All right still on my argument on the existence of the law of relativistic charge.
We can loosely define charge as the electromagnetic property of matter and charged particles as matter particles possessing elecromagnetic property.
The particle charge-velocity relation can be modified to:
e^2=2h√(ε/μ)=2h√(kεo/μo) ------1
and the particle mass velocity-relation can be modified to:
m^2=2kh√(εo/μo)/σ. ------2
The presence of charge deforms space, so that the speed of the particle (spin or rotatiomal) is equal to kc, where k is a dynamic variable of space.
Mote the ratio of 2 to 1 yields the square of the specific charge relationship.
when k is greater than one then the particle exceeds the speed of light in free space.
According to equation 2 above there is nothing that will prevent the particle to exceed the speed of light. According to eqn. 2 the mass of the particle increases with k (which is actually the square of the ratio of relative permittivity to relative permiability of the deformed space).
I propose that When electromagnetic waves interact with charged particle there is transfer of electromagnetic energy which results in the change of the charge of particle- charge also being a form of energy. According to 1 above fractional charge may result where there is strong magnetic field but heavy charge may result where electric field is stronger relative to magnetic field.

Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya

Good morning friend. Still on my argument for the existence of law of relativistic charge.
It may be argued from Einstein's relativity that E^2=p^2c^2+mo^2 x c^4 (where p=particle momentum)
Or m^2c^4=m^2xV^2 x c^2 + mo^2 x c^4
Or m^2 x c^2 (c^2-v^2) = mo^2 x c^4
0r m^2= mo^2 x c^2/(c^2-v^2)
Or m= mo √ (1-V^2/c^2) -------------- 1a. Using such an approach it can easily be deduced that the limiting speed of mass is c.
Let us use the same approach on the electron whose mass is given by m^2=2hεov/σ^2.
Then mc^2=√ (2hεov^3 x c^2/σ^2 + 2hεov x c^4/σ^2)
Or m=√ (2hεo)/(c x σ) x√ (v^3 + v x c^2)
Or m= √ (2hεo x α)/(c x σ) x√ (v^2 + c^2) --------- 1b
Equation 1b does not put a limit to speed. I can perceive your argument but remember rest is relative. The electron may have a rest mass in this reference frame but by another reference frame (you may call it an absolute frame of reference if you so desire) may have a velocity
v=α x c =2.11877 x 10^6 m/s, so that when the electron is at rest in this reference frame it will have a charge e^2=2hεoαc. Since rest is relative the Lorentz metric can in simple terms also be written as:
∂s^2 = (w-v) ^2 x∂t^2 +L^2 x ∂t^2=c^2∂t^2 in a limiting case of a modified Pythagoras theorem.
Or L= 1/√ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2)] ------------- 2
Where L= Lorentz factor. The Lorentz factor of equation will allow greater than speed of light travel provided w-v<c.
Multiplying the Galilean relativity by the square of L the new composition of velocity relation obtained becomes w'= (w-v) x L^2= (w-v)/ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2)] ----------------- 3.
Note: Since l=lo√ [1-(w-v)/c^2} and t=to /√ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2] then
w'= (w-v)/ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2
The above composition of velocity relation will allow for greater than speed of light travel.

Yours Samuel Bonaya Buya

I would also like to present an idea on gravity. I will at the moment omit the quantitative treatment. I propose that heavenly bodies like planets and stars have gravitational seas that radiate circular gravitational waves from the source particle. The speed of these gravitational waves decrease with increase in distance from the source - in other words the grad of the speed of the gravitational waves is negative. The gravitational field strength at a point in space is therefore equal to the rate of change of velocity of these gravitational waves. Space is therefore permiated by a sea of gravity or gravity ether, a hidden dimension. Gravitational waves of different heavenly do interact leading to phenomena like rotation of planets , air and ocean tides climatic changes , gravitational levitation etc. These gravitational seas are a sort of a medium with varying refractive index and light passing through a gravitational sea can udergo redshifting and also bending. The curvature of spacetime around matter can therefore be accounted for by the negative grad. of their speeds which create accelerating geodesics. What do you think?
Samuel Bonaya Buya.

Good morning friend. This post is an edit of a previous posting. Still on my argument for the existence of law of relativistic charge.
It may be argued from Einstein's relativity that E^2=p^2c^2+mo^2 x c^4 (where p=particle momentum)
Or m^2c^4=m^2xV^2 x c^2 + mo^2 x c^4
Or m^2 x c^2 (c^2-v^2) = mo^2 x c^4
0r m^2= mo^2 x c^2/(c^2-v^2)
Or m= mo √ (1-V^2/c^2) -------------- 1a.
Using such an approach it can easily be deduced that the limiting speed of mass is c.
Let us use the same approach on the electron whose mass is given by m^2=2hεov/σ^2.
Then mc^2=√ (2hεov^3 x c^2/σ^2 + 2hεov x c^4/σ^2)
Or m=√ [(2hεo) x (v^3 + v x c^2)] /(c x σ) = 1/σ x √[(2hεo v) x(1+v^2/c^2)]
Or m= 1/σ x √[(2hεo αc) x(1+v^2/c^2)]--------- 1b
Or e^2= (2hεo v) x(1+v^2/c^2)---------- 2a
Or e^2= (2hεo αc) x (1+v^2/c^2) ----------------- 2c.
From 2b:
α= v/c x (1+v^2/c^2) ------------------- 3b
Equation 1b does not put a limit to speed. I can perceive your argument but remember rest is relative. The electron may have a rest mass in this reference frame but by another reference frame (you may call it an absolute frame of reference if you so desire) may have a velocity
v=α x c =2.11877 x 10^6 m/s, so that when the electron is at rest in this reference frame it will have a charge e^2=2hεoαc. Since rest is relative the Lorentz metric can in simple terms also be written as:
∂s^2 = (w-v) ^2 x∂t^2 +(c^2/L^2) x ∂t^2=c^2∂t^2 in a limiting case of a modified Pythagoras theorem.
Or L= 1/√ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2)] ------------- 2
Where L= Lorentz factor. The Lorentz factor of equation will allow greater than speed of light travel provided w-v<c.
Multiplying the Galilean relativity by the square of L the new composition of velocity relation obtained becomes w'= (w-v) x L^2= (w-v)/ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2)] ----------------- 3.
Note: Since l=lo√ [1-(w-v)/c^2} and t=to /√ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2] then
w'= (w-v)/ [1-(w-v) ^2/c^2]
The above composition of velocity relation will allow for greater than speed of light travel.

Yours Samuel Bonaya Buya

In a previous post I proposed that heavenly bodies like planets and stars have gravitational seas that radiate circular gravitational waves from the source particle. The speed of these gravitational waves decrease with increase in distance from the source - in other words the grad of the speed of the gravitational waves is negative. The gravitational field strength at a point in space is therefore equal to the rate of change of velocity of these gravitational waves. Space is therefore permeated by a sea of gravity or gravity ether, a hidden dimension. Gravitational waves of different heavenly do interact leading to phenomena like rotation of planets, air and ocean tides climatic changes, gravitational levitation etc. These gravitational seas are a sort of a medium with varying refractive index and light passing through a gravitational sea can undergo redshifting and also bending. The curvature of spacetime around matter can therefore be accounted for by the negative grad. of their speeds which create accelerating geodesics.
I propose that mass provides the gravitational energy to its surrounding gravitational sea/ether to enable propagation of gravitational waves. If ρs is the density of the gravitational sea/ether and θ is the density of the source of gravity (mass) then a simple Newtonian relation connecting the two densities can be given by the following approximate relation:
vs^2 x ρs= 2Gmθro/r^2 ------------------- 1
Where r is the distance to the source and ro is the radius of the body
I propose a simple relation between speed of light and speed of gravity
c = 4πnGmθf/ ( vs^2 x ρs) ---------- 2
Where f = frequency of the radiation.
Or λ = 4πnGmθ/ ( vs^2 x ρs)
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya

In previous posts I proposed that heavenly bodies like planets and stars have gravitational seas that radiate circular gravitational waves from the source particle. The speed of these gravitational waves decrease with increase in distance from the source - in other words the grad of the speed of the gravitational waves is negative. The gravitational field strength at a point in space is therefore equal to the rate of change of velocity of these gravitational waves. Space is therefore permeated by a sea of gravity or gravity ether, a hidden dimension. Gravitational waves of different heavenly do interact leading to phenomena like rotation of planets, air and ocean tides climatic changes, gravitational levitation etc. These gravitational seas are a sort of a medium with varying refractive index and light passing through a gravitational sea can undergo redshifting and also bending. The curvature of spacetime around matter can therefore be accounted for by the negative grad. Of their speeds which create accelerating geodesics.
I propose that mass provides the gravitational energy to its surrounding gravitational sea/ether to enable propagation of gravitational waves. If ρs is the density of the gravitational sea/ether and θ is the density of the source of gravity (mass) then a simple Newtonian relation connecting the two densities is given by:
vs^2 x ρs= 2Gmθro/r^2 ------------------- 1
Where r is the distance to the source
Where vs= speed of gravity
I propose a simple relation between speed of light and speed of gravity
c = 4πnGmθf/ ( vs^2 x ρs) ---------- 2
Where f = frequency of the radiation.
Or λ = 4πnGmθ/ ( vs^2 x ρs) -------------- 3
Where λ is wavelength of electromagnetic waves;
I propose a possible relation connecting wavelength of gravitational and mass of source of gravity as:
λs 2x ρs x r^2/ro =m -------------------- 4
I propose another possible relation connecting frequency of gravitational wave and mass of source of gravity as:
f^2=G x θ -------------------- 5
Where θ is the density of the body. By the above proposed gravity laws gravitational waves of large bodies like the earth are characterized by very low frequency [except for super dense objects], extremely large wavelengths and superluminal speeds. For example a planet of mass 6 x 10^24 kg and radius 6.37 x10^6 m having density 5540 kg/m3 in a space having a gravity sea of density 1 x10^-27 kg/m3 will generate gravity waves of frequency of frequency 6.08 x 10^-4 Hz, wavelength 3.07 x 10^22 m, speed 1.87 x 10^19 m/s. Gravity waves are therefore very hard to detect because of their very low frequency. Quantum entanglement becomes possible when the waves when the waves of a particle are transmitted by the fast traveling gravitational waves of Large bodies.
I really appreciated reading an article posted by Ionian on 5th December 2007, titled " The ocean called space'-By Simon J. Takouridis. The article qualitatively laid out very well the fluid mechanics of such an ocean will generate gravitational field which was described as "precipitation of insoluble material". I believe the treatment above fits very well the article. I leave the rest to you fluid dynamists to complete the model of gravity based on space as a sea/ ocean of ether.
I would also like to bring in another thought for the members of the forum to ponder. Consider two metric state states such that:
c^2 x∂t0^2 = w^2 x ∂t^2 -------------------------------- 6a
Let us take a situation where w<c so that w^2 = c^2 –v^2 ---------------7a
Then substituting 7 into 6a we obtain the relation:
c^2 x∂t0^2 =[c^2 – v^2] ∂t^2 -----------------------------6b
Or t = to /√ (1 – v^2/c^2) ------------------------------------ 8
The relation 8 connects time in the two metric states so that when light passes from one metric state to the other it is refracted since by 6:
c/w =t/to =c/√(c^2 –v^2) = n --------------------------- 9a
So that light moving from optically denser medium to optically less dense medium bends and undergoes time delay. Thus time dilation and bending of light in case 9b can be attributed to reduction of speed of light as it moves from one metric state to another.
Let us consider a situation where w>c so that w^2 = c^2 + v^2 --------------- 7b
Then c^2 x ∂to^2 = [c^2 + v^2] ∂t^2 =w^2 x ∂t^2 ------------------ 6c case of time contraction
Then by 6c:
c/w= 1/√ (1 + v^2/c^2) = t/to = n ------------------ 9b
The above equations show that the speed of light can be c, less than c or greater than c depending on the space conditions. In the case of equation 9b time contracts when light travels at speeds greater than c , etc.
As w → ∞ ∂t/∂to → 0. In the dimension ∂t/∂to= 0 Past present and future coexist. Before the beginning before time started, before Planck's mass it was all eternal in Elohim, Yeshua, past present and future coexisted in him, The great eternal Spirit, see, heaven is in dimension faster than this one and that is why the seer could climb to that dimension by a gift and could see the coming into power over the US a woman and the happenings in Los Angeles, the sharks, the sea weeping into the land etc. in those days. Moses,
On meeting Yeshua at the burning bush received the book the contained the mystery of the seven seals which was to be revealed in the last days to an intellectual age by the spirit of Elijah, none of the wicked will understand. Time is the unfolding of the mystery of Elohim.
Planck's is of time dimension, has a time scale, time began with the creation of the first particle of matter which has energy that is a trillion that of the known universe, as presented in some previous posting in some other threads. The big bang, the Thunder of Yeshua, the voice of Elohim thundered and time began with creation and what co existed in Him as past Present and Future began unfolding, expressing his attributes, Elohim unfolding what was at the back part of His mind through time.
I also would like to express some appreciation reading some poll posting titled Phase velocity of information –NeoNo.1 posted 5th December 2007.Quote NeoNo.1 @ Dec.30th 2007,03:30 PM.
An Oxymoron of relativistic Expectations: This wave equation d^2u/dt^2 – c^2 d2u/dx2 + w2 u = 0 has a set of solutions u=A cos(ax – but)
c^2a^2 – b^2 + w^2 =0 which are sine waves propagating with speed v = b/a =sqrt(c^2 +( w/a)^2)

The relativistic law of time governing such a wave equation should be the one given in equation 9b.
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya.

There has been much misconception and erroneous speculation on time travel. By equation 9b of my previous post, time contracts in dimensions that are faster than speed of light. In such a space
The time span between events contracts, until in a space where speed is infinite
(∂t/∂to= 0 according to my previous post), past, present and future coexist because time span between events is zero (all events contract to a point).
Let me make a further comment on gravity. As previously proposed, space consists of a sea of ether. The presence of matter in space propagates a disturbance through the ether sea in the form of gravity waves. The acceleration of these gravity waves is gravity.
That is the relationship between gravitational field strength and speed of gravity is given by:
g = √ (G x ρ) x vs ------------------------ 10
ρ = density of ether.
Or ρ x vs2 =Gm^2/r^4 -------------- 1b (Compare to equation 1 of posting 105)
Ether of density 1 x 10^-27 kg/m^3 moving at a speed of 1.87 x 10^19 m/s will produce a gravitational acceleration of 4. 85 m/s^2.
The energy of a gravity particle is given by:
E=h√ (Gxρ) ----------------------------- 11
The above 11 equations should be able to account for gravity, account for geometric theory of gravitation and also reconcile quantum mechanics and gravity and set the stage for theory of everything. Zephir's idea of Aether wave theory was good but he failed to bring out the qualitative character of his theory. What do you think Alphanumeric, rpenner and other experts?
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya

It seems there are no replies to my postings. Is it because the members of the forum are satisfied with my theories? Where have they failed the quantitative tests? Where has my theory on gravity failed to match geometric theory of gravity? Where has my proposed law of relativistic charge failed to produce experimental findings in relativity? Isn't it's ability to derive Rydberg's constant, it's ability to match Gauss law, Amperes circuital law Faraday's law , derive experimental results of electron charge etc. sufficient evidence that the law is physical? What would hinder my presentations from being adopted as possible theories in Physics? Any replies?
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya

Or is it because the presentation is simplistic and is originating from somebody who is unknown and doesn't have what you regard has no name or credibility? Is it because it is not in agreement with some authorities in physics whose words are taken as absolutes? The established physical principles should guide us in building a theory. The law of relativistic charge and the law of relativistic mass following from it matches specific charge test , experimental findings on charge of electron, findings of atomic spectroscopy etc. I challenge any Lacausian professor of maths or Physics in any part of the world to come forward to challenge these presentations on the basis of failure to meet physical tests.
yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya.

In some previous stop I proposed a relationship connecting the frequency of a gravitational wave and mass of the source of gravity as:
f^2=G x θ -------------------- 5a
Or:
ω^2 = 2πx G x θ ------------5b
Equation 5b establishes the fact that mass spins or rather curves space. Using equation 5b we can calculate the frequency of curvature of space around the earth due to the presence of mass as
3.807 x 10^-3 rad/s = 775 000 milliseconds/s.
The atmosphere above the surface of the earth experiences some drag. For example if we take the mean density of the atmosphere of the earth as 0.04 kg/m3 then drag frequency is (using equation is 3.2465 x 10^-6 rad/s = 6 609 milliseconds/ s. When the density of the atmosphere reduces this atmospheric drag frequency is reduced while the speed of the particles of the atmosphere increases since:
vs^2 x ρs= 2Gmθro/r^2 ------------------- 1
When the mean speed of a gas increases its temperature rises according to kinetic theory of matter. Research findings have established that carbon dioxide emission produce a reduction of the density of the earth's outer atmosphere leading to global warming. The equations above can be useful in building the quantitative theory of climatic change due either to atmospheric pollution or changes in solar cycle.
A further development of this thought will show that the relationship between the coefficient of viscosity (η) and the density of the atmosphere is given by:
η = 2π x G x ρ x m/ (3x vt) ------------------ 12
where ρ = density of the atmosphere
m = mass of the falling body
vt = terminal velocity.
The equation 12 establishes that the viscosity of a fluid is proportional to its density. A reduction of the density of the earth's atmosphere will also reduce its viscous drag. I hope Your reading this article will help to enrich your experience. What do you think?
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya

I will propose a simple superstring theory that can be used in high energy physics that be used to bring general relativity and quantum mechanics. Consider a string field having n Plank masses each of mass mp. The metric of the string is given by:
lp x 3√ n =3√ (n x mp/ρ) = c x 3√n x tp ------------------- 13
Where tp = Planck's time = 3.387416467 x 10^-43 s.
lp = Plank's length = 1.015521909 x 10^-34 m.
mp = Planck's mass = 2.176438564 x 10^-8 kg
Now if l = lp x 3√ n ---------------------- 14
v = c x 3√n ------------------------------- 15
and m = mp x n ----------------------------16.
Where m= energy of the universe in the form of mass.
If m= 2 x 10^64 kg then for the string field
n = 9.189324398 x 10^71 and 3√ (m/ρ) =0.029598601 and ρ = 7.712877111 x 10^74
and v = 2.914619709 x 10^32 m/s and l =9.873030797 x 10^-11 m and g= 1.369409809 x 10^74 N/kg. I hope this presentation has been an eye opener. What do you think?
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya.

I will propose a simple superstring theory that can be used in high energy physics that be used to bring general relativity and quantum mechanics. Consider a string field having n Plank masses each of mass mp. The metric of the string is given by:
lp x 3√ n =3√ (n x mp/ρ) = c x 3√n x tp ------------------- 13
Where tp = Planck's time = 3.387416467 x 10^-43 s.
lp = Plank's length = 1.015521909 x 10^-34 m.
mp = Planck's mass = 2.176438564 x 10^-8 kg
Now if l = lp x 3√ n ---------------------- 14
v = c x 3√n ------------------------------- 15
and m = mp x n ----------------------------16.
Where m= energy of the universe in the form of mass.
If m= 2 x 10^64 kg then for the string field
n = 9.189324398 x 10^71 and 3√ (m/ρ) =0.029598601m and ρ = 7.712877111 x 10^74 kg/m3
and v = 2.914619709 x 10^32 m/s and l =9.873030797 x 10^-11 m and g= 1.369409809 x 10^74 N/kg. I hope this presentation has been an eye opener. What do you think?
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya.

The frequency of an aether particle/ graviton is given by:
f^2 =G x ρ ------------------------ 5a
Or its spin is given by:
ω^2 = 2π x G x ρ ------------------5b
Where ρ is the density of the particle
A string theory approach has the advantage of generalizing particles as strings with different frequency modes. To present my proposed particle structure and property theory I will resort to an approach that will integrate some form of string theory with some form aether wave approach together with my proposed law of relativistic charge to come up with a theory consistent with geometric theory of gravitation and observed electromagnetic properties of matter and light and to establish interrelation between the gravitational and electromagnetic phenomena. I will used a multi-prong approach to present a theory consistent with both special and general relativity, that will permit superluminal speeds without violating causality, that will bring compatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics, that will eliminate the necessity of renormalizations in quantum mechanics.
A charged particle can be visualized as a string of aether particles/gravitons whose frequency is sum of frequencies of its constituent ether particles/gravitons or:
fs^2 = 2 x εo x v^5/ (h x σ^2) = G x ρ x n ------------- 5c
Where fs = frequency of string
σ = specific charge.
n = number of aether particles/ gravitons.
We can visualize aether particles/ gravitons as particles having extremely high specific charge given by the relation:
σ^2 = 2 x εo x c^5/ (h x ρ x G) --------------- 17a
An aether particle/graviton possesses extremely low magnetic field since its spin is the product of its magnetic and electric property as in the relationship proposed below:
ω =+/- (σ x -------------- 5d
Where B = magnetic flux density in Teslas. Aether particles/gravitons in a string field have the following specific charge relationship:
σ^2 = 2 x εo x c^5/ (h x ρ x G x n) = 2 x εo x v^5/ (hf^2) ------------------ 17b
Equation 3b is a variant form of the law of relativistic charge proposed in this forum.
Where:
c^5/ (h x ρ x G x n) = v^5/f^2 ---------------------- 18a
Where in this case f= frequency of string.
Or:
c^5 x f^2 = v^5 x h x ρ x G ----------------- 18b
And in this case f= frequency of aether wave particle/ graviton. ρ= density of aether/gravity particle.
Thus speed of light can be viewed as speed of gravity in a slower metric/ dimension and speed of gravity is speed of light in a faster metric/dimension for facilitation of quantum entanglement or action from a distance or instantaneous transmission of force. Equation 18b can be viewed as a relation connecting speed of light in a faster metric to speed of light in a slower metric. Gravity waves transmit spins of entangled quantum mechanical system so that entangled electrons A and B interchange their spin states. Let me emphasize here that faster than speed of light travel does not violate causality. Faster than speed of light travel causes time contraction. The Lorentz factor for faster than light travel from was shown in equation 9 of a previous post to be 1/√ (1 + v^2/c^2). I will show in another post how superluminal speeds are attainable without violating causality.
Note: in equation 3b the density of the string is given by:
θ = ρ x n -------------------- 19
Thus according to equation 19 a string is a compactification or a packing together or squeezing together or compression or condensation of aether particles/gravitons. Thus a string can be viewed as a denser/compactified aether particle/graviton.
From 1b and 1c:
B = +/- (2π x √ (G x ρ)/σ) ------- 7a. We can say that aether particles possess high specific charge and virtually no magnetic field. The equation 7 allows for magnetic reversal.
If κ^2=ρ/σ^2 ---------- 8
κ is the density function of the string/aether particle/graviton/charged particle.
Or when equation 8 is written in another form
(κ x σ)^2=ρ ----9a
Or (κ x σ) ^2=θ ----9b for a string.
Then B=+-(2πκ√G) -------7b
When equation 7a is applied to strings it takes the form:
B = +/- (ω/σ) ------------------ 7c.
The above equations can be used to account for and relate all fundamental interactions since all forces can be expressed in the relation:
F=m x ω x v ----------------- 10.
When the string is taken as a point particle its radius is given by the relation:
r^2 = (2π^2 x h x σ^2)/ (εo x v^3) -------- 11
Or ω^3 x r^5 =2π^2 x h x σ^2/ εo ------------- 12.
I would also like to point out that from equation 5 mass can be defined as spin of space since m = ω^2 x L^3/(4π^2 x G) -------20.
From the equation we can say Plank’s mass is a space whose event horizon spins at a frequency of 2.99792458 x 10^42 Hz and whose centre spin’s at infinite frequency for it to account for the mass of the universe. The center of this quantum blackhole has the blueprint of all space eternity and time. All past present and future of the universe co-exist at this centre point of the Plank’s mass. This point is the Logos space that gave birth to Plank’s mass a spinning space that has the energy of the whole universe. Plank’s mass is an explosion a bang a creation from logos space from which there was explosion of gravity, space, time and electromagnetic field. Remember electromagnetism is a property of spin. Gravity is a property of spin gravitational force can be visualized as force between two spaces. Now electromagnetic field originates from spin since B x σ =√[(4π^2 x G x m)/(L^3)]------------7d.
Let me also add that superluminal speeds do not violate causality. Consider three metric states such that L^2 = c^2 x to^2 = (c^2 – v^2) x t^2 = ( c^2 + v^2) x t1^2. Then t = to/√ (1 – v^2/c^2) and t1 = to/ (1 +v^2/c^2). You see causality is not violated
What do you think? I hope this presentation has been beneficial to you. Due to time constraints I will stop here.
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya

The presentations almost completes the key aspects of my theory. There are a few things to be added like my theory on the unified atom. The presentation above should shed light on Cassimir effect, the nature of fundamental forces and brings a more complete understanding of the physical principle governing nature. Special relativity can be extended by generalizing it to allow for greater than speed of light travel. The concept of time travel has generally been misconceived. This forum has provided me an opportunity to present my findings which it would have been difficult to present elsewhere. I previously tried to no avail to present my work from between 2002 to 2006. In 2006 August I got registered to this forum. I hope my misspelled words and poor way of presentation will not stumble you. I had two questions in my life from my childhood. One was whose is God? What is the mystery of existence and the universe. These questions led me to read and search through many books. At college I Satyagraha, the impossible question, Doctrines thoroughly went through the Bible many times, read on astronomy, wanted to perfect my mathematical skills in order to understand the laws of the universe. I did not concentrate on my studies. The greatest gift that I received was a Bible given to me in 1972 by a German Missionary Klaus Moukenhappt from Neuchritchen mission, Germany. I will remember him for that gift. I was his keen student. At college I had many questions and conflicts about the Bible. I attended meetings conducted by many international evangelists. It was through reading William Marrion Branham, the Kentucky born Prophet that all my questions were resolved. The Bible became completely open to me. I believe the Bible to be the ultimate. By the words of William Branham nature is complementary to the working of God. I recommend to the Forum members the reading of his books for spiritual evidence.
Yours,
Samuel Bonaya Buya.

I'm almost certain that binding energies would increase dimensionally across the board within atoms to the inverse sq root (c+v)(c-v)

The cute thing would be to design an experiment that would fit on a F-18 Hornet and prove it as easily as time dilation.

Playing around with protons in a magnetic field has the problem of the apparatus generating the field building in step with the relativistic charges of the protons.

Some material become partially magnetized in a magnetic field but again the the material and the apparatus would be in sync.

The LHC couldn't be accurate enough in measuring the speed of it particles but then again why accelerate your particle beam to near light speed when when you could prove the effect with particles at 10 miles per second. There could be a control beam at much lower velocity and it would be a mater of correlating the electrostatic deflection within an electro magnet to the duration the magnetic field acted on them. The control beam of low velocity particles would deflect the most however the 10mile/s should deflect more than if there wasn't a build up of relativistic charge. Perhaps an electron beam should be used in place of a proton beam.

Good morning friends. Thanks Momentino for your comments. Sorry for taking too long to react. I stay far from Internet services so it becomes had to react immediately. After this presentation I will propose a simplistic experiment that can be conducted to confirm some of my proposals. Here in Kenya we just heard our presidential elections and we are just waiting for the final results to be announced. Today is also my sixteenth wedding anniversary.
In this presentation I will try to discuss some key highlights of my theory. I will attempt to show why Bonaya Samuel’s unified field theory qualifies as a Theory of everything and as a unified field theory. It is my hope that this post will be an eye opener to you. This article will discuss qualitatively the nature of light, the relationship between gravitational field and electromagnetic field (equations 22c and 25), relationship between speed of light and speed of gravity (equations 23a –. I will express gravity in quantum mechanics terms and suggest and equation relating gravitation radiation emitted in transition between two orbits (equations 24a-d), will show how Planck’s mass can have energy for an infinite universe, will propose that the uncertainty principle used in quantum mechanics should be referred to as uncertainty of limitations imposed on the observer by the source used for observation rather than a physical principle of nature etc.
The equation m = (ω ^2 x L^3)/ (4π^2 x G) ------------------------------------------- 20
Can be reduced to the equation:
2L =8π^2 G x M/c^2 ---------------------------------------- 21
The tensor form of the above equation yields Einstein field equations. Viewed in terms of equation 21 gravity can take definition of a metric or a spacetime. When The Einstein’s constant of equation 21 is sent to the left side of the equation and both sides multiplied by M2 /d^2 where d= distance between the two masses, then gravity can take the definition of force since acceleration,
a1 = G x m2/d^2 -------------------------- 22a
And
a2 = G x m1/d^2 -------------------- 22b
That is mass m1 causes mass m2 towards it and the vice-versa.
The above equation can be reduced to quantum gravity and also Newtonian gravity.
Using equation 20 if a photon is to be a zero dimension massless particle then it should have the following properties:
ω^2 x r^2 =c^2 where ω → ∞ and r→ 0.
The wavelength of an electromagnetic wave would then consist of a string photon field with wavelength of the wave as λ = L/2π.
For Planck’s mass to have energy for an infinite universe then it should have the following properties:
ω^2 x r^2 = ∞ where ω → ∞ and r→ 0.
And mp = (ω ^2 x L^3)/ (4π^2 x G). Then the radius of the singularity of the quantum blackhole would be zero and the radius of the event horizon would be half Plank’s length.
According to the law of relativistic mass derived in my theory, a Plank’s mass with infinite energy is one whose specific charge tends to infinity
A Logos space would be a zero dimensional space having infinite spin speed.
Notice, using equation 20 we can obtain the following gravitational field strength relation
g= c x f = vg x fg = G x m/d^2-----------------22c
f = frequency of the electromagnetic wave associated with gravity wave of the gravitational field.
fg = frequency of the gravity wave.
vg = velocity of gravity waves.
From equation 22:
c = vg x √ (fg/ f) ---------------------------------------23a
From equation 22:
f = g/c -------------------------------------------24a
Or:
Eg =h x g/c ----------------------------------- 24 b
Where Eg = gravitational energy.
The change in gravitational energy in transition from one orbit to another is given by:
ΔEg = Eg1 – Eg1 = h/c x [g1 –g2] ----24c
Or:
f'’ = [g1 –g2]/c ---------------------------24d
Where f’ is the frequency radiated in transition from one orbit to another.
Equation 24 can be used to determine the frequency of radiation emitted by a blackhole. Equation 24 provides a link between quantum mechanics and general relativity. No renormalization is required when the approach above is used. Equation 22 establishes a relationship between gravitational and electromagnetic fields and if you so wish, you can represent it in vector or tensor form.
When the relativistic law of mass derived in my theory is integrated with equation 21 and some other parameters then the following universal gravitational constant relationship is obtained:
G = [(µo x c^2) / (8π^2)] x [(740 x σe)/N] ^2 --------------------- 25a
With the above equation it becomes easy to model gravity without using G.
The relation between c and G is given by:
c = [2π N√ (2G/µo)]/ [740 x σe] ------------------------------------ 23b
Where σe = specific charge of an electron N = Avogadro number. G can be related to any other charged particle and the equation will take the form of equation 22. The equation 25 unifies the electromagnetic and gravitational phenomena just as Maxwell’s electromagnetic wave. Equation 25 shows how gravitation is related to magnetism. The Einstein constant of general relativity holds the key to the unification of the electromagnetic and gravitational phenomena. The whole key of Einstein’s unified field theory is in equation 25 and is the climax and vindication of the law of relativistic charge.
The equation shows that universal gravitational constant:
1. Is dependent on the specific charge of a particle.
2. Is independent of variation of fine structure constant.
3. Is related to electromagnetism.
4. Is connected to all particles and light.
5. When substituted in the law of universal gravitation, gravitational force is a fractional manifestation of the sum of scalar magnitudes of electrostatic forces – i.e.
Fg = [(µo x c^2) / (8π^2)] x [(740 x σe)/N] ^2 x M1 x M2 /r^2 = (591/2N) ^2 x │ΣFe│ --26
6. Fractionality of charge of a particle or it’s variation with variation in mass does not affect the fine structure constant.
7. Even as the mass of an electron is relativistic its charge is relativistic.
8. By equation 22a change in e does not affect c, the speed of light in a vacuum.
9. It is the specific charge of the charged particle that is conserved not its charge.
Note that the specific charge of the particle takes into account the relative permeability and permittivity of the medium.
10. The proposed principle of conservation of charge is not inconsistent with the joint operation of relativity of mass and Joseph Thompson’s specific charge relation and is one of the erroneous principles that have brought chaos in the world of theoretical physics.
Note if the gravitational constant is expressed in the form
G = hc/ (2π x mp^2) =h x e^2/ (4π x α x ε0 x mp^2) = h x e^2/ (2π x α x n x ε0 x mp^2) ---------------- 25b, the equation will care of fractional charge but does not take care of change in fine structure constant, so that by equation 22 a change in fine structure constant will affect G.
Bonaya Samuel’s unified field theory qualifies to be Both a Theory of everything since
1. It establishes an interrelationship between all the known physical constants.
2. It brings together quantum mechanics and general relativity.
3. It establishes the relationship between gravitational and electromagnetic waves.
Let us look at some of the physical constants interrelated.
1. R=(εo/2h)^(1/2)α^(5/2)c^(3/2)/σe
Relationship between Rydberg’s constant, Planck’s constant, fine structure constant speed of light permittivity of free space and specific charge of an electron.
2. the Stephan's constant (σs) relation
σs = (1632(RH x σe) ^6 x K^4)/ (5 x α^15 x c^11 x εo^3)= (6526 x (R x σe)^6 x r^4)/(5α^3 x c^9 x εo x F^4) =81 x π^8 x k^4 x α^2/(h^3 x c^2)
Relation between Stephan’s constant, Rydberg’s constant, specific charge of an electron, Boltzman’s constant (k) , fine structure constant, speed of light and permittivity of free space, ideal gas constant ®, Faraday’s constant (F).
3. k= {h^3/4 x σs^ (1/4) x (c/α) ^1/2}/ {3 x π^2).
Relationship between Boltzman’s constant, Planck’s constant, specific charge of an electron, speed of light and fine structure constant.
4. Gravitational constant relationships.
G = (h x c)/ (2π x mp^2) =h x e^2/ (4π x α x ε0 x mp^2) = [(µo x c^2) / (8π^2)] x [(740 x σe)/N] ^2.
5. Wien’s displacement constant relation
w = 2π x (h/σs) ^1/4 x (α x c) ^1/2
and so on. These physical constant can completely interrelated. It is my hope that every piece of the jigsaw puzzle of physical universe has been fitted for you to see the picture. The major theme of the picture is Logos.
Therefore we can say Bonaya Samuel’s unified field theory qualifies to be a theory of everything.
The above principles lead us to an absolute, infinitesimal space, Logos space, having infinite speed. The universe is a creation of Logos. Planks mass is a creation of Logos. Logos brought forth the first particle of mass, the mustard seed of creation, and from it exploded a heaven/space of light/electromagnetic waves/ aether/ocean called space, the waters that covered the face of the deep/space and the earth (matter). If there are any multi-verses then they are subsets of this one universe that originated from Logos, the Alpha. All the laws of the universe were in Logos before it was brought forth. In Logos the past, present and future of the universe coexist- foreknowledge. Logos is the intelligence, the light, the life of the universe, the unseen intransient dimension which can appear as a hallo of light, a pillar of fire. Logos had the whole code of the Bible of nature and the code contained the history, present and future of every piece of the universe. Let me interject these words that it will take sons and daughters in the image of Logos, with the mind of Logos to be made manifest, to manifest Logos to the people, those seven thunders of rev. 10:1-7.
Is uncertainty Principle a physical principle?
That is a very fundamental question that requires to be tackled.
Quantum