An Idea For A Toe

kristalris

5th June 2012 - 01:40 PM

/sites.google.com/site/simplexsigilum/

A falsifiable Idea for a Theory of Everything. Einstein & Newton all correct within a given framework. On my site I build you a universe with just two particles. Only one being a building block. Absolute conductivity in a double ether of these particles with strings of these particles tunneling there way in spirals. It's a surface tension scenario of these strings eating there way tru the ether, thereby gathering mass and causing gravity. Simpel explanation for gravity, waves, symmetry problem and double slit experiment. Falsifiable with math's if a Kristal isn't formed under set conditions. Further more a prediction that a fast spaceship will accelerate more than a slow one towards the moon or mars. Great speeds needed to beat the inherent measurement problem.
A infinite multiverse with all scenario's played out all the time for ever. Yin and yang between chaos and order. It will always remain interesting.

AlexG

5th June 2012 - 05:50 PM

New meaningless word salad.

kristalris

6th June 2012 - 12:13 PM

QUOTE (AlexG+Jun 5 2012, 05:50 PM)

New meaningless word salad.

Well at least you agree it's new. That's a start. I've been very short in my posting, and maybe to short. For the rest you should visit my site of which I see that I didn't copy it correctly in my posting. https://sites.google.com/site/simplexsigilum/

By the way the idea has been looked at by some nuclear physicists, one of which has given an elaborate response. Neither accepting or rejecting it. After which I changed it. They want, like you obviously do, to see the math's. Anyway before you get to the math's you first need to get the assumptions right. Otherwise its garbage in garbage out. Assumptions are done and made in words. Salad or no salad.

So, you come up with a better holistic idea based on assumptions (with or without maths). Better in the sense of Occam's razor. Again: first the idea then the math's. That's a basic error in the way the problem is treated. Like you've made as well.

So, indeed I'm looking for someone to put the math's to it.

Apart from that: do you disagree it's falsifiable? If so why?

PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.

To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.