Hello everyone,
I am just wondering between this 2 alternative power source which is the more likely one? I mean in the sense that in the upcoming 20-50 years which of these will be available for mass consumption? What are some of the problems facing this 2 power source?
Thanks
Just like the poor economics of using cyclotrons to turn lead into gold at about $2,000,000/oz. isn't a way to wealth, anti-matter isn't a power source except if there is a natural source of anti-matter. It takes more energy to make anti-matter (because of inefficiencies in technology) than you can recover from the anti-matter. Even if the process were 100% efficient, it would not be a power source, but more like a charge on a rechargeable battery -- the power still needs to come from somewhere else.
Neither and I doubt we will ever move past oil honestly. All the other ways of generation include great danger to society. I think governments will have stuff like zero point energy in time but for the general population they will never hear about it. I think the phaze in humanity where lower and middle class exist is coming to an end so the We you talk about may not even exist in 20 years or so.
QUOTE (magpies+Apr 1 2009, 04:49 AM)
Neither and I doubt we will ever move past oil honestly. All the other ways of generation include great danger to society. I think governments will have stuff like zero point energy in time but for the general population they will never hear about it. I think the phaze in humanity where lower and middle class exist is coming to an end so the We you talk about may not even exist in 20 years or so.
I beg to differ. If the scientific community would stop and listen to me. within 10 years fossil fuels will be no more than a novelty. Usage of the grid will be phased out within 20 years. simply will be no need for appliances that have a cord to plug. With my mechanism everything contains it's own power supply. this greatly increases mobility and eliminates the need to use batteries and other such storage devices.
my mechanism is 100% safe as a consumer product. 100% green in the meaning that no pollutants are emitted as a result of transformations of energy. 100% frictionless. +100% efficient. 100% multifarious it works in many different configurations via design variations. 100% scalable nano to macro. 100% closed system barring entropy entirely.
electronics actually run on low DC volt. AC is only for the transmission of great distances. The targeted market is the auto/transportation industry and electronics this gets the technology directly to the end user in new products. I alone control the distribution of the technology and i assure you it will be suppressed by no government. Of course there is a military platform and that will be suppressed.
I'm not crazy or some nutcase i just happen to be the one that figured out a cyclic method of transforming energy. This mechanism is the final billion pieces to the scientific puzzle.
I'm here looking for peers and to promote the technology to the scientific community. I'm prepaired to try to explain any part of the technology you don't understand.
Lord Of The Ring
Terry L Hewett Sr
I beg to differ. If the scientific community would stop and listen to me. within 10 years fossil fuels will be no more than a novelty. Usage of the grid will be phased out within 20 years. simply will be no need for appliances that have a cord to plug. With my mechanism everything contains it's own power supply. this greatly increases mobility and eliminates the need to use batteries and other such storage devices.
my mechanism is 100% safe as a consumer product. 100% green in the meaning that no pollutants are emitted as a result of transformations of energy. 100% frictionless. +100% efficient. 100% multifarious it works in many different configurations via design variations. 100% scalable nano to macro. 100% closed system barring entropy entirely.
electronics actually run on low DC volt. AC is only for the transmission of great distances. The targeted market is the auto/transportation industry and electronics this gets the technology directly to the end user in new products. I alone control the distribution of the technology and i assure you it will be suppressed by no government. Of course there is a military platform and that will be suppressed.
I'm not crazy or some nutcase i just happen to be the one that figured out a cyclic method of transforming energy. This mechanism is the final billion pieces to the scientific puzzle.
I'm here looking for peers and to promote the technology to the scientific community. I'm prepaired to try to explain any part of the technology you don't understand.
Lord Of The Ring
Terry L Hewett Sr
QUOTE (LOTR+Apr 1 2009, 02:41 PM)
I'm not crazy
Moderator: This is solely the opinion of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of this forum or any of its readers. Moreover, the poster does not provide an expert basis for forming this opinion, and relying on this opinion may not be legally feasible in some jurisdictions.
Seriously now, as with Pencho Valev, anyone can talk about change, but the proof is accomplishing it. Stop wasting time talking and start doing.
"Talk is cheap" has never been more true since the Internet was introduced.
Moderator: This is solely the opinion of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of this forum or any of its readers. Moreover, the poster does not provide an expert basis for forming this opinion, and relying on this opinion may not be legally feasible in some jurisdictions.
Seriously now, as with Pencho Valev, anyone can talk about change, but the proof is accomplishing it. Stop wasting time talking and start doing.
"Talk is cheap" has never been more true since the Internet was introduced.
QUOTE (rpenner+Apr 3 2009, 04:41 AM)
Moderator: This is solely the opinion of the poster and not necessarily the opinion of this forum or any of its readers. Moreover, the poster does not provide an expert basis for forming this opinion, and relying on this opinion may not be legally feasible in some jurisdictions.
Seriously now, as with Pencho Valev, anyone can talk about change, but the proof is accomplishing it. Stop wasting time talking and start doing.
"Talk is cheap" has never been more true since the Internet was introduced.
Here's the difference Pencho Valev was/is trying to prove something without the mechanism/model to verify his theories. My theories are born of the 20yrs research and development of a mechanism. When I started i simply wanted to figure out a way to drive a changing magnetic flux field through (as in plunging through) an induction coil cyclic.
I was naive as a child to physics beyond basic mechanical interactions. I worked out the mechanics of the mechanism 5 years before i discovered the internet. With the discovery of the internet and the realization that before me was the worlds first open sourced educational tool. I began a campaign to research and develop my mechanism. It didn't take me long to discover that the mechanism and the well utilized principles it is based on defied much of physics. I met resistance right away upon introduction to physics via newsgroups. I met that resistance with a thirst for knowledge. i researched every principle law and field of criteria that even remotely was effected by this simple mechanism. that brought me to the very bowels of physics.
I soon figured out that i was in way over my head, and that i will need the help and support of the academic and scientific communities to successfully introduce this technology. this technology seemingly questions a perpetual states existence. Cyclic in this mechanism is cyclic forever. There is no such thing as free energy there is always a cost. In this mechanism the cost is in materials and initialization beyond that it is free. Over unity is another roadblock. What exactly is unity? at what point is something unified? In this mechanism transformations of energy are unified intentionally for transforming energy cyclic.
In prototyping stage Goes way beyond talk.
Youtube SRTT
ring drive
Lord of the ring.
Terry L Hewett Sr
Seriously now, as with Pencho Valev, anyone can talk about change, but the proof is accomplishing it. Stop wasting time talking and start doing.
"Talk is cheap" has never been more true since the Internet was introduced.
Here's the difference Pencho Valev was/is trying to prove something without the mechanism/model to verify his theories. My theories are born of the 20yrs research and development of a mechanism. When I started i simply wanted to figure out a way to drive a changing magnetic flux field through (as in plunging through) an induction coil cyclic.
I was naive as a child to physics beyond basic mechanical interactions. I worked out the mechanics of the mechanism 5 years before i discovered the internet. With the discovery of the internet and the realization that before me was the worlds first open sourced educational tool. I began a campaign to research and develop my mechanism. It didn't take me long to discover that the mechanism and the well utilized principles it is based on defied much of physics. I met resistance right away upon introduction to physics via newsgroups. I met that resistance with a thirst for knowledge. i researched every principle law and field of criteria that even remotely was effected by this simple mechanism. that brought me to the very bowels of physics.
I soon figured out that i was in way over my head, and that i will need the help and support of the academic and scientific communities to successfully introduce this technology. this technology seemingly questions a perpetual states existence. Cyclic in this mechanism is cyclic forever. There is no such thing as free energy there is always a cost. In this mechanism the cost is in materials and initialization beyond that it is free. Over unity is another roadblock. What exactly is unity? at what point is something unified? In this mechanism transformations of energy are unified intentionally for transforming energy cyclic.
In prototyping stage Goes way beyond talk.
Youtube SRTT
ring drive
Lord of the ring.
Terry L Hewett Sr
QUOTE (LOTR+Apr 1 2009, 02:41 PM)
I'm not crazy or some nutcase.
Lord Of The AssRing
Terry L Halfwit Sr
off his face on drugs then? ..... can be the only explanation. 
Lord Of The AssRing
Terry L Halfwit Sr
off his face on drugs then? ..... can be the only explanation.
QUOTE (Geoff Mollusc+Apr 4 2009, 11:01 PM)
off his face on drugs then? ..... can be the only explanation. If your going to TRY to debunk the technology and claims I present. then lets get the party started!
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.