I just saw a new poster with the typical Alpha clone fingerprint - 4 posts, two positive ratings from cloned <Max> and TheDoc accounts, with the typical "m.o.".
I'll enjoy placing my bets on this being the latest incarnation.
The name is Bingo, stay tuned for the next upcoming wave of negative spams.
He should give AlphaNumeric and crew a positive and spam half the rest of the board with negatives, if he proves patient enough.
Yes that is a good idea
we live into space-now
universe exist into spave-now
we live into space-now
universe exist into spave-now
QUOTE (StevenA+)
I just saw a new poster with the typical Alpha clone fingerprint - 4 posts, two positive ratings from cloned <Max> and TheDoc accounts, with the typical "m.o.".
You know, Steven, you still haven't backed up your claim that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. What's the matter? What are you waiting for? Why can't you prove it?
If I'm so obviously a new Alpha sockpuppet, "exposing" me should be no problem.
So go on, Steven. Prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Go on, I dare you. Prove it.
I dare you.
Just as I will enjoy watching you lose all your money after you've lost the bet.
Just as I will enjoy watching you lose all your money after you've lost the bet.
The name is Bingo, stay tuned for the next upcoming wave of negative spams.
Says the idiot who spams anyone he deems to be an "Alpha Clone", despite his predictions being wrong 90% of the time.
This might be an interesting read for you, Steven.
You know, Steven, you still haven't backed up your claim that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. What's the matter? What are you waiting for? Why can't you prove it?
If I'm so obviously a new Alpha sockpuppet, "exposing" me should be no problem.
So go on, Steven. Prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Go on, I dare you. Prove it.
I dare you.
QUOTE
I'll enjoy placing my bets on this being the latest incarnation.
Just as I will enjoy watching you lose all your money after you've lost the bet.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| I'll enjoy placing my bets on this being the latest incarnation. |
Just as I will enjoy watching you lose all your money after you've lost the bet.
The name is Bingo, stay tuned for the next upcoming wave of negative spams.
Says the idiot who spams anyone he deems to be an "Alpha Clone", despite his predictions being wrong 90% of the time.
This might be an interesting read for you, Steven.
QUOTE (TheDoc+)
You know, Steven, you still haven't backed up your claim that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. What's the matter? What are you waiting for? Why can't you prove it?
I implied it was statistical and likely there's only some 99.9% probability that Bingo is the next clone.
We can simply look at the fact that Bingo has posted these 4 sentences. One for each post:
I implied it was statistical and likely there's only some 99.9% probability that Bingo is the next clone.
We can simply look at the fact that Bingo has posted these 4 sentences. One for each post:
QUOTE (Bingo+)
Quote #1:
I nominate TheDoc for truly being the most outstanding new member the FM have ever had in 2008 thus far.
I nominate TheDoc for truly being the most outstanding new member the FM have ever had in 2008 thus far.
QUOTE (Bingo+)
Quote #2:
Way-out false accusation of exceptional monster inaccuracy.
Way-out false accusation of exceptional monster inaccuracy.
QUOTE (Bingo+)
Quote #3:
Good post inkaat, however this is a physics forum!
Good post inkaat, however this is a physics forum!
QUOTE (Bingo+)
Quote #4:
As much outrageous amusement as defending .9r is not equal to 1?
And for these 4 sentences, you've given yourself 2 positives from two of your accounts. (I rarely give preemptive negatives, but I decided to go ahead and spam you first on this new toon of yours)
Now we can go back and look at the relative spam ratio of negatives given by your clones to some of the best posters on the forum and find that you've exceeded even card counting probabilities and hit the jackpot on spammed representation on this forum with regard to feedback. (I could do some statistical analysis on the probability of some non-forum mafia unrelated poster with 4 sentences and find not a single feedback for, likely on average 30 posts or more).
You're entirely predictable, Alpha, Cecil, Princess BlueBalls, <Max>, TheDoc, Bingo and at least 8 or more other names I can't remember off hand.
Sure, apples don't always have to fall when dropped. There's little of anything saying that the laws of physics couldn't change at some unforseen future, but for now, I'm willing to bet that a bad one won't fall far from the tree.
As much outrageous amusement as defending .9r is not equal to 1?
And for these 4 sentences, you've given yourself 2 positives from two of your accounts. (I rarely give preemptive negatives, but I decided to go ahead and spam you first on this new toon of yours)
Now we can go back and look at the relative spam ratio of negatives given by your clones to some of the best posters on the forum and find that you've exceeded even card counting probabilities and hit the jackpot on spammed representation on this forum with regard to feedback. (I could do some statistical analysis on the probability of some non-forum mafia unrelated poster with 4 sentences and find not a single feedback for, likely on average 30 posts or more).
You're entirely predictable, Alpha, Cecil, Princess BlueBalls, <Max>, TheDoc, Bingo and at least 8 or more other names I can't remember off hand.
Sure, apples don't always have to fall when dropped. There's little of anything saying that the laws of physics couldn't change at some unforseen future, but for now, I'm willing to bet that a bad one won't fall far from the tree.
QUOTE (StevenA+)
I implied it was statistical and likely there's only some 99.9% probability that Bingo is the next clone.
You're dodging. Are you going to prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, or not?
You're dodging again. You can't actually prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, can you?
You're dodging again. You can't actually prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, can you?
(I rarely give preemptive negatives, but I decided to go ahead and spam you first on this new toon of yours)
Man oh man this made me laugh out loud.
Do you REALLY think you've conducted a "preemptive strike" against me, or Alpha, or Trout, or NOM, or whoever is next on your "Clone List"? Because you haven't. And the more that you think that you have, the more of an idiot you will appear to be.
That's funny, because I haven't spammed AlphaNumeric or Euler with negatives. Neither has Trout, or Alpha, or NOM...
That's funny, because I haven't spammed AlphaNumeric or Euler with negatives. Neither has Trout, or Alpha, or NOM...
You're entirely predictable, Alpha, Cecil, Princess BlueBalls, <Max>, TheDoc, Bingo and at least 8 or more other names I can't remember off hand.
And you're just as "predictable", Steven. You spout long posts filled with unfounded and ignorant claims, you post a couple of random stats, and then act like you've exposed half of the forum as Alpha sockpuppets. But yet, after all your ranting about how Alpha has some 200 duplicate accounts lying in wait to "spam" your feedback, you haven't proved anything. You never managed to prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Same with Trout, same with Empress Palpatine. You haven't "exposed" them as clones of Alpha. Not once.
So I'm giving you one last shot, Steven. Prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha.
Go on, prove it. I bet you won't. I bet you can't.
No, there's a slight possibility that the future is something other than expected, but I don't happen to have access to I.P. addresses and such to give more tangible evidence other than the posts and comments on the forum, so it's simply something that (in the limit
) approaches absolute certainty.
(BTW, I didn't even know that the 4 posts were one liners when I posted this, but sure enough it turned out true that it was just your usual spam posts. I've already seen this enough times in the past to know the pattern ... use a different alias and show me to be mistaken!
)
As administrator of my Joint, I have IP addresses for TheDoc and Alpha. I can prove they are not the same person, but ethics prevent me from giving you the data.
If this helps quell your anxiety, all good. If not, STFU and forget about it, please. It is boring.
Prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. You've been given three chances already, and you still haven't backed up any of your accusations.
So go on, Steven. Prove it, and show me to be mistaken. You're up to the task, aren't you?
Prove me to be incorrect. You have nothing but accusations and evidence against your claim.
You obviously already knew the account was the new clone with almost no evidence from within the context of the posts that it was the new clone (except the possibility that you also had that 'gut feeling' that Bingo was in fact the new incarnation, but you'd have to be perusing the board quite vigorously and watching all comments from new members closely if you were able to do this within at least the first 3 sentences (your positive feedback to your Bingo account was within the first 3 posts as you'd already given a positive by the time I saw it on the fourth post).
So is it possible that you simply have lightning fast reflexes with regard to spotting the new clone or is it almost certainly the alternate, that you already knew Bingo was the new clone because you were personally involved?
I'm simply using the scientific method of observation and prediction and watching the apple continue to predictably fall ... sure, .999... could never precisely equal 1 and maybe someday apples won't fall, but for purposes of being a proven theory it's at least as predictive in its abilities as the Big Bang theory. (I can't even prove the Earth approximately spherical, other than just to show someone lots of evidence in support of it and hope they see the obvious also)
You're dodging. Are you going to prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, or not?
QUOTE
And for these 4 sentences, you've given yourself 2 positives from two of your accounts.
You're dodging again. You can't actually prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, can you?
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| And for these 4 sentences, you've given yourself 2 positives from two of your accounts. |
You're dodging again. You can't actually prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, can you?
(I rarely give preemptive negatives, but I decided to go ahead and spam you first on this new toon of yours)
Man oh man this made me laugh out loud.
Do you REALLY think you've conducted a "preemptive strike" against me, or Alpha, or Trout, or NOM, or whoever is next on your "Clone List"? Because you haven't. And the more that you think that you have, the more of an idiot you will appear to be.
QUOTE
Now we can go back and look at the relative spam ratio of negatives given by your clones to some of the best posters on the forum
That's funny, because I haven't spammed AlphaNumeric or Euler with negatives. Neither has Trout, or Alpha, or NOM...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Now we can go back and look at the relative spam ratio of negatives given by your clones to some of the best posters on the forum |
That's funny, because I haven't spammed AlphaNumeric or Euler with negatives. Neither has Trout, or Alpha, or NOM...
You're entirely predictable, Alpha, Cecil, Princess BlueBalls, <Max>, TheDoc, Bingo and at least 8 or more other names I can't remember off hand.
And you're just as "predictable", Steven. You spout long posts filled with unfounded and ignorant claims, you post a couple of random stats, and then act like you've exposed half of the forum as Alpha sockpuppets. But yet, after all your ranting about how Alpha has some 200 duplicate accounts lying in wait to "spam" your feedback, you haven't proved anything. You never managed to prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Same with Trout, same with Empress Palpatine. You haven't "exposed" them as clones of Alpha. Not once.
So I'm giving you one last shot, Steven. Prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha.
Go on, prove it. I bet you won't. I bet you can't.
QUOTE (Derek1148+Apr 11 2008, 04:12 AM)
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 11 2008, 04:20 AM)
QUOTE (Derek1148+Apr 11 2008, 04:22 AM)
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 11 2008, 04:06 AM)
You're dodging again. You can't actually prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, can you?
No, there's a slight possibility that the future is something other than expected, but I don't happen to have access to I.P. addresses and such to give more tangible evidence other than the posts and comments on the forum, so it's simply something that (in the limit) approaches absolute certainty.
(BTW, I didn't even know that the 4 posts were one liners when I posted this, but sure enough it turned out true that it was just your usual spam posts. I've already seen this enough times in the past to know the pattern ... use a different alias and show me to be mistaken!)
No, there's a slight possibility that the future is something other than expected, but I don't happen to have access to I.P. addresses and such to give more tangible evidence other than the posts and comments on the forum, so it's simply something that (in the limit
) approaches absolute certainty.(BTW, I didn't even know that the 4 posts were one liners when I posted this, but sure enough it turned out true that it was just your usual spam posts. I've already seen this enough times in the past to know the pattern ... use a different alias and show me to be mistaken!
)
Dearest darling Bozo,
I'll wager you $10,000 (USD) that I'm not Alpha nor TheDoc.
Feeling lucky?
I'll wager you $10,000 (USD) that I'm not Alpha nor TheDoc.
Feeling lucky?
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 11 2008, 04:36 AM)
QUOTE (Bingo+Apr 11 2008, 05:47 AM)
Dearest darling Bozo,
I'll wager you $10,000 (USD) that I'm not Alpha nor TheDoc.
Feeling lucky?
Let me guess, I have to write up a paper and submit it to your *cough* friends ... I mean impartial judges to verify?
So hypothesizing something and then testing the hypothesis for statistical significance is not enough?
I'll wager you $10,000 (USD) that I'm not Alpha nor TheDoc.
Feeling lucky?
Let me guess, I have to write up a paper and submit it to your *cough* friends ... I mean impartial judges to verify?
So hypothesizing something and then testing the hypothesis for statistical significance is not enough?
>Multiple Personality Disorder
Multiple Personality Disorder^4
The sock puppets here have sock puppets.
I think that of course their are some here who only have a sock puppet (or two) but in some cases I think that the sock puppets have taken on such a life of their own that they have spawned puppets and in turn their puppet has multiplied. See what happens when you have un-protected sox.
Multiple Personality Disorder^4
The sock puppets here have sock puppets.
I think that of course their are some here who only have a sock puppet (or two) but in some cases I think that the sock puppets have taken on such a life of their own that they have spawned puppets and in turn their puppet has multiplied. See what happens when you have un-protected sox.
QUOTE (StevenA+)
No, there's a slight possibility that the future is something other than expected, but I don't happen to have access to I.P. addresses and such to give more tangible evidence other than the posts and comments on the forum, so it's simply something that (in the limit ) approaches absolute certainty.
So in other words, you don't have any proof for your accusations other than your "gut feelings" and a couple of random stats. Yeah, that's what I thought.
Prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. You've been given three chances already, and you still haven't backed up any of your accusations.
So go on, Steven. Prove it, and show me to be mistaken. You're up to the task, aren't you?
) approaches absolute certainty.So in other words, you don't have any proof for your accusations other than your "gut feelings" and a couple of random stats. Yeah, that's what I thought.
QUOTE
I've already seen this enough times in the past to know the pattern ... use a different alias and show me to be mistaken!
Prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. You've been given three chances already, and you still haven't backed up any of your accusations.
So go on, Steven. Prove it, and show me to be mistaken. You're up to the task, aren't you?
QUOTE (StevenA+Apr 11 2008, 06:54 AM)
Let me guess, I have to write up a paper and submit it to your *cough* friends ... I mean impartial judges to verify?
So hypothesizing something and then testing the hypothesis for statistical significance is not enough?
??? No!, if you're going either to humbly apologize for your paraniod/psychotic words or furnish my pockets with lovely cash - we've simply to determine the truth!
If I contact TheDoc & Alpha and promise them a 3 way split I'm sure they'd supply you with (along with myself) conclusive evidence of our uniqueness.
The ball's in your court.
- Idiot!
So hypothesizing something and then testing the hypothesis for statistical significance is not enough?
??? No!, if you're going either to humbly apologize for your paraniod/psychotic words or furnish my pockets with lovely cash - we've simply to determine the truth!If I contact TheDoc & Alpha and promise them a 3 way split I'm sure they'd supply you with (along with myself) conclusive evidence of our uniqueness.
The ball's in your court.
- Idiot!
QUOTE (StevenA+Apr 10 2008, 11:57 PM)
No, there's a slight possibility that the future is something other than expected, but I don't happen to have access to I.P. addresses and such to give more tangible evidence other than the posts and comments on the forum, so it's simply something that (in the limit
) approaches absolute certainty.(BTW, I didn't even know that the 4 posts were one liners when I posted this, but sure enough it turned out true that it was just your usual spam posts. I've already seen this enough times in the past to know the pattern ... use a different alias and show me to be mistaken!
) As administrator of my Joint, I have IP addresses for TheDoc and Alpha. I can prove they are not the same person, but ethics prevent me from giving you the data.
If this helps quell your anxiety, all good. If not, STFU and forget about it, please. It is boring.
QUOTE (Sapo+Apr 11 2008, 01:58 PM)
As administrator of my Joint, I have IP addresses for TheDoc and Alpha. I can prove they are not the same person, but ethics prevent me from giving you the data.
If this helps quell your anxiety, all good. If not, STFU and forget about it, please. It is boring.
Don't forget me.
StevenA thinks I am (or that I have) a sockpuppet, likely of Alpha, since that's the only person StevenA has directly and explicitly accused of being the sole person behind the FM's various "sockpuppets."
If this helps quell your anxiety, all good. If not, STFU and forget about it, please. It is boring.
Don't forget me.
StevenA thinks I am (or that I have) a sockpuppet, likely of Alpha, since that's the only person StevenA has directly and explicitly accused of being the sole person behind the FM's various "sockpuppets."
QUOTE (TheDoc+Apr 11 2008, 05:37 PM)
Prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. You've been given three chances already, and you still haven't backed up any of your accusations.
So go on, Steven. Prove it, and show me to be mistaken. You're up to the task, aren't you?
Prove me to be incorrect. You have nothing but accusations and evidence against your claim.
You obviously already knew the account was the new clone with almost no evidence from within the context of the posts that it was the new clone (except the possibility that you also had that 'gut feeling' that Bingo was in fact the new incarnation, but you'd have to be perusing the board quite vigorously and watching all comments from new members closely if you were able to do this within at least the first 3 sentences (your positive feedback to your Bingo account was within the first 3 posts as you'd already given a positive by the time I saw it on the fourth post).
So is it possible that you simply have lightning fast reflexes with regard to spotting the new clone or is it almost certainly the alternate, that you already knew Bingo was the new clone because you were personally involved?
I'm simply using the scientific method of observation and prediction
and watching the apple continue to predictably fall ... sure, .999... could never precisely equal 1 and maybe someday apples won't fall, but for purposes of being a proven theory it's at least as predictive in its abilities as the Big Bang theory. (I can't even prove the Earth approximately spherical, other than just to show someone lots of evidence in support of it and hope they see the obvious also)
QUOTE (Bingo+Apr 11 2008, 05:47 AM)
I'll wager you $10,000 (USD)
Finally! Someone who understands that "dollar" has many meanings in a international forum. Good job!
Finally! Someone who understands that "dollar" has many meanings in a international forum. Good job!
QUOTE (StevenA+)
Prove me to be incorrect.
Stop dodging and prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Prove yourself to be correct.
And yet, amazingly enough, so do you! Golly gosh gee whiz
You haven't proved even one of your accusations right. Not even one.
And yet, amazingly enough, so do you! Golly gosh gee whiz
You haven't proved even one of your accusations right. Not even one.
You obviously already knew the account was the new clone with almost no evidence from within the context of the posts that it was the new clone
Oh? Do enlighten me, o informed one.
I gave Bingo a positive for this.
I gave Bingo a positive for this.
So is it possible that you simply have lightning fast reflexes with regard to spotting the new clone or is it almost certainly the alternate, that you already knew Bingo was the new clone because you were personally involved?
You continue to say "It's almost certain, it's almost certain!!" but you haven't proved anything. You are the one working off of "gut feelings", not me. You accused at least 5 other people of being "Alpha clones" but you haven't proved even one of your assertions correct. You keep spouting random facts and statistics but you can't actually come up with any proof. You make long rants about your feedback but you never bother to think that maybe there are more than three people who dislike you.
The ball is still in your court.
Stop dodging and prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Prove yourself to be correct.
QUOTE
You have nothing but accusations and evidence against your claim.
And yet, amazingly enough, so do you! Golly gosh gee whiz
You haven't proved even one of your accusations right. Not even one.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| You have nothing but accusations and evidence against your claim. |
And yet, amazingly enough, so do you! Golly gosh gee whiz
You haven't proved even one of your accusations right. Not even one.
You obviously already knew the account was the new clone with almost no evidence from within the context of the posts that it was the new clone
Oh? Do enlighten me, o informed one.
QUOTE
(your positive feedback to your Bingo account was within the first 3 posts as you'd already given a positive by the time I saw it on the fourth post).
I gave Bingo a positive for this.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| (your positive feedback to your Bingo account was within the first 3 posts as you'd already given a positive by the time I saw it on the fourth post). |
I gave Bingo a positive for this.
So is it possible that you simply have lightning fast reflexes with regard to spotting the new clone or is it almost certainly the alternate, that you already knew Bingo was the new clone because you were personally involved?
You continue to say "It's almost certain, it's almost certain!!" but you haven't proved anything. You are the one working off of "gut feelings", not me. You accused at least 5 other people of being "Alpha clones" but you haven't proved even one of your assertions correct. You keep spouting random facts and statistics but you can't actually come up with any proof. You make long rants about your feedback but you never bother to think that maybe there are more than three people who dislike you.
The ball is still in your court.
QUOTE (Sapo+)
As administrator of my Joint, I have IP addresses for TheDoc and Alpha. I can prove they are not the same person, but ethics prevent me from giving you the data.
You have my permission to show him the IPs in the future, if you change your mind.
You have my permission to show him the IPs in the future, if you change your mind.
QUOTE (StevenA+Apr 11 2008, 03:26 PM)
Prove me to be incorrect. You have nothing but accusations and evidence against your claim.
Are you SURE that's the way you want to argue this?
Derek's on form today!
Bingo,
Are you Derek?
g.
Derek's on form today!
Bingo,
Are you Derek?
g.
Give us a big sloppy kiss and I'll tell ya.
Are you SURE that's the way you want to argue this?
QUOTE (Sapo+)
As administrator of my Joint, I have IP addresses for TheDoc and Alpha. I can prove they are not the same person, but ethics prevent me from giving you the data.
Cause I'm pretty sure Sapo's not gonna lie about it, especially when he could be proven wrong...
(I know you would, but Sapo's not like you. He has these things called principles.)
Cause I'm pretty sure Sapo's not gonna lie about it, especially when he could be proven wrong...
(I know you would, but Sapo's not like you. He has these things called principles.)
QUOTE (StevenA+Apr 12 2008, 08:26 AM)
Prove me to be incorrect. You have nothing but accusations and evidence against your claim.
You obviously already knew the account was the new clone with almost no evidence from within the context of the posts that it was the new clone (except the possibility that you also had that 'gut feeling' that Bingo was in fact the new incarnation, but you'd have to be perusing the board quite vigorously and watching all comments from new members closely if you were able to do this within at least the first 3 sentences (your positive feedback to your Bingo account was within the first 3 posts as you'd already given a positive by the time I saw it on the fourth post).
So is it possible that you simply have lightning fast reflexes with regard to spotting the new clone or is it almost certainly the alternate, that you already knew Bingo was the new clone because you were personally involved?
I'm simply using the scientific method of observation and prediction and watching the apple continue to predictably fall ... sure, .999... could never precisely equal 1 and maybe someday apples won't fall, but for purposes of being a proven theory it's at least as predictive in its abilities as the Big Bang theory. (I can't even prove the Earth approximately spherical, other than just to show someone lots of evidence in support of it and hope they see the obvious also)
You really are an idiot.
4 points of data is not enough to prove anything with 99% accuracy.
In fact, Bingo's total posts (11 at the time I made this post) aren't enough to prove anything with 99% accuracy.
It seems you know less about Statistics then you do any other branch of Maths.
You obviously already knew the account was the new clone with almost no evidence from within the context of the posts that it was the new clone (except the possibility that you also had that 'gut feeling' that Bingo was in fact the new incarnation, but you'd have to be perusing the board quite vigorously and watching all comments from new members closely if you were able to do this within at least the first 3 sentences (your positive feedback to your Bingo account was within the first 3 posts as you'd already given a positive by the time I saw it on the fourth post).
So is it possible that you simply have lightning fast reflexes with regard to spotting the new clone or is it almost certainly the alternate, that you already knew Bingo was the new clone because you were personally involved?
I'm simply using the scientific method of observation and prediction
and watching the apple continue to predictably fall ... sure, .999... could never precisely equal 1 and maybe someday apples won't fall, but for purposes of being a proven theory it's at least as predictive in its abilities as the Big Bang theory. (I can't even prove the Earth approximately spherical, other than just to show someone lots of evidence in support of it and hope they see the obvious also) You really are an idiot.
4 points of data is not enough to prove anything with 99% accuracy.
In fact, Bingo's total posts (11 at the time I made this post) aren't enough to prove anything with 99% accuracy.
It seems you know less about Statistics then you do any other branch of Maths.
The best way to solve this is ask.
Bingo,
Are you Alpha?
Bingo,
Are you Alpha?
QUOTE (Derek1148+Apr 13 2008, 11:52 PM)
The best way to solve this is ask.
Bingo,
Are you Alpha?
No.
Bingo,
Are you Alpha?
No.
QUOTE (Bingo+Apr 13 2008, 11:54 PM)
No.
Okay. Case closed.
Okay. Case closed.
Derek's on form today!
Bingo,
Are you Derek?
g.
QUOTE (Gorgeous+Apr 14 2008, 12:01 AM)
Derek's on form today!
Bingo,
Are you Derek?
g.
Give us a big sloppy kiss and I'll tell ya.
QUOTE (Bingo+Apr 14 2008, 12:41 AM)
Give us a big sloppy kiss and I'll tell ya.
Aha! That means you ARE Derek, then!
g.
Aha! That means you ARE Derek, then!
g.
Hi StevenA,
My suspicion is that Alpha is not any of the fivedoughnut clones. I must admit his later posts do have much in common with 5D's but I think this can be attributed to his/her desire to imitate features he admired about 5D rather than that he actually was one of the clones.
At present I'd say we are 'lucky' enough to have four (or more) active 5D clones .. Bingo, Moomin, Username and <Max>.
-C2.
My suspicion is that Alpha is not any of the fivedoughnut clones. I must admit his later posts do have much in common with 5D's but I think this can be attributed to his/her desire to imitate features he admired about 5D rather than that he actually was one of the clones.
At present I'd say we are 'lucky' enough to have four (or more) active 5D clones .. Bingo, Moomin, Username and <Max>.
-C2.
QUOTE (Confused2+Apr 14 2008, 01:13 AM)
Hi StevenA,
My suspicion is that Alpha is not any of the fivedoughnut clones. I must admit his later posts do have much in common with 5D's but I think this can be attributed to his/her desire to imitate features he admired about 5D rather than that he actually was one of the clones.
At present I'd say we are 'lucky' enough to have four (or more) active 5D clones .. Bingo, Moomin, Username and <Max>.
-C2.
Ok, thanks for that!
g.
My suspicion is that Alpha is not any of the fivedoughnut clones. I must admit his later posts do have much in common with 5D's but I think this can be attributed to his/her desire to imitate features he admired about 5D rather than that he actually was one of the clones.
At present I'd say we are 'lucky' enough to have four (or more) active 5D clones .. Bingo, Moomin, Username and <Max>.
-C2.
Ok, thanks for that!
g.
QUOTE (deathlyhem+)
..... sweet-talk from the para-delusionoid-inept un-ashamedly extreme *uck'-*unt'.
Hypocrisy is rather an intensely understated issue considering your previously shambolic whince of an excuse for previous evidence of intelligence!
.. and another!
Hypocrisy is rather an intensely understated issue considering your previously shambolic whince of an excuse for previous evidence of intelligence!
.. and another!
QUOTE (Confused2+Apr 14 2008, 01:13 AM)
Hi StevenA,
My suspicion is that Alpha is not any of the fivedoughnut clones. I must admit his later posts do have much in common with 5D's but I think this can be attributed to his/her desire to imitate features he admired about 5D rather than that he actually was one of the clones.
At present I'd say we are 'lucky' enough to have four (or more) active 5D clones .. Bingo, Moomin, Username and <Max>.
-C2.
I guessed on the other ones, except Username. I must have missed one of the latest clones. Thank you. I'll keep my eyes out for the upcoming Username round of spamming
(Oh I think Trout and prometheus should be in that list too)
My suspicion is that Alpha is not any of the fivedoughnut clones. I must admit his later posts do have much in common with 5D's but I think this can be attributed to his/her desire to imitate features he admired about 5D rather than that he actually was one of the clones.
At present I'd say we are 'lucky' enough to have four (or more) active 5D clones .. Bingo, Moomin, Username and <Max>.
-C2.
I guessed on the other ones, except Username. I must have missed one of the latest clones
. Thank you. I'll keep my eyes out for the upcoming Username round of spamming (Oh I think Trout and prometheus should be in that list too)
I am Spartacus!
g.
g.
QUOTE (StevenA+Apr 17 2008, 01:47 AM)
I guessed on the other ones, except Username. I must have missed one of the latest clones . Thank you. I'll keep my eyes out for the upcoming Username round of spamming
(Oh I think Trout and prometheus should be in that list too)
So what does that do to your 99% accuracy???
. Thank you. I'll keep my eyes out for the upcoming Username round of spamming (Oh I think Trout and prometheus should be in that list too)
So what does that do to your 99% accuracy???
QUOTE (bm1957+Apr 17 2008, 08:39 PM)
So what does that do to your 99% accuracy???
I know just how inaccurate he is, but then facts have never been StevenA's strong point.
No doubt I'll get yet another set of accusations as to my supposed sock-puppets now.
I know just how inaccurate he is, but then facts have never been StevenA's strong point.
No doubt I'll get yet another set of accusations as to my supposed sock-puppets now.
It takes a certain amount of time to distinguish between members who..
1/ Register
2/ Give negative feedback to StevenA (and/or myself)
3/ ROTFLTAO
Same person? Different person? Exciting isn't it? Interested? Me? Only when I'm really bored .. otherwise ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
9%, 99% .. such a fascinating subject isn't it? ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz. OK if you're a troll and you want to know how well the trolling is working you need accurate information .. I can see the point .. but .. ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-C2.
1/ Register
2/ Give negative feedback to StevenA (and/or myself)
3/ ROTFLTAO
Same person? Different person? Exciting isn't it? Interested? Me? Only when I'm really bored .. otherwise ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
9%, 99% .. such a fascinating subject isn't it? ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz. OK if you're a troll and you want to know how well the trolling is working you need accurate information .. I can see the point .. but .. ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-C2.
OK I'm bored.
Do a quick search for 'dispensor'
You get Moomin and Deathlyhem.
What are the chances of that happening? C'mon guys .. lets have some numbers..
6 billion people, 1 physics site ..
-C2.
Do a quick search for 'dispensor'
You get Moomin and Deathlyhem.
What are the chances of that happening? C'mon guys .. lets have some numbers..
6 billion people, 1 physics site ..
-C2.
QUOTE (Confused2+Apr 17 2008, 09:39 PM)
OK I'm bored.
Do a quick search for 'dispensor'
You get Moomin and Deathlyhem.
What are the chances of that happening? C'mon guys .. lets have some numbers..
6 billion people, 1 physics site ..
-C2.
Confused2,
You're an anti-semetic nazi, and my police officer neighbour will shoot you through the head when he cataches up with you!
p.s Thanks for giving Neil Farbstein a poz - 'read' astounding volumes of pathetic mental incompetence, bozoid fukkwit creepster.
Do a quick search for 'dispensor'
You get Moomin and Deathlyhem.
What are the chances of that happening? C'mon guys .. lets have some numbers..
6 billion people, 1 physics site ..
-C2.
Confused2,
You're an anti-semetic nazi, and my police officer neighbour will shoot you through the head when he cataches up with you!
p.s Thanks for giving Neil Farbstein a poz - 'read' astounding volumes of pathetic mental incompetence, bozoid fukkwit creepster.
The spelling of 'fukkwit' links 'username','Rabbit' and 'Niel Farbsteln' .. what are the chances of THAT happening?
Just give a number (eg 1 in X) .. that's pretty reasonable. Without getting involved in the crap (this is a physics site after all) .. let's go for some numbers ..
-C2.
Just give a number (eg 1 in X) .. that's pretty reasonable. Without getting involved in the crap (this is a physics site after all) .. let's go for some numbers ..
-C2.
The word 'nutsack' links more of them.
Let's share the joke .. does NOM have more than 30 'pozzies' from the same person?
-C2.
Let's share the joke .. does NOM have more than 30 'pozzies' from the same person?
-C2.
QUOTE (Confused2+Apr 17 2008, 11:09 PM)
The word 'nutsack' links more of them.
Let's share the joke .. does NOM have more than 30 'pozzies' from the same person?
-C2.
Hey, leave NOM alone, he's a real scientist, he has a 'de plume-er' don't you know!
g.
Let's share the joke .. does NOM have more than 30 'pozzies' from the same person?
-C2.
Hey, leave NOM alone, he's a real scientist, he has a 'de plume-er' don't you know!
g.
This thread smacks of lame.
QUOTE (Confused2+Apr 17 2008, 10:27 PM)
The spelling of 'fukkwit' links 'username','Rabbit' and 'Niel Farbsteln' .. what are the chances of THAT happening?
Just give a number (eg 1 in X) .. that's pretty reasonable. Without getting involved in the crap (this is a physics site after all) .. let's go for some numbers ..
-C2.
Strange?? .... I conducted a similar search for "Confused2" - and found a whole bunch of component hallmarks for this oaf:
1.Idiot
2.Cretin
3.Pretender
4.Fake
5.*****
6.Fukker
7.Sputum
8.Muttonhead
9.Clown
10.Diarrhoea
Just give a number (eg 1 in X) .. that's pretty reasonable. Without getting involved in the crap (this is a physics site after all) .. let's go for some numbers ..
-C2.
Strange?? .... I conducted a similar search for "Confused2" - and found a whole bunch of component hallmarks for this oaf:
1.Idiot
2.Cretin
3.Pretender
4.Fake
5.*****
6.Fukker
7.Sputum
8.Muttonhead
9.Clown
10.Diarrhoea
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.