http://www.physorg.com/news3095.html

The more commands the average cell phone is going to receive for now and in the future, the more important this finding will be. More processing with less voltage will save consumers money and will provide a better, less jumpy transition to another function on the cell phone.

Received article.

The question prompts, that what is the R.F. signature, for teens who incessantly talk on cell phones in malls, in similar fashion to cows chewing their cuds and other processes in fields?

So what you must plot, is feed pwr from bat, to components, to projected r.f. footprint?

Some people don't want their acoustic media irradiated, or to have their cell phones blow up on their persons, while fueling their vehicles?

Very good' thank you.Must better ferrite the article...The evolution is similar to the mechanics of new p.c.s where a user profile is only such, when you need it.

Phillip 347, the cud analogy was beautiful. I agree, the gift of blab may be too much for these new cell phones to handle if multiple functions are in use on a floating platform built for high speed performance.