reading about IRAS 10214+4724, a proto galaxy, found on the edges of the observable universe, has got me thinking and i am kinda stuck in a thought.
say this galaxy is 200,000 years after the big bang,, and lets pretend there isnt expansion (it doesnt really matter in this case). lets assume this is the first galaxy in the observabke universe.
SO lets say we train our tellescopes on this object that is 15 billion lights years away.. and watch it for 1 billion years, changing from a proto galaxy to a full fledge one.
Assuming it isnt moving towards us or away.. in a billion years it should still be 15 billion light years years away but now the edge of time or the big bang has moved back a billion years. so the edge of the observable universe is now like 16 billion years away
My question is what would you see if you focused on the spot where the first galaxies are forming.. would you see IRAS 10214+4724 as it is being formed near the time fo teh big bang 16 billions years ago and see the same galaxy at 15 billion light years away as it is a billion years older?
SOrry it is such a messy thought.. hope it is understandable.
to shorten.. if we discover the first galaxy ever being formed and watch it for 1 billion years getting bigger.. why cant we look back near the big bang and see the first galaxy ever formed
My gut says we wouldnt be able to see the same galaxy forming.. maybe a different one... but it is really starting to bother me and maybe one of you can tell me what i am missing.