square17320509
21st November 2007 - 04:27 AM
QUOTE (Montec+Nov 19 2007, 07:17 PM)
Hello square17320509
Would not the reduction in aperture of the "scanning beam" reduce the light gathering ability of the telescope?
That's it

As mentioned in my site, it would require the exposure time longer than that of ordinary reflecting telescope.
Montec
21st November 2007 - 09:00 PM
Hello square17320509
May I suggest multiple scanning beams with computer integrated image software as a solution. Something similar to a
DLP projection system but only in reverse.
square17320509
23rd November 2007 - 04:40 AM
QUOTE (Montec+Nov 21 2007, 09:00 PM)
Hello square17320509
May I suggest multiple scanning beams with computer integrated image software as a solution. Something similar to a
DLP projection system but only in reverse.
Oh, that's a nice idea! But I think ususal CCD is still available for the image sensor rather than using expensive devices such as DLP.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.