Hi,
My name is Claudio Bianco. I am an inventor, and have just completed my last work called "Continual Wind-Up", with which I take advantage of water oscillations to wind up a cord, and thus generate electricity.
I believe to have opened a new research field for renewable energy, but since I am the father of this invention, my opinion does not matter.
I chose to use internet to make the invention known and I would appreciate your opinion.I would therefore like to invite you to discover a
new way of generating electricity without polluting on www.cuerdacontinua.com
.
Hello Claudio...
Congratulations on a beautiful, well executed web site.
A mechanical apparatus to capture energy from wave motion is workable. The ones to capture power from waterfalls and flowing streams are also feasible as has been demonstrated for centuries. The perpetual motion one however does not work for the following reasons.
The rise and fall of the bell at 100% efficiency, meaning no loss of energy from friction, will only cancel itself out contributing no surplus energy to the system. The same will be true for the air in the system. The amount of energy consumed in pumping the air into the submerged bell will be greater than the energy produced by the rising air pocket. Therefore there is less energy produced by the system than is consumed by it.
Sorry... no cigar this time. Maybe next time?
Good Luck
.
Hello Claudio...
Congratulations on a beautiful, well executed web site.
A mechanical apparatus to capture energy from wave motion is workable. The ones to capture power from waterfalls and flowing streams are also feasible as has been demonstrated for centuries. The perpetual motion one however does not work for the following reasons.
The rise and fall of the bell at 100% efficiency, meaning no loss of energy from friction, will only cancel itself out contributing no surplus energy to the system. The same will be true for the air in the system. The amount of energy consumed in pumping the air into the submerged bell will be greater than the energy produced by the rising air pocket. Therefore there is less energy produced by the system than is consumed by it.
Sorry... no cigar this time. Maybe next time?
Good Luck
.
So why can't we make micro generators that use vibration and movement from common things such as cars , roadbeds even body movement?Or even the rotation of the earth??
Looks like you have been really working/thinking hard for something. I like to appreciation you for the same. As fizzeksman says, looks like your system consumes more energy than the output energy. Can you rectify that and update your model?!
To have perpetual motion (something that exists already by its own definition) you must do what you can to eliminate all friction within the device. Since this is impossible than you must do what you can to eliminate all the friction you possibly can with todays technology so that with a mechanical advantage (eg. gearing that turns one revolution of one shaft into ten revolutions of another shaft) you don't have the increase in load so the 10 to 1 mechanical advantage in a friction less environment would equal the load of a 1 to 1 in a normal friction filled environment.
Have you seen this invention?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxnHJoyrQpM
a viewers (not very scientific) explanation in you tube:
AmigaHeretic (1 month ago)
The yellow bubble thing drops charging a battery or whatever is efficient at holding a charge. When it goes back up, beneath the bubble have something slide under it to seal the tube so the water doesn't fall back down when the top is opened. Now the top is opened & the tube moved back over and hooked to the chain to fall again
So how much energy would that portion above take? Whatever that amount of energy is make the chain and water tube at least that tall or taller to get excess energy.
COULD SOMEONE SPEAK TO WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING THERE?
SORRY CLAUDIO I MEAN ABSOLUTELY NO DISRESPECT I THOUGHT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS...YOUR SITE IS EXTRAORDINARY!
LINKS ARE ALLOWED HERE ALSO...in case you didn't know this.
CLAUDIO's SITE: http://www.cuerdacontinua.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxnHJoyrQpM
a viewers (not very scientific) explanation in you tube:
AmigaHeretic (1 month ago)
The yellow bubble thing drops charging a battery or whatever is efficient at holding a charge. When it goes back up, beneath the bubble have something slide under it to seal the tube so the water doesn't fall back down when the top is opened. Now the top is opened & the tube moved back over and hooked to the chain to fall again
So how much energy would that portion above take? Whatever that amount of energy is make the chain and water tube at least that tall or taller to get excess energy.
COULD SOMEONE SPEAK TO WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING THERE?
SORRY CLAUDIO I MEAN ABSOLUTELY NO DISRESPECT I THOUGHT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS...YOUR SITE IS EXTRAORDINARY!
LINKS ARE ALLOWED HERE ALSO...in case you didn't know this.
CLAUDIO's SITE: http://www.cuerdacontinua.com
The amount of energy from many of these ideas are so insignificant compared to the energy consumption of oil that it will not replace oil. In the future when the oil supply wanes the only other source that is even greater than our oil reserves for energy will be the geothermal heat below the surface of the earth. Steam for electricity and H2 production will be available through technology without the need for war over oil.
Crusadex,
The US military began experimenting with the use of devices in soldiers boots several years ago to generate the electricity needed for all of the varied equipment they carry - night vision scopes, radios, etc.
Recently on the internet you could find a backpack someone had fitted with a rope and pulley mechanism that would generate electricity from the movement of the backpack during normal walking.
The US military began experimenting with the use of devices in soldiers boots several years ago to generate the electricity needed for all of the varied equipment they carry - night vision scopes, radios, etc.
Recently on the internet you could find a backpack someone had fitted with a rope and pulley mechanism that would generate electricity from the movement of the backpack during normal walking.
QUOTE
geothermal heat below the surface of the earth. Steam for electricity and H2 production will be available through technology without the need for war over oil
Why they haven't done that sooner is beyond me. Oh wait maybe the money grubbing oil companies are the reason why
I don't care who comes up with it, hell I openly talk about my design in hopes that someone sees it's worth the investment. All I ask is that they don't sell out when the oil companies start waving that multi million dollar check around and does the right thing. Put those F***ers out of business.
QUOTE (Precursor562+Feb 24 2007, 02:42 PM)
To have perpetual motion (something that exists already by its own definition) you must do what you can to eliminate all friction within the device. Since this is impossible than you must do what you can to eliminate all the friction you possibly can with todays technology so that with a mechanical advantage (eg. gearing that turns one revolution of one shaft into ten revolutions of another shaft) you don't have the increase in load so the 10 to 1 mechanical advantage in a friction less environment would equal the load of a 1 to 1 in a normal friction filled environment.
So it's hard to have a frictionless enviroment.
Why can't you trick friction?
Make it work for you instead of against.
So it's hard to have a frictionless enviroment.
Why can't you trick friction?
Make it work for you instead of against.
"Crusadex,
The US military began experimenting with the use of devices in soldiers boots several years ago to generate the electricity needed for all of the varied equipment they carry - night vision scopes, radios, etc.
Recently on the internet you could find a backpack someone had fitted with a rope and pulley mechanism that would generate electricity from the movement of the backpack during normal walking."
Yeah.I heard a japanese scientist has added microgenerators to .
Most of this stuff seems pretty basic.It just takes a little common sense to make real life applications.
The US military began experimenting with the use of devices in soldiers boots several years ago to generate the electricity needed for all of the varied equipment they carry - night vision scopes, radios, etc.
Recently on the internet you could find a backpack someone had fitted with a rope and pulley mechanism that would generate electricity from the movement of the backpack during normal walking."
Yeah.I heard a japanese scientist has added microgenerators to .
Most of this stuff seems pretty basic.It just takes a little common sense to make real life applications.
www.cuerdacontinua.com/hydrospiral
you could always build your own windmill, it is the easiest electricity generating power source to build yourself.
QUOTE (crusadex+Mar 2 2007, 01:58 PM)
So it's hard to have a frictionless enviroment.
Why can't you trick friction?
Make it work for you instead of against.
not so hard if you do it right. I have invented a mechanism that operates in a 100% frictionless environment. Yes it is perpetual in nature. yes it is a dynamo for producing voltage and with the perpetual aspect involved in cyclic transformations of energy. implicating the generation of voltage for infinity.
You cannot trick friction. We have found ways to reduce friction in common mechanisms. but the fact remains in all mechanisms except mine that friction is a factor between moving surfaces.
Terry L Hewett Sr
Why can't you trick friction?
Make it work for you instead of against.
not so hard if you do it right. I have invented a mechanism that operates in a 100% frictionless environment. Yes it is perpetual in nature. yes it is a dynamo for producing voltage and with the perpetual aspect involved in cyclic transformations of energy. implicating the generation of voltage for infinity.
You cannot trick friction. We have found ways to reduce friction in common mechanisms. but the fact remains in all mechanisms except mine that friction is a factor between moving surfaces.
Terry L Hewett Sr
QUOTE (LOTR+Mar 26 2009, 01:01 AM)
not so hard if you do it right. I have invented a mechanism that operates in a 100% frictionless environment. Yes it is perpetual in nature. yes it is a dynamo for producing voltage and with the perpetual aspect involved in cyclic transformations of energy. implicating the generation of voltage for infinity.
You cannot trick friction. We have found ways to reduce friction in common mechanisms. but the fact remains in all mechanisms except mine that friction is a factor between moving surfaces.
Terry L Hewett Sr
I believe you're confusing friction with fiction here, Mr Halfwit Sr.
You cannot trick friction. We have found ways to reduce friction in common mechanisms. but the fact remains in all mechanisms except mine that friction is a factor between moving surfaces.
Terry L Hewett Sr
I believe you're confusing friction with fiction here, Mr Halfwit Sr.
QUOTE (Geoff Mollusc+Mar 26 2009, 01:42 AM)
I believe you're confusing friction with fiction here, Mr Halfwit Sr.
Ya think so? Oh ok. Tell you what I've been called worse by better.
You made an assumption based on little to no information.
OMG that guy said 100% frictionless. he must be crazy!
Well just because you cannot grasp the concept doesn't make me crazy.
I cannot produce the mathematics involved in this. If there was a dyslexia for numbers i got it. Besides it deals with natural integers which are infinite and unworkable in mathematics. I'm pretty sure any way you do it your going to come up with the result = 0 . Mathematics doesn't tell natural physics what to do, Natural physics is absolute and only allows mathematics to confirm what mankind is smart enough to figure out.
3 basic principles at play.
"electromotive force" provided by the drive coils causes the armature to be caged and spin via path of least resistance. the coils and armature permanent field segments are arranged to give the armature no other choice but to spin within the ring/toroid chamber. Supported by a electromagnetic field similar to a mag-lev. Effectively a true magnetic bearing.
"kinetic energy" Situation created and maintained via the suspension and forced movement of the toroid armature to drive coil interaction. along with that all of it's known by-products.
"electromagnetic induction" in the form of plunging a permanent magnet flux field through an induction coil at 90 degrees. In this mechanism multiple magnets are arranged in segments that actually create a extra flux field that is capable of also exciting the induction coils and producing a voltage. strong and weak forces apply.
I have had to dumb it down to the basics on many occasions and here is the simplest way i can put it. Process 1 produces kinetic energy for the work of performing process 2 which is to induce a voltage to power process 1. Any extra can be stored in capacitors if needed.
However the kinetic energy is in it's own right a storage mechanism.
were dealing with transformations of energy that come full circle with a unified cycle of transformations. A set of transformations i can only define as infinite. elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic> for infinity or until acted upon by an outside force.
User posted image: <a target='_blank' href='http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/ringaniicoils.gif'>User posted image</a>
This is a linear representation of 1/4 of the prototype. the manipulation of the extra flux field. the act of reducing it to virtually nothing within a mass and then allowing it to expand is the same way we treat gases in refrigeration systems. the same effect can be derived from manipulating magnetic fields in the same manner.
User posted image: <a target='_blank' href='http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/ringdrawingincomplete.jpg'>User posted image</a>
Lord Of The Ring
Terry L Hewett Sr
Ya think so? Oh ok. Tell you what I've been called worse by better.
You made an assumption based on little to no information.
OMG that guy said 100% frictionless. he must be crazy!
Well just because you cannot grasp the concept doesn't make me crazy.
I cannot produce the mathematics involved in this. If there was a dyslexia for numbers i got it. Besides it deals with natural integers which are infinite and unworkable in mathematics. I'm pretty sure any way you do it your going to come up with the result = 0 . Mathematics doesn't tell natural physics what to do, Natural physics is absolute and only allows mathematics to confirm what mankind is smart enough to figure out.
3 basic principles at play.
"electromotive force" provided by the drive coils causes the armature to be caged and spin via path of least resistance. the coils and armature permanent field segments are arranged to give the armature no other choice but to spin within the ring/toroid chamber. Supported by a electromagnetic field similar to a mag-lev. Effectively a true magnetic bearing.
"kinetic energy" Situation created and maintained via the suspension and forced movement of the toroid armature to drive coil interaction. along with that all of it's known by-products.
"electromagnetic induction" in the form of plunging a permanent magnet flux field through an induction coil at 90 degrees. In this mechanism multiple magnets are arranged in segments that actually create a extra flux field that is capable of also exciting the induction coils and producing a voltage. strong and weak forces apply.
I have had to dumb it down to the basics on many occasions and here is the simplest way i can put it. Process 1 produces kinetic energy for the work of performing process 2 which is to induce a voltage to power process 1. Any extra can be stored in capacitors if needed.
However the kinetic energy is in it's own right a storage mechanism.
were dealing with transformations of energy that come full circle with a unified cycle of transformations. A set of transformations i can only define as infinite. elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic>elec>kinetic> for infinity or until acted upon by an outside force.
User posted image: <a target='_blank' href='http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/ringaniicoils.gif'>User posted image</a>
This is a linear representation of 1/4 of the prototype. the manipulation of the extra flux field. the act of reducing it to virtually nothing within a mass and then allowing it to expand is the same way we treat gases in refrigeration systems. the same effect can be derived from manipulating magnetic fields in the same manner.
User posted image: <a target='_blank' href='http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/ringdrawingincomplete.jpg'>User posted image</a>
Lord Of The Ring
Terry L Hewett Sr
why not use piezoelectric crystals? 
You could make floating capacitors and implement piezoelectric cigarette lighter igniters strung in a candycane pattern around a thickish floating tube connected to the buoys. The movement of the waves will click thousands of tiny lighters charging your capacitors i mean buoys. Make it into a grid!
Hey if it works hit me up
Rush L. Goodspeed III
Really! Please!
You could make floating capacitors and implement piezoelectric cigarette lighter igniters strung in a candycane pattern around a thickish floating tube connected to the buoys. The movement of the waves will click thousands of tiny lighters charging your capacitors i mean buoys. Make it into a grid!
Hey if it works hit me up
Rush L. Goodspeed III
Really! Please!
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.