in the spirit of the season, maybe you could post your new dance at Pravda.Ru, the 'Black Vault' & ApolloH too, so we can all enjoy these new steps tongue.gif

Cheers


stallion4
QUOTE (Lon Waters+Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE (Common Sense+Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM)
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


... There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

I believe we are all here in agreement with this statement. This is the quote from the Victor Thorn/WING-TV article which Paul refutes. I appreciate Paul taking the efforts he has to get the word out about this erroneous quote, and also for confronting the WING-TV group for their disrespectful showing at the 911 memorial service last September. Thanks also to stallion4 for helping to clear up the issue and indicate what Paul's actual thoughts are (insert disclaimers here).

Lon

Wrong. That statement is from the Randy Lavello article, not the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. still stands behind that statement AND his statement he made about bombs being planted in the WTC buildings:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html

The only thing that he doesn't stand behind is his remark about the gag order which he said was speculation on his part.

I personally believe that 'Common Sense' is a shill and has been employed to post here.

BTW, I believe that the "Pod "info is BS. And I'm also not hired to post here - so what's your excuse, 'Common Sense' - have you been hired to post on this message board?

Yes or no?
stallion4
“Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? “[/b]
By Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84604
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


Professor Steven E. Jones provided an invited seminar open to the public at Utah Valley State College in Orem, Utah, on February 1, 2006: "9/11 Revisited: Scientific and Ethical Questions”

An MP3 of the Two Hour Seminar (61MB): http://tinyurl.com/974zy
PowerPoint Slideshow JPEGS (4.6MB ZIP file): http://tinyurl.com/95bht

Review of Seminar:
“Prof. Jones' Utah 9/11 Seminar - Feb.1, 2006”
http://www.gnn.tv/blogs/12675/Prof_Jones_U...inar_Feb_1_2006

Daily Herald - Central Utah's Newspaper:
“Questions remain from 9/11 report, professor says”
http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/163875/3/



-KUTV (Salt Lake City CBS affiliate) - Thursday, November 10, 2005
“Collapse or Implosion: BYU Professor Has Theory About 9/11 Attacks”
Video: http://kutv.com/topstories/local_story_314234334.html

-Deseret Morning News - Thursday, November 10, 2005
“Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC”, by Elaine Jarvik
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html

-MSNBC's 'The Situation' - Tuesday, November 15, 2005
“Professor believes planes didn't cause all the damage around the WTC”
Video: http://www.911blogger.com/2005/11/byu-prof...n-jones-on.html

-TRIBUNE-REVIEW - Sunday, November 20, 2005
“Jonesing on conspiracy theories”, by Bill Steigerwald
http://pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review...d/s_395972.html



OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT REPORTS AND CRITIQUES


-Official NIST Report: http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1CollapseofTowers.pdf
-NIST Report Critique: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html
-Official FEMA Report: http://www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm
-FEMA Report Critique: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/official/fema.html
-Official 9/11 Commission Report: http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
-9/11 Commission Report Critique: http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/commission/report.html



INFORMATION ABOUT WTC BUILDING 7


-Official NIST Report for WTC 7 - pg 6 – “Working Collapse Hypothesis”
“An initial local failure at the lower floors (below Floor 13) of the building due to fire and/or debris induced structural damage of a critical column (the initiating event), which supported a large span floor bay with an area of about 2,000 ft2”
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%...pse%20Final.pdf

-Official FEMA Report on WTC 7 – Chapter 5, pg 31
“Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.” http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf

-Building 7, the Untold Story: http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/index.html


-WTC lease holder, Larry Silverstein, commenting on the collapse of Building 7 in the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds", which aired in September of 2002:

“I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”
Video: http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/wtc7_pbs.WMV


-In the same documentary, America Rebuilds, a clean up worker at ground zero uses the term "pull" when preparing for the controlled demolition of Building 6: (Use of the word “pull” as slang for “demolish”)

Unidentified Construction Worker: "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready to pull building six."

Luis Mendes, NYC Dept of Design and Construction: "We had to be very careful how we demolished building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and then damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area.” Video: http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/pull_wtc6.wmv


-Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges: Says "pull it" meant to evacuate firefighters, but there were no firefighters in the building. http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/si...tc7_charges.htm


-Reporter who witnessed the collapse of Building 7: "People started to run away from the scene [WTC7] and I turned in time to see what looked like a skyscraper implosion - looked like it had been done by a demolition crew - the whole thing just collapsing down on itself and another big huge plume of gray and white smoke shooting up into the air and then more of the smoke billowing up the street here... so that’s number one, number two, and now number seven that have come down from this explosion. "

Live report by 1010 WINS NYC News Radio on 9-11-01. This report can be heard in the documentary 911 Eyewitness (the film can be downloaded for free at this link: http://question911.com/links.php )


-Emergency worker who witnessed the collapse of Building 7: "We were watching the building [WTC7] actually ‘cuz it was on fire… the bottom floors of the building were on fire and… we heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder… turned around - we were shocked to see that the building was ah well it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out… it was horrifying… about a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that… we saw the building crash down all the way to the ground… we were in shock. "

Live report by 1010 WINS NYC News Radio on 9-11-01. This report can be heard in the documentary 911 Eyewitness (the film can be downloaded for free at this link: http://question911.com/links.php )


-Guns & Butter Radio interview - April 27th 2005:
Hosted by Bonnie Falkner
Guest: Indira Singh (Ground Zero Emergency Worker)

Bonnie: How long did you work as an emergency medical technician and exactly what is it that you were doing (at ground zero)?

Indira: ...when I got there we were setting up triage sites (at ground zero), close, very close to the area. The triage site that I was setting up was behind, well, to the east of Building 7 where Building 7 came down...
...we were setting up triages as close to the pile as possible… so what we were doing was setting up different kinds of stations… IV stations, cardiac stations, wound stations, burn stations ...just trying to have an organized space. What happened with that particular triage site is that pretty soon afternoon, after mid-day on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down... I do believe that they brought Building 7 down... By noon or one o'clock they told us we had to move from that triage site up to Pace University a little further away because Building 7 was going to come down or being brought down.


Bonnie: Did they actually use the word "brought" down and who was it that was telling you this?

Indira: The fire department... the fire department and they did use the word "we're going to have to bring it down."

The entire interview can be listened to at this link. The excerpts from above can be found approximately 10 minutes into the interview. http://tinyurl.com/7dww8


-Columbia Journalism Review – May/June 2003, by Thomas Franklin

Excerpt from an article written by award winning photographer, Thomas Franklin, who snapped the world famous photo of firemen raising the American flag at ground zero. In the article Franklin explains that all of ground zero was evacuated less than an hour before WTC 7 was demolished at approximately 5:20 pm on 9/11:

"Much of what happened to me on September 11 is a blur, but this moment I clearly remember: It was 4:45 p.m., and all the firemen and rescue workers were evacuating Ground Zero after word came that a third building -- WTC 7 -- was ready to fall. I had only a few frames left, and an entire day's worth of pictures to develop, so I prepared to head back to New Jersey." Link to entire article: http://archives.cjr.org/year/02/2/franklin.asp




A MIXTURE OF NEWS/FILM FOOTAGE AND NEW YORK TIMES QUOTES WHERE SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO BOMBS, EXPLOSIONS, AND CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS ARE MADE

The video clips are of FDNY personnel, emergency workers, reporters, and witnesses.

The quotes are from the Official ‘Oral Histories’ Transcripts of FDNY personnel and emergency workers as conducted a few months after 9/11 by the WTC Task Force Interviewers and published in the New York Times:

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html



- CBS News Anchor, Dan Rather, comments on the collapse of WTC Building 7: “Amazing, incredible pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”
Video: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/w..._demolition.mpg



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STEPHEN GREGORY
Interview Date: October 3, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110008.PDF

pgs 14-16: I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q. Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A. No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did you see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.
I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building coming down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever. But it's just strange that two people sort of say the same thing and neither one of us talked to each other about it. …


Q. On the television pictures it appeared as well, before the first collapse, that there was an explosion up on the upper floors.

A. I know about the explosion on the upper floors. This was like eye level. I didn't have to go like this. Because I was looking this way. I'm not going to say it was on the first floor or the second floor, but somewhere in that area I saw to me what appeared to be flashes. I don't know how far down this was already. I mean, we had heard the noise but, you know, I don't know.


-CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE Interview Date: November 7, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

pg 10: I had no clue what was going on. Never turned around because a sound came from somewhere that I never heard before. Some people compared it with an airplane. It was the worst sound of a rolling sound, not a thunder. I can’t explain it, what it was. All I know is -- and a force started to come hit me in my back. I can’t explain it. You had to be there. All I know is I had to run because I thought there was an explosion.

pg 11: Whatever this explosion was simply sucked all the oxygen out of the air.

pg 15: Somewhere around the middle of the world trade center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building. I went inside and I told everybody that the other building or there was an explosion occurring up there and I said I think we have another major explosion…

pg 16: So here these explosions are getting bigger and louder and bigger and louder…

pgs 17-18: Again, I didn’t see what was happening behind me, but knowing of all the explosions I thought here was another explosion coming and this sound again and this wave of this force again. I just jumped on the boat, closed the door with my left hand and just sank down to my knees. Here whatever it was just came right at us again.


-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THOMAS FlTZPATRlCK Interview Date: October 1, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110001.PDF

pgs 13-14: We looked up at the building straight up, we were that close. All we saw was a puff of smoke coming from about 2 thirds of the way up. Some people thought it was an explosion. I don't think I remember that. I remember seeing, it looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building. I assume now that that was either windows starting to collapse like tinsel or something. Then the building started to come down. My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV.



-FDNY recall "detonations" in South Tower:

fireman2: We made it outside, we made it about a block.
fireman1: We made it at least 2 blocks.
fireman2: 2 blocks.
fireman1: and we started runnin'
fireman2: poch-poch-poch-poch-poch-poch-poch
fireman1: Floor by floor it started poppin' out ..
fireman2: It was as if as if they had detonated, det..
fireman1: yea detonated yea
fireman2: as if they had planned to take down a building,
boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom ...
fireman1: All the way down, I was watchin it, and runnin'
Video: http://www.prisonplanet.tv/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg


-WTC Worker: “…we started walking down the stairs and made it to the eighth floor.Big Explosion. Blew us back into the eighth floor...” Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.....explosion..wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
FIREFIGHTER EDWARD CACHIA
Interview Date: December 6, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110251.PDF

pg 5: As my officer and I were looking at the south tower, it just gave. It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit, because we originally had thought there was like an internal detonation explosives because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down.


-PARAMEDIC DANIEL RIVERA Interview Date: OCTOBER 10 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF

pg 9: It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was -- do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear “pop, pop, pop, pop, pop”? That’s exactly what -- because I thought it was that. When I heard that frigging noise, that’s when I saw the building coming down.


-FIREFIGHTER KENNETH ROGERS Interview Date: December 10, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110290.PDF

pgs 3-4: … then there was an explosion in the south tower, which according to this map, this exposure just blew out in flames. A lot of guys left at that point. I kept watching. Floor after floor after floor. One floor under another after another and when it hit about the fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb, because it looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing. I was there in '93.


-LIEUTENANT GEORGE J. DeSIMONE Interview Date: October 22, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110129.PDF

pg 6: The next thing I know, we heard a little bit of a rumbling, and then white powder came from the first collapsed building. I thought it was an explosion initially.

pgs 7-8: After that, I still thought it was an explosion. I thought it was some kind of thermal explosion where I'm either going to get burnt -- and I had kind of ideas that it was going to be something like Hiroshima where all this heat was coming at me and we were going to get burnt -- or if the heat didn't burn me, I thought that all the parts coming out of this building, the windows, metal, all the things like that, that I might be severed in half.

pg 10: I don't think we understood the magnitude of what was going on. I was fearful that there were bombs in the building. That was my first thought, being the military kind of guy that I am.


-FATHER JOHN DELENDICK Interview Date: December 6, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110230.PDF

pgs 5-6: I remember asking Ray Downey was it the jet fuel that blew up. He said at that point he thought there were bombs up there because it was too even. As we've since learned, it was the jet fuel that was dropping down that caused all this. But he said it was too even.

Q. Symmetrical?
A. So his original thought was that he thought it was a bomb up there as well.



-NBC Reporter, Pat Dawson: “[Albert Turi] the Chief of Safety of the Fire Department of New York City told me he received word of the possibility of a secondary device, that is another bomb going off. He tried to get his men out as quickly as he could, but he said there was another explosion which took place. …That his theory he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building.” Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.reporter.1.wmv


-MSNBC Reporter, Ann Thompson: “... Cars on fire… cars just turned by the force of the explosions…”
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc....ompson.cars.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
FIREFIGHTER TIMOTHY JULIAN
Interview Date: December 26, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110386.PDF

pg 10: … right when we got to the corner of Washington and Albany, that’s when I heard the building collapse. First I thought it was an explosion. I thought maybe there was a bomb on the plane, but delayed type of thing, you know, secondary device. I was convinced for a week it was secondary devices. … You know, and I just heard like an explosion and a then a cracking type of noise, and then it sounded like a freight train, rumbling and picking up speed, and I remember I looked up, and I saw it coming down…


-LIEUTENANT ROBERT DORRITIE Interview Date: December 11, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110299.PDF

pg 4: … we were deciding which way to go into the south tower. That's when I looked up, and the tower started coming down, which at the time I said I thought it was a secondary device. I had warned the guys about secondary devices on the way down and to be careful of that.


-FIREFIGHTER TIMOTHY BURKE Interview Date: January 22, 2002
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110488.PDF

pg 8: Then the building popped, lower than the fire, which learned was I guess, the aviation fuel fell into the pit, and whatever floor it fell on heated up really bad and that’s why it popped at that floor. That’s the rumor I heard. But it seemed like I was going oh, my god, there is a secondary device because the way the building popped thought it was an explosion.


-FIRE MARSHAL JOHN COYLE Interview Date: December 28, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110406.PDF

pg 8: The tower was -- it looked to me – I thought it was exploding, actually. That’s what I thought for hours afterwards, that it had exploded or the plane or there had been some device on the plane that had exploded, because the debris from the tower had shot out far over our heads. It was raining down.

pgs 15-16: While I was down at Battery Park, I finally got through on my phone to my father and said, “I’m alive. I just wanted to tell you, go to church, I’m alive. I just so narrowly escaped this thing.” He said, “where were you? You were there?” I said, “yeah, I was right there when it blew up.” He said, “you were there when the planes hit?” I said, “no, I was there when it exploded, the building exploded.” He said, “you mean, when it fell down?” I said, “no, when it exploded.” I still didn’t realized what had happened. I totally thought it had been blown up. That’s just the perspective of looking up at it, it seemed to have exploded out. But that I guess was the force of the upper stories collapsing down.


-FIREFIGHTER ANGEL RIVERA Interview Date: January 22, 2002
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110489.PDF

pgs 4-5: We were there about ten minutes before the chief told us go to the Marriott Hotel, go from the 14th floor up, search and evacuate all the floors. So we walk all the way up, no problem. Then we hear the explosion and debris falling. We were looking out of the windows and see body parts all over the place. It was scary. It was very sad. We searched 14, 15, went in one lobby, we came out the other way, we went in one stairway, came up -- when we hit the 19th floor, something horrendous happened. It was like a bomb went off. We thought we were dead. The whole building shook. The brick coming out of -- the door to the hallway into the hotel blew off like somebody had thrown it all over the place. It shook all over the place. We were thrown on the floor. We looked inside the lobby after everything calmed down, and everything was collapsed. The building was still shaking and we're still hearing explosions going on everywhere, so we decided let's get out of here. After we decided to get out of there, we dropped everything. We had a roof rope; we dropped it. We didn't think about retaining our tools. We just wanted to get out of there. We ran all the way down to the fourth floor where we ran out of stairs. There were no more stairs.

pg 7: Mike Mullan walked one flight up, and then the most horrendous thing happened. That's when hell came down. It was like a huge, enormous explosion. I still can hear it. Everything shook. Everything went black. The wind rushed, very slowly [sound], all the dust, all the -- and everything went dark.

pg 9: When the second tower came down, we had no idea what was going on. We thought another plane, another bomb, another as a second device. We thought, this is it, we are dead.



-MSNBC Reporter, Rick Sanchez: "… Police have found what they describe as a suspicious device, and they fear that it might be something that could lead to another explosion...I spoke with some police officials moments ago, Chris, and they told me that they have reason to believe that one of the explosions at the WTC aside from the ones that may have been caused by the impact of the plane with the building, may have been caused by a van that was parked in the building that may have had some type of explosive device in it. So, their fear here is that there may have been explosive devices planted either in the building or in the adjacent area ..."
Video: http://www.terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.w....explosives.wmv


-WTC Worker: “…we stuck on the stairs for a while, we finally got down to the lobby. Then we get to the lobby, there’s this big explosion.” Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc....g.explosion.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
BATTALION CHIEF DOMINICK DeRUBBIO
Interview Date: October 12, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110064.PDF

pg 5: It was weird how it started to come down. It looked like it was a timed explosion, but I guess it was just the floors starting to pancake one on top of the other.


-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER JAMES DRURY Interview Date: October 16, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110098.PDF

pg 6: We were in the process of getting some rigs moved when I turned, as I heard a tremendous roar, explosion, and saw that the first of the two towers was starting to come down.

pg 7: That was the north tower now coming down. I should say that people in the street and myself included thought that the roar was so loud that the explosive - bombs were going off inside the building. Obviously we were later proved wrong.

pg 12: As I said I thought the terrorists planted explosives somewhere in the building. That's how loud it was, crackling explosive, a wall.


-FIREFIGHTER JOHN MALLEY Interview Date: December 12, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110319.PDF

pg 5: I felt the rumbling, and then I felt the force coming at me. I was like, what the hell is that? In my mind it was a bomb going off. The pressure got so great, I stepped back behind the columns separating the revolving doors. Then the force just blew past me. It blew past me it seemed for a long time. In my mind I was saying what the hell is this and when is it going to stop? Then it finally stopped, that pressure which I thought was a concussion of an explosion. It turns out it was the down pressure wind of the floors collapsing on top of each other.

pg 6: There were secondary explosions, I don't know, aerosol cans or whatever. But we're in the darkness. We see basically the glow of a flashlight and still things coming down. The noise, the explosions, whatever it was.


-CAPTAIN JAY SWITHERS Interview Date: October 30, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF

pg 5: I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.



-MSNBC Reporter, Ann Thompson: "At 10:30 I tried to leave the building, but as soon as I got outside I heard a second explosion and another rumble and more smoke and more dust. I ran inside the building and the chandelier shook and again black smoke filled the air. Within another five minutes we were covered again with more soot and more dust. And then a fire marshal came in and said we had to leave, because if there was a third explosion this building might not last."
Video: http://www.terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.....explosions.wmv


-Reporter: “… there was an explosion. It was way up where the fire was.. and the whole building, at that point, bellied out in flames…”Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.reporter.2.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
LIEUTENANT GREGG HANSSON
Interview Date: October 9, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110017.PDF

pg 15: Then a large explosion took place. In my estimation that was the tower coming down, but at that time I did not know what that was. I thought some type of bomb had gone off.


-FIREFIGHTER WILLIAM REYNOLDS Interview Date: December 11, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110288.PDF

pgs 3-4: After a while, and I don't know how long it was, I was distracted by a large explosion from the south tower and it seemed like fire was shooting out a couple of hundred feet in each direction, then all of a sudden the top of the tower started coming down in a pancake. …

Q. … where was the fire? Like up at the upper levels where it started collapsing?
A. It appeared somewhere below that. Maybe twenty floors below the impact area of the plane. I saw it as fire and when I looked at it on television afterwards, it doesn't appear to show the fire. It shows a rush of smoke coming out below the area of the plane impact. The reason why I think the cameras didn't get that image is because they were a far distance away and maybe I saw the bottom side where the plane was and the smoke was up above it.

pg 8: So we kind of just all were walking around dazed and I ran into a Battalion Chief. I don't know who he was. I said to him, I said, "Chief, they're evacuating the other building; right?" … Before the north tower fell. He said, "No." I said, "Why not? They blew up the other one." I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, "If they blew up the one, you know they're gonna blow up the other one." He said, "No, they're not." I said, "Well, you gotta tell them to evacuate it, because it's gonna fall down and you gotta get the guys out."


-FIREFIGHTER THOMAS TURILLI Interview Date: January 17, 2002
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110501.PDF

pgs 4-5: … sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight, and then just a huge wind gust just came.


-FIREFIGHTER KEITH MURPHY Interview Date: December 5, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110238.PDF

pgs 19-20: I had heard right before the lights went out, I had heard distant boom boom boom, sounded like three explosions. I don’t know what it was. At the time, I would have said they sounded like bombs, but it was boom boom boom and then the lights all go out. I hear someone say oh, ***, that was just for the lights out. I would say about 3, 4 seconds, all of sudden this tremendous roar. It sounded like being in tunnel with the train coming at you. It sounded like nothing I had ever heard in my life, but it didn’t sound good. All of a sudden I could feel the floor started to shake and sway. We were being thrown like literally off our feet, side to side, getting banged around and then a tremendous a wind started to happen. It probably lasted maybe 15 seconds, 10 to 15 seconds. It seemed like hurricane force wind. It would blow you off your feet and smoke and debris and more things started falling.


-EMT MICHAEL OBER Interview Date: October 16, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110093.PDF

pgs 4-5: Then we heard a rumble, some twisting metal, we looked up in the air, and to be totally honest, at first, I don’t know exactly…but it looked to me just like an explosion. It didn’t look like the building was coming down, it looked like just one floor had blown completely outside of it. I was sitting there looking at it. I just never thought they would ever come down, so I didn’t think they were coming down.



-War Corespondent, Jack Kelley: "…Apparently what appears to happen was that at the same time two planes hit the building that there... that the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings which also exploded at the same time, and brought both of them down..."
Video: http://www.terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.w....jack.kelley.rm


-Terrorism Security Expert (used by many news organizations): “We’ve heard reports of secondary explosions after the aircraft impacted, whether in fact there wasn't something else at the base of the towers that in fact were the coup de grace to bring them to the ground.”
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.wtc.s...frey.beatty.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
LIEUTENANT NEIL BROSNAN
Interview Date: December 12, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110328.PDF

pgs 8-9: Actually the explosion came in through those doors and came up behind the way I had come in. And I realized that, that the explosion came from the way had just left.

pg 20: They observed the explosion and the hallway disappeared. They thought the hallway blew up where I had come from.


-FIREFIGHTER RICHARD BANACISKI Interview Date: December 6, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110253.PDF

pgs 3-4: We were there I don't know, maybe 10, 15 minutes and then I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions. Everybody just said run and we all turned around and we ran into the parking garage because that's basically where we were. Running forward would be running towards it. Not thinking that this building is coming down. We just thought there was going to be a big explosion, stuff was going to come down.


-EMT JULIO MARRERO Interview Date: October 25, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110162.PDF

pg 4: I heard a loud bang. We looked up, and we just saw the building starting to collapse.

pg 5: I was screaming from the top of my lungs, and I must have been about ten feet away from her and she couldn't even hear me, because the building was so loud, the explosion, that she couldn't even hear me.


-FIREFIGHTER CRAIG CARLSEN Interview Date: January 25, 2002
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF

pg 6: I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.


-FIREFIGHTER KEVIN DUGGAN Interview Date: December 14, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110345.PDF

pg 7: … looked like the middle of [the south tower] was just exploding out



-ABC Reporter: …the entire building has just collapsed as if a demolition team set off....”
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.abc.demolition.team.wmv


-Witness: "I was about five blocks away when I heard explosions... three thuds and turned around to see the building that we just got out of... tip over and fall in on itself." Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.witness.1.wmv


-Witness: "...and then all of a sudden it started like... it sounded like gunfire... you know, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang and then all of a sudden three big explosions. "
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.witness.2.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
SUPERVISING FIRE MARSHAL JOHN D. LYNN
Interview Date: December 27, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110389.PDF

pg 3: It's hard to deal with the time frame, but it seems as if suddenly there was a -- our attention was drawn to the south tower. There was some kind of explosion, you might say, up in the area where the fire was. Actually, in hindsight, that was the start of the collapse. Now, we were very close at that time.


-BATTALION CHIEF JOHN SUDNIK Interview Date: November 7, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110198.PDF

pg 4: Then we heard a loud explosion or what sounded like a loud explosion and looked up and I saw tower two start coming down.


-PARAMEDIC KEVIN DARNOWSKI Interview Date: November 9, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF

pg 8: At that time I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.


-CHIEF STEVE GRABHER Interview Date: December 6, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110241.PDF

pgs 10-11: Just as I go out of the building, one of my guys says hey Captain, the building is coming down. I looked over my shoulder and you could see the whole top of the south tower leaning towards us. It looked like it was coming over. You could see the windows pop out just like in the picture, looked like a movie. I saw one floor of windows pop out, like poof, poof. I saw one and a half floors pop out. It looked almost like an explosion. The whole top was teetering, and I really thought just the top of the building was falling off.



-FDNY: "As we were getting our gear on and making our way to the stairway, there was a heavy duty explosion."
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/heavy.duty.explosion.wmv


-Street Reporter: "45 minutes into the taping that we were doing, there was… an explosion. It was way up where the fire was, and the whole building… at that point… bellied out… in flames… and everybody ran."
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.reporter.2.wmv


-9/11 Hero William Rodriguez: says explosions before airplanes hit: (INN World Report - 15 Minute Interview)
Video: http://www.911proof.com/resources/innrodri...nsept05snow.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
LIEUTENANT PATRICK SCARINGELLO
Interview Date: October 10, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110030.PDF

pg 4: I heard the explosion from up above. I looked up, I saw smoke and flame and then I saw the top tower tilt, start to twist and lean.


-FIREFIGHTER CHRISTOPHER FENYO Interview Date: December 11, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110295.PDF

pg 3: There was an explosion at the top of the Trade Center and a piece of Trade Center flew across the West Side Highway and hit the Financial Center.

pg 5: About a couple minutes after George came back to me is when the south tower from our perspective exploded from about midway up the building.

pgs 6-7: At that point a debate began to rage because the perception was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges. We had really no concept of the damage on the east side of 2 World Trade Center at that point, and at that point many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade…


-LIEUTENANT GARY GATES Interview Date: October 12, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110065.PDF

pgs 6-7: I looked up, and the building exploded, the building that we were very close to, which was one tower. The whole top came off like a volcano.

Q. What was that, was that the second plane hitting?

A. … I realized in talking with people over a period of two weeks, that had to be the collapse, because since that was the north tower which was hit by a plane first, the other tower was hit by a plane just before we got there. So now both towers have been hit by a plane. The north tower was burning. So the explosion, what I realized later, had to be the start of the collapse. It was the way the building appeared to blowout from both sides. I'm looking at the face of it, and all we see is the two sides of the building just blowing out and coming apart like this, as I said, like the top of a volcano.


-FIREFIGHTER KEVIN MURRAY: Interview Date: October 9, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110020.PDF

pg 7: We helped a lady out of there and we started walking up to the third floor. That third floor was clear. There was no damage, nothing. We got up to the fifth floor and there was severe damage. The ceilings had come down, the some walls had caved in. … Then we went to the sixth floor and did the same thing. Same sort of damage up there.

pg 15: When the tower started -- there was a big explosion that I heard and someone screamed that it was coming down and I looked away and I saw all the windows domino -- you know, dominoeing up and then come down.



-FDNY: "We were trying to get some of the people out, but then there was secondary explosions and then subsequent collapses..." Video: http://www.911blimp.net/videos/FDNY-explosions.mov


-Construction Worker:

“I go downstairs… the foreman tells me to go to remove the containers… as I’m walking by the main freight car of the building in the corridor… that’s… that’s when I got blown. I mean... the impact of the explosion... of whatever happened it threw me to the floor… and that’s when everything started happening. It knocked me right to the floor...”
“…As we were running up the ramps [to 2 WTC]… and then all of a sudden in happened all over again. Building 2 got hit. And… I don’t know that… I just know something else… hit us to the floor. Right in the basement you felt it… walls were caving in…”

Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc....ent.morelli.wmv
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc....ent.morelli.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
FIREFIGHTER RICHARD BOERI
Interview Date: December 10, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110302.PDF

pg 4: We had our backs to the tower and under that pedestrian bridge walking south, myself, Eddie Kennedy and the officer, when you heard the crackling. You looked up and you saw the one floor explode on itself and the top start to slide.


-LT. THOMAS PIAMBINO Interview Date: January 24, 2002
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110493.PDF

pg 5: The south tower had fallen, but at that time I didn't know what it was. All I heard was a tremendous explosion. The tower I was in shook really bad. It really shook bad, and my opinion, I thought it was another aircraft that hit the building.

pgs 9-10: We started to go north on West Street as fast as we could. We weren't running, but we were moving, walking pretty fast, and then the north tower started to fall, and my perception was that when I looked back at the tower as it was starting to come down -- I was booking -- was that there was -- I thought it exploded, and I didn't realize it had collapsed. It looked to me like an explosion, and you could feel the -- you could feel it coming, and they were still running away from it. I mean, you weren't going to out run it. At that point, we all split up. I mean, it was like run, and each one of us took refuge behind something, and I wound up taking refuge behind an ESU truck, I believe it was, a Police Department ESU truck, I think, and I just rode it out until first there was the explosion or the concussion, and then there was very, very strong wind, and then there was the black -- black -- dirt black cloud, and you couldn't see nothing, and it became very, very quiet…


-FIREFIGHTER FRANK SWEENEY Interview Date: October 18, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110113.PDF


pg 9: I hear what sounded like firecrackers and a low rumble. I look up, and the south tower – I could see the top part of the siding overlapping the bottom side of the siding..



-CNN Producer:

“...Every few minutes you'll hear like a small sort of a rumbling sound, almost like an explosion sound and another chunk of it will come flying down into the street...”
Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc....nsound.part.wmv

“…There was just a huge ... [explosion? Word apparently muted on original CNN video] and enormous pieces of debris just falling one right after the other…” Video: http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc....nsored.part.wmv



-NEW YORK TIMES ‘ORAL HISTORIES’ - WTC TASK FORCE INTERVIEWS
CAPTAIN WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN
Interview Date: December 17, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110361.PDF

pg 5: I looked up and I could see the top of the north tower mushroom out in a cloud of dust and smoke and you could see the tip of the antenna sort of wobble.


-FIREFIGHTER KEVIN GORMAN Interview Date: January 9, 2002
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110434.PDF

pg 6: … I heard the explosion, looked up, and saw like three floors explode, saw the antenna coming down, and turned around and ran north.


-FIREFIGHTER JOHN PICARELLO Interview Date: December 6, 2001
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110240.PDF

pgs 14-15: … started to hear that rumbling sound again. I looked up, and the first thing I saw was the aerial on the top of the tower just rocking one way and rocking the other way, and all of a sudden there it goes.


-News Footage with Battalion Chief Joseph Pfeiffer:

Narrator: Pfeiffer was the first chief into the building. Right away, a guy from the Port Authority told him ‘the damage was somewhere above the 78th floor’. But all you had to do what look around. It was obvious, something had happened right there, in the lobby.

Pfeiffer: “You just… you just saw that, all the windows were blown out. The lobby… looked like the plane hit the lobby.”
Video: http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/underground/lobby.mpg




OTHER EXPERT OPINIONS


-Matthys Levy, Structural Engineer and Co Author of “Why Buildings Fall Down”


Levy has stated in the past that fire brought down the WTC buildings on 9/11. But it is interesting that he also made a public statement saying the WTC collapses resembled controlled demolition. (Matthys Levy was/is a representative for Weidlinger Associates; a company hired by WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein to help prove to his insurers that the failures of the Towers were the result of two separate terrorist attacks, and therefore allow Silverstein to double his insurance payout.)

“It was the fire ... causing the failure of the steel columns and that caused the collapse”
http://wcbs880.com/topstories/topstoriesny..._113150328.html

"If you've seen many of the managed demolitions where they implode a building and they cause it to essentially to fall vertically because they cause all of the vertical columns to fail simultaneously, that's exactly what it looked like and that's what happened." Video: http://www.freepressinternational.com/discovery.html



-Professor Shi Yongjiu, Director of Civil Engineering Department, Qinghua University

Yongjui is an expert on steel structure. He guesses that the lower part of the WTC twin towers may got seriously damaged.

Why WTC Steel Towers Collapsed at One Blow September 20, 2001

“According to steel structure's mechanical nature, the towers shouldn't collapse as late as an hour later after the planes slammed into. What's more, it should be in a way to topple over gradually instead of crashing down as seen in videotapes. It looks more like a directional blast in doing the job of destruction, so he feels that huge damages must have been done at the lower part of the towers.“ http://english.people.com.cn/english/20010...0920_80655.html



-Van Romero, Vice President for Research and Economic Development
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology


Romero is a major authority on the effects of explosions on buildings.

Just days after 9/11, this explosives expert stated that he could tell the WTC was professional demolished by watching the videotapes. A few days later Romero recanted, and then received a promotion.

Explosives Planted in Towers, New Mexico Tech Expert Says Albuquerque Journal, September 14, 2001

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse”

"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that”

"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points.”


Original Link of quote: http://www.abqjournal.com/aqvan09-11-01.htm
Archived link of Romero's quote: http://www.world-action.co.uk/explosives.html


New Mexico Tech Explosives Expert 'Flip-Flops' On WTC Controlled Demo Theory; Refuses To Explain Why:
“Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail.” http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20284

Romero receives promotion - January 11, 2002: http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpg/news/2002/11jan05.html

Romero appointed to the Presidential Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans: http://www.yic.gov/paceea/adcom/bios.html



- Jerry Russell, Ph.D. (MS in Engineering) - “Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC”
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcont...litionatwtc.htm


-David Ray Griffin - “The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True”
http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html



Foxx
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 6 2006, 05:05 AM)
Foxx,

WTC 7 is pretty easy to find:
QUOTE
Power to WTC 7 entered at 13,800 volts (V), was stepped down to 480/277 V by silicone oil-filled transformers in individual masonry vaults on the 5th floor, and was distributed throughout the building. On each floor, one of the 277 legs was tapped and stepped down to supply single-phase 120-V branch circuits. The main system had ground fault protection.

An array of fuels typically associated with offices was distributed throughout much of the building. In addition, WTC 7 contained 10 transformers at street level, 12 transformers on the 5th floor, and 2 dry transformers on the 7th floor. The Con Ed substation contained (outside the building footprint) eight 30-foot-wide transformers that supplied 13-kilovolt ampere (kVA) power to the 6th floor of the building.



http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:RzaYQt...us&ct=clnk&cd=1

Thanks reasonwhy...

Can you suggest a 'reasonable' cause for the electrical overload which caused these transformers to 'explode' momentarily before the 'initiation of collapse'?

Of course, we all know thatv wtc 7 was a unique situation being the Con-ED power supply for that manhatten area.

The fire-fighter quotes related to the twin towers. As far as I know the 'towers' were NOT an electrical sub-station... but I could be wrong again?

Thanks for that information on WTC 7... but it doesn't tell us anything about WHERE the transformers were placed within the twin towers. biggrin.gif


adoucette
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 6 2006, 12:52 AM)
QUOTE (adoucette+Feb 5 2006, 08:42 PM)
Refresh my memory Foxx.

QUOTE
fire-fighters reported brisant flashes


I didn't know what brisant meant until I read the word in this thread and looked it up.

Kinda surprised (after hearing some of their Audio) that your typical NY Firefighter would be familiar with the term.


Arthur

Arthur,
What are you suggesting?

I'm suggesting that Foxx MADE UP THE TERM "Brisant Flashes".

You see, Brisant is an adjective that defines the shattering effect of an explosion.

It really has NOTHING to do with the amount of LIGHT that an explosion gives off, or what the explosion looks like.

For example, in Hollywood, where they use SQUIBS to SIMULATE larger explosions and bullet impacts, they would also likely employ pyrotechnics that DON'T SHATTER anything (i.e. low Brisance) but give off a lot of light, you know, for the effect.

So when Foxx MAKES UP A TERM like "Brisant Flashes" he is in essence putting words in the firefighters mouths. The firefighters may have seen FLASHES but associating those FLASHES with Brisance is most likely A FOXXY.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/brisant

Arthur

adoucette
After seeing Foxx's post explaining Brisant Flashes.

Turns out I was right.

It is a Foxxy.

Meaning, Foxx made it up and it has no basis in reality.

Arthur
Foxx
Brisant Flashes???

Thanks Stallion4...

as usual... an in-depth analysis...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...indpost&p=61558


Are you associated with Team8 + ???

Cheers

Foxx





reasonwhy
QUOTE (Foxx+Feb 5 2006, 09:48 PM)
QUOTE (reasonwhy+Feb 6 2006, 05:05 AM)
Foxx,

WTC 7 is pretty easy to find:
QUOTE
Power to WTC 7 entered at 13,800 volts (V), was stepped down to 480/277 V by silicone oil-filled transformers in individual masonry vaults on the 5th floor, and was distributed throughout the building. On each floor, one of the 277 legs was tapped and stepped down to supply single-phase 120-V branch circuits. The main system had ground fault protection.

An array of fuels typically associated with offices was distributed throughout much of the building. In addition, WTC 7 contained 10 transformers at street level, 12 transformers on the 5th floor, and 2 dry transformers on the 7th floor. The Con Ed substation contained (outside the building footprint) eight 30-foot-wide transformers that supplied 13-kilovolt ampere (kVA) power to the 6th floor of the building.



http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:RzaYQt...us&ct=clnk&cd=1

Thanks reasonwhy...

Can you suggest a 'reasonable' cause for the electrical overload which caused these transformers to 'explode' momentarily before the 'initiation of collapse'?

Of course, we all know thatv wtc 7 was a unique situation being the Con-ED power supply for that manhatten area.

The fire-fighter quotes related to the twin towers. As far as I know the 'towers' were NOT an electrical sub-station... but I could be wrong again?

Thanks for that information on WTC 7... but it doesn't tell us anything about WHERE the transformers were placed within the twin towers. biggrin.gif

I do not think it was the transformer; I was just helping the official conspiracy theorist. I think everything should be explored no matter how ridicules. For WTC 1 and 2 all I could find is the new elevator transformers:

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Power to WTC 7 entered at 13,800 volts (V), was stepped down to 480/277 V by silicone oil-filled transformers in individual masonry vaults on the 5th floor, and was distributed throughout the building. On each floor, one of the 277 legs was tapped and stepped down to supply single-phase 120-V branch circuits. The main system had ground fault protection.

An array of fuels typically associated with offices was distributed throughout much of the building. In addition, WTC 7 contained 10 transformers at street level, 12 transformers on the 5th floor, and 2 dry transformers on the 7th floor. The Con Ed substation contained (outside the building footprint) eight 30-foot-wide transformers that supplied 13-kilovolt ampere (kVA) power to the 6th floor of the building.



http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:RzaYQt...us&ct=clnk&cd=1

Thanks reasonwhy...

Can you suggest a 'reasonable' cause for the electrical overload which caused these transformers to 'explode' momentarily before the 'initiation of collapse'?

Of course, we all know thatv wtc 7 was a unique situation being the Con-ED power supply for that manhatten area.

The fire-fighter quotes related to the twin towers. As far as I know the 'towers' were NOT an electrical sub-station... but I could be wrong again?

Thanks for that information on WTC 7... but it doesn't tell us anything about WHERE the transformers were placed within the twin towers. biggrin.gif

I do not think it was the transformer; I was just helping the official conspiracy theorist. I think everything should be explored no matter how ridicules. For WTC 1 and 2 all I could find is the new elevator transformers:

Original Technical Specifications
The existing generator sets were replaced with SCR drives. Due to the power requirements of the aforementioned equipment, new drive componentry would be design-specific to WTC. ACE engineers, in conjunction with outside vendors, developed a system capable of powering the massive equipment with no negative effects to the building's power supply.
The use of SCRs for this installation required an isolation transformer, choke and harmonic filter as outlined below.
Isolation Transformer: 450 KVA-4250 lbs. (WPI)
Choke: 5MH-500A-2280 lbs. (WPI)
Harmonic Filter: 210KVAR-1280 lbs. 350BP(TVI)
SCR Drive: DSD-412 10 to 1250 amp (MagneTek)
The size of the new SCR drive enclosure was too large to fit in the elevator machine room. The choke and isolation transformer were also too large to be installed within the machine room space. The original motor-generator room, which could house this equipment, was located seven floors below the machine level. In order to support the combined weight of the new equipment in the existing motor generator room, a steel platform had to be erected, consisting of steel I-beams welded to the building steel and steel plates attached to the I-beams forming a mounting foundation. All the above equipment was isolated from the building steel by special high tensile rubber pads.
Installations of two separate trough runs (one high voltage and one communication) from the elevator motor room to the motor generator room seven floors away, proved a challenge. A run of approximately 80 vertical feet, employed over 300 running feet of 2-1/2" x 8" and 2"x 2" trough raceway. This run traveled through plaster ceilings, concrete floors and around structural steel. The remote location necessitated the installation of a new 800 amp service disconnect switch with a remote shunt trip, installed in each motor generator room.

http://www.elevator-world.com/magazine/arc...03-002.html-ssi

I am not being paid so I can look at both sides of the argument(Unlike the official conspiracy theorist). biggrin.gif
hereward
QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 6 2006, 01:51 AM)
QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.

Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly


A] civil engineers,


B] licensed architects,


C] construction contractors or


D] demolition experts*,


Len

* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.

LenBrazil,

Have you ever heard of a guy by the name of Nicholas Copernicus? He wrote this treatise a few hundred years ago, suggesting that the earth revolves around the Sun. Up till that time none of the "experts" in any relevent fields had been prepared to publish a similar statement, although I suspect many were secretly in agreement with him.

The reason all the experts kept quiet about their views was possibly due to the fear of being charged with heresy and losing their jobs, or worse. To be guilty of heresy was, in medieval times, a very serious matter. Copernicus himself was forced to retract his views on threat of ex-communication.

Later Galileo decided to stick his neck out and advocate the Copernican theory. Galileo was arrested and tried for heresy.

These days the heretics are called whistle blowers and they don't get burned at the stake, but they do get burned in other ways, and they often lose their jobs, their marriages and their health. It is a big price to pay.

So, is the fact that civil engineers, architects and demolitions experts are not publicly advocating the controlled demolition theory proof that they all agree with the official theory? I suspect not.

On the other hand, I put it to you: why have we not seen a peer reviewed rebuttal of the theory that WTC 7 was brought down by explosives?






Lon Waters
QUOTE (stallion4+Feb 6 2006, 05:44 AM)
[QUOTE=Lon Waters,Feb 5 2006, 07:19 AM][QUOTE=Common Sense,Feb 5 2006, 05:59 AM] [QUOTE]"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac [/QUOTE]
Wrong. That statement is from the Randy Lavello article, not the WING TV article. Paul Isaac Jr. still stands behind that statement AND his statement he made about bombs being planted in the WTC buildings:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavel...0503_bombs.html

The only thing that he doesn't stand behind is his remark about the gag order which he said was speculation on his part.

I am sorry, I mistook the quote that Common_Sense gave as the one from the WING-TV article.
Lon Waters
edited to removed double post
adoucette
QUOTE (hereward+Feb 6 2006, 02:55 AM)
QUOTE (lenbrazil+Feb 5 2006, 11:57 PM)
I have a question for all the CT's out there.

Can you name any: ______________ who after studying the evidence believe explosives were used to bring down the towers? Not just in the US any where in the World. I far as I know none have done so publicly


A] civil engineers,


B] licensed architects,


C] construction contractors or


D] demolition experts*,


Len

* In the days following 9/11 a Chinese civil engineer and an American mining engineer/explosives expert said after seeing video of the collapses that they looked like controlled demo. The American retracted his assessment after studying the evidence, the Chinese engineer has been silent on the subject ever since.

LenBrazil,

Have you ever heard of a guy by the name of Nicholas Copernicus? He wrote this treatise a few hundred years ago, suggesting that the earth revolves around the Sun. Up till that time none of the "experts" in any relevent fields had been prepared to publish a similar statement, although I suspect many were secretly in agreement with him.

The reason all the experts kept quiet about their views was possibly due to the fear of being charged with heresy and losing their jobs, or worse. To be guilty of heresy was, in medieval times, a very serious matter. Copernicus himself was forced to retract his views on threat of ex-communication.

Later Galileo decided to stick his neck out and advocate the Copernican theory. Galileo was arrested and tried for heresy.

These days the heretics are called whistle blowers and they don't get burned at the stake, but they do get burned in other ways, and they often lose their jobs, their marriages and their health. It is a big price to pay.

So, is the fact that civil engineers, architects and demolitions experts are not publicly advocating the controlled demolition theory proof that they all agree with the official theory? I suspect not.

On the other hand, I put it to you: why have we not seen a peer reviewed rebuttal of the theory that WTC 7 was brought down by explosives?

Are you kidding me?

Has Steven Jones lost his job?
What about OUTSIDE the US? Conspiracy books on 9/11 sell quite well in France and Germany. Heck one was written by the ex German Def Min. Its quite fasionable over there to proclaim that America Sucks at most everything so one would think that at least one civil engineer or architect would want to make a name for themselves via a peer reviewed article.

They've had almost a year since the final draft was published by NIST, and what do you know, nothing.

NADA
ZIP
ZILCH

Why no peer reviewed rebuttle to the theory that WTC 7 was brought down by explosives?

You mean other than the fact that the Final NIST Report hasn't come out?

Pretty friggin obvious, one hasn't come out for the same reason no one has written a peer reviewed article debunking two headed aliens.

laugh.gif

Arthur
Common Sense
The dishonesty on the CT side is sickening. They lie about the very people who would give their life to safe them...

Stop lying about what the fireman said...

QUOTE
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski


http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt

What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski


http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ski_Richard.txt

What do you expect the floors to sound like as they drop, one next to the other? If it didn't SEEM like explosions I would worry we weren't on earth.

“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory


This was one of those quotes taken out of context I told you about. Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context part...

I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.

I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever
.

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...ory_Stephen.txt

Let me guess why they left that important part out..

QUOTE
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera


SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.

Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?

A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.

Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?

A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF

First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera


SO WE WERE PRETTY MUCH-MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE INSIDE THIS BUILDING. I LIKE SAID, I DONT KNOW IF ITS FIVE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR FOUR WORLD TRADE CENTER. MOST OF THEM WERE IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE CHIEF OR THE CAPTAIN SAID IF YOU WANT YOU CAN STAY INSIDE THAT BUILDING. BUT I DIDNT FEEL SAFE BECAUSE I KNEW IT WAS TERRORIST ATTACK SO I WAS SCARED. EVERY TIME YOU HEAR PLANE EVERYONE WOULD RUN. SO I PRETTY MUCH STOOD AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE. I WOULD SEE TRIAGE, BUT I WAS PRETTY MUCH IN BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

THEN THAT'S WHEN-I KEPT ON WALKING CLOSE TO THE SOUTH TOWER, AND THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED.

Q: HOW DID YOU KNOWTHAT IT WAS COMING DOWN?

A: THAT NOISE .IT WAS NOISE.

Q: WHAT DID YOU HEAR? WHAT DID YOU SEE?

A: IT WAS A FRIGGING NOISE. AT FIRST I THOUGHT IT WAS-DO YOU EVER SEE PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION WHERE THEY SET THE CHARGES ON CERTAIN FLOORS AND THEN YOU HEAR "POP, POP, POP, POP, POP"? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT-BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110035.PDF

First notice he and everyone else was scared of TERRORISTS. What do TERRORIST DO? They BLOW SHIAT UP. So it's not unreasonable for someone who is thinking TERRORIST to hear the sound of huge concrete floors falling one on top of the other to think "BOMB" first. As I said, No one has ever seen an airplane hit buildings constructed like this and the collapse if this odd combination.

“There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." --Chief Frank Cruthers


there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. it appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyreg...IC/Cruthers.txt

And why wouldn't floors falling around the building NOT APPEAR to be an EXPLOSION... blink.gif

QUOTE
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski


Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF

And here is the outright LIE...

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
"I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.” --Paramedic Kevin Darnowski


Again, just more sounds like explosions as floors ram into each other. Note he doesn't say he SAW three explosions.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110202.PDF

And here is the outright LIE...

“ we heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.” -- Firefighter Craig Carlsen


Note where these lairs but the "...."

Now for the REAL quote...

I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110505.PDF

With that alone I should rest my case. wink.gif These CT sites are dishonest.

Here is the other lie, they split up these quote to make it seem like there are more than hey really are. You have paramedic Daniel Rivera and Stephen Gregory split up as if there are different accounts. They are the same account. What other reason would they have for splitting them up???

QUOTE
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore



MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".

I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.

...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING


SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.

It's time to see a transformer explosion.

http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion

All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.

SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." -- Captain Karin Deshore



MY BACK WAS TOWARDS THE BUILDING, TRYING TO PUSH EVERYBODY UP.
GRASSY HILL WAS THERE AND UP UNDERNEATH THAT OVERPASS, WHEN SOMEBODY JUST SIMPLY SHOUTED AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT WAS, "ITS BLOWING".

I HAD NO CLUE WHAT WAS GOING ON. I NEVER TURNED AROUND BECAUSE A SOUND CAME FROM SOMEWHERE THAT NEVER HEARD BEFORE. SOME PEOPLE COMPARED IT WITH AN AIRPLANE. IT WAS THE WORST SOUND OF ROLLING SOUND, NOT A THUNDER CANT EXPLAIN IT, WHAT IT WAS. ALL I
KNOW IS -- AND FORCE STARTED TO COME HIT ME IN MY BACK. I CANT EXPLAIN IT. YOU HAD TO BE THERE. ALL I KNOW IS -- HAD TO RUN BECAUSE I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION.

...I WAS UNAWARE WHAT WAS HAPPENING. I THOUGHT
IT WAS JUST MAJOR EXPLOSION I DIDNT KNOW THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING


SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT. INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS COULD SEE. THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING.

It's time to see a transformer explosion.

http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electri...ormer-Explosion

All these buildings had transformers and transformer vaults.

SO HERE THESE EXPLOSIONS ARE GETTING BIGGER AND LOUDER AND BIGGER AND LOUDER AND I TOLD EVERYBODY IF THIS BUILDING TOTALLY EXPLODES, STILL UNAWARE THAT THE OTHER BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED, IM GOING IN THE WATER.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

“I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.” -- Captain Jay Swithers


When I was giving her the oxygen, setting up the tank, you could hear a loud rumble. Somebody said run for your life. I turned to see who was yelling "run".
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go.

But one thing that did happen was an ambulance pulled up which was very clean. So I assumed that the vehicle had not been in the - what I thought was an explosion at the time, but was the first collapse.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110172.PDF

First he heard the rumble. Not the so called "Explosion" which he never saw. Then he thought he heard an explosion because he saw the debris falling away from the building. He had TERRORIST on his mind and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bomb. You don't have to be a psychologist here.

QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
"there were definitely bombs in those buildings,” Isaac added that “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.” --Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac


This is pulled straight out of someones a$$. There is NO Paul Isaac on the record saying anything of the kind. Another CT deception.

Fire officer Paul Isaac Jr. asserted that 9-11 was an inside job last September 11 at ground zero where mourners and protesters were gathered; “I know 9-11 was an inside job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too”, said Isaac.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bombs_inside_wtc.html



No such quote can be found anywhere but on conspiracy theory sites.
adoucette
Common Sense,

You may have to post this another dozen or so times, these CT'ers reading comprehension is VERY low and they have VERY selective retention.

Then there are those extreme cases like Foxx who will not only MISREAD these quotes but also manage to stick BRISANT in front of "Flash".

I believe its a symtom of a previously unknown illness, Conspiracy Related Attention Paralysis or CRAP for short.

Arthur



Common Sense
QUOTE (adoucette+Feb 6 2006, 02:25 PM)
Common Sense,

You may have to post this another dozen or so times, these CT'ers reading comprehension is VERY low and they have VERY selective retention.

Then there are those extreme cases like Foxx who will not only MISREAD these quotes but also manage to stick BRISANT in front of "Flash".

I believe its a symtom of a previously unknown illness, Conspiracy Related Attention Paralysis or CRAP for short.

Arthur

HAHAHA "CRAP"! I love it!
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.