QUOTE (AlphaNumeric+Jun 18 2009, 05:25 PM)
Because people don't think Einstein was perfect and someone who should be blindly listened to. Oh and because you're an idiot.
Hear, hear!
Amrit, since in the past tiresome years, you have not be able to prove that time does not exist or even connect your claim with a communicable point of view, why should I not attempt to win the argument (for all practical purposes) by suspending your account for 1,588,486,769,856,000,000 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom, effectively separating past from future for you and us both?
flyingbuttressman
6th July 2009 - 06:49 PM
QUOTE (rpenner+Jul 6 2009, 01:40 PM)
Hear, hear!
Amrit, since in the past tiresome years, you have not be able to prove that time does not exist or even connect your claim with a communicable point of view,
why should I not attempt to win the argument (for all practical purposes) by suspending your account for 1,588,486,769,856,000,000 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom, effectively separating past from future for you and us both?
I'm guessing... 2000 Earth days?
rpenner
7th July 2009 - 01:23 AM
If I am right and amrit is wrong, yes. 2000 days.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.